Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Rifampin in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis

PURPOSE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a standard clinical procedure that uses the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug in the body to determine the optimal dose. The pharmacokinetic variability of the drug(s) is a significant contributor to poor treatment outcomes, including the development of acquired drug resistance. TDM aids in dose optimization and improves outcomes while lessening drug toxicity. TDM is used to manage patients with tuberculosis (TB) who exhibit a slow response to therapy, despite good compliance and drug-susceptible organisms. Additional indications include patients at risk of malabsorption or delayed absorption of TB drugs and patients with drug-drug interaction and drug toxicity, which confirm compliance with therapy. TDM usually requires two blood samples: the 2 h and the 6 h post-dose. This narrative review will discuss the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TB drugs, determinants of poor response to therapy, indications of TDM, methods of performing TDM, and its interpretations.

METHODS

This is a narrative review. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the CINAHL from inception to April 2024. We used the following search terms: tuberculosis, therapeutic drug monitoring, anti-TB drugs, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, limited sample strategies, diabetes and TB, HIV and TB, and multidrug-resistant TB. All types of articles were selected.

RESULTS

TDM is beneficial in managing TB, especially in patients with slow responses, drug-resistance TB, recurrent TB, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and human immunodeficiency virus infection.

CONCLUSION

TDM is beneficial for improving outcomes, reducing the risk of acquired drug resistance, and avoiding side effects.

Recent advances in the treatment of tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health challenge and one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In the last decade, the TB treatment landscape has dramatically changed. After long years of stagnation, new compounds entered the market (bedaquiline, delamanid, and pretomanid) and phase III clinical trials have shown promising results towards shortening duration of treatment for both drug-susceptible (Study 31/A5349, TRUNCATE-TB, and SHINE) and drug-resistant TB (STREAM, NiX-TB, ZeNix, and TB-PRACTECAL). Dose optimization of rifamycins and repurposed drugs has also brought hopes of further development of safe and effective regimens. Consequently, international and WHO clinical guidelines have been updated multiple times in the last years to keep pace with these advances.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review aims to summarize the state-of-the-art on treatment of drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB, as well as recent trial results and an overview of ongoing clinical trials.

SOURCES

A non-systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed and MEDLINE, focusing on the treatment of TB. Ongoing clinical trials were listed according to the authors' knowledge and completed consulting clinicaltrials.gov and other publicly available websites (www.resisttb.org/clinical-trials-progress-report, www.newtbdrugs.org/pipeline/trials).

CONTENT

This review summarizes the recent, major changes in the landscape for drug-susceptible and drug-resistant treatment, with a specific focus on their potential impact on patient outcomes and programmatic TB management. Moreover, insights in host-directed therapies, and advances in pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics are discussed. A thorough outline of ongoing therapeutic clinical trials is presented, highlighting different approaches and goals in current TB clinical research.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research should be directed to individualize regimens and protect these recent breakthroughs by preventing and identifying the selection of drug resistance and providing widespread, affordable, patient-centred access to new treatment options for all people affected by TB.

The long and winding road towards new treatments against lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis

Although lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis have been targeted for global elimination, these helminth infections are still a major public health problem across the tropics and subtropics. Despite decades of research, treatment options remain limited and drugs that completely clear the infections, and can be used on a large scale, are still unavailable. In the present review we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of currently available treatments and new ones in development. Novel candidates (corallopyronin A, DNDi-6166, emodepside, and oxfendazole) are currently moving through (pre)clinical development, while the development of two candidates (AWZ1066S and ABBV-4083/flubentylosin) was recently halted. The preclinical R&D pipeline for filarial infections continues to be limited, and recent setbacks highlight the importance of continuous drug discovery and testing.

Effect of Interindividual Variability in Metabolic Clearance and Relative Bioavailability on Rifampicin Exposure in Tuberculosis Patients with and without HIV Co-Infection: Does Formulation Quality Matter?

The present study aims to characterise the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin (RIF) in tuberculosis (TB) patients with and without HIV co-infection, considering the formation of 25-O-desacetyl-rifampicin (desRIF). It is hypothesised that the metabolite formation, HIV co-infection and drug formulation may further explain the interindividual variation in the exposure to RIF. Pharmacokinetic, clinical, and demographic data from TB patients with (TB-HIV+ group; n = 18) or without HIV (TB-HIV- group; n = 15) who were receiving RIF as part of a four-drug fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimen (RIF, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) were analysed, along with the published literature data on the relative bioavailability of different formulations. A population pharmacokinetic model, including the formation of desRIF, was developed and compared to a model based solely on the parent drug. HIV co-infection does not alter the plasma exposure to RIF and the desRIF formation does not contribute to the observed variability in the RIF disposition. The relative bioavailability and RIF plasma exposure were significantly lower than previously reported for the standard regimen with FDC tablets. Furthermore, participants weighting less than 50 kg do not reach the same RIF plasma exposure as compared to those weighting >50 kg. In conclusion, as no covariate was identified other than body weight on CL/F and Vd/F, low systemic exposure to RIF is likely to be caused by the low bioavailability of the formulation.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Evidence From a Phase 3 Trial to Support Flat-Dosing of Rifampicin for Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin in treating drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) is still highly debated. In the phase 3 clinical trial Study 31/ACTG 5349 (NCT02410772), all participants in the control regimen arm received 600 mg rifampicin daily as a flat dose. Here, we evaluated relationships between rifampicin exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed rifampicin concentration time profiles using population nonlinear mixed-effects models. We compared simulated rifampicin exposure from flat- and weight-banded dosing. We evaluated the effect of rifampicin exposure on stable culture conversion at 6 months; TB-related unfavorable outcomes at 9, 12, and 18 months using Cox proportional hazard models; and all trial-defined safety outcomes using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Our model-derived rifampicin exposure ranged from 4.57 mg · h/L to 140.0 mg · h/L with a median of 41.8 mg · h/L. Pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated that flat-dosed rifampicin provided exposure coverage similar to the weight-banded dose. Exposure-efficacy analysis (n = 680) showed that participants with rifampicin exposure below the median experienced similar hazards of stable culture conversion and TB-related unfavorable outcomes compared with those with exposure above the median. Exposure-safety analysis (n = 722) showed that increased rifampicin exposure was not associated with increased grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Flat-dosing of rifampicin at 600 mg daily may be a reasonable alternative to the incumbent weight-banded dosing strategy for the standard-of-care 6-month regimen. Future research should assess the optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin, at doses higher than the current recommendation.

High-dose, short-duration versus standard rifampicin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: a partially blinded, three-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is a key component of tuberculosis elimination. To improve completion and reduce the burden for people and health systems, short, safe, and effective TPT regimens are needed. We aimed to compare safety and treatment completion of various doses and durations of rifampicin in people who were recommended to receive TPT.

METHODS

This partially blinded, parallel-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial was done at seven university-affiliated clinics in Canada, Indonesia, and Viet Nam. Participants aged 10 years or older were included if they had an indication for TPT according to WHO guidelines for Indonesia and Viet Nam, or Canadian guidelines for Canadian sites, and a positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rifampicin at 10 mg/kg once daily for 4 months (standard-dose group), 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months (20 mg/kg group), or 30 mg/kg daily for 2 months (30 mg/kg group). The randomisation sequence was computer generated with blocks of variable size (three, six, and nine) and stratified by country for Indonesia and Viet Nam, and by city within Canada. Participants and investigators were masked to dose in high-dose groups, but unmasked to duration in all groups. The two co-primary outcomes were safety (in the safety population, in which participants received at least one dose of the study drug) and treatment completion (in the modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population, excluding those ineligible after randomisation). Protocol-defined adverse events were defined as grade 3 or worse, or rash or allergy of any grade, judged by an independent and masked panel as possibly or probably related to the study. A margin of 4% was used to assess non-inferiority. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988933 (active).

FINDINGS

Between Sept 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 1692 people were assessed for eligibility, 1376 were randomly assigned, and eight were excluded after randomisation. 1368 participants were included in the mITT population (454 in the standard group, 461 in the 20 mg/kg group, and 453 in the 30 mg/kg group). 589 (43%) participants were male and 779 (57%) were female. 372 (82%) in the standard-dose group, 329 (71%) in the 20 mg/kg group, and 293 (65%) in the 30 mg/kg group completed treatment. No participants in the standard-dose group, one (<1%) of 441 participants in the 20 mg/kg group, and four (1%) of 423 in the 30 mg/kg group developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity. Risk of protocol-defined adverse events was higher in the 30 mg/kg group than in the standard-dose group (adjusted risk difference 4·6% [95% CI 1·8 to 7·4]) or the 20 mg/kg group (5·1% [2·3 to 7·8]). There was no difference in the risk of adverse events between the 20 mg/kg and standard-dose groups (-0·5% [95% CI -2·4 to 1·5]; non-inferiority met). Completion was lower in the 20 mg/kg group (-7·8% [95% CI -13·6 to -2·0]) and the 30 mg/kg group (-15·4% [-21·4 to -9·4]) than in the standard-dose group.

