Test-retest of a phoria adaptation stimulus-induced functional MRI experiment

The Impact of the Test Dissociation on the Binocular Balance of Children

PURPOSE

this research compared the dissociated phoria at near and distance fixation in free space using the Howell test, alternate Cover test, and Thorington test.

METHODS

220 healthy Mexican children (mean age 8.3±2.5 years) participated in this study. Phorias were quantified at both distances using each test, from the least to the most disruptive. The stereopsis degree and near point of convergence (break/recovery) were analyzed to understand their role in the visual system's sensorimotor balance.

RESULTS

statistically significant differences were found among techniques, with a higher congruence for the EF. However, only the Howell and Thorington tests can be interchanged. The break value and near exophoria relate to each other and affect the stereopsis degree, whereas age is associated with the stereopsis degree and break value.

CONCLUSIONS

the three techniques cannot be interchanged except for the Howell and Thorington test for the EF at far. The differences in the mode of dissociation could relate to the results.

Topical Review: Methodological Variables in Clinical and Laboratory Measurements of Fixation Disparity

SIGNIFICANCE

Fixation disparity is a small vergence error that does not disrupt fusion. Fixation disparity measures correlate with binocular symptoms. This article covers methodological differences between clinical fixation disparity measurement devices, findings when objective and subjective fixation disparities are compared, and the potential impact of binocular capture on fixation disparity measurements. Fixation disparity is a small vergence error that occurs in nonstrabismic individuals and does not disrupt fusion. This article reviews clinical fixation disparity variables and their clinical diagnostic value. Clinical devices that are used to measure these variables are described, as are studies in which the output from these devices has been compared. Methodological differences between the devices such as the location of the fusional stimulus, the rate at which judgments of dichoptic alignment are made, and the strength of the accommodative stimulus are all considered. In addition, the article covers theories of the neural origins of fixation disparity and control system models incorporating fixation disparity. Studies in which objective fixation disparities (oculomotor portion of fixation disparity assessed with an eye tracker) and subjective fixation disparities (sensory portion of fixation disparity assessed psychophysically with dichoptic Nonius lines) have been compared are also examined, and consideration is given to why some investigators find differences in these measures, whereas other investigators do not. The conclusion thus far is that there are likely complex interactions between vergence adaptation, accommodation, and the location of the fusional stimulus that lead to differences in objective and subjective fixation disparity measures. Finally, capture of the visual direction of monocular stimuli by adjacent fusional stimuli and the implications for fixation disparity measures are considered.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation for different vergence eye movement subtypes

INTRODUCTION

Maddox suggested that there were four convergence subtypes, each driven by a different stimulus. The purpose of this study was to assess the neural correlates for accommodative convergence, proximal convergence (convergence stimulus provided), disparity convergence and voluntary convergence (no specific convergence stimulus provided) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

METHODS

Ten subjects (mean age = 24.4 years) with normal binocular vision participated. The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals of the brain from fMRI scans were measured when subjects made vergence eye movements while: (1) alternately viewing letters monocularly where one eye viewed through a -2.00 D lens, (2) alternately viewing Difference of Gaussian targets monocularly at distance and near, (3) viewing random dot stereograms with increasing disparity and (4) voluntarily converging the eyes with binocular viewing.

RESULTS

The accommodative convergence paradigm resulted in activation on the right side in the right fusiform cortex and the right middle occipital cortex. The proximal convergence stimulus mainly activated areas in the right occipital lobe. The disparity stimulus activated areas in the left occipital cortex and the left frontal cortex. Finally, the voluntary convergence paradigm resulted in activation primarily in the occipital lobe and mostly bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

The accommodative, proximal, disparity and voluntary convergence paradigms resulted in activation in unique areas in the brain with functional MRI. Activation was found in more areas in the proximal and voluntary conditions compared with the accommodative and disparity conditions.

Underlying neurological mechanisms associated with symptomatic convergence insufficiency

Convergence insufficiency (CI) is the most common binocular vision problem, associated with blurred/double vision, headaches, and sore eyes that are exacerbated when doing prolonged near work, such as reading. The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism Adult Population Study (NCT03593031) investigates the mechanistic neural differences between 50 binocularly normal controls (BNC) and 50 symptomatic CI participants by examining the fast and slow fusional disparity vergence systems. The fast fusional system is preprogrammed and is assessed with convergence peak velocity. The slow fusional system optimizes vergence effort and is assessed by measuring the phoria adaptation magnitude and rate. For the fast fusional system, significant differences are observed between the BNC and CI groups for convergence peak velocity, final position amplitude, and functional imaging activity within the secondary visual cortex, right cuneus, and oculomotor vermis. For the slow fusional system, the phoria adaptation magnitude and rate, and the medial cuneus functional activity, are significantly different between the groups. Significant correlations are observed between vergence peak velocity and right cuneus functional activity (p = 0.002) and the rate of phoria adaptation and medial cuneus functional activity (p = 0.02). These results map the brain-behavior of vergence. Future therapeutic interventions may consider implementing procedures that increase cuneus activity for this debilitating disorder.