Foveal Cone Structure in Patients With Blue Cone Monochromacy

S-cone contribution to oscillatory potentials in patients with blue cone monochromacy

PURPOSE

The aim of this exploratory study is to investigate the role of S-cones in oscillatory potentials (OPs) generation by individuals with blue-cone monochromacy (BCM), retaining S-cones, and achromatopsia (ACHM), lacking cone functions.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from 39 ACHM patients, 20 BCM patients, and 26 controls. Central foveal thickness was obtained using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, while amplitude and implicit time (IT) of a- and b-waves were extracted from the ISCEV Standard dark-adapted 3 cd.s.m-2 full-field ERG (ffERG). Time-frequency analysis of the same measurement enabled the extraction of OPs, providing insights into the dynamic characteristics of the recorded signal.

RESULTS

Both ACHM and BCM groups showed a significant reduction (p < .00001) of a- and b-wave amplitudes and ITs as well as the power of the OPs compared to the control groups. The comparison between ACHM and BCM didn't show any statistically significant differences in the electrophysiological parameters. The analysis of covariance revealed significantly reduced central foveal thickness in the BCM group compared to ACHM and controls (p < .00001), and in ACHM compared to controls (p < .00001), after age correction and Tukey post-hoc analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

S-cones do not significantly influence OPs, and the decline in OPs' power is not solely due to a reduced a-wave. This suggests a complex non-linear network influenced by photoreceptor inputs. Morphological changes don't correlate directly with functional alterations, prompting further exploration of OPs' function and physiological role.

Phenotyping and genotyping inherited retinal diseases: Molecular genetics, clinical and imaging features, and therapeutics of macular dystrophies, cone and cone-rod dystrophies, rod-cone dystrophies, Leber congenital amaurosis, and cone dysfunction syndromes

Inherited retinal diseases (IRD) are a leading cause of blindness in the working age population and in children. The scope of this review is to familiarise clinicians and scientists with the current landscape of molecular genetics, clinical phenotype, retinal imaging and therapeutic prospects/completed trials in IRD. Herein we present in a comprehensive and concise manner: (i) macular dystrophies (Stargardt disease (ABCA4), X-linked retinoschisis (RS1), Best disease (BEST1), PRPH2-associated pattern dystrophy, Sorsby fundus dystrophy (TIMP3), and autosomal dominant drusen (EFEMP1)), (ii) cone and cone-rod dystrophies (GUCA1A, PRPH2, ABCA4, KCNV2 and RPGR), (iii) predominant rod or rod-cone dystrophies (retinitis pigmentosa, enhanced S-Cone syndrome (NR2E3), Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (CYP4V2)), (iv) Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (GUCY2D, CEP290, CRB1, RDH12, RPE65, TULP1, AIPL1 and NMNAT1), (v) cone dysfunction syndromes (achromatopsia (CNGA3, CNGB3, PDE6C, PDE6H, GNAT2, ATF6), X-linked cone dysfunction with myopia and dichromacy (Bornholm Eye disease; OPN1LW/OPN1MW array), oligocone trichromacy, and blue-cone monochromatism (OPN1LW/OPN1MW array)). Whilst we use the aforementioned classical phenotypic groupings, a key feature of IRD is that it is characterised by tremendous heterogeneity and variable expressivity, with several of the above genes associated with a range of phenotypes.

Adaptive optics imaging in inherited retinal diseases: A scoping review of the clinical literature

Adaptive optics (AO) imaging enables direct, objective assessments of retinal cells. Applications of AO show great promise in advancing our understanding of the etiology of inherited retinal disease (IRDs) and discovering new imaging biomarkers. This scoping review systematically identifies and summarizes clinical studies evaluating AO imaging in IRDs. Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched on February 6, 2023. Studies describing AO imaging in monogenic IRDs were included. Study screening and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. This review presents (1) a broad overview of the dominant areas of research; (2) a summary of IRD characteristics revealed by AO imaging; and (3) a discussion of methodological considerations relating to AO imaging in IRDs. From 140 studies with AO outcomes, including 2 following subretinal gene therapy treatments, 75% included fewer than 10 participants with AO imaging data. Of 100 studies that included participants' genetic diagnoses, the most common IRD genes with AO outcomes are CNGA3, CNGB3, CHM, USH2A, and ABCA4. Confocal reflectance AO scanning laser ophthalmoscopy was the most reported imaging modality, followed by flood-illuminated AO and split-detector AO. The most common outcome was cone density, reported quantitatively in 56% of studies. Future research areas include guidelines to reduce variability in the reporting of AO methodology and a focus on functional AO techniques to guide the development of therapeutic interventions.