INTERPRETATION

In this trial, 2 months of 30 mg/kg daily rifampicin had significantly worse safety and completion than 4 months of 10 mg/kg daily and 2 months of 20 mg/kg daily (the latter, a fully blinded comparison); we do not consider 30 mg/kg to be a good option for TPT. Rifampicin at 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months was as safe as standard treatment, but with lower completion. This difference remains unexplained.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Twice-daily Ritonavir-boosted Atazanavir With Rifampicin

BACKGROUND

Critical drug-drug interactions (DDI) and hepatotoxicity complicate concurrent use of rifampicin and protease inhibitors. We investigated whether dose escalation of atazanavir/ritonavir could safely overcome the DDI with rifampicin.

METHODS

DERIVE (NCT04121195, EDCTP) was a dose-escalation trial in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. Four intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) visits were performed: PK1 300/100 mg OD (baseline); PK2 300/100 mg OD with rifampicin 600 mg; PK3 300/100 mg twice a day (BID) with rifampicin 600 mg OD; PK4 300/100 mg BID with rifampicin 1200 mg OD. Dolutegravir 50 mg BID throughout the study period ensured participants remained protected from subtherapeutic atazanavir concentrations. The data were interpreted with noncompartmental analysis. The target minimum concentration was atazanavir's protein-adjusted IC90 (PA-IC90), 0.014 mg/L.

RESULTS

We enrolled 26 participants (23 female) with median (range) age 44 (28-61) years and weight 67 (50-75) kg. Compared with PK1, atazanavir Ctau, and AUC were significantly reduced at PK2 by 96% and 85%, respectively. The escalation to BID dosing (PK3) reduced this difference in Ctau, and AUC24 to 18% lower and 8% higher, respectively. Comparable exposures were maintained with double doses of rifampicin. Lowest Ctau during PK1, PK3, and PK4 were 12.7-, 4.8-, and 8.6-fold higher than PA-IC90, respectively, whereas 65% of PK2 Ctau were below the limit of quantification (0.03 mg/L), hence likely below PA-IC90. No participant developed significant elevation of liver enzymes, reported a serious adverse event (SAE) or experienced rebound viraemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice daily atazanavir/ritonavir during rifampicin co-administration was well tolerated and achieved plasma concentrations above the target.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04121195. Registered on 09 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04121195.

Variability in plasma rifampicin concentrations and role of SLCO1B1, ABCB1, AADAC2 and CES2 genotypes in Ethiopian patients with tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Rifampicin, a key drug against tuberculosis (TB), displays wide between-patient pharmacokinetics variability and concentration-dependent antimicrobial effect. We investigated variability in plasma rifampicin concentrations and the role of SLCO1B1, ABCB1, arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) and carboxylesterase 2 (CES-2) genotypes in Ethiopian patients with TB.

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed TB (n = 119) who had received 2 weeks of rifampicin-based anti-TB therapy. Venous blood samples were obtained at three time points post-dose. Genotypes for SLCO1B1 (c.388A > G, c.521T > C), ABCB1 (c.3435C > T, c.4036A > G), AADACc.841G > A and CES-2 (c.269-965A > G) were determined. Rifampicin plasma concentration was quantified using LC-MS/MS. Predictors of rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7 h were analysed.

RESULTS

The median rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7 were 6.76 µg/mL (IQR 5.37-8.48) and 17.05 µg·h/mL (IQR 13.87-22.26), respectively. Only 30.3% of patients achieved the therapeutic efficacy threshold (Cmax>8 µg/mL). The allele frequency for SLCO1B1*1B (c.388A > G), SLCO1B1*5 (c.521T > C), ABCB1 c.3435C > T, ABCB1c.4036A > G, AADAC c.841G > A and CES-2 c.269-965A > G were 2.2%, 20.2%, 24.4%, 14.6%, 86.1% and 30.6%, respectively. Sex, rifampicin dose and ABCB1c.4036A > G, genotypes were significant predictors of rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7. AADACc.841G > A genotypes were significant predictors of rifampicin Cmax. There was no significant influence of SLCO1B1 (c.388A > G, c.521T > C), ABCB1c.3435C > T and CES-2 c.269-965A > G on rifampicin plasma exposure variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtherapeutic rifampicin plasma concentrations occurred in two-thirds of Ethiopian TB patients. Rifampicin exposure varied with sex, dose and genotypes. AADACc.841G/G and ABCB1c.4036A/A genotypes and male patients are at higher risk of lower rifampicin plasma exposure. The impact on TB treatment outcomes and whether high-dose rifampicin is required to improve therapeutic efficacy requires further investigation.

Safety and Efficacy of 25 mg/kg and 35 mg/kg vs 10 mg/kg Rifampicin in Pulmonary TB: A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Globally, no trial data are available on head-to-head comparison between 10 mg/kg and 25/35 mg/kg rifampicin in treating pulmonary tuberculosis during study initiation.

Methods

A multicentric, phase IIb randomized trial recruited 333 new culture-positive, drug-sensitive adult patients with pulmonary tuberculosis to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose rifampicin (R25/R35), against conventional dose (R10) given daily for 8 weeks followed by standard doses for 16 weeks. Main outcomes were treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and time-to-culture conversion in liquid media, assessed by division of AIDS system for grading the severity of adverse events division of AIDS criteria and Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

In a modified intention-to-treat population of 323 patients (R10: 105/R25: 112/R35: 106), grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 34 patients (R10: 9.5% [10/105], R25: 9.8% [11/112], R35: 12.3% [13/106]) during the intensive phase. Among 23 patients (R10: 3.8% [4/105], R25: 6.3% [7/112], R35: 11.3% [12/106]) with grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity, 15 (R10: 1.9% [2/105], R25: 3.6% [4/112], R35: 8.5% [9/106]) had grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia and 9 patients (R10: 1.0% [1/105], R25: 0.9% [1/112], R35: 6.6% [7/106]) developed clinical jaundice. Significant differences observed only between R10 and R35 with hepatotoxicity (P = .039), hyperbilirubinemia (P = .031), clinical jaundice (P = .032), and treatment interruption (P = .039). Eighteen serious AEs and 6 deaths (R10: 3/R25: 1/R35: 2) occurred during study period. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in R25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.31 [solid: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.46-2.67]) and R35 (1.81; 95% CI, 1.33-2.48 [solid: 2.24; 95% CI, 1.64-3.06]), than R10 (34 vs 44 days). R25 had no failure/relapse.

Conclusions

Hepatotoxicity, clinical jaundice, and treatment interruptions occurred significantly higher with R35 than R10. Because R25 was comparably safe as R10 and also highly efficacious than R10, it may be considered for implementation. Clinical Trials Registration. CTRI/2017/12/010951.

A Dose-Finding Study to Guide Use of Verapamil as an Adjunctive Therapy in Tuberculosis

Induction of mycobacterial efflux pumps is a cause of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) drug tolerance, a barrier to shortening antitubercular treatment. Verapamil inhibits Mtb efflux pumps that mediate tolerance to rifampin, a cornerstone of tuberculosis (TB) treatment. Verapamil's mycobacterial efflux pump inhibition also limits Mtb growth in macrophages in the absence of antibiotic treatment. These findings suggest that verapamil could be used as an adjunctive therapy for TB treatment shortening. However, verapamil is rapidly and substantially metabolized when co-administered with rifampin. We determined in a dose-escalation clinical trial of persons with pulmonary TB that rifampin-induced clearance of verapamil can be countered without toxicity by the administration of larger than usual doses of verapamil. An oral dosage of 360 mg sustained-release (SR) verapamil given every 12 hours concomitantly with rifampin achieved median verapamil exposures of 903.1 ng.h/mL (area under the curve (AUC)0-12 h ) in the 18 participants receiving this highest studied verapamil dose; these AUC findings are similar to those in persons receiving daily doses of 240 mg verapamil SR but not rifampin. Moreover, norverapamil:verapamil, R:S verapamil, and R:S norverapamil AUC ratios were all significantly greater than those of historical controls receiving SR verapamil in the absence of rifampin. Thus, rifampin administration favors the less-cardioactive verapamil metabolites and enantiomers that retain similar Mtb efflux inhibitory activity to verapamil, increasing overall benefit. Finally, rifampin exposures were 50% greater after verapamil administration, which may also be advantageous. Our findings suggest that a higher dosage of verapamil can be safely used as adjunctive treatment in rifampin-containing treatment regimens.

The quest to deliver high-dose rifampicin: can the inhaled approach help?

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health problem that poses a challenge to global treatment programs. Rifampicin is a potent and highly effective drug for TB treatment; however, higher oral doses than the standard dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampicin may offer better efficacy in TB treatment.

AREAS COVERED

High oral dose rifampicin is not implemented in anti-TB regimens yet and requires about a 3-fold increase in dose for increased efficacy. We discuss inhaled delivery of rifampicin as an alternative or adjunct to oral high-dose rifampicin. Clinical results of safety, tolerability, and patient compliance with antibiotic dry powder inhalers are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials suggest that an approximately 3-fold increase in the standard oral dose of rifampicin may be required for better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, animal studies suggest that inhaled rifampicin can deliver a high concentration of the drug to the lungs and achieve approximately double the plasma concentration than that from oral rifampicin. Clinical trials on inhaled antibiotics suggest that dry powder inhalation is a patient-friendly and well-tolerated approach in treating respiratory infections compared to conventional treatments. Rifampicin, a well-known anti-TB drug given orally, is a good candidate for clinical development as a dry powder inhaler.

