Lung Volume Reduction Surgery and Improvement of Endothelial Function and Blood Pressure in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Management of Refractory Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition with an estimated prevalence of 12% in adults over the age of 30 years worldwide. COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a substantial economic and social burden. There are an estimated 3 million deaths annually due to COPD. However, most of the patients with COPD respond to routine interventions like bronchodilator therapy, assessing supplemental oxygen needs, smoking cessation, vaccinations, and pulmonary rehabilitation. There is a significant number of patients who unfortunately progress to have persistent symptoms despite these interventions. Refractory COPD is not yet formally defined. Patients with severe persistent symptoms or exacerbations despite appropriate care can be considered to have refractory COPD. Managing refractory COPD needs a multidimensional approach. In this review article, we will discuss essential interventions like ensuring adequate inhaler techniques, exploring the need for non-invasive ventilatory support, use of chronic antibiotics and phosphodiesterase inhibitors to advanced therapies like bronchoscopic lung volume reduction surgery, and the upcoming role of anti-IL5 agents in managing patients with refractory COPD. We will also discuss non-pharmacologic interventions like psycho-social support and nutritional support. We will conclude by discussing the palliative care aspect of managing patients with refractory COPD. Through this review article, we aim to better the approach to managing patients with refractory COPD and discuss new upcoming therapies.

Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema

COPD is a highly prevalent, chronic and irreversible obstructive airway disease without curative treatment. Standard therapeutic strategies, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have only limited effects on lung function parameters of patients with severe disease. Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, many patients with severe COPD still have a high burden of dyspnoea and a poor quality of life. If these patients have severe lung emphysema, with hyperinflation as the driver of symptoms and exercise intolerance, lung volume reduction may be an effective treatment with a significant impact on lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Currently, different lung volume reduction approaches, both surgical and bronchoscopic, have shown encouraging results and have been implemented in COPD treatment recommendations. Nevertheless, choosing the optimal lung volume reduction strategy for an individual patient remains challenging. Moreover, there is still room for improving durability of effect and safety in all available procedures. Ongoing and innovative research is essential to push this field forwards. This review provides an overview of results and limitations of the current lung volume reduction options for patients with severe lung emphysema and hyperinflation.

Recovery of Endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation impairment in convalescent COVID-19 patients: Insight from a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is a key-feature in acute COVID-19. However, follow-up data regarding endothelial dysfunction and injury after COVID-19 infection are lacking. We aimed to investigate the changes in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation at baseline and four months after hospital discharge in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Twenty COVID-19 patients were compared to 24 healthy controls. Clinical and morphological data were collected after hospital admission for SARS-CoV-2 infection and reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) measurement was performed with a delay between 24 and 48 h after hospital admission and four months after hospital discharge in the outpatient clinics. Blood tests including inflammatory markers and measurement of post-occlusive vasorelaxation by digital peripheral arterial tonometry were performed at both visits.

RESULTS

At baseline, COVID-19 patients exhibited reduced RHI compared to controls (p < 0.001), in line with an endothelial dysfunction. At four months follow-up, there was a 51% increase in the RHI (1.69 ± 0.32 to 2.51 ± 0.91; p < 0.01) in favor of endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation recovery. RHI changes were positively correlated with baseline C-reactive protein (r = 0.68; p = 0.02). Compared to COVID-19 patients with a decrease in RHI, COVID-19 patients with an increase in RHI beyond the day-to-day variability (i.e. >11%) had less severe systemic inflammation at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Convalescent COVID-19 patients showed a recovery of systemic artery endothelial dysfunction, in particular patients with lower inflammation at baseline. Further studies are needed to decipher the interplay between inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.

Bronchoscopic Management of COPD and Advances in Therapy

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent and morbid disease marked by irreversible structural changes in the lungs. Bronchoscopic therapies have significantly expanded the treatment armamentarium for patients with persistent symptoms by reducing the physiologic detriments of hyperinflation in a less invasive fashion than surgical lung volume reduction. The spectrum of bronchoscopic techniques to reduce hyperinflation includes endobronchial valves, coils, thermal ablation, and biologic sealants. Other therapies focus on reducing parasympathetic tone and mucus hypersecretion and include targeted lung denervation, bronchial rheoplasty, and cryospray techniques. In this article, we will review the variety of techniques for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, both established and investigational, along with their respective benefits and complications and will briefly review other investigational therapies for COPD.

