Exercise Tolerance according to the Definition of Airflow Obstruction in Smokers

Spirometry for the diagnosis of airway obstruction in patients with risk factors for COPD: the GOLD and lower limit of normal criteria

OBJECTIVE

The identification of persistent airway obstruction is key to making a diagnosis of COPD. The GOLD guidelines suggest a fixed criterion-a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 70%-to define obstruction, although other guidelines suggest that a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < the lower limit of normal (LLN) is the most accurate criterion.

METHODS

This was an observational study of individuals ≥ 40 years of age with risk factors for COPD who were referred to our pulmonary function laboratory for spirometry. Respiratory symptoms were also recorded. We calculated the prevalence of airway obstruction and of no airway obstruction, according to the GOLD criterion (GOLD+ and GOLD-, respectively) and according to the LLN criterion (LLN+ and LLN-, respectively). We also evaluated the level of agreement between the two criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 241 individuals were included. Airway obstruction was identified according to the GOLD criterion in 42 individuals (17.4%) and according to the LLN criterion in 23 (9.5%). The overall level of agreement between the two criteria was good (k = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.81), although it was lower among the individuals ≥ 70 years of age (k = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.12-0.72). The proportion of obese individuals was lower in the GOLD+/LLN+ category than in the GOLD+/LLN- category (p = 0.03), as was the median DLCO (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the GOLD criterion appears to be associated with a higher prevalence of COPD. The agreement between the GOLD and LLN criteria also appears to be good, albeit weaker in older individuals. The use of different criteria to define airway obstruction seems to identify individuals with different characteristics. It is essential to understand the clinical meaning of discordance between such criteria. Until more data are available, we recommend a holistic, individualized approach to, as well as close follow-up of, patients with discordant results for airway obstruction.

Mechanisms of Exertional Dyspnea in Patients with Mild COPD and a Low Resting DLCO

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lower resting diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) often report troublesome dyspnea during exercise although the mechanisms are not clear. We postulated that in such individuals, exertional dyspnea is linked to relatively high inspiratory neural drive (IND) due, in part, to the effects of reduced ventilatory efficiency. This cross-sectional study included 28 patients with GOLD I COPD stratified into two groups with (n = 15) and without (n = 13) DL_CO less than the lower limit of normal (<LLN; Global Lung Function Initiative criteria) and 16 healthy controls. We compared dyspnea (Borg scale), IND (by diaphragm electromyography), ventilatory equivalent for CO₂ (V̇_E/V̇CO₂), and respiratory mechanics during incremental cycle exercise in the three groups. Spirometry and resting lung volumes were similar between COPD groups. During exercise, dyspnea, IND and V̇_E/V̇CO₂ were higher at equivalent work rates (WR) in the DL_CO<LLN group compared with the other two groups (all p < 0.05). In patients with DL_CO<LLN, severe respiratory mechanical constraints, indicated by end-inspiratory lung volume of approximately 90% of total lung capacity, occurred at a lower WR than the other two groups (p < 0.05). The dyspnea/IND relationship was similar across groups; therefore, the increased dyspnea at a standardized WR in the low DL_CO<LLN group reflected the higher corresponding IND. Higher dyspnea ratings in patients with mild COPD and DL_CO<LLN were associated with higher IND and V̇_E/V̇CO₂ at a given work rate. Higher ventilatory requirements in the DL_CO<LLN group accelerated dynamic mechanical abnormalities earlier in exercise, further increasing IND and dyspnea.

Reduced exercise tolerance in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The contribution of combined abnormalities of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide and ventilatory efficiency

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The combination of both reduced resting diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL_CO ) and ventilatory efficiency (increased ventilatory requirement for CO₂ clearance [V˙_E /V˙CO₂ ]) has been linked to exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The current study examined if low resting DL_CO and higher exercise ventilatory requirements were associated with earlier critical dynamic mechanical constraints, dyspnoea and exercise limitation in patients with mild COPD.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we compared V˙_E /V˙CO₂ , dynamic inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), dyspnoea and exercise capacity in groups of patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 1 COPD with (1) a resting DL_CO at or greater than the lower limit of normal (≥LLN; Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations [n = 44]) or (2) below the <LLN (n = 33), and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 81).