Meropenem-vaborbactam restoration of first-line drug efficacy and comparison of meropenem-vaborbactam-moxifloxacin versus BPaL MDR-TB regimen

BACKGROUND

Meropenem in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) and other drugs was tested to identify alternative treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

METHODS

The following were performed: (1) MIC experiments; (2) static time-kill studies (STKs) with different BLIs; and (3) a hollow fibre model system of TB (HFS-TB) studies with meropenem-vaborbactam combined with human equivalent daily doses of 20 mg/kg or 35 mg/kg rifampin, or moxifloxacin 400 mg, or linezolid 600 mg vs. bedaquiline-pretonamid-linezolid (BPaL) for MDR-TB. The studies were performed using Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) H37Rv and an MDR-TB clinical strain (named M. tuberculosis 16D) that underwent whole genome sequencing. Exponential decline models were used to calculate the kill rate constant (K) of different HFS-TB regimens.

RESULTS

Whole genome sequencing revealed mutations associated with resistance to rifampin, isoniazid, and cephalosporins. The meropenem-vaborbactam MIC of M. tuberculosis was H37Rv 2 mg/L and > 128 mg/L for M. tuberculosis 16D. Relebactam and vaborbactam improved both the potency and efficacy of meropenem in STKs. Meropenem-vaborbactam alone failed to kill M. tuberculosis 16D but killed below day 0 burden when combined with isoniazid and rifampin, with the moxifloxacin combination being the most effective and outranking bedaquiline and pretomanid. In the HFS-TB, meropenem-vaborbactam-moxifloxacin and BPaL had the highest K (log10 cfu/mL/day) of 0.31 (95% CI 0.17-0.58) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.21-0.56), while meropenem-vaborbactam-rifampin (35 mg/kg) had a K of 0.18 (95% CI 0.12-0.25). The K for meropenem-vaborbactam-moxifloxacin-linezolid demonstrated antagonism.

CONCLUSION

Adding meropenem-vaborbactam could potentially restore the efficacy of isoniazid and rifampin against MDR-TB. The meropenem-vaborbactam-moxifloxacin backbone regimen has implications for creating a new effective MDR-TB regimen.

Unexpectedly low drug exposures among Ugandan patients with TB and HIV receiving high-dose rifampicin

We characterized the pharmacokinetics of standard- and high-dose rifampicin in Ugandan adults with tuberculosis and HIV taking dolutegravir- or efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. A liver model with saturable hepatic extraction adequately described the data, and the increase in exposure between high and standard doses was 4.7-fold. This was lower than what previous reports of dose-exposure nonlinearity would predict and was ascribed to 38% lower bioavailability of the rifampicin-only top-up formulation compared to the fixed-dose combination.

Correlations among the plasma concentrations of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs and the physiological parameters influencing concentrations

Background: The plasma concentrations of the four most commonly used first-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs, isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA), are often not within the therapeutic range. Insufficient drug exposure could lead to drug resistance and treatment failure, while excessive drug levels may lead to adverse reactions. The purpose of this study was to identify the physiological parameters influencing anti-TB drug concentrations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The 2-h plasma concentrations of the four drugs were measured by using the high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Results: A total of 317 patients were included in the study. The proportions of patients with INH, RMP, EMB, and PZA concentrations within the therapeutic range were 24.3%, 31.5%, 27.8%, and 18.6%, respectively. There were positive associations between the concentrations of INH and PZA and RMP and EMB, but negative associations were observed between the concentrations of INH and RMP, INH and EMB, RMP and PZA, and EMB and PZA. In the multivariate analysis, the influencing factors of the INH concentration were the PZA concentration, total bile acid (TBA), serum potassium, dose, direct bilirubin, prealbumin (PA), and albumin; those of the RMP concentration were PZA and EMB concentrations, weight, α-l-fucosidase (AFU), drinking, and dose; those of the EMB concentration were the RMP and PZA concentrations, creatinine, TBA and indirect bilirubin; and those of the PZA concentration were INH, RMP and EMB concentrations, sex, weight, uric acid and drinking. Conclusion: The complex correlations between the concentrations of the four first-line anti-TB drugs lead to a major challenge in dose adjustment to maintain all drugs within the therapeutic window. Levels of TBA, PA, AFU, and serum potassium should also be considered when adjusting the dose of the four drugs.

Four-Month High-Dose Rifampicin Regimens for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Shorter but effective tuberculosis treatment regimens would be of value to the tuberculosis treatment community. High-dose rifampicin has been associated with more rapid and secure lung sterilization and may enable shorter tuberculosis treatment regimens. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults who were given a diagnosis of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis to a 6-month control regimen, a similar 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1200 mg/d (study regimen 1 [SR1]), or a 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1800 mg/d (study regimen 2 [SR2]). Sputum specimens were collected at regular intervals. The primary end point was a composite of treatment failure and relapse in participants who were sputum smear positive at baseline. The noninferiority margin was 8 percentage points. Using a sequence of ordered hypotheses, noninferiority of SR2 was tested first. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2020, 672 patients were enrolled in six countries, including 191 in the control group, 192 in the SR1 group, and 195 in the SR2 group. Noninferiority was not shown. Favorable responses rates were 93, 90, and 87% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively, for a country-adjusted absolute risk difference of 6.3 percentage points (90% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.5) comparing SR2 with the control group. The proportions of participants experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event were 4.0, 4.5, and 4.4% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four-month high-dose rifampicin regimens did not have dose-limiting toxicities or side effects but failed to meet noninferiority criteria compared with the standard 6-month control regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. (Funded by the MRC/Wellcome Trust/DFID Joint Global Health Trials Scheme; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02581527.)

A dose-finding study to guide use of verapamil as an adjunctive therapy in tuberculosis

Induction of mycobacterial efflux pumps is a cause of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) drug tolerance, a barrier to shortening antitubercular treatment. Verapamil inhibits Mtb efflux pumps that mediate tolerance to rifampin, a cornerstone of tuberculosis treatment. Verapamil's mycobacterial efflux pump inhibition also limits Mtb growth in macrophages in the absence of antibiotic treatment. These findings suggest that verapamil could be used as an adjunctive therapy for TB treatment shortening. However, verapamil is rapidly and substantially metabolized when co-administered with rifampin. We determined in a dose-escalation clinical trial that rifampin-induced clearance of verapamil can be countered without toxicity by the administration of larger than usual doses of verapamil. An oral dosage of 360 mg sustained-release (SR) verapamil given every 12 hours concomitantly with rifampin achieved median verapamil exposures of 903.1 ng.h/ml (AUC 0-12h), similar to those in persons receiving daily doses of 240 mg verapamil SR but not rifampin. Norverapamil:verapamil, R:S verapamil and R:S norverapamil AUC ratios were all significantly greater than those of historical controls receiving SR verapamil in the absence of rifampin, suggesting that rifampin administration favors the less-cardioactive verapamil metabolites and enantiomers. Finally, rifampin exposures were significantly greater after verapamil administration. Our findings suggest that a higher dosage of verapamil can be safely used as adjunctive treatment in rifampin-containing treatment regimens.

Buruli-RifDACC: Evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose rifampicin on outcomes in Mycobacteriumulcerans disease, a protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Ghana

Background

Buruli ulcer (BU) can lead to disfiguring ulcers and permanent disability. The 2030 World Health Organization (WHO) road map for Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) calls for major scaling up in diagnosis and management to eliminate disability due to the disease. Current treatment for BU is with daily oral rifampicin (10mg/kg dose) and clarithromycin (15mg/kg dose) for eight weeks, combined with standard gauze wound dressings. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings have been shown to irreversibly bind bacteria on wound surfaces resulting in their removal when dressings are changed. This trial aims to determine whether combining a high-dose oral rifampicin regimen with DACC dressings can improve the rate of wound healing relative to standard-dose oral rifampicin combined with DACC dressings.

Methods

This is an individual, multi-centre Phase 3 randomised controlled trial, which will be conducted in three clinical sites in Ghana. The primary outcome measure will be the mean time to clearance of viable mycobacteria. Cost and health-related quality of life data will be collected, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

Discussion

The findings from this trial could lead to a change in how BU is treated. A shorter but more efficacious regimen would lead to improved treatment outcomes and potentially substantial financial and economic savings.

Trial registration

Pan African Clinical Trials Repository (registration number; PACTR202011867644311). Registered on 30 th November 2020.