Endothelial function in patients with COPD: an updated systematic review of studies using flow-mediated dilatation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in COPD. Endothelial dysfunction is suggested to be involved in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis, and multiple studies report endothelial dysfunction in COPD. This article summarized the current knowledge on endothelial function in COPD patients.

AREAS COVERED

Databases were screened until November 2022 for studies using ultrasound-based flow-mediated dilation in patients with stable COPD. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random effects model. Meta-regression analyses assessed the effects of demographic and clinical variables.

EXPERT OPINION

34 studies were identified (1365 COPD patients; 617 controls). Pooled analysis demonstrated an impaired endothelial-dependent (-2.33%; 95%CI -3.30/-1.35; p < 0.001) and endothelial-independent dilation (-3.11%; 95%CI -5.14/-1.08; p = 0.003) in COPD patients when compared to non-COPD controls. Meta-regression identified that higher age, worse severity of airflow obstruction, and current smoking were significantly associated with impaired endothelial function. Studies evaluating the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on endothelial function in COPD patients demonstrated conflicting results.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves and Coils. A Network Meta-analysis

Background: Coils and endobronchial valves are the most widely used bronchoscopic lung volume reduction devices in patients with advanced emphysema. However, the choice of each specific device depends on emphysema characteristics (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and presence of lobar collateral ventilation (CV). These devices have not been compared in a head-to-head study design.Objectives: To conduct a network comparative meta-analysis studying the effect of valves in patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, and to also study the effects of valves and coils in patients with mixed homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema.Data Sources and Data Extraction: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for potentially includable randomized active comparator trials from inception to January 20, 2020, and data were extracted in the working sheets of Comprehensive Meta-analysis.Synthesis: Network meta-analysis was conducted in R program using package "netmeta."Results: In patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, both Spiration and Zephyr valves showed significant increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (0.11 L [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05 to 0.16] and 0.14 L [0.08 to 0.19], respectively) and in reducing St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (-9.32 [-14.18 to -4.45] and -8.14 [-11.94 to -4.35], respectively) as compared with control, with no significant interintervention differences. Only Zephyr valves showed significant improvement (52.3 m [95% CI, 26.53 to 77.93]) in six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Both were ranked as equally efficacious in these patients. In the mixed homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema group of patients, both Zephyr valves and coils showed significant increases in FEV₁ and 6MWD and reduction in SGRQ, as compared with control. Although there were no significant interintervention differences, the magnitude of improvement in these parameters was highest with Zephyr valves (e.g., 6MWD increased by 56.74 m [23.66 to 89.81] vs. 30.31 m [4.00 to 56.63]) in coils), ranking them first. In both populations, these interventions showed a statistically significant association with procedure-related pneumothorax but not with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.Conclusions: In patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, both Zephyr and Spiration valves were equally efficacious in FEV₁ and SGRQ improvement. However, in the mixed patients with homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema, Zephyr valves show relative superiority over coils especially with respect to improvement in 6MWD.

Critical Analysis of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial Results for Lung-Volume-Reduction Surgery

The National Emphysema Treatment Trial compared medical treatment of severe pulmonary emphysema with lung-volume-reduction surgery in a multiinstitutional randomized prospective fashion. Two decades later, this trial remains one of the key sources of information we have on the treatment of advanced emphysematous lung disease. The trial demonstrated the short- and long-term effectiveness of surgical intervention as well as the need for strict patient selection and preoperative workup. Despite these findings, the key failure of the trial was an inability to convince the medical community of the value of surgical resection in the treatment of advanced emphysema.

