Eccentricity dependence of orientation anisotropy of surround suppression of contrast-detection threshold

Radial bias in face identification

Human vision in the periphery is most accurate for stimuli that point towards the fovea. This so-called radial bias has been linked with the organization and spatial selectivity of neurons at the lowest levels of the visual system, from retinal ganglion cells onwards. Despite evidence that the human visual system is radially biased, it is not yet known whether this bias persists at higher levels of processing, or whether high-level representations are invariant to this low-level orientation bias. We used the case of face identity recognition to address this question. The specialized high-level mechanisms that support efficient face recognition are highly dependent on horizontally oriented information, which convey the most useful identity cues in the fovea. We show that face selective mechanisms are more sensitive on the horizontal meridian (to the left and right of fixation) compared to the vertical meridian (above and below fixation), suggesting that the horizontal cues in the face are better extracted on the horizontal meridian, where they align with the radial bias. The results demonstrate that the radial bias is maintained at high-level recognition stages and emphasize the importance of accounting for the radial bias in future investigation of visual recognition processes in peripheral vision.

The effect of aging on the eccentricity dependency of orientation anisotropy of perceptual surround suppression

The features of perceptual surround suppression vary with eccentricity, such that the suppression strength is increased for horizontally oriented stimuli relative to other orientations near the fovea, but is strongest for radially oriented stimuli more peripherally. Perceptual suppression also varies with age, which has been well-studied for central fixation. However, only limited data are available regarding perceptual suppression in older adults for nonfoveal vision, and none of those studies have taken orientation biases of contrast sensitivity into account. Here, we explored the effects of older age on the eccentricity dependency of orientation biases of perceptual suppression. We found increased perceptual suppression in older adults at both 6° and 15° eccentricities relative to younger adults. A main effect of the horizontal orientation bias was found at 6° and a main effect of the radial orientation bias was found at 15° in both groups. In summary, perceptual surround suppression of contrast is stronger for older adults compared with younger adults at 6° and 15° eccentricities, but retinotopic orientation anisotropies are maintained with age. This study provides new insight into parafoveal visual perception in older adults, which may be particularly important to understand the visual experience of those who depend on nonfoveal vision owing to common age-related eye diseases.