High dose rifampin for 2 months vs standard dose rifampin for 4 months, to treat TB infection: Protocol of a 3-arm randomized trial (2R2)

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an essential component for TB elimination. In order to be successfully implemented on a large scale, TPT needs to be safe, affordable and widely available in all settings. Short TPT regimens, that are less burdensome than longer regimens, to patients and health systems, are needed. Doses of rifampin higher than the standard 10mg/kg/day were tolerated in studies to reduce duration of treatment for tuberculosis disease (TBD). The objective of this trial is to test the safety of high dose rifampin monotherapy to shorten the duration of the currently recommended TPT of 4 months rifampin.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a phase 2b, randomised, controlled, parallel group, superiority, partially-blind trial. Primary outcomes are completion of treatment (as a proxy measure of tolerability) and safety. The two experimental arms comprise 60 days of (i) 20mg/kg/day or (ii) 30mg/kg/day rifampin; the control arm comprises 120 days of 10mg/kg/day rifampin as TPT. Participants are adults and children 10 years or older, eligible for TPT. Completion is the primary outcome, measured by pill count and is defined as taking minimum of 80% of treatment in 120% of allowed time; it will be tested for superiority by logistic regression. Safety outcome comprises proportion of grade 3-5 adverse events and grade 1-2 rash, adjudicated related to study drug, and resulting in permanent drug discontinuation; compared for non-inferiority between each of the two high dose arms and the standard arm, using Poisson regression. A sample size of 1,359 participants will give 80% power to detect a 10% difference in completion rates and a 1% difference in the safety outcome. The study is conducted in Canada, Indonesia and Vietnam. Enrolment is ongoing at all sites.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approvals from a local research ethics board (REB) have been obtained at all participating sites and by the trial coordinating centre. Approval has been given by drug regulatory agencies in Canada and Indonesia and by Ministry of Health in Vietnam; participants give written informed consent before participation. All data collected are non-nominal. Primary results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal when all participants have completed treatment; results of secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication at the end of study; all sites will receive the final data of participants from their sites.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03988933). Coordinating center is the study team working at McGill University Health Center-Research Institute (MUHC-RI); sponsor is the MUHC-RI; funding has been granted by Canadian Institute of Health Research (FDN-143350).

New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians

Although tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable, the lengthy treatment (generally 6 months), poor patient adherence, high inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), emergence of drug resistance, presence of comorbidities, and adverse drug reactions complicate TB therapy and drive the need for new drugs and/or regimens. Hence, new compounds are being developed, available drugs are repurposed, and the dosing of existing drugs is optimized, resulting in the largest drug development portfolio in TB history. This review highlights a selection of clinically available drug candidates that could be part of future TB regimens, including bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid, linezolid, clofazimine, optimized (high dose) rifampicin, rifapentine, and para-aminosalicylic acid. The review covers drug development history, preclinical data, PK, and current clinical development.

Safety of Rifampicin at High Dose for Difficult-to-Treat Tuberculosis: Protocol for RIAlta Phase 2b/c Trial

Previous clinical trials for drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) have shown that first-line treatment with doses of rifampicin up to 40 mg/kg are safe and increase the early treatment response for young adults with pulmonary tuberculosis. This may lead to a shorter treatment duration for those persons with TB and a good baseline prognosis, or increased treatment success for vulnerable subgroups (age > 60, diabetes, malnutrition, HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C coinfection, TB meningitis, stable chronic liver diseases). Here, we describe the design of a phase 2b/c clinical study under the hypothesis that rifampicin at 35 mg/kg is as safe for these vulnerable groups as for the participants included in previous clinical trials. RIAlta is an interventional, open-label, multicenter, prospective clinical study with matched historical controls comparing the standard DS-TB treatment (isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) with rifampicin at 35 mg/kg (HR35ZE group) vs. rifampicin at 10 mg/kg (historical HR10ZE group). The primary outcome is the incidence of grade ≥ 3 Adverse Events or Severe Adverse Events. A total of 134 participants will be prospectively included, and compared with historical matched controls with at least a 1:1 proportion. This will provide a power of 80% to detect non-inferiority with a margin of 8%. This study will provide important information for subgroups of patients that are more vulnerable to TB bad outcomes and/or treatment toxicity. Despite limitations such as non-randomized design and the use of historical controls, the results of this trial may inform the design of future more inclusive clinical trials, and improve the management of tuberculosis in subgroups of patients for whom scientific evidence is still scarce. Trial registration: EudraCT 2020-003146-36, NCT04768231.

Pharmacogenetic variability and the probability of site of action target attainment during tuberculosis meningitis treatment: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations study

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Our objective was to investigate the role of patient pharmacogenetic variability in determining site of action target attainment during tuberculous meningitis (TBM) treatment. Rifampin and isoniazid PBPK model that included SLCO1B1 and NAT2 effects on exposures respectively were obtained from literature, modified, and validated using available cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) concentrations. Population simulations of isoniazid and rifampin concentrations in brain interstitial fluid and probability of target attainment according to genotypes and M. tuberculosis MIC levels, under standard and intensified dosing, were conducted.

RESULTS

The rifampin and isoniazid model predicted steady-state drug concentration within brain interstitial fluid matched with the observed CSF concentrations. At MIC level of 0.25 mg/L, 57% and 23% of the patients with wild type and heterozygous SLCO1B1 genotype respectively attained the target in CNS with rifampin standard dosing, improving to 98% and 91% respectively with 35 mg/kg dosing. At MIC level of 0.25 mg/L, 33% of fast acetylators attained the target in CNS with isoniazid standard dosing, improving to 90% with 7.5 mg/kg dosing.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the combined effects of pharmacogenetic and M. tuberculosis MIC variability were potent determinants of target attainment in CNS. The potential for genotype-guided dosing during TBM treatment should be further explored in prospective clinical studies.

Buruli-RifDACC: Evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose rifampicin on outcomes in Mycobacterium ulcerans disease, a protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Ghana [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Background

Buruli ulcer (BU) can lead to disfiguring ulcers and permanent disability. The 2030 World Health Organization (WHO) road map for Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) calls for major scaling up in diagnosis and management to eliminate disability due to the disease. Current treatment for BU is with daily oral rifampicin (10mg/kg dose) and clarithromycin (15mg/kg dose) for eight weeks, combined with standard gauze wound dressings. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings have been shown to irreversibly bind bacteria on wound surfaces resulting in their removal when dressings are changed.  This trial aims to determine whether combining a high-dose oral rifampicin regimen with DACC dressings can improve the rate of wound healing relative to standard-dose oral rifampicin combined with DACC dressings.

Methods

This is an individual, multi-centre Phase 3 randomised controlled trial, which will be conducted in three clinical sites in Ghana. The primary outcome measure will be the mean time to clearance of viable mycobacteria. Cost and health-related quality of life data will be collected, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

Discussion

The findings from this trial could lead to a change in how BU is treated. A shorter but more efficacious regimen would lead to improved treatment outcomes and potentially substantial financial and economic savings.

Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter

Die Tuberkulose ist in Deutschland eine seltene, überwiegend gut behandelbare Erkrankung. Weltweit ist sie eine der häufigsten Infektionserkrankungen mit ca. 10 Millionen Neuerkrankungen/Jahr. Auch bei einer niedrigen Inzidenz in Deutschland bleibt Tuberkulose insbesondere aufgrund der internationalen Entwicklungen und Migrationsbewegungen eine wichtige Differenzialdiagnose. In Deutschland besteht, aufgrund der niedrigen Prävalenz der Erkrankung und der damit verbundenen abnehmenden klinischen Erfahrung, ein Informationsbedarf zu allen Aspekten der Tuberkulose und ihrer Kontrolle. Diese Leitlinie umfasst die mikrobiologische Diagnostik, die Grundprinzipien der Standardtherapie, die Behandlung verschiedener Organmanifestationen, den Umgang mit typischen unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen, die Besonderheiten in der Diagnostik und Therapie resistenter Tuberkulose sowie die Behandlung bei TB-HIV-Koinfektion. Sie geht darüber hinaus auf Versorgungsaspekte und gesetzliche Regelungen wie auch auf die Diagnosestellung und präventive Therapie einer latenten tuberkulösen Infektion ein. Es wird ausgeführt, wann es der Behandlung durch spezialisierte Zentren bedarf.

Die Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie „Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter“ soll allen in der Tuberkuloseversorgung Tätigen als Richtschnur für die Prävention, die Diagnose und die Therapie der Tuberkulose dienen und helfen, den heutigen Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Tuberkulose in Deutschland gewachsen zu sein.

Treatment shortening of drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis using high-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion (Hi-DoRi-3): a study protocol for an open-label randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment regimen for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB), comprising four companion drugs, requires a minimum duration of 6 months, and this lengthy treatment leads to poor adherence and increased toxicity. To improve rates of adherence, reduce adverse events, and lower costs, a simplified and shortened treatment regimen is warranted.

METHODS

This study is a multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial of non-inferiority design that compares a new regimen with the conventional regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary TB. The investigational group will use a regimen of high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day) with isoniazid and pyrazinamide, and the treatment will be maintained for 12 weeks after the achievement of negative conversion of sputum culture. The control group will be treated for 6 months with a World Health Organization-endorsed regimen consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin (10 mg/kg/day), ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. The primary endpoint is the proportion of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include time to unfavorable treatment outcome, time to culture conversion on liquid medium, treatment success rate at the end of treatment, proportion of recurrence at 18 months after randomization, time to recurrence after treatment completion, and adverse events of grade 3 or higher during the treatment. We predict a 10% unfavorable outcome for the control group, and 0% difference from the investigational group. Based on 80% verification power and a 2.5% one-sided significance level for a non-inferiority margin of 6%, 393 participants per group are required. Considering the 15% dropout rate, a total of 926 participants (463 in each group) will be recruited.