The Association Between Lung Hyperinflation and Coronary Artery Disease in Smokers

BACKGROUND

Smokers manifest varied phenotypes of pulmonary impairment.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Which pulmonary phenotypes are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in smokers?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed data from the University of Pittsburgh COPD Specialized Center for Clinically Oriented Research (SCCOR) cohort (n = 481) and the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) cohort (n = 2,580). Participants were current and former smokers with > 10 pack-years of tobacco exposure. Data from the two cohorts were analyzed separately because of methodologic differences. Lung hyperinflation was assessed by plethysmography in the SCCOR cohort and by inspiratory and expiratory CT scan lung volumes in the COPDGene cohort. Subclinical CAD was assessed as the coronary artery calcium score, whereas clinical CAD was defined as a self-reported history of CAD or myocardial infarction (MI). Analyses were performed in all smokers and then repeated in those with airflow obstruction (FEV₁ to FVC ratio, < 0.70).

RESULTS

Pulmonary phenotypes, including airflow limitation, emphysema, lung hyperinflation, diffusion capacity, and radiographic measures of airway remodeling, showed weak to moderate correlations (r < 0.7) with each other. In multivariate models adjusted for pulmonary phenotypes and CAD risk factors, lung hyperinflation was the only phenotype associated with calcium score, history of clinical CAD, or history of MI (per 0.2 higher expiratory and inspiratory CT scan lung volume; coronary calcium: OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .02; clinical CAD: OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3; P = .01; and MI in COPDGene: OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8; P = .05). FEV₁ and emphysema were associated with increased risk of CAD (P < .05) in models adjusted for CAD risk factors; however, these associations were attenuated on adjusting for lung hyperinflation. Results were the same in those with airflow obstruction and were present in both cohorts.

INTERPRETATION

Lung hyperinflation is associated strongly with clinical and subclinical CAD in smokers, including those with airflow obstruction. After lung hyperinflation was accounted for, FEV₁ and emphysema no longer were associated with CAD. Subsequent studies should consider measuring lung hyperinflation and examining its mechanistic role in CAD in current and former smokers.

Vascular endothelial damage in COPD: current functional assessment methods and future perspectives

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the relationship between these two entities is not fully understood; smoking, inflammation, arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction are significant determinants. Endothelial dysfunction is not only associated with cardiovascular disease, but also with COPD severity.Areas covered: Several functional methods have been developed to evaluate endothelial function in healthy and diseased individuals; from the invasive angiography of epicardial coronary arteries and Venous-Occlusion-Plethysmography, to more modern, noninvasive approaches such as Flow-Mediated-Dilatation, Peripheral-Arterial-Tonometry and Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy, all these methods have boosted clinical research in this field. In this context, this narrative review, which included articles published in PubMed and Scopus up to 25-November-2020, summarizes available functional methods for endothelial damage assessment in COPD and discusses existing evidence on their associations with comorbidities and outcomes in this population.Expert opinion: Accumulated evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction occurs in early stages of CΟPD and worsens with pulmonary obstruction severity and during acute exacerbations. Novel methods evaluating endothelial function offer a detailed, real-time assessment of different parameters related to vascular function and should be increasingly used to shed more light on the role of endothelial damage on cardiovascular and COPD progression.

A few more steps lead to improvements in endothelial function in severe and very severe COPD

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is among the most prevalent concomitant chronic diseases in COPD. Physical activity (PA) modifies endothelial function and is commonly impaired in COPD. However, studies directly investigating the effects of increased PA on endothelial function in COPD are lacking. We investigated the effect of changes in PA on endothelial function in patients with severe to very severe COPD. Furthermore, we determined which variables modify this effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a secondary outcome analysis from a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of combined PA counselling and pedometer-based feedback in COPD. We analysed the change in PA based on three visits during one year. We measured PA using a validated triaxial accelerometer, and endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation.

RESULTS

Data was analysed from 54 patients, which provided 101 change scores. Multiple regression modelling, including adjustment for baseline step count, showed strong evidence for an association between changes in flow-mediated dilation and changes in PA (p < 0.001). The analysis of several effect modificators showed no evidence of any influence on the interaction between PA and endothelial function: smoking status (p = 0.766), severity of airflow obstruction (p = 0.838), exacerbation frequency (p = 0.227), lung diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide % pred. (p = 0.735).

CONCLUSION

We found strong evidence that increasing steps per day ameliorates the heavily impaired endothelial function in patients with severe and very severe COPD. Further studies should examine which factors influence this relationship in a positive or negative manner.

