1
|
Prendki V, Malézieux-Picard A, Azurmendi L, Sanchez JC, Vuilleumier N, Carballo S, Roux X, Reny JL, Zekry D, Stirnemann J, Garin N. Accuracy of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, serum amyloid A and neopterin for low-dose CT-scan confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239606. [PMID: 32997689 PMCID: PMC7526885 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The diagnosis of pneumonia based on semiology and chest X-rays is frequently inaccurate, particularly in elderly patients. Older (C-reactive protein (CRP); procalcitonin (PCT)) or newer (Serum amyloid A (SAA); neopterin (NP)) biomarkers may increase the accuracy of pneumonia diagnosis, but data are scarce and conflicting. We assessed the accuracy of CRP, PCT, SAA, NP and the ratios CRP/NP and SAA/NP in a prospective observational cohort of elderly patients with suspected pneumonia. Methods We included consecutive patients more than 65 years old, with at least one respiratory symptom and one symptom or laboratory finding suggestive of infection, and a working diagnosis of pneumonia. Low-dose CT scan and comprehensive microbiological testing were done in all patients. The index tests, CRP, PCT, SAA and NP, were obtained within 24 hours. The reference diagnosis was assessed a posteriori by a panel of experts considering all available data, including patients’ outcome. We used area under the curve (AUROC) and Youden index to assess the accuracy and obtain optimal cut-off of the index tests. Results 200 patients (median age 84 years) were included; 133 (67%) had pneumonia. AUROCs for the diagnosis of pneumonia was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56–0.72) for CRP; 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51–0.68) for PCT; 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52–0.69) for SAA; 0.41 (95% CI: 0.32–0.49) for NP; 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55–0.71) for CRP/NP; and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.53–0.70) for SAA/NP. No cut-off resulted in satisfactory sensitivity or specificity. Conclusions Accuracy of traditional (CRP, PCT) and newly proposed biomarkers (SAA, NP) and ratios of CRP/NP and SAA/NP was too low to help diagnosing pneumonia in the elderly. CRP had the highest AUROC. Clinical Trial Registration NCT 02467092
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Prendki
- Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Division of Internal Medicine for the Aged, Geneva University Hospitals, Thônex, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Astrid Malézieux-Picard
- Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Division of Internal Medicine for the Aged, Geneva University Hospitals, Thônex, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Leire Azurmendi
- Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Medical Faculty, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Charles Sanchez
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Medical Faculty, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Vuilleumier
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Medical Faculty, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Diagnostic Department, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Carballo
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Roux
- Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Division of Internal Medicine for the Aged, Geneva University Hospitals, Thônex, Switzerland
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Luc Reny
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dina Zekry
- Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Division of Internal Medicine for the Aged, Geneva University Hospitals, Thônex, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Stirnemann
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Garin
- Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Riviera Chablais Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Méndez R, Aldás I, Menéndez R. Biomarkers in Community-Acquired Pneumonia (Cardiac and Non-Cardiac). J Clin Med 2020; 9:E549. [PMID: 32085380 PMCID: PMC7073979 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains the first cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide due to infection. Several aspects such as severity and host response are related to its clinical course and outcome. Beyond the acute implications that the infection provokes in the host, pneumonia also has long-term negative consequences. Among them, cardiovascular complications and mortality are the most outstanding. Therefore, an adequate recognition and stratification of the risk of complications and mortality is crucial. Many biomarkers have been studied for these reasons, considering that each biomarker mirrors a different aspect. Moreover, the clinical application of many of them is still being deliberated because of their limitations and the heterogeneity of the disease. In this review, we examine some of the most relevant biomarkers that we have classified as cardiac and non-cardiac. We discuss some classic biomarkers and others that are considered novel biomarkers, which are mainly involved in cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl Méndez
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe/Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avda, Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Irene Aldás
- University of Valencia, Medicine Faculty, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain
| | - Rosario Menéndez
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe/Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avda, Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- University of Valencia, Medicine Faculty, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|