DISCUSSION

This study will inform on the feasibility of the treatment regimen using high-dose rifampicin with a shortened and individualized treatment duration for pulmonary TB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04485156 . Registered on July 24, 2020.

High-Dose Rifampicin Mediated Systemic Alterations of Cytokines, Chemokines, Growth Factors, Microbial Translocation Markers, and Acute-Phase Proteins in Pulmonary Tuberculosis

High-dose rifampicin (HDR) is now undergoing clinical trials to improve the efficacy of anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT). However, the influence of HDR in the modulation of different cytokines, chemokines/growth factors, microbial translocation markers (MTMs), and acute-phase proteins (APPs) in pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is not well known. PTB individuals were separated into three different arms (R10, R25, and R35) based on their rifampicin dosage. We examined the circulating levels of Type 1, Type 2, pro-inflammatory/regulatory cytokines, chemokines/growth factors, MTMs, and APPs at baseline and after completion of the second month of ATT by ELISA. The baseline levels of cytokines, chemokines/growth factors, MTMs, and APPs did not (except IL-5, IL-6, IL-17A, MCP-1, MIP-1β, GCSF, SAA, ⍺2 MG, Hp) significantly differ between the study individuals. However, at the second month, the plasma levels of Type 1 (TNFα and IFNγ), Type 2 (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13), pro-inflammatory/regulatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-17A, IL-10, and GMCSF), and APPs were significantly decreased in R35 regimen- compared to R25 and/or R10 regimen-treated PTB individuals. In contrast, the plasma levels of IL-2, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1β, GSF, and MTMs were significantly increased in the R35 regimen compared to R25 and/or R10 regimen-treated PTB individuals. Overall, our data reveal that HDR could potentially be beneficial for host immunity by altering different immune and inflammatory markers.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring During Tuberculosis Treatment

Tuberculosis (TB) patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are more likely to have low blood concentrations of the first-line anti-TB drugs (associated with poor outcomes). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for certain TB patient populations at increased risk for a poor outcome. Our objective was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of a 2-hour TDM serum sample for the first-line anti-TB drugs among HIV/TB patients, and evaluate the information gained by an additional 6-hour sample. We created a virtual (n = 1,000) HIV/TB patient population and performed pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations using published population models for isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. We performed receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of a single 2-hour serum sample with samples obtained at 2- and 6-hours post-dosing. The sensitivity of a single 2-hour serum concentration to identify HIV/TB patients with adequate serum exposures was lowest for rifampin (54.9%, 95% CI 50.79-59.41%) and highest for ethambutol (70.8%, 95% CI 66.06-72.61%) for C_max targets. Diagnostic accuracy of a single 2-hour serum sample for the AUC_0-24 target was highest for isoniazid (93%, 95% CI 90.9-94.1%) and lowest for pyrazinamide (66.3%, 95% CI 62.6-70.0%). In summary, the diagnostic performance of TDM for C_max and AUC_0-24 targets demonstrated variability across the first-line anti-TB drugs. The addition of a 6-hour serum sample lead to the highest statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) and highest increase in diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve) for rifampin for C_max and AUC. The other first-line drugs had modest/negligible increases in diagnostic accuracy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Current perspective of new anti-Wolbachial and direct-acting macrofilaricidal drugs as treatment strategies for human filariasis

Filarial diseases like lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis belong to the Neglected Tropical Diseases and remain a public health problem in endemic countries. Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis can lead to stigmatizing pathologies and present a socio-economic burden for affected people and their endemic countries. Current treatment recommendations by the WHO include mass drug administration with ivermectin for the treatment of onchocerciasis and a combination of ivermectin, albendazole and diethylcarbamazine (DEC) for the treatment of lymphatic filariasis in areas that are not co-endemic for onchocerciasis or loiasis. Limitations of these treatment strategies are due to potential severe adverse events in onchocerciasis and loiasis patients following DEC or ivermectin treatment, respectively, the lack of a macrofilaricidal efficacy of those drugs and the risk of drug resistance development. Thus, to achieve the elimination of transmission of onchocerciasis and the elimination of lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem by 2030, the WHO defined in its roadmap that new alternative treatment strategies with macrofilaricidal compounds are required. Within a collaboration of the non-profit organizations Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and partners from academia and industry, several new promising macrofilaricidal drug candidates were identified, which will be discussed in this review.

High intrapulmonary rifampicin and isoniazid concentrations are associated with rapid sputum bacillary clearance in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

Background

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics may better explain response to tuberculosis (TB) treatment than plasma pharmacokinetics. We explored these relationships by modeling bacillary clearance in sputum in adult patients on first-line treatment in Malawi.

Methods

Bacillary elimination rates (BER) were estimated using linear mixed-effects modelling of serial time-to-positivity in mycobacterial growth indicator tubes for sputum collected during the intensive phase of treatment (weeks 0–8) for microbiologically confirmed TB. Population pharmacokinetic models used plasma and intrapulmonary drug levels at 8 and 16 weeks. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were investigated using individual-level measures of drug exposure (area-under-the-concentration-time-curve [AUC] and C_max) for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, in plasma, epithelial lining fluid, and alveolar cells as covariates in the bacillary elimination models.

Results

Among 157 participants (58% human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] coinfected), drug exposure in plasma or alveolar cells was not associated with sputum bacillary clearance. Higher peak concentrations (C_max) or exposure (AUC) to rifampicin or isoniazid in epithelial lining fluid was associated with more rapid bacillary elimination and shorter time to sputum negativity. More extensive disease on baseline chest radiograph was associated with slower bacillary elimination. Clinical outcome was captured in 133 participants, with 15 (11%) unfavorable outcomes recorded (recurrent TB, failed treatment, or death). No relationship between BER and late clinical outcome was identified.

Conclusions

Greater intrapulmonary drug exposure to rifampicin or isoniazid in the epithelial lining fluid was associated with more rapid bacillary clearance. Higher doses of rifampicin and isoniazid may result in sustained high intrapulmonary drug exposure, rapid bacillary clearance, shorter treatment duration and better treatment outcomes.

Emerging data on rifampicin pharmacokinetics and approaches to optimal dosing in children with tuberculosis

INTRODUCTION

Despite its longstanding role in tuberculosis (TB) treatment, there continues to be emerging rifampicin research that has important implications for pediatric TB treatment and outstanding questions about its pharmacokinetics and optimal dose in children.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to summarize and discuss emerging data on the use of rifampicin for: 1) routine treatment of drug-susceptible TB; 2) special subpopulations such as children with malnutrition, HIV, or TB meningitis; 3) treatment shortening. We also highlight the implications of these new data for child-friendly rifampicin formulations and identify future research priorities.

EXPERT OPINION

New data consistently show low rifampicin exposures across all pediatric populations with 10-20 mg/kg dosing. Although clinical outcomes in children are generally good, rifampicin dose optimization is needed, especially given a continued push to shorten treatment durations and for specific high-risk populations of children who have worse outcomes. A pooled analysis of existing data using applied pharmacometrics would answer many of the important questions remaining about rifampicin pharmacokinetics needed to optimize doses, especially in special populations. Targeted clinical studies in children with TB meningitis and treatment shortening with high-dose rifampicin are also priorities.

Safety and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of a shorter tuberculosis treatment with high-dose pyrazinamide and rifampicin: a study protocol of a phase II clinical trial (HighShort-RP)

INTRODUCTION

Increased dosing of rifampicin and pyrazinamide seems a viable strategy to shorten treatment and prevent relapse of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB), but safety and efficacy remains to be confirmed. This clinical trial aims to explore safety and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of a high-dose pyrazinamide-rifampicin regimen.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adult patients with pulmonary TB admitted to six hospitals in Sweden and subjected to receive first-line treatment are included. Patients are randomised (1:3) to either 6-month standardised TB treatment or a 4-month regimen based on high-dose pyrazinamide (40 mg/kg) and rifampicin (35 mg/kg) along with standard doses of isoniazid and ethambutol. Plasma samples for measurement of drug exposure determined by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry are obtained at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours, at day 1 and 14. Maximal drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h) are estimated by non-compartmental analysis. Conditions for early model-informed precision dosing of high-dose pyrazinamide-rifampicin are pharmacometrically explored. Adverse drug effects are monitored throughout the study and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0. Early bactericidal activity is assessed by time to positivity in BACTEC MGIT 960 of induced sputum collected at day 0, 5, 8, 15 and week 8. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of first-line drugs are determined using broth microdilution. Disease severity is assessed with X-ray grading and a validated clinical scoring tool (TBscore II). Clinical outcome is registered according to WHO definitions (2020) in addition to occurrence of relapse after end of treatment. Primary endpoint is pyrazinamide AUC0-24h and main secondary endpoint is safety.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and the Swedish Medical Products Agency. Informed written consent is collected before study enrolment. The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04694586.

