Comparison between discrimination and identification processes using line-drawing stimuli

Should Panelists Refrain from Wearing a Personal Fragrance Prior to Sensory Evaluation? The Effect of Using Perfume on Olfactory Performance

It is typically recommended that panelists should refrain from wearing personal fragrances, such as perfume or cologne, prior to sensory evaluation. Interestingly, no study has been reported as to whether panelists’ perceptions of test samples could be affected by personal fragrances worn by themselves. The objective of this study was, therefore, to determine the effect of such a personal fragrance on olfactory performance. Nineteen untrained participants were screened, recruited for, and underwent the Sniffin’ Sticks test designed for measuring olfactory performances that included the odor threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI). The olfactory performance tasks were conducted under three fragrance level conditions: (1) control (no fragrance), (2) just-about-right (JAR), and (3) excessive, with a preliminary study used to identify both the JAR and excessive fragrance levels. The results showed that the odor discrimination, odor threshold, and combined TDI performances were significantly lowered in the two conditions with the perfume fragrance, while the odor identification performance exhibited no significant differences across all three conditions. These findings provide empirical evidence that even low to moderate levels of personal fragrance can significantly reduce individuals’ olfactory capabilities, possibly subsequently altering the perception of test samples during sensory evaluation.

The role of peripheral vision in vertical road sign identification and discrimination

The role of peripheral vision in road sign identification and discrimination was investigated in two studies. Peripheral vision plays an important role in road signs perception due to their lateral positioning. In the first study 20 participants identified road signs presented at five levels of horizontal eccentricity (1.1°-12.4°), and two levels of vertical eccentricity (0°-2.5°). In the second study road sign discrimination was tested in a same-different discrimination task. The first study showed that a vertical offset of 2.5° degraded proportion correct rate by 9%. Proportion correct rate decreased from 79% to 41% in the transition from 1.1° to 12.4° of horizontal offset. The second study showed an accurate discrimination for road signs presented within a horizontal offset of 6.4°. Road signs with angular shapes and prominent vertexes as triangular or cross signs were better identified in peripheral vision than signs with more compact shapes (circular signs). Practitioner summary: Vertical road signs, due to their lateral positioning, are often perceived in peripheral vision. Horizontal and vertical eccentricity negatively impacts the driver's ability to correctly identify and discriminate traffic signs. The use of singular shapes and a design with simple pictograms and large contrasting areas strongly facilitate road sign perception in peripheral vision.