1
|
Criner GJ, Delage A, Voelker K, Hogarth DK, Majid A, Zgoda M, Lazarus DR, Casal R, Benzaquen SB, Holladay RC, Wellikoff A, Calero K, Rumbak MJ, Branca PR, Abu-Hijleh M, Mallea JM, Kalhan R, Sachdeva A, Kinsey CM, Lamb CR, Reed MF, Abouzgheib WB, Kaplan PV, Marrujo GX, Johnstone DW, Gasparri MG, Meade AA, Hergott CA, Reddy C, Mularski RA, Case AH, Makani SS, Shepherd RW, Chen B, Holt GE, Martel S. Improving Lung Function in Severe Heterogenous Emphysema with the Spiration Valve System (EMPROVE). A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 200:1354-1362. [PMID: 31365298 PMCID: PMC6884033 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0383oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Less invasive, nonsurgical approaches are needed to treat severe emphysema. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) versus optimal medical management. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, subjects aged 40 years or older with severe, heterogeneous emphysema were randomized 2:1 to SVS with medical management (treatment) or medical management alone (control). Measurements and Main Results: The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in mean FEV1 from baseline to 6 months. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: difference in FEV1 responder rates, target lobe volume reduction, hyperinflation, health status, dyspnea, and exercise capacity. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of composite thoracic serious adverse events. All analyses were conducted by determining the 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCIs) for the difference between treatment and control arms. Between October 2013 and May 2017, 172 participants (53.5% male; mean age, 67.4 yr) were randomized to treatment (n = 113) or control (n = 59). Mean FEV1 showed statistically significant improvements between the treatment and control groups—between-group difference at 6 and 12 months, respectively, of 0.101 L (95% BCI, 0.060–0.141) and 0.099 L (95% BCI, 0.048–0.151). At 6 months, the treatment group had statistically significant improvements in all secondary endpoints except 6-minute-walk distance. Composite thoracic serious adverse event incidence through 6 months was greater in the treatment group (31.0% vs. 11.9%), primarily due to a 12.4% incidence of serious pneumothorax. Conclusions: In patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema, the SVS shows significant improvement in multiple efficacy outcomes, with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard J Criner
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Antoine Delage
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Hôpital Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Adnan Majid
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Zgoda
- Carolinas Medical Center (Atrium Health), Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Donald R Lazarus
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Roberto Casal
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Robert C Holladay
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Adam Wellikoff
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Karel Calero
- Tampa General Hospital, University South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mark J Rumbak
- Tampa General Hospital, University South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Paul R Branca
- University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Ravi Kalhan
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Carla R Lamb
- Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Michael F Reed
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Phillip V Kaplan
- Detroit Clinical Research Center, Beaumont Botsford Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| | | | - David W Johnstone
- Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Mario G Gasparri
- Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Samir S Makani
- University of California Medical Center at San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Benson Chen
- California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California; and
| | | | - Simon Martel
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Hôpital Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kloth C, Thaiss WM, Fritz J, Nikolaou K, Beer M, Hetzel J, Ioanoviciu SD, Horger M. Prediction of response to endobronchial coiling based on morphologic emphysema characterization of the lung lobe to be treated and the ipsilateral non-treated lobe as well as on functional computed tomography-data: correlation with clinical and pulmonary function. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:93-102. [PMID: 30863577 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To test if the emphysema type of the targeted lobe, ipsilateral non-targeted lobe, and lobes of the contralateral lung impact outcome of endobronchial lung volume reduction (ELVR) treatment, and to document lobar volume changes in treated and non-treated lung lobes. Methods Thirty patients (16 men, 14 women; median age, 66±6 years; range, 48-78 years) underwent chest-computed tomography (CT) before and after endobronchial coiling for lung volume reduction (LVR) at our institution between December 2011 and March 2016. Forty-five pulmonary lobes were coiled. We classified the treated lobes into homogenous or heterogeneous emphysema phenotype based on the distribution of voxels showing tissue attenuation of less than -950 HU. Clinical response was defined as an increase or consistency in the walking distance (6MWT) 6 months after LVR-therapy. Lung volume changes were compared for treated, ipsilateral, and contralateral lobes. Additionally, pulmonary function tests (PFT), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT), and blood gas analysis were performed. Results Responder (19/30, 63.3%) showed a significant improvement of 6 MWT from 281.05 to 335.26 (P=0.001). Non-responder (11/30, 36.7%) showed a decrease in 6MWT from 308.18 to 255.45 (P=0.001). Responders showed a significant reduction in CAT test from 23.23 to 20.73 points (P=0.038) and pCO2 from 42.94 to 40.31 (P=0.001), whereas non-responders showed an increase in pCO2 (P=0.003; from 44.27 to 47.45). There were no significant changes in PFT-parameters. In responders, there was a significant volume reduction in treated lobes from 1,627.68 to 1,519.21 mL (P=0.009). In responders, treated lobes/non-treated ipsilateral lobes were homogenous (n=11/5) and heterogeneous (n=10/28). In non-responders, treated lobes/non-treated ipsilateral were homogenous (n=5/4) and heterogeneous (n=7/16). In responders and non-responders, the emphysema phenotype in treated, ipsilateral non-treated and even contralateral lobes (P=0.250) did not differ and or change significantly before and after therapy. Only the volume of treated lobes in responders changed significantly after coiling. Conclusions The emphysema-phenotype in the targeted and non-targeted ipsilateral lobe has no impact on the outcome of endobronchial coiling for LVR and also does not change significantly after treatment, whereas the volume of the treated lobe significantly decreases in responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kloth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Jan Fritz
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Meinrad Beer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hetzel
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Marius Horger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|