New developments in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that 25% of the world's population are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with a 5–10% lifetime risk of progression into TB disease. Early recognition of TB disease and prompt detection of drug resistance are essential to halting its global burden. Culture, direct microscopy, biomolecular tests and whole genome sequencing are approved methods of diagnosis; however, their widespread use is often curtailed owing to costs, local resources, time constraints and operator efficiency. Methods of optimising these diagnostics, in addition to developing novel techniques, are under review. The selection of an appropriate drug regimen is dependent on the susceptibility pattern of the isolate detected. At present, there are 16 new drugs under evaluation for TB treatment in phase I or II clinical trials, with an additional 22 drugs in preclinical stages. Alongside the development of these new drugs, most of which are oral medications, new shorter regimes are under evaluation. The aim of these shorter regimens is to encourage patient adherence, and prevent relapse or the evolution of further drug resistance. Screening for TB infection, especially in vulnerable populations, provides an opportunity for intervention prior to progression towards infectious TB disease. New regimens are currently under evaluation to assess the efficacy of shorter durations of treatment in this population. In addition, there is extensive research into the use of post-exposure vaccinations in this cohort. Worldwide collaboration and sharing of expertise are essential to our ultimate aim of global eradication of TB disease.

Early detection of drug resistance is essential to our goal of global eradication of TB. Tolerable drugs and shorter regimens promote patient adherence. Treating TB infection in vulnerable groups will prevent further global spread of TB disease.https://bit.ly/3oUW0SN

Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy Regimen Containing Higher Dose Rifampin for Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Tuberculous meningitis is difficult to diagnose and is associated with high mortality. Recently, several studies evaluated the intensified regimen containing higher dose rifampin to treat tuberculous meningitis. However, this topic remains to be concluded. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacokinetics parameters, safety, and survival benefits of high-dose rifampin for tuberculous meningitis.

Method

Data were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies describing an antituberculosis regimen including a higher dose of rifampin for patients with tuberculous meningitis. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated via The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 software, the synthesis of the data was shown in mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

There were six randomized control trails included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the concentration in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were significantly higher in the intervention group than the standard group [MD = 22.08, 95%CI (16.24, 27.92), p < 0.00001; MD = 0.74, 95%CI (0.42, 1.05), p < 0.00001], as well as the area under the time concentration curve between 0 and 24 h (AUC₀₋₂₄) of rifampin [MD 203.56, 95%CI (153.07, 254.05), p < 0.00001] in plasma, but the overall survival did not improve [RR = 0.92, 95%CI (0.67, 1.26), p = 0.61]. For adverse events, the results showed a statistically significant lower incidence of hypersensitivity compared with the intervention group [RR = 1.72, 95%CI (1.13, 2.62), p = 0.01]. Fortunately, other common adverse drug reactions such as liver injury, neurological events, myelosuppression, and cardiotoxicity had no significant increase [RR = 0.98, 95%CI (0.77, 1.26), p = 0.90; RR = 1.10, 95%CI (0.94, 1.30), p = 0.23; RR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.59, 1.13), p = 0.22; RR = 1.11, 95%CI (0.66, 1.86), p = 0.70].

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that the intensified treatment regimen including a higher dose of rifampin significantly increased the rifampin concentration both in the plasma and CSF, and it was safe in patients with tuberculous meningitis, but resulted in no improvement in survival rates.

Has the Time Come for Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of First-Line and WHO Group A Antituberculosis Drugs?

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health issue, with approximately 10 million people being infected each year, and is the leading cause of mortality from infectious disease, with 1.5 million deaths a year. Optimal TB treatment requires a combination of drugs for an adequate treatment duration owing to persistent organisms, hardly accessible infection sites, and a high risk of resistance selection. Long-term therapy increases the risk of patients' loss of adherence, adverse drug reactions, and drug-drug interactions, potentially leading to treatment failure. The high interpatient variability of TB drug exposure is another point eliciting interest in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize treatment. Studies reporting clinically relevant exposure thresholds, which might be proposed as targets toward treatment personalization, are discussed. Practical TDM strategies have also been reported to circumvent issues related to delayed drug absorption and the need for multiple samples when evaluating the area under the curve of drug concentrations. The need for treatment individualization is further emphasized because of the development of multidrug-resistant TB or extensively drug-resistant TB. Finally, the willingness to shorten the treatment duration while maintaining success is also a driver for ensuring adequate exposure to TB drugs with TDM. The aim of the present review was to underline the role of TDM in drug-susceptible TB and World Health Organization group A TB drugs.

High-dose rifamycins in the treatment of TB: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in using high-dose rifamycin (HDR) regimens in TB treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HDR regimens remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing HDR to standard-dose rifamycin (SDR) regimens.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies comparing daily therapy with HDRs to SDRs. Rifamycins included rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Our primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs), with secondary outcomes of death, all adverse events, SAE by organ and efficacy outcomes of 2-month culture conversion and relapse. This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020142519).

RESULTS

We identified 9057 articles and included 13 studies with 6168 participants contributing 7930 person-years (PY) of follow-up (HDR: 3535 participants, 4387 PY; SDR: 2633 participants, 3543 PY). We found no significant difference in the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SAE between HDR and SDR (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.23, I ²=41%). There was no significant difference when analysis was limited to SAE possibly, probably or likely medication-related (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41, I ²=0%); studies with low risk of bias (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, I ²=44%); or studies using rifampicin (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0. 0.75-1.32, I ²=38%). No significant differences were noted in pooled outcomes of death, 2-month culture conversion and relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

HDRs were not associated with a significant difference in SAEs, 2-month culture conversion or death. Further studies are required to identify specific groups who may benefit from HDR.

High-dose rifampicin for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is one of the most serious types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and has caused distress to human. Effective treatment is particularly important. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of high-dose and standard-dose rifampicin.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to identify randomized controlled trials that reported high-dose rifampicin in treatment of patients with TBM. The retrieval time is limited from inception to June 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using STATA 12.0 software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 12 studies involving 1596 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed no significant differences in 6-month mortality, 9-month mortality, Grade I-II AE, Grade III-V AE, hepatotoxicity, hepatotoxicity Grade I-II and cardiologic events between high-dose rifampicin (or high-dose rifampicin plus moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) and standard-dose groups. The log(C_max ) (WMD 0.69, 95%CI 0.59-0.79, p 0.001) and log(AUC_0-24h ) (WMD 0.79, 95%CI 0.71-0.88, p 0.001) were higher with high-dose rifampicin. Subgroup analysis revealed the rise of log(C_max ) in high-dose rifampicin orally was consistent with intravenous administration compared with the control (WMD 0.69, 95%CI 0.66-0.73, p 0.001).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

High-dose rifampicin was not a protective factor for 6-month mortality, despite increased plasma C_max and AUC_0-24h . However, the above conclusions are still required to be verified through more RCTs due to the limited quantity of included studies.

Human filariasis-contributions of the Litomosoides sigmodontis and Acanthocheilonema viteae animal model

Filariae are vector-borne parasitic nematodes that are endemic worldwide, in tropical and subtropical regions. Important human filariae spp. include Onchocerca volvulus, Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia spp., and Loa loa and Mansonella spp. causing onchocerciasis (river blindness), lymphatic filariasis (lymphedema and hydrocele), loiasis (eye worm), and mansonelliasis, respectively. It is estimated that over 1 billion individuals live in endemic regions where filarial diseases are a public health concern contributing to significant disability adjusted life years (DALYs). Thus, efforts to control and eliminate filarial diseases were already launched by the WHO in the 1970s, especially against lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis, and are mainly based on mass drug administration (MDA) of microfilaricidal drugs (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, albendazole) to filarial endemic areas accompanied with vector control strategies with the goal to reduce the transmission. With the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it was decided to eliminate transmission of onchocerciasis and stop lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem by 2030. It was also requested that novel drugs and treatment strategies be developed. Mouse models provide an important platform for anti-filarial drug research in a preclinical setting. This review presents an overview about the Litomosoides sigmodontis and Acanthocheilonema viteae filarial mouse models and their role in immunological research as well as preclinical studies about novel anti-filarial drugs and treatment strategies.

Precision-Enhancing Risk Stratification Tools for Selecting Optimal Treatment Durations in Tuberculosis Clinical Trials

Rationale: No evidence-based tools exist to enhance precision in the selection of patient-specific optimal treatment durations to study in tuberculosis clinical trials. Objectives: To develop risk stratification tools that assign patients with tuberculosis into risk groups of unfavorable outcome and inform selection of optimal treatment duration for each patient strata to study in clinical trials. Methods: Publicly available data from four phase 3 trials, each evaluating treatment duration shortening from 6 to 4 months, were used to develop parametric time-to-event models that describe unfavorable outcomes. Regimen, baseline, and on-treatment characteristics were evaluated as predictors of outcomes. Exact regression coefficients of predictors were used to assign risk groups and predict optimal treatment durations. Measurements and Main Results: The parametric model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72. A six-item risk score (HIV status, smear grade, sex, cavitary disease status, body mass index, and Month 2 culture status) successfully grouped participants into low (1,060/3,791; 28%), moderate (1,740/3,791; 46%), and high (991/3,791; 26%) risk, requiring treatment durations of 4, 6, and greater than 6 months, respectively, to reach a target cure rate of 93% when receiving standard-dose rifamycin-containing regimens. With current one-duration-fits-all approaches, high-risk groups have a 3.7-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.7-5.1) and 2.4-fold (1.9-2.9) higher hazard risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with low- and moderate-risk groups, respectively. Four-month regimens were noninferior to the standard 6-month regimen in the low-risk group. Conclusions: Our model discrimination was modest but consistent with current models of unfavorable outcomes. Our results showed that stratified medicine approaches are feasible and may achieve high cure rates in all patients with tuberculosis. An interactive risk stratification tool is provided to facilitate decision-making in the regimen development pathway.