Comorbidities and Readmissions in Survivors of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is defined by chronic airflow obstruction, but is presently considered as a complex, heterogeneous, and multicomponent disease in which comorbidities and extrapulmonary manifestations make important contributions to disease expression. COPD-related hospital readmission. In particular frequent intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions for exacerbations represent a major challenge and place a high burden on patient outcomes and health-related quality of life, as well as on the healthcare system.In this narrative review, we first address major and often undiagnosed comorbidities associated with COPD that could have an impact on hospital readmission after an index ICU admission for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Some guidance for treatment is discussed. Second, we present predictors of hospital and ICU readmission and discuss various strategies to reduce such events.There is a strong rationale to detect and treat major comorbidities early after index ICU admission for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. It still remains unclear, however, if a comprehensive and holistic approach to comorbidities in frail patients surviving hypercapnic respiratory failure can efficiently reduce the readmission rate.

Endothelial dysfunction is not a predictor of outcome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Local airway inflammation may cause systemic changes which result in endothelial dysfunction. Only a few studies have used reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in order to measure their endothelial dysfunction.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of endothelial dysfunction, measured by RH-PAT, in assessing disease severity and systemic burden in a cohort of COPD patients.

Methods

In this prospective, monocentric study, 157 patients with moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD class II-IV) were examined for endothelial dysfunction using RH-PAT (Itamar medical Ltd., Caesarea, Israel). In a nested-cohort, examination was repeated at exacerbation. The association between reactive hyperemia index (RHI), augmentation index (AI) and disease severity and outcome parameters was analysed.

Results

57% of the COPD patients had a dysfunctional endothelium and the median (IQR) RHI was 1.42 (1.27–1.53). Exacerbation of COPD was not associated with a significant change in RHI (p = 0.625) or ΑΙ (p = 0.530). None of the diagnostic or clinical outcomes of COPD was associated with RHI or arterial stiffness.

Conclusion

Endothelial dysfunction is common in COPD. However, it does not seem to be a predictor neither of disease severity, nor of outcome and does not change during exacerbations of the disease.

Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The RENEW trial demonstrated that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils improves quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise performance. In this post hoc analysis of RENEW, we examine the mechanism of action of endobronchial coils that drives improvement in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients from the RENEW coil-treated group who were treated in one or both lobes that were deemed as the most destroyed were included in this retrospective analysis. Expiratory and inspiratory HRCT scans were used to assess lobar volume change from baseline to 12 months post coil treatment in treated and untreated lobes.

RESULTS

Reduction in lobar RV in treated lobes was significantly associated with favourable clinical improvement. Independent predictor of the change in RV and FEV₁ was the change in lobar RV reduction in the treated lobes and for change in 6MWD the absence of cardiac disease and the change in SGRQ, while the independent predictor of change in SGRQ was the change in 6MWD.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that residual lobar volume reduction in treated lobes measured by QCT is the driving mechanism of action of endobronchial coils leading to positive clinical outcomes. However, the improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life seems to be affected by the presence of cardiac disease.

Endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in combination with coronary heart disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the state of the vascular wall in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) combined with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 108 patients: 37 patients with COPD and CAD and 71 patients with COPD without CAD. Endothelial function was studied in tests with reactive hyperemia and nitroglycerin. The number of blood plasma desquamated endotheliocytes were determined by the Hladovec method. In patients with COPD identified are signs of vascular wall remodeling: thickening wall of the brachial artery, reduction of the flow-mediated vasodilation. Patients with COPD in combination with CHD demonstrated higher impairments of the vasoregulatory dysfunction of endothelial of the vascular wall.

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

In patients with COPD combined with chronic coronary heart disease more pronounced endothelial dysfunction with disturbance of endothelium-dependent vasomotor reactions.

Surgical and endoscopic interventions that reduce lung volume for emphysema: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe emphysema is a debilitating condition with few treatment options. Lung volume reduction procedures in the treatment of severe emphysema have shown excellent results in selected patients but their exact role remains unclear with studies reporting a wide variation in outcomes. We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of volume reduction.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE on Sept 29, 2016, for trials of lung volume reduction in patients with emphysema, and we did an updated search on Embase and PubMed on June 18, 2018. We only included randomised controlled studies published in English evaluating the intervention with either sham or standard of care. Inclusion was limited to trials of techniques in which there was sustainable volume reduction. Primary outcomes were residual volume, FEV₁, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and 6-min walk distance (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were severe adverse events (including mortality), short-term mortality, and overall mortality. We extracted summary level data from the trial publications and where necessary we obtained unpublished data. A random-effects model with the I² statistic was used to determine heterogeneity and trial weight in each analysis. The study is registered with the PROSPERO database, number CRD42016045705.

