Depth perception from dynamic occlusion in motion parallax: roles of expansion-compression versus accretion-deletion

Interaction of contour geometry and optic flow in determining relative depth of surfaces

Dynamic occlusion, such as the accretion and deletion of texture near a boundary, is a major factor in determining relative depth of surfaces. However, the shape of the contour bounding the dynamic texture can significantly influence what kind of 3D shape, and what relative depth, are conveyed by the optic flow. This can lead to percepts that are inconsistent with traditional accounts of shape and depth from motion, where accreting/deleting texture can indicate the figural region, and/or 3D rotation can be perceived despite the constant speed of the optic flow. This suggests that the speed profile of the dynamic texture and the shape of its bounding contours combine to determine relative depth in a way that is not explained by existing models. Here, we investigated how traditional structure-from-motion principles and contour geometry interact to determine the relative-depth interpretation of dynamic textures. We manipulated the consistency of the dynamic texture with rotational or translational motion by varying the speed profile of the texture. In Experiment 1, we used a multi-region figure-ground display consisting of regions with dots moving horizontally in opposite directions in adjacent regions. In Experiment 2, we used stimuli including two regions separated by a common border, with dot textures moving horizontally in opposite directions. Both contour geometry (convexity) and the speed profile of the dynamic dot texture influenced relative-depth judgments, but contour geometry was the stronger factor. The results underscore the importance of contour geometry, which most current models disregard, in determining depth from motion.

The interpretation of dynamic occlusion: Combining contour geometry and accretion/deletion of texture

Conventional accounts of motion perception mostly treat accretion/deletion-the appearance or disappearance of texture at a boundary between regions-as an essentially decisive cue to relative depth: the accreting/deleting surface is interpreted as being behind adjacent surfaces. Under certain circumstances, however, accretion/deletion can be perceived in a radically different way: the accreting or deleting surface is seen as rotating in depth in front of adjacent surfaces. This alternative interpretation suggests a problem in conventional accounts of motion interpretation that cannot account for this phenomenon, in part because they ignore the role of contour geometry. In two experiments, we examined the combined role of contour convexity and accretion/deletion in determining the perception of relative depth by parametrically manipulating the strength of each cue. Our results show that convexity plays a more substantial role, often dominating the 3D percept, even in cases when the saliency of the convexity cue is substantially weakened on a contour where the texture was accreting/deleting at high rates. These results highlight the need for a rethinking of theories of perceptual organization in the critical case of moving stimuli.

Areal differences in depth cue integration between monkey and human

Electrophysiological evidence suggested primarily the involvement of the middle temporal (MT) area in depth cue integration in macaques, as opposed to human imaging data pinpointing area V3B/kinetic occipital area (V3B/KO). To clarify this conundrum, we decoded monkey functional MRI (fMRI) responses evoked by stimuli signaling near or far depths defined by binocular disparity, relative motion, and their combination, and we compared results with those from an identical experiment previously performed in humans. Responses in macaque area MT are more discriminable when two cues concurrently signal depth, and information provided by one cue is diagnostic of depth indicated by the other. This suggests that monkey area MT computes fusion of disparity and motion depth signals, exactly as shown for human area V3B/KO. Hence, these data reconcile previously reported discrepancies between depth processing in human and monkey by showing the involvement of the dorsal stream in depth cue integration using the same technique, despite the engagement of different regions.

In everyday life, we interact with a three-dimensional world that we perceive via our two-dimensional retinas. Our brain can reconstruct the third dimension from these flat retinal images using multiple sources of visual information, or cues. The horizontal displacement of the two retinal images, known as binocular disparity, and the relative motion between different objects are two important depth cues. However, to make the most of the information provided by each cue, our brains must efficiently integrate across them. To examine this process, we used neuroimaging in monkeys to record brain responses evoked by stimuli signaling depths defined by either binocular disparity or relative motion in isolation, and also when the two cues are combined congruently or incongruently. We found that cortical area MT in monkeys is involved in the fusion of these two particular depth cues, in contrast to previous human imaging data that pinpoint a more posterior cortical area, V3B/KO. Our findings support the existence of depth cue integration mechanisms in primates; however, this fusion appears to be computed in slightly different areas in humans and monkeys.