A hydrogel-based implantable multidrug antitubercular formulation outperforms oral delivery

We present a non-immunogenic, injectable, low molecular weight, amphiphilic hydrogel-based drug delivery system (TB-Gel) that can entrap a cocktail of four front-line antitubercular drugs, isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. We showed that TB-Gel is more effective than oral delivery of the combination of four drugs in reducing the mycobacterial infection in mice. Results show that half the dose of chemotherapeutic drugs is sufficient to achieve a comparable therapeutic effect to that of oral delivery.

Increased bactericidal activity but dose-limiting intolerability at 50 mg·kg-1 rifampicin

Background

Accumulating data indicate that higher rifampicin doses are more effective and shorten tuberculosis (TB) treatment duration. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and 7- and 14-day early bactericidal activity (EBA) of increasing doses of rifampicin. Here we report the results of the final cohorts of PanACEA HIGHRIF1, a dose escalation study in treatment-naive adult smear-positive patients with TB.

Methods

Patients received, in consecutive cohorts, 40 or 50 mg·kg⁻¹ rifampicin once daily in monotherapy (day 1–7), supplemented with standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol between days 8 and 14.

Results

In the 40 mg·kg⁻¹ cohort (n=15), 13 patients experienced a total of 36 adverse events during monotherapy, resulting in one treatment discontinuation. In the 50 mg·kg⁻¹ cohort (n=17), all patients experienced adverse events during monotherapy, 93 in total; 11 patients withdrew or stopped study medication. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate and tolerability rather than safety related, i.e. gastrointestinal disorders, pruritis, hyperbilirubinaemia and jaundice. There was a more than proportional increase in the rifampicin geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 12 h (AUC_0–24 h) for 50 mg·kg⁻¹ compared with 40 mg·kg⁻¹; 571 (range 320–995) versus 387 (range 201–847) mg·L⁻¹·h, while peak exposures saw proportional increases. Protein-unbound exposure after 50 mg·kg⁻¹ (11% (range 8–17%)) was comparable with lower rifampicin doses. Rifampicin exposures and bilirubin concentrations were correlated (Spearman's ρ=0.670 on day 3, p<0.001). EBA increased considerably with dose, with the highest seen after 50 mg·kg⁻¹: 14-day EBA −0.427 (95% CI −0.500– −0.355) log₁₀CFU·mL⁻¹·day⁻¹.

Conclusion

Although associated with an increased bactericidal effect, the 50 mg·kg⁻¹ dose was not well tolerated. Rifampicin at 40 mg·kg⁻¹ was well tolerated and therefore selected for evaluation in a phase IIc treatment-shortening trial.

While bactericidal activity continues to increase with dose, for the first time we identified dose-limiting intolerability for rifampicin dosed at 50 mg·kg⁻¹; 40 mg·kg⁻¹ seems the optimal tolerable dose for evaluation in TB treatment-shortening trialshttps://bit.ly/37dUIuB

Rifampicin Can Be Given as Flat-Dosing Instead of Weight-Band Dosing

BACKGROUND

The weight-band dosing in tuberculosis treatment regimen has been implemented in clinical practice for decades. Patients will receive different number of fixed dose combination tablets according to their weight-band. However, some analysis has shown that weight was not the best covariate to explain variability of rifampicin exposure. Furthermore, the rationale for using weight-band dosing instead of flat-dosing becomes questionable. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the average and the variability of rifampicin exposure after weight-band dosing and flat-dosing.

METHODS

Rifampicin exposure were simulated using previously published population pharmacokinetics model at dose 10-40 mg/kg for weight-band dosing and dose 600-2400 mg for flat-dosing. The median area under the curve (AUC0-24 h) after day 7 and 14 were compared as well as the variability of each dose group between weight-band and flat-dosing.

RESULTS

The difference of median AUC0-24 h of all dose groups between flat-dosing and weight-band dosing were considered low (< 20%) except for the lowest dose. At the dose of 10 mg/kg (600 mg for flat-dosing), flat-dosing resulted in higher median AUC0-24h compared to the weight-band dosing. A marginal decrease in between-patient variability was predicted for weight-band dosing compared to flat-dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-band dosing yields a small and non-clinically relevant decrease in variability of AUC0-24h.

Dynamics of sputum conversion during effective tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Two weeks' isolation is widely recommended for people commencing treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The evidence that this corresponds to clearance of potentially infectious tuberculous mycobacteria in sputum is not well established. This World Health Organization-commissioned review investigated sputum sterilisation dynamics during TB treatment.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

For the main analysis, 2 systematic literature searches of OvidSP MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health, and EBSCO CINAHL Plus were conducted to identify studies with data on TB infectiousness (all studies to search date, 1 December 2017) and all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for drug-susceptible TB (from 1 January 1990 to search date, 20 February 2018). Included articles reported on patients receiving effective treatment for culture-confirmed drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. The outcome of interest was sputum bacteriological conversion: the proportion of patients having converted by a defined time point or a summary measure of time to conversion, assessed by smear or culture. Any study design with 10 or more particpants was considered. Record sifting and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Random effects meta-analyses were performed. A narrative summary additionally describes the results of a systematic search for data evaluating infectiousness from humans to experimental animals (PubMed, all studies to 27 March 2018). Other evidence on duration of infectiousness-including studies reporting on cough dynamics, human tuberculin skin test conversion, or early bactericidal activity of TB treatments-was outside the scope of this review. The literature search was repeated on 22 November 2020, at the request of the editors, to identify studies published after the previous censor date. Four small studies reporting 3 different outcome measures were identified, which included no data that would alter the findings of the review; they are not included in the meta-analyses. Of 5,290 identified records, 44 were included. Twenty-seven (61%) were RCTs and 17 (39%) were cohort studies. Thirteen studies (30%) reported data from Africa, 12 (27%) from Asia, 6 (14%) from South America, 5 (11%) from North America, and 4 (9%) from Europe. Four studies reported data from multiple continents. Summary estimates suggested smear conversion in 9% of patients at 2 weeks (95% CI 3%-24%, 1 single study [N = 1]), and 82% of patients at 2 months of treatment (95% CI 78%-86%, N = 10). Among baseline smear-positive patients, solid culture conversion occurred by 2 weeks in 5% (95% CI 0%-14%, N = 2), increasing to 88% at 2 months (95% CI 84%-92%, N = 20). At equivalent time points, liquid culture conversion was achieved in 3% (95% CI 1%-16%, N = 1) and 59% (95% CI 47%-70%, N = 8). Significant heterogeneity was observed. Further interrogation of the data to explain this heterogeneity was limited by the lack of disaggregation of results, including by factors such as HIV status, baseline smear status, and the presence or absence of lung cavitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found that most patients remained culture positive at 2 weeks of TB treatment, challenging the view that individuals are not infectious after this interval. Culture positivity is, however, only 1 component of infectiousness, with reduced cough frequency and aerosol generation after TB treatment initiation likely to also be important. Studies that integrate our findings with data on cough dynamics could provide a more complete perspective on potential transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by individuals on treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 85226.

Standard versus high dose of rifampicin in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

A growing amount of evidence suggests that the rifampicin dosing currently recommended for tuberculosis treatment could be associated with inadequate exposure and unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to compare clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety outcomes of standard and higher rifampicin dosing.

METHODS

Data sources were MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis that included experimental or observational studies comparing 8-week sputum culture conversion, treatment failure, or safety outcomes in naïve patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated with standard (10 mg/kg) or higher doses of rifampicin.

RESULTS

Of a total of 9683 citations screened, eight randomized controlled trials were included, accounting for 1897 subjects; the risk of bias was low in three studies, high in two and intermediate in three. At week 8 a higher proportion of patients in the high-dose group obtained a sputum culture conversion than those in the standard dose group (83.7% versus 80.6%, RR 1.06; 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p 0.028); this result was confirmed in the sub-analysis including patients treated with a rifampicin dose of ≥20 mg/kg, but not in those treated with 11-19 mg/kg. Events of treatment failure at end of treatment showed no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.84; 95%CI 0.59-1.21, p 0.362). In the analysis evaluating safety outcome, the difference in the occurrence of a grade 3 or 4 liver toxicity or adverse drug reactions leading to discontinuation was not significant at the statistical analysis among the groups (7.2% versus 5.4%, RR 1.19; 95%CI 0.81-1.73, p 0.370, and 1.5% versus 0.6%, RR 2.31; 95%CI 0.65-8.21, p 0.195, respectively). No statistical heterogeneity among studies was observed for each outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of rifampicin were associated with an increased rate of sputum culture conversion at 8 weeks of treatment, particularly in patients receiving ≥20 mg/kg.