FINDINGS

We identified 4747 references in the search, and included 20 randomised controlled trials of lung volume reduction involving 2794 participants with emphysema. Following lung volume reduction from any of the interventions in pooled analyses (ie, surgery, endobronchial valve, endobronchial coil, or sclerosing agents), the mean differences compared with the control were reduction in residual volume of 0·58 L (95% CI -0·80 to -0·37), increase in FEV₁ of 15·87% (95% CI 12·27 to 19·47), improvement in 6MWT of 43·28 m (31·36 to 55·21), and reduction in the SGRQ of 9·39 points (-10·92 to -7·86). The odds ratio for a severe adverse event, which included mortality, was 6·21 (95% CI 4·02 to 9·58) following intervention. Regression analysis showed improvements relative to the degree of volume reduction: FEV₁ (r²=0·86; p<0·0001), 6MWT (r²=0·77; p<0·0001), and SGRQ (r²=0·70; p<0·0001). Most studies were at high risk of bias for lack of blinding, and heterogeneity was high for some outcomes when pooled across all interventions, but was generally lower in the subgroups by intervention type.

INTERPRETATION

Despite limitations of high risk of bias and heterogeneity for some analyses, our results provide support that lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema on maximal medical treatment has clinically meaningful benefits. These benefits should be considered alongside potential adverse events.

FUNDING

None.

Treatment strategies after acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Impact on mortality

INTRODUCTION

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a common reason for presentation to emergency departments (ED), but the management of these episodes is often heterogeneous regardless of their potential impact on short-term adverse outcomes.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal, retrospective study of all patients >40 years old admitted to the ED of two Spanish teaching hospitals for an AECOPD between January 1st and May 31st, 2016. All data were collected from electronic medical records. The primary outcomes were patient treatment at discharge and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to model the determinants of 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 465 included patients, 56% were prescribed a 3-drug combination at hospital discharge, 22% a 2-drug combination, 19% a single drug, and 4% other or no treatment. Approximately 8% of patients died within 90 days after an AECOPD. Multivariate logistic models revealed that having more than 2 severe exacerbations within the last 12 months (OR (95% CI): 15.12 (4.22-54.22)) and being prescribed a single drug at discharge (OR (95% CI): 7.23 (2.44-21.38)) were the main determinants of 90-day mortality after an AECOPD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reflects the real-life heterogeneity in the pharmacological treatments prescribed after an ED admission for an AECOPD and suggests the potential impact of suboptimal inhaled treatment strategies on 90-day mortality rates.

Endothelial dysfunction is associated with impaired lung function in two independent community cohorts

BACKGROUND

Prior studies investigating the association between endothelial dysfunction and impaired lung function have been small and inconsistent. The primary aim was to investigate the association between endothelial function and lung function in two community-based cohorts.

METHODS

We used a discovery/replication approach to study the association between endothelial function and lung function in the Prospective investigation of Obesity, Energy and Metabolism (POEM, discovery cohort, n = 490, mean age 50.3 ± 0.2 years) and the Prospective Study of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS, replication cohort, n = 892, mean age 70.2 ± 0.15 years). Spirometry and three different measures of endothelial function were performed including both the invasive forearm technique (endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation [EDV and EIDV, respectively] and noninvasive flow mediated dilation [FMD]).

RESULTS

An age and sex adjusted association between lower EDV and lower FEV₁ was found in POEM and replicated in PIVUS. After merging the two cohorts, 1 standard deviation decrease in EDV was associated with 1.57% lower FEV₁ after additional adjustment for smoking status, body mass index, exercise level, and C-reactive protein (95% confidence intervals 0.63-2.51, p = 0.001). The association was slightly lower albeit still statistically significant after excluding participants without cardiovascular disease and chronic respiratory disease and appeared stronger among previous/current smokers vs. non-smokers and in men vs. women (p for interaction = 0.2 and 0.02 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that even individuals with sub-clinical impairments of lung function in the community have concomitant endothelial dysfunction.

