1
|
Sievers B, Thornton MA. Deep social neuroscience: the promise and peril of using artificial neural networks to study the social brain. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2024; 19:nsae014. [PMID: 38334747 PMCID: PMC10880882 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
This review offers an accessible primer to social neuroscientists interested in neural networks. It begins by providing an overview of key concepts in deep learning. It then discusses three ways neural networks can be useful to social neuroscientists: (i) building statistical models to predict behavior from brain activity; (ii) quantifying naturalistic stimuli and social interactions; and (iii) generating cognitive models of social brain function. These applications have the potential to enhance the clinical value of neuroimaging and improve the generalizability of social neuroscience research. We also discuss the significant practical challenges, theoretical limitations and ethical issues faced by deep learning. If the field can successfully navigate these hazards, we believe that artificial neural networks may prove indispensable for the next stage of the field's development: deep social neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beau Sievers
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, 420 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Mark A Thornton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6207 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dibot NM, Tieo S, Mendelson TC, Puech W, Renoult JP. Sparsity in an artificial neural network predicts beauty: Towards a model of processing-based aesthetics. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011703. [PMID: 38048323 PMCID: PMC10721202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Generations of scientists have pursued the goal of defining beauty. While early scientists initially focused on objective criteria of beauty ('feature-based aesthetics'), philosophers and artists alike have since proposed that beauty arises from the interaction between the object and the individual who perceives it. The aesthetic theory of fluency formalizes this idea of interaction by proposing that beauty is determined by the efficiency of information processing in the perceiver's brain ('processing-based aesthetics'), and that efficient processing induces a positive aesthetic experience. The theory is supported by numerous psychological results, however, to date there is no quantitative predictive model to test it on a large scale. In this work, we propose to leverage the capacity of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to model the processing of information in the brain by studying the link between beauty and neuronal sparsity, a measure of information processing efficiency. Whether analyzing pictures of faces, figurative or abstract art paintings, neuronal sparsity explains up to 28% of variance in beauty scores, and up to 47% when combined with a feature-based metric. However, we also found that sparsity is either positively or negatively correlated with beauty across the multiple layers of the DCNN. Our quantitative model stresses the importance of considering how information is processed, in addition to the content of that information, when predicting beauty, but also suggests an unexpectedly complex relationship between fluency and beauty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas M. Dibot
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
- LIRMM, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Sonia Tieo
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Tamra C. Mendelson
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moore JA, Wilms M, Gutierrez A, Ismail Z, Fakhar K, Hadaeghi F, Hilgetag CC, Forkert ND. Simulation of neuroplasticity in a CNN-based in-silico model of neurodegeneration of the visual system. Front Comput Neurosci 2023; 17:1274824. [PMID: 38105786 PMCID: PMC10722164 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1274824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this work was to enhance the biological feasibility of a deep convolutional neural network-based in-silico model of neurodegeneration of the visual system by equipping it with a mechanism to simulate neuroplasticity. Therefore, deep convolutional networks of multiple sizes were trained for object recognition tasks and progressively lesioned to simulate neurodegeneration of the visual cortex. More specifically, the injured parts of the network remained injured while we investigated how the added retraining steps were able to recover some of the model's object recognition baseline performance. The results showed with retraining, model object recognition abilities are subject to a smoother and more gradual decline with increasing injury levels than without retraining and, therefore, more similar to the longitudinal cognition impairments of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Moreover, with retraining, the injured model exhibits internal activation patterns similar to those of the healthy baseline model when compared to the injured model without retraining. Furthermore, we conducted this analysis on a network that had been extensively pruned, resulting in an optimized number of parameters or synapses. Our findings show that this network exhibited remarkably similar capability to recover task performance with decreasingly viable pathways through the network. In conclusion, adding a retraining step to the in-silico setup that simulates neuroplasticity improves the model's biological feasibility considerably and could prove valuable to test different rehabilitation approaches in-silico.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine A. Moore
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Matthias Wilms
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alejandro Gutierrez
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kayson Fakhar
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fatemeh Hadaeghi
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claus C. Hilgetag
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nils D. Forkert
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are machine learning algorithms that have revolutionized computer vision due to their remarkable successes in tasks like object classification and segmentation. The success of DNNs as computer vision algorithms has led to the suggestion that DNNs may also be good models of human visual perception. In this article, we review evidence regarding current DNNs as adequate behavioral models of human core object recognition. To this end, we argue that it is important to distinguish between statistical tools and computational models and to understand model quality as a multidimensional concept in which clarity about modeling goals is key. Reviewing a large number of psychophysical and computational explorations of core object recognition performance in humans and DNNs, we argue that DNNs are highly valuable scientific tools but that, as of today, DNNs should only be regarded as promising-but not yet adequate-computational models of human core object recognition behavior. On the way, we dispel several myths surrounding DNNs in vision science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix A Wichmann
- Neural Information Processing Group, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany;
