Characterizing Nebulizer Performance for Methacholine Challenge Tests

Two-minute tidal breathing methacholine bronchial challenge: Comparison of two jet nebulisers

BACKGROUND

The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline for methacholine challenge testing (MCT) recommended using the English Wright (EW) nebuliser. However, other brands of nebulisers are also indicated to be acceptable for this technique, but further validation of nebuliser performance is recommended.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC₂₀ -FEV₁ ) measured by using EW nebuliser and DV 646 nebuliser.

METHODS

Subjects were randomly assigned to undergo 2-min tidal breathing methacholine challenge with either EW or DV 646 nebuliser on two separate days, which were at least 24 hours but not more than 7 days apart. The above procedure was repeated for each subject in 1 month, but the nebulisers were selected in a reverse order.

RESULTS

The study includes 15 mild and stable asthmatic patients. The geometric means (SD) of methacholine PC₂₀ measured with using EW and DV 646 nebulisers were 1.82 (6.38) mg/mL versus 0.83 (1.82) mg/mL, respectively in the initial two visits and 2.56 (6.29) mg/mL versus 0.78 (1.40) mg/mL in the following two visits (both P < 0.05). There are well correlations between PC20-EW1 and PC20-EW2 (r = 0.99, P < 0.01), PC20-DV1 and PC20-DV2 (r = 0.88, P < 0.01), and between PC20-EW1 and PC20-DV1 (r = 0.91, P < 0.01), PC20-EW2 and PC20-DV2 (r = 0.78, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PC₂₀ -FEV₁ measured by using the two conventional jet nebulisers was both repeatable and the results were highly correlated.

A Dose-Response Study Examining the Use of Methacholine Challenge to Demonstrate Local Therapeutic Equivalence of the Salmeterol Component of Generic Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Combination Products

Background: Asthma is widely treated using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combinations, for example, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FPS) dry powder inhaler, marketed as Advair^® Diskus^®. Some regulators require generics to demonstrate local (lung) therapeutic equivalence (LTE) for each component of the FPS reference, ideally with a dose-response within the approved FPS dose range. We sought to develop a methacholine challenge (MeCh) LTE methodology for assessing the LABA (salmeterol) component of FPS. Methods: Forty-six patients with asthma received single doses of albuterol (active control; 90 or 180 μg), FPS (100/50 or 200/100 μg), and placebo on 5 separate study days. Spirometry and MeCh were performed 1, 6, and 10 hours after study drug inhalation. Primary endpoint was provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC₂₀). Study entry required screening PC₂₀ ≤8 mg/mL, with a greater than fourfold increase (and PC₂₀ ≤128 mg/mL) after 180 μg albuterol. Results: Both albuterol (90 and 180 μg) and FPS (100/50 and 200/100 μg) significantly increased PC₂₀ compared with placebo (sustained 6 and 10 hours postdose with FPS but not albuterol). The dose-response slopes (95% confidence interval) estimated 1 hour after treatment were 0.374 (-0.068 to 0.815) and 0.310 (-0.135 to 0.754) between low and high doses of albuterol and FPS, respectively, both nonsignificant. Slopes were shallower than those available in the literature for albuterol and formoterol, but similar to those for salmeterol. Conclusions: These data confirm that the bronchoprotective effect of FPS lasts longer than that of albuterol. The shallow dose-response slope we observed for albuterol is contrary to previous reports, probably due to the measurement of PC₂₀ beginning at 1 hour postdose. The results suggest that use of MeCh to assess LTE for salmeterol formulations may be more difficult to accomplish than it is for albuterol and formoterol products.

Direct bronchoprovocation test methods: history 1945-2018

INTRODUCTION

Bronchoprovocation inhalation challenge tests with direct acting stimuli (e.g. methacholine) are widely used clinically to aid in the diagnosis of asthma. Areas covered: The history of direct challenges with histamine and muscarinic agonists is reviewed. This began with parenteral administration of stimuli with responses monitored clinically and by VC, progressing to inhalation dose-response challenges monitored by FEV₁ and FEV₁/VC ratio, both (the challenge method and the technology to measure FEV₁) developed by Robert Tiffeneau in the mid-1940s. Careful standardization of methods has become appreciated albeit after-the-fact. Recent guidelines recommend standardizing the methacholine PD₂₀ at 400 μg above which a methacholine challenge is considered negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The methacholine inhalation test is highly sensitive for a diagnosis of current asthma when symptoms under evaluation are clinically current and when methacholine is inhaled without deep inhalations. Under these circumstances, a methacholine PD₂₀ > 400 μg excludes current asthma with reasonable certainty. PD₂₀ values >25 μg and ≤400 μg will have a variable specificity and positive predictive value for asthma which increases the lower the PD₂₀ and the higher the pre-test probability for a diagnosis of asthma. A PD₂₀ ≤25 μg has high specificity and low sensitivity for asthma.