Using the direct-injection model of early uveal melanoma hepatic metastasis to identify TPS as a potentially useful serum biomarker

A multiplex immunoassay of serum biomarkers for the detection of uveal melanoma

Background

Approximately 50% of uveal melanoma (UM) patients develop metastases preferentially in the liver leading to death within 15 months. Currently, there is no effective treatment for metastatic UM, in part because the tumor burden is typically high when liver metastases are detected through abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) or imaging studies. The use of LFTs results followed by diagnostic tests has high specificity and predictive values but low sensitivity, and better tests are needed for early diagnosis of the primary tumor as well as its metastatic spread. To evaluate serum biomarkers for the early detection of UM, multiplex immunoassays were developed.

Methods

Magnetic bead-based multiplex immunoassays were developed for the selected serum biomarkers using a Bio-Plex 200 system. The dynamic ranges, lower limits of detection and quantification, cross-reactivity, and intra- and inter-assay precision were assessed. All proteins were analyzed in sera of 48 patients diagnosed with UM (14 metastatic, 9 disease–free (DF) ≥ 5 years, 25 unknown) and 36 healthy controls. The performance of the biomarkers was evaluated individually and in combination for their ability to detect UM.

Results

A 7-plex immunoassay of OPN, MIA, CEACAM-1, MIC-1, SPON1, POSTN and HSP27 was developed with negligible cross-reactivity, recovery of 84–105%, and intra-assay and inter-assay precision of 2.3–7.5% or 2.8–20.8%, respectively. Logistic regression identified a two-marker panel of HSP27 and OPN that significantly improved the individual biomarker performance in discriminating UM from healthy controls. The improved discrimination of a two-marker panel of MIA and MIC-1 was also observed between metastatic UM and DF, however not statistically significant due to the small sample size.

Conclusions

The multiplex immunoassay provides sufficient analytical performance to evaluate serum biomarkers that complement each other in detection of UM, and warrants further validation with a larger number of patient samples.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12014-019-9230-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nestin expression in primary and metastatic uveal melanoma - possible biomarker for high-risk uveal melanoma

PURPOSE

Nestin, a member of the intermediate filament protein family, has been described as a putative cancer stem cell marker (CSC) in uveal melanoma and poor prognostic factor in a variety of tumours, including cutaneous melanoma. In this study, we examined the expression of nestin in primary (PUM) and metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) samples, and correlated the findings with histological, clinical and survival data.

METHODS

Nestin expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 141 PUM and 26 MUM samples; 11 PUM cases were matched with their corresponding metastases. The percentage of tumour cells expressing nestin was scored by three independent observers. Statistical analysis of all data was performed with SPSS.

RESULTS

Nestin expression was identified in both the cytoplasm and membrane of UM cells. Increased expression of nestin in PUM samples was associated with known poor prognostic parameters, including epithelioid cell morphology (p < 0.001), closed loops (p = 0.001), higher mitotic count (p < 0.001), monosomy 3 (p = 0.007) and chromosome 8q gain (p < 0.001). Primary uveal melanoma (PUM) with nestin expression levels above a cut-off value of 10% [as determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis] was associated with a significantly reduced survival time (Log-rank, p = 0.002). In MUM, a higher percentage of nestin-positive tumour cells combined with poor prognostic markers in the PUM led to a shorter survival time following the development of metastases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, increased nestin expression in PUM is a predictor of a tumour phenotype associated with metastatic progression and reduced survival time at onset of metastasis.

The biology of uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM), a rare cancer of the eye, is distinct from cutaneous melanoma by its etiology, the mutation frequency and profile, and its clinical behavior including resistance to targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockers. Primary disease is efficiently controlled by surgery or radiation therapy, but about half of UMs develop distant metastasis mostly to the liver. Survival of patients with metastasis is below 1 year and has not improved in decades. Recent years have brought a deep understanding of UM biology characterized by initiating mutations in the G proteins GNAQ and GNA11. Cytogenetic alterations, in particular monosomy of chromosome 3 and amplification of the long arm of chromosome 8, and mutation of the BRCA1-associated protein 1, BAP1, a tumor suppressor gene, or the splicing factor SF3B1 determine UM metastasis. Cytogenetic and molecular profiling allow for a very precise prognostication that is still not matched by efficacious adjuvant therapies. G protein signaling has been shown to activate the YAP/TAZ pathway independent of HIPPO, and conventional signaling via the mitogen-activated kinase pathway probably also contributes to UM development and progression. Several lines of evidence indicate that inflammation and macrophages play a pro-tumor role in UM and in its hepatic metastases. UM cells benefit from the immune privilege in the eye and may adopt several mechanisms involved in this privilege for tumor escape that act even after leaving the niche. Here, we review the current knowledge of the biology of UM and discuss recent approaches to UM treatment.

Uveal Melanoma Metastasis Models

Metastatic disease is the leading cause of death among patients with uveal melanoma. Treatment options for patients with clinically disseminated disease are usually unsuccessful. In vitro and in vivo models are important tools to investigate the pathogenesis of metastatic uveal melanomas and develop treatments for the metastases. In vitro experimental approaches focusing on cell invasion/migration which mimic the steps of the complex metastatic process may also be used for the identification of potential anti-invasion/migration drugs that may inhibit the spreading of tumor cells or the development of metastases. The effects of these drugs must subsequently be confirmed in reliable in vivo models before entering the clinical trial phase. Several models of intraocular melanoma with metastases in rodents and rabbits are currently being used. Most experimental models of uveal melanoma metastases require injection or implantation of melanoma cells into orthotopic locations, including into the liver, spleen, tail vein, or the left ventricle of the heart, in order to mimic the metastatic process.

Proteomics of uveal melanoma: a minireview

Uveal melanoma (UM) continues to be associated with a high mortality rate of up to 50% due to metastatic spread primarily to the liver. Currently there are relatively effective treatments for the primary tumor, though the management of the metastatic disease remains inadequate. Conventional diagnostic tools have a low sensitivity for detecting metastasis, and early detection of metastatic spread would allow more treatment options that could ultimately increase survival of UM patients. Advanced proteomic methods have already helped to find potential biomarkers associated with UM pathogenesis and metastasis. In the present review we discuss the field of proteomics in relation to studies elucidating biomarkers of UM, where proteins such as S-100 β , osteopontin (OPN), and melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) have been shown to be associated with metastasis.

Blood biomarkers for uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma disseminates hematogenously, and blood biomarkers may be useful for prognosis and for monitoring disease progression. Melanoma-associated, metastatic and immune factors have been measured in the blood of patients with uveal melanoma, as have circulating melanoma cells. Most of the biomarkers were derived from studies in cutaneous melanoma. For various biological and/or technical reasons, these assessments have not demonstrated the accuracy required for effective prognostic or monitoring assays. Advances in uveal melanoma genomics and proteomics have generated many candidate biomarkers that are potentially measurable in blood. Measuring circulating nucleic acids may also be possible. Improvements in molecular profiling techniques that accurately predict metastatic risk in uveal melanoma patients should facilitate biomarker discovery and aid implementation in clinical testing. The stage is set to translate the advances made in understanding the molecular characteristics of uveal melanoma in order to identify and test clinically useful blood biomarkers of tumor dissemination and/or progression.

The molecular classification of uveal melanocytic lesions: an important discovery in context

This Commentary discusses a multi-gene expression assay for predicting metastasis in uveal melanoma.