Lung volume reduction surgery does not increase daily physical activity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a treatment option for selected patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema. The positive effects of LVRS on exercise capacity are well known. In contrast, the effect of LVRS on daily physical activity (PA) is less clear.

Methods

In a prospective case-control study we evaluated selected patients with severe COPD and emphysema who underwent LVRS and COPD patients following usual care. Controls were matched for age, severity of airflow obstruction (FEV₁) and hyperinflation [residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC)]. Treatment effect of LVRS on activity parameters was analysed using univariable regression model adjusting for treatment group.

Results

A total of 19 patients underwent LVRS and 16 COPD patients without a surgical intervention during the study period were included. The median (quartile) FEV₁%_pred was 28% (range, 21-33%), RV/TLC was 69% (range, 64-73%) in cases while controls had a median (quartile) FEV₁%_pred of 33% (range, 28.5-49.5%) and a RV/TLC of 58% (range, 49-61%). Age and body mass index (BMI) were comparable between both groups. Number of steps per day following LVRS was comparable to before the intervention (mean change: -115, 95% CI: -994.6 to 764.3, P=0.779) and was not significantly different to the change in control subjects (mean treatment effect: 931.4, 95% CI: -252.4 to 2,115.1, P=0.117).

Conclusions

The results from this study reveal that patients undergoing LVRS did not increase their daily level of PA despite improvement of exercise capacity and symptoms.

Endobronchial Coils Versus Lung Volume Reduction Surgery or Medical Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Homogenous Emphysema

Rationale: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction utilizing shape-memory nitinol endobronchial coils (EBC) may be safer and more effective in severely hyperinflated homogeneous emphysema compared to medical therapy or lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Methods: The effect of bilateral EBC in patients with homogeneous emphysema on spirometry, lung volumes and survival was compared to patients with homogeneous emphysema randomized in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) to LVRS or medical therapy. NETT participants were selected to match EBC participants in age, baseline spirometry, and gender. Outcomes were compared from baseline, at 6 and 12 months. Results: There were no significant baseline differences in gender in the EBC, NETT-LVRS or medical treatment patients. At baseline no differences existed between EBC and NETT-LVRS patients in forced expiratory volume in 1 second ( FEV₁) or total lung capacity (TLC) %-predicted; residual volume (RV) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) %-predicted were higher in the EBC group compared to NETT-LVRS (p < 0.001). Compared to the medical treatment group, EBC produced greater improvements in FEV₁ and RV but not TLC at 6 months. FEV₁ and RV in the EBC group remained significantly improved at 12-months compared to the medical treatment group. While all 3 therapies improved quality of life, survival at 12 months with EBC or medical therapy was greater than NETT-LVRS. Conclusion: EBC may be a potential therapeutic option in patients with severe homogeneous emphysema and hyperinflation who are already receiving optimal medical treatment.

Endothelial function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of studies using flow mediated dilatation

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Endothelial function may be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. In contrast to the attention given to pulmonary endothelial dysfunction, little is known about peripheral vascular changes in COPD. Therefore, we reviewed the literature on peripheral endothelial function in COPD.

METHODS

Databases were screened for studies using ultrasound-based flow-mediated dilation (FMD), the reference method for assessing peripheral endothelial function, in stable COPD patients. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random effects model.

RESULTS

17 studies were identified, with a total of 1228 participants (724 COPD patients; 504 controls). Pooled analysis demonstrated an impaired endothelial-dependent FMD (-3.22%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.74 to -1.69; p < 0.001; I² = 96%) and endothelial-independent FMD (-2.86%; 95%CI -5.63 to -0.09; p = 0.04; I² = 83%) in COPD patients when compared with smoking and non-smoking controls.

CONCLUSION

This review provides evidence for impaired peripheral endothelial function in COPD. Since impaired endothelial function may contribute to cardiovascular morbidity, a more comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping is considered important in COPD to address cardiovascular risk. A high frequency of cardiovascular comorbidity is observed in COPD patients, and therefore well-controlled, larger studies that investigate endothelial function in COPD patients are recommended.