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doerig A, Sommers RP, Seeliger K, Richards B, Ismael J, Lindsay GW, Kording KP, Konkle T, van Gerven MAJ, Kriegeskorte N, Kietzmann TC. The neuroconnectionist research programme. Nat Rev Neurosci 2023:10.1038/s41583-023-00705-w. [PMID: 37253949 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00705-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) inspired by biology are beginning to be widely used to model behavioural and neural data, an approach we call 'neuroconnectionism'. ANNs have been not only lauded as the current best models of information processing in the brain but also criticized for failing to account for basic cognitive functions. In this Perspective article, we propose that arguing about the successes and failures of a restricted set of current ANNs is the wrong approach to assess the promise of neuroconnectionism for brain science. Instead, we take inspiration from the philosophy of science, and in particular from Lakatos, who showed that the core of a scientific research programme is often not directly falsifiable but should be assessed by its capacity to generate novel insights. Following this view, we present neuroconnectionism as a general research programme centred around ANNs as a computational language for expressing falsifiable theories about brain computation. We describe the core of the programme, the underlying computational framework and its tools for testing specific neuroscientific hypotheses and deriving novel understanding. Taking a longitudinal view, we review past and present neuroconnectionist projects and their responses to challenges and argue that the research programme is highly progressive, generating new and otherwise unreachable insights into the workings of the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Doerig
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rowan P Sommers
- Department of Neurobiology of Language, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Seeliger
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Blake Richards
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Mila, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Montréal Neurological Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, CIFAR, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Konrad P Kording
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, CIFAR, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Bioengineering, Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tim C Kietzmann
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quilty-Dunn J, Porot N, Mandelbaum E. The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behav Brain Sci 2022; 46:e261. [PMID: 36471543 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x22002849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Mental representations remain the central posits of psychology after many decades of scrutiny. However, there is no consensus about the representational format(s) of biological cognition. This paper provides a survey of evidence from computational cognitive psychology, perceptual psychology, developmental psychology, comparative psychology, and social psychology, and concludes that one type of format that routinely crops up is the language-of-thought (LoT). We outline six core properties of LoTs: (i) discrete constituents; (ii) role-filler independence; (iii) predicate-argument structure; (iv) logical operators; (v) inferential promiscuity; and (vi) abstract content. These properties cluster together throughout cognitive science. Bayesian computational modeling, compositional features of object perception, complex infant and animal reasoning, and automatic, intuitive cognition in adults all implicate LoT-like structures. Instead of regarding LoT as a relic of the previous century, researchers in cognitive science and philosophy-of-mind must take seriously the explanatory breadth of LoT-based architectures. We grant that the mind may harbor many formats and architectures, including iconic and associative structures as well as deep-neural-network-like architectures. However, as computational/representational approaches to the mind continue to advance, classical compositional symbolic structures - that is, LoTs - only prove more flexible and well-supported over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Quilty-Dunn
- Department of Philosophy and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. , sites.google.com/site/jakequiltydunn/
| | - Nicolas Porot
- Africa Institute for Research in Economics and Social Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Rabat, Morocco. , nicolasporot.com
| | - Eric Mandelbaum
- Departments of Philosophy and Psychology, The Graduate Center & Baruch College, CUNY, New York, NY, USA. , ericmandelbaum.com
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bowers JS, Malhotra G, Dujmović M, Llera Montero M, Tsvetkov C, Biscione V, Puebla G, Adolfi F, Hummel JE, Heaton RF, Evans BD, Mitchell J, Blything R. Deep problems with neural network models of human vision. Behav Brain Sci 2022; 46:e385. [PMID: 36453586 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x22002813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have had extraordinary successes in classifying photographic images of objects and are often described as the best models of biological vision. This conclusion is largely based on three sets of findings: (1) DNNs are more accurate than any other model in classifying images taken from various datasets, (2) DNNs do the best job in predicting the pattern of human errors in classifying objects taken from various behavioral datasets, and (3) DNNs do the best job in predicting brain signals in response to images taken from various brain datasets (e.g., single cell responses or fMRI data). However, these behavioral and brain datasets do not test hypotheses regarding what features are contributing to good predictions and we show that the predictions may be mediated by DNNs that share little overlap with biological vision. More problematically, we show that DNNs account for almost no results from psychological research. This contradicts the common claim that DNNs are good, let alone the best, models of human object recognition. We argue that theorists interested in developing biologically plausible models of human vision need to direct their attention to explaining psychological findings. More generally, theorists need to build models that explain the results of experiments that manipulate independent variables designed to test hypotheses rather than compete on making the best predictions. We conclude by briefly summarizing various promising modeling approaches that focus on psychological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Bowers
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Gaurav Malhotra
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Marin Dujmović
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Milton Llera Montero
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Christian Tsvetkov
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Valerio Biscione
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Guillermo Puebla
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
| | - Federico Adolfi
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ; https://jeffbowers.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/
- Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - John E Hummel
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Rachel F Heaton
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Benjamin D Evans
- Department of Informatics, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Jeffrey Mitchell
- Department of Informatics, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Ryan Blything
- School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|