Blue cone monochromacy and gene therapy

Blue cone monochromacy (BCM) is a congenital vision disorder characterized by complete loss or severely reduced long- and middle-wavelength cone function, caused by mutations in the OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene cluster on the X-chromosome. BCM patients typically suffer from poor visual acuity, severely impaired color discrimination, myopia, and nystagmus. In this review, we cover the genetic causes of BCM, clinical features of BCM patients, genetic testing, and clinical outcome measurements for future BCM clinical trials. However, our emphasis is on detailing the animal models for BCM and gene therapy using adeno-associated vectors (AAV). We describe two mouse models resembling the two most common causes of BCM, current progress in proof-of-concept studies to treat BCM with deletion mutations, the challenges we face, and future directions.

Unique Haplotypes in OPN1LW as a Common Cause of High Myopia With or Without Protanopia: A Potential Window Into Myopic Mechanism

Purpose

Specific haplotypes (LVAVA, LIVVA, and LIAVA) formed by five polymorphisms (p.L153M, p.V171I, p.A174V, p.I178V, and p.S180A in exon 3 of OPN1LW) that cause partial or complete exon skipping have been reported as unique genetic causes of high myopia with or without colorblindness. This study aimed to identify the contribution of OPN1LW to early-onset high myopia (eoHM) and the molecular basis underlying eoHM with or without colorblindness.

Methods

Comparative analysis of exome sequencing data was conducted for 1226 families with eoHM and 9304 families with other eye conditions. OPN1LW variants detected by targeted or whole exome sequencing were confirmed by long-range amplification and Sanger sequencing, together with segregation analysis. The clinical data were thoroughly analyzed.

Results

Unique haplotypes and truncation variants in OPN1LW were detected exclusively in 68 of 1226 families with eoHM but in none of the 9304 families with other visual diseases (P = 1.63 × 10-63). Four classes of variants were identified: haplotypes causing partial splicing defects in OPN1LW (LVAVA or LIVVA in 31 families), LVAVA in OPN1LW-OPN1MW hybrid gene (in 3 families), LIAVA in OPN1LW (in 29 families), and truncations in OPN1LW (in 5 families). The first class causes partial loss of red photopigments, whereas the latter three result in complete loss of red photopigments. This is different from the replacement of red with green owing to unequal re-arrangement causing red-green colorblindness alone. Of the 68 families, 42 affected male patients (31 families) with the first class of variants (LVAVA or LIVVA in OPN1LW) had eoHM alone, whereas 37 male patients with the latter 3 classes had eoHM with protanopia. Adaptive optics retinal imaging demonstrated reduced cone regularity and density in men with eoHM caused by OPN1LW variants compared to those patients with eoHM and without OPN1LW variants.

Conclusion

Based on the 68 families with unique variants in OPN1LW, our study provides firm evidence that the two different phenotypes (eoHM with or without colorblindness) are caused by two different classes of variants (partial splicing-effect haplotypes or complete splicing-effect haplotypes/truncation variants, respectively). The contribution of OPN1LW to eoHM (isolated and syndromic) was characterized by OPN1LW variants found in 5.5% (68/1226) of the eoHM families, making it the second most common cause of monogenic eoHM alone (2.4%) and a frequent cause of syndromic monogenic eoHM with colorblindness. Such haplotypes, in which each individual variant alone is considered a benign polymorphism, are potential candidates for other hereditary diseases with causes of missing genetic defects.