Impact of Visual Cues on the Magnitude and Variability of the Accommodative Response in Children With Emmetropia and Uncorrected Hyperopia and Adults

Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor

Purpose

This validation study examines the PowerRef 3 as a method for measuring accommodation objectively. We assess agreement with refractive measurements obtained simultaneously by the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A autorefractor.

Methods

Refractive measurements were recorded simultaneously using the PowerRef 3 and WAM-5500A in 32 noncyclopleged participants aged 15 to 46 years. Accommodative states were recorded for 10 seconds at six accommodative demands (5 diopters [D], 4 D, 3 D, 2.5 D, 2 D, and 0 D) while participants fixated a high-contrast Maltese cross. WAM-5500A measurements were converted to power in the vertical meridian for comparison with PowerRef 3 data. Dioptric difference values were computed, and agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and intraclass correlation coefficient analyses.

Results

The mean absolute dioptric differences measured 0.14 D or less across accommodative demands. Analyses showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient across the tested demands (0.93). Bland-Altman plots indicated a bias of -0.02 D with 95% LOA of -1.03 D to 0.99 D. The 95% LOA was smallest for the 3 D demand (-0.71 D to 0.64 D), and largest at 5 D demand (-1.51 D to 1.30 D).

Conclusions

The mean dioptric differences between the PowerRef 3 and WAM-5500A autorefractor were small and not clinically significant. While some variability in agreement was observed depending on the tested demand, the PowerRef 3 demonstrated good agreement with the WAM-5500A.

Translational Relevance

The PowerRef 3 may be used to obtain objective measures of accommodation both monocularly and binocularly and provides a more flexible method, especially in pediatric populations.

Refractive Error and Eye Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses

Purpose: To explore the associations between refractive errors and multiple eye health outcomes. Methods: This is an umbrella review based on systematic reviews with meta-analyses. In our study, refractive errors included myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia. We reconducted the meta-analyses whose primary data were available in sufficient detail by random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I ². The main outcomes included myopic macular degeneration (MMD), retinal detachment (RD), cataract, open-angle glaucoma (OAG), strabismus, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Results: Myopia was associated with increased risk of MMD (relative risk = 102.11, 95% CI 52.6-198.22), RD (3.45, 1.08-11.00), nuclear cataract (2.15, 1.53-3.03), posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataract (1.74, 1.41-2.15), OAG (1.95, 1.74-2.19), exotropia (5.23, 2.26-12.09), but decreased risk of DR (0.83, 0.66-1.04), and early AMD (0.80, 0.67-0.94). From mild-to-high myopia, the association strengthened for MMD, RD, nuclear cataract, PSC cataract, OAG, and DR. Hyperopia was associated with an increased risk of early AMD (1.09, 1.01-1.18) and esotropia (22.94, 10.20-51.62). Astigmatism and anisometropia were associated with increased risk of both exotropia and esotropia. Conclusions: Myopia, especially high myopia, demonstrated the highest risk for eye health outcomes, such as MMD, RD, OAG, nuclear and PSC cataracts, and exotropia. However, myopia was associated with a lower risk of early AMD and DR. Individuals with hyperopia are more likely to suffer early AMD and esotropia. Astigmatism and anisometropia predispose to strabismus. A lot of research studies on the mechanism of the associations are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=239744; identifier: 239744.

Vergence, accommodation, and visual tracking in children and adolescents evaluated in a multidisciplinary concussion clinic

Many patients with concussion experience visual symptoms following injury that lead to a diagnosis of convergence insufficiency, accommodative insufficiency, or saccadic dysfunction. However, these diagnostic categories are based on aggregates of clinical tests developed from a non-concussed population and therefore may not accurately describe visual deficits in the concussed population. Thus, we sought to understand individual metrics of visual dysfunction in chronically symptomatic post-concussion patients. This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients examined at the multidisciplinary concussion clinic (MDCC) at Boston Children's Hospital over four years. Patients aged 5-21 years who had a complete assessment of eye alignment, vergence, accommodation, and visual tracking, and had visual acuity better than or equal to 20/30 in each eye were included. Patients with history of amblyopia, strabismus, or ocular pathology were excluded. Chart review yielded 116 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age 15 years, 64% female). The majority of patients (52%) experienced a single concussion and most were sports-related (50%). Clinical data show vergence, accommodation, or visual tracking deficits in 95% of patients. A receded near point of convergence (NPC, 70/116) and reduced accommodative amplitude (63/116) were the most common deficits. Both NPC and accommodative amplitude were significantly correlated with one another (r = -0.5) and with measures of visual tracking (r = -0.34). Patients with chronic post-concussion symptoms show deficits in individual metrics of vergence, accommodation and visual tracking. The high incidence of these deficits, specifically NPC and accommodative amplitude, highlights the need for a detailed sensorimotor evaluation to guide personalized treatment following concussion.