RESULTS

Spirometry and resting lung volumes were similar in the two COPD groups. During exercise, V˙_E /V˙CO₂ (nadir and slope) was consistently higher in the DL_CO  < LLN compared with the other groups (all p < 0.05). The DL_CO  < LLN group had lower IRV and greater dyspnoea intensity at standardized submaximal work rates and lower peak work rate and oxygen uptake than the other two groups (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Reduced exercise capacity in patients with DL_CO  < LLN was related to higher ventilatory requirements, a faster rate of decline in dynamic IRV and greater dyspnoea during exercise. These simple measurements should be considered for the clinical evaluation of unexplained exercise intolerance in individuals with ostensibly mild COPD.

The ratio FEV1 /FVC and its association to respiratory symptoms-A Swedish general population study

Chronic airflow limitation (CAL) can be defined as fixed ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.70 after bronchodilation. It is unclear which is the most optimal ratio in relation to respiratory morbidity. The aim was to investigate to what extent different ratios of FEV₁/FVC were associated with any respiratory symptom. In a cross‐sectional general population study, 15,128 adults (50–64 years of age), 7,120 never‐smokers and 8,008 ever‐smokers completed a respiratory questionnaire and performed FEV₁ and FVC after bronchodilation. We calculated different ratios of FEV₁/FVC from 0.40 to 1.0 using 0.70 as reference category. We analysed odds ratios (OR) between different ratios and any respiratory symptom using adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Among all subjects, regardless of smoking habits, the lowest odds for any respiratory symptom was at FEV₁/FVC = 0.82, OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.41–0.56). Among never‐smokers, the lowest odds for any respiratory symptom was at FEV₁/FVC = 0.81, OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.41–0.70). Among ever‐smokers, the odds for any respiratory symptom was lowest at FEV₁/FVC = 0.81, OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.16–1.19), although the rate of inclining in odds was small in the upper part, that is FEV₁/FVC = 0.85 showed similar odds, OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.38–0.55). We concluded that the odds for any respiratory symptoms continuously decreased with higher FEV₁/FVC ratios and reached a minimum around 0.80–0.85, with similar results among never‐smokers. These results indicate that the optimal threshold associated with respiratory symptoms may be higher than 0.70 and this should be further investigated in prospective longitudinal studies.

Lung Function Testing in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Lung function testing has undisputed value in the comprehensive assessment and individualized management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a pathologic condition in which a functional abnormality, poorly reversible expiratory airway obstruction, is at the core of its definition. After an overview of the physiologic underpinnings of the disease, the authors outline the role of lung function testing in this disease, including diagnosis, assessment of severity, and indication for and responses to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. They discuss the current controversies surrounding test interpretation with these purposes in mind and provide balanced recommendations to optimize their usefulness in different clinical scenarios.

Dyspnea and Exercise Limitation in Mild COPD: The Value of CPET

The majority of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have mild airflow limitation as determined by simple spirometry. Although small airway dysfunction is the hallmark of COPD, many studies attest to complex heterogeneous physiological impairments beyond increased airway resistance. These impairments are related to inflammation of lung parenchyma and its microvasculature, which is obscured by simple spirometry. Recent studies using advanced radiological imaging have highlighted significant structural abnormalities in smokers with relatively preserved spirometry. These important studies have generated considerable interest and have reinforced the pressing need to better understand the physiological consequences of various morphological abnormalities, and their impact on the clinical outcomes and natural history of COPD. The overarching objective of this review is to provide a concise overview of the importance and utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in clinical and research settings. CPET uniquely allows evaluation of integrated abnormalities of the respiratory, cardio-circulatory, metabolic, peripheral muscle and neurosensory systems during increases in physiologic stress. This brief review examines the results of recent studies in mild COPD that have uncovered consistent derangements in pulmonary gas exchange and development of “restrictive” dynamic mechanics that together contribute to exercise intolerance. We examine the evidence that compensatory increases in inspiratory neural drive from respiratory control centers are required during exercise in mild COPD to maintain ventilation commensurate with increasing metabolic demand. The ultimate clinical consequences of this high inspiratory neural drive are earlier onset of critical respiratory mechanical constraints and increased perceived respiratory discomfort at relatively low exercise intensities.