Higher Dosing of Rifamycins Does Not Increase Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

Improvements in the translational value of preclinical models can allow more-successful and more-focused research on shortening the duration of tuberculosis treatment. Although the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) is considered a valuable addition to the drug development pipeline, its exact role has not been fully determined yet. Since the strategy of increasing the dose of rifamycins is being evaluated for its treatment-shortening potential, additional in vitro modeling is important. Therefore, we assessed increased dosing of rifampin and rifapentine in our HFIM in order to gain more insight into the place of the HFIM in the drug development pipeline. Total and free-fraction concentrations corresponding to daily dosing of 2.7, 10, and 50 mg of rifampin/kg of body weight, as well as 600 mg and 1,500 mg rifapentine, were assessed in our HFIM using the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Drug activity and the emergence of drug resistance were assessed by CFU counting and subsequent mathematical modeling over 14 days, and pharmacokinetic exposures were checked. We found that increasing rifampin exposure above what is expected with the standard dose did not result in higher antimycobacterial activity. For rifapentine, only the highest concentration showed increased activity, but the clinical relevance of this observation is questionable. Moreover, for both drugs, the emergence of resistance was unrelated to exposure. In conclusion, in the simplest experimental setup, the results of the HFIM did not fully correspond to preexisting clinical data. The inclusion of additional parameters and readouts in this preclinical model could be of interest for proper assessment of the translational value of the HFIM.

Pharmacokinetics of rifampicin after repeated intra-tracheal administration of amorphous and crystalline powder formulations to Sprague Dawley rats

Rifampicin is one of the key drugs used to treat tuberculosis and is currently used orally. The use of higher oral doses of rifampicin is desired for better therapeutic efficacy, but this is accompanied by increased risk of systemic toxicity thus limiting its recommended oral dose to 10 mg/kg per day. Inhaled delivery of rifampicin is a potential alternative mode of delivery, to achieve high drug concentrations in both the lung and potentially the systemic circulation. In addition, rifampicin exists either as amorphous or crystalline particles, which may show different pharmacokinetic behaviour. However, disposition behaviour of amorphous and crystalline rifampicin formulations after inhaled high-dose delivery is unknown. In this study, rifampicin pharmacokinetics after intra-tracheal administration of carrier-free, amorphous and crystalline powder formulations to Sprague Dawley rats were evaluated. The formulations were administered once daily for seven days by oral, intra-tracheal and oral plus intra-tracheal delivery, and the pharmacokinetics were studied on day 0 and day 6. Intra-tracheal administration of the amorphous formulation resulted in a higher area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) compared to the crystalline formulation. For both formulations, the intra-tracheal delivery led to significantly higher AUC compared to the oral delivery at the same dose suggesting higher rifampicin bioavailability from the inhaled route. Increasing the intra-tracheal dose resulted in a more than dose proportional AUC suggesting non-linear pharmacokinetics of rifampicin from the inhaled route. Upon repeated administration for seven days, no significant decrease in the AUCs were observed suggesting the absence of rifampicin induced enzyme auto-induction in this study. The present study suggests an advantage of inhaled delivery of rifampicin in achieving higher drug bioavailability compared to the oral route.

Rifampicin and Isoniazid Maximal Concentrations are Below Efficacy-associated Thresholds in the Majority of Patients: Time to Increase the Doses?

BACKGROUND

The treatment of drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) is highly effective; however, many patients have suboptimal drug exposure, which possibly explains treatment failures and selection of resistance. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and determinants of suboptimal maximal concentrations (C_max) for anti-TB drugs.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted in patients receiving first-line anti-TB treatment. At two early time points (T1 and T2), blood samples were withdrawn 2 hours post-dose (C_max) and drug concentrations were measured. Data were expressed as medians (interquartile ranges).

RESULTS

The study included 199 participants: 72.9% were male and the median age was 39.8 years (27.5-51.4). The median C_max at T1 and T2 were 7950 ng/mL and 7122 ng/mL (rifampicin), 3260 ng/mL and 3185 ng/mL (isoniazid), 4210 ng/mL and 5742 ng/mL (ethambutol), and 31 008 ng/mL and 30 352 ng/mL (pyrazinamide), respectively. Higher doses/kg and other variables (being born in Italy and female gender for rifampicin, older age and proton pump inhibitor use for isoniazid, female gender and older age for pyrazinamide) were identified by multivariate linear regression analysis. Participants with a higher body mass index received lower doses/kg of all anti-TB drugs. Suboptimal C_max at T1 and T2 were observed in 60% and 66% (rifampicin), 54% and 55% (isoniazid), 33% and 39% (ethambutol), 20% and 11% (pyrazinamide) of patients. Despite 21% of patients at T1 and 24% at T2 showing two or more drugs with suboptimal exposure, no effect on treatment outcome was observed.

DISCUSSION

The majority of patients receiving first-line anti-TB drugs had low isoniazid and rifampin C_max. Increased doses or the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in selected patients may be advised.

Shortened Tuberculosis Treatment for People with HIV in South Africa. A Model-based Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Rationale: Recent tuberculosis treatment trials failed to show that some 4-month (4m) regimens were noninferior to conventional 6-month (6m) regimens for a composite clinical outcome. Novel shortened regimens may still have important clinical and economic benefits in populations with high loss to follow-up (LTFU) and in subgroups such as people with human immunodeficiency virus.Objectives: To identify scenarios in which a novel 4m regimen would be preferred to a conventional 6m regimen for treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis in people with human immunodeficiency virus in South Africa, in terms of short-term and long-term clinical and economic outcomes.Methods: We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications-International microsimulation model to project outcomes modeled on participants in the OFLOTUB trial. For calibration purposes, we did a base case analysis by applying trial-informed parameters for the 4m/6m regimens, including monthly LTFU during treatment (0.68%/0.83%), average monthly tuberculosis recurrence (0.65%/0.31%), and monthly drug costs (U.S. dollars [USD]25.90/3.70). We then evaluated different scenarios and 4m regimen characteristics, varying key parameters, including LTFU (informed by observational cohort data), recurrence, and cost. We projected outcomes, including 2-year mortality and life expectancy. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, evaluating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a 4m versus 6m regimen.Results: In the base case model analysis, risk of the composite unfavorable outcome in the 4m/6m groups was 19.8%/15.9%, similar to the trial; projected life expectancies were 22.1/22.3 years. In analyses of alternative scenarios and 4m regimen characteristics, a 4m regimen yielded lower risk of the composite unfavorable outcome than the conventional 6m regimen if LTFU increased to greater than 3.5%/mo or if average recurrence after a 4m regimen decreased to less than 0.45%/mo, and it yielded higher life expectancy if LTFU was greater than 3.5%/mo or if recurrence was less than 0.5%/mo. A 4m regimen was not cost-effective in the base case but became cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <USD940/yr of life saved) in two-way sensitivity analysis; for example, if LTFU was greater than or equal to 5.3%/mo and either average recurrence was less than or equal to 0.5%/mo or drug cost was less than or equal to USD15/mo.Conclusions: A novel shortened tuberculosis treatment regimen could improve outcomes such as survival despite conferring a higher recurrence risk, particularly in settings where LTFU is higher than that seen in recent trials.

The Impact of First-Line Anti-Tubercular Drugs' Pharmacokinetics on Treatment Outcome: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis remains the major public health problem besides tremendous efforts to combat it. Most tuberculosis patients are treated with a standard dose of first-line anti-TB drugs. The cure rate, however, varies from patient to patient. Various factors have been related to anti-TB treatment failure. In recent years, studies associating lower plasma concentrations of anti-TB drugs with poor treatment outcomes are emerging although the results are inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the impact of first-line anti-tubercular drugs pharmacokinetics on treatment outcome.

METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for articles published in the English language between January 2010 to June 2020 was conducted to identify eligible studies describing associations of first-line anti-tubercular drug pharmacokinetics with treatment outcomes. The primary outcomes considered were pharmacokinetics parameter results and its association with treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The search identified 1754 articles of which twelve articles; ten prospective observational studies and two controlled clinical trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority of the studies showed target concentrations for the first-line anti-tubercular drugs below the current standard range. Among the twelve studies, eleven studies assessed rifampicin pharmacokinetics of which eight reported association of drug concentration and treatment outcomes. Similarly, four out of eight and three out of seven reported drug concentration and treatment outcome association for isoniazid and pyrazinamide, respectively. Despite the low plasma concentration, a favorable treatment outcome was achieved for the bulk of the patients. Irrespective of the inconsistency, an increase in exposure to rifampicin improved the outcome, and lower rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide concentration are associated with poor outcome. No data are available for ethambutol associating its pharmacokinetics with treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of first-line antitubercular drugs can influence treatment outcomes. Further controlled clinical studies are, however, required to establish these relationships.

A review of recent advances in anti-tubercular drug development

Tuberculosis is a global threat but in particular affects people from developing countries. It is thought that nearly a third of the population of the world live with its causative bacteria in a dormant form. Although tuberculosis is a curable disease, the chances of cure become slim as the disease becomes multidrug-resistant and the situation gets even worse as the disease becomes extensively drug-resistant. After approximately 5 decades without any new TB drug in the pipeline, there has been some good news in the recent years with the discovery of new drugs such as bedaquiline and delamanid as well as the discovery of new classes of anti-tubercular drugs. Some old drugs such as clofazimine, linezolid and many others which were not previously indicated for tuberculosis have been also repurposed for tuberculosis and they are performing well.