GDF-15 plasma levels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with subclinical coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a cytokine associated with cardiovascular mortality, increases during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, but any role in stable COPD is unknown. We tested associations between GDF-15 and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, in COPD subjects free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of COPD participants (GOLD stages 2-4) in the COPDGene cohort without CVD at enrollment, using baseline CAC (from non-EKG-gated chest computed tomography) and plasma GDF-15 (by custom ELISA). We used multinomial logistic modeling of GDF-15 associations with CAC, adjusting for demographics, baseline risk (calculated using the HEART: Personal Heart Early Assessment Risk Tool (Budoff et al. 114:1761-1791, 2006) score), smoking history, measures of airflow obstruction, emphysema and airway disease severity.

RESULTS

Among 694 participants with COPD (47% women, mean age 63.6 years) mean GDF-15 was 1,304 pg/mL, and mean CAC score was 198. Relative to the lower GDF-15 tertile, higher tertiles showed bivariate association with increasing CAC score (mid tertile odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 2.51; higher tertile OR 2.86, CI 2.04, 4.02). This association was maintained after additionally adjusting for baseline CVD risk, for co-morbidities and descriptors of COPD severity and impact, markers of cardiac stress (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T) and of inflammation (Interleukin-6), and in subgroup analysis excluding men, diabetics, current smokers or those with limited ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In ever-smokers with COPD free of clinical CVD, GDF-15 contributes independently to subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00608764 . Registered 28 January 2008.

The role of the endothelium in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

COPD and asthma are important chronic inflammatory disorders with a high associated morbidity. Much research has concentrated on the role of inflammatory cells, such as the neutrophil, in these diseases, but relatively little focus has been given to the endothelial tissue, through which inflammatory cells must transmigrate to reach the lung parenchyma and cause damage. There is evidence that there is an abnormal amount of endothelial tissue in COPD and asthma and that this tissue and its’ progenitor cells behave in a dysfunctional manner. This article reviews the evidence of the involvement of pulmonary endothelium in COPD and asthma and potential treatment options for this.

Pulmonary Perfusion Changes as Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Computed Tomography after Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction by Coils

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic lung volume reduction by coils (LVRC) is a recent treatment approach for severe emphysema. Furthermore, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) now offers a combined assessment of lung morphology and pulmonary perfusion.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to assess the impact of LVRC on pulmonary perfusion with DECT.

METHODS

Seventeen patients (64.8 ± 6.7 years) underwent LVRC. DECT was performed prior to and after LVRC. For each patient, lung volumes and emphysema quantification were automatically calculated. Then, 6 regions of interest (ROIs) on the iodine perfusion map were drawn in the anterior, mid, and posterior right and left lungs at 4 defined levels. The ROI values were averaged to obtain lung perfusion as assessed by the lung's iodine concentration (CLung, μg·cm-3). The CLung values were normalized using the left atrial iodine concentration (CLA) to take into account differences between successive DECT scans.

RESULTS

The 6-min walk distance (6MWD) improved significantly after the procedure (p = 0.0002). No lung volume changes were observed between successive DECT scans for any of the patients (p = 0.32), attesting the same suspended inspiration. After LVRC, the emphysema index was significantly reduced in the treated lung (p = 0.0014). Lung perfusion increased significantly adjacent to the treated areas (CLung/CLA from 3.4 ± 1.7 to 5.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) and in the ipsilateral untreated areas (from 4.1 ± 1.4 to 6.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), corresponding to a mean 65 and 61% increase in perfusion, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the contralateral upper and lower areas (from 4.4 ± 1.9 to 4.8 ± 2.1, p = 0.273, and from 4.9 ± 2.0 to 5.2 ± 1.7, p = 0.412, respectively). A significant correlation between increased 6MWD and increased perfusion was found (p = 0.0027, R2 = 0.3850).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis based on DECT acquisition revealed that LVRC results in a significant increase in perfusion in the coil-free areas adjacent to the treated ones, as well as in the ipsilateral untreated areas. This suggests a possible role for LVRC in the improvement of the ventilation/perfusion relationship.

Lung volume reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performed to treat patients with severe diffuse emphysema was reintroduced in the nineties. Lung volume reduction surgery aims to resect damaged emphysematous lung tissue, thereby increasing elastic properties of the lung. This treatment is hypothesised to improve long-term daily functioning and quality of life, although it may be costly and may be associated with risks of morbidity and mortality. Ten years have passed since the last version of this review was prepared, prompting us to perform an update.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to gather all available evidence from randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) versus non-surgical standard therapy in improving health outcomes for patients with severe diffuse emphysema. Secondary objectives included determining which subgroup of patients benefit from LVRS and for which patients LVRS is contraindicated, to establish the postoperative complications of LVRS and its morbidity and mortality, to determine which surgical approaches for LVRS are most effective and to calculate the cost-effectiveness of LVRS.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified RCTs by using the Cochrane Airways Group Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) register, in addition to the online clinical trials registers. Searches are current to April 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that studied the safety and efficacy of LVRS in participants with diffuse emphysema. We excluded studies that investigated giant or bullous emphysema.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. When possible, we combined data from more than one study in a meta-analysis using RevMan 5 software.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two new studies (89 participants) in this updated review. A total of 11 studies (1760 participants) met the entry criteria of the review, one of which accounted for 68% of recruited participants. The quality of evidence ranged from low to moderate owing to an unclear risk of bias across many studies, lack of blinding and low participant numbers for some outcomes. Eight of the studies compared LVRS versus standard medical care, one compared two closure techniques (stapling vs laser ablation), one looked at the effect of buttressing the staple line on the effectiveness of LVRS and one compared traditional 'resectional' LVRS with a non-resectional surgical approach. Participants completed a mandatory course of pulmonary rehabilitation/physical training before the procedure commenced. Short-term mortality was higher for LVRS (odds ratio (OR) 6.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.22 to 11.79; 1489 participants; five studies; moderate-quality evidence) than for control, but long-term mortality favoured LVRS (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95; 1280 participants; two studies; moderate-quality evidence). Participants identified post hoc as being at high risk of death from surgery were those with particularly impaired lung function, poor diffusing capacity and/or homogenous emphysema. Participants with upper lobe-predominant emphysema and low baseline exercise capacity showed the most favourable outcomes related to mortality, as investigators reported no significant differences in early mortality between participants treated with LVRS and those in the control group (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.29; 290 participants; one study), as well as significantly lower mortality at the end of follow-up for LVRS compared with control (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.78; 290 participants; one study). Trials in this review furthermore provided evidence of low to moderate quality showing that improvements in lung function parameters other than forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), quality of life and exercise capacity were more likely with LVRS than with usual follow-up. Adverse events were more common with LVRS than with control, specifically the occurrence of (persistent) air leaks, pulmonary morbidity (e.g. pneumonia) and cardiovascular morbidity. Although LVRS leads to an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), the procedure is relatively costly overall.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Lung volume reduction surgery, an effective treatment for selected patients with severe emphysema, may lead to better health status and lung function outcomes, specifically for patients who have upper lobe-predominant emphysema with low exercise capacity, but the procedure is associated with risks of early mortality and adverse events.

Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease beyond the lungs

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an umbrella term that covers many clinical subtypes with clearly different pulmonary and extra-pulmonary characteristics, but with persistent airflow limitation in common. This insight has led to the development of a more personalised approach in bronchodilator therapy, prevention of exacerbations, and advanced treatments (such as non-invasive ventilation and lung volume reduction techniques). However, systemic manifestations and comorbidities of COPD also contribute to different clinical phenotypes and warrant an individualised approach as part of integrated disease management. Alterations in bodyweight and composition, from cachexia to obesity, demand specific management. Psychological symptoms are highly prevalent, and thorough diagnosis and treatment are necessary. Moreover, prevention of exacerbations requires interventions beyond the lungs, including treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, reduction of cardiovascular risks, and management of dyspnoea and anxiety. In this Review, we discuss the management of COPD beyond the respiratory system and propose treatment strategies on the basis of the latest research and best practices.

Cardiac impact of inhaled therapy in the largest randomised placebo-controlled trial in COPD history: have we reached the SUMMIT?

SUMMIT supports the efficiency and cardiovascular safety of LABA and ICS in COPD patients at cardiovascular riskhttp://ow.ly/p6Is300ffoc