Integrating Clinical Data and Tear Proteomics to Assess Efficacy, Ocular Surface Status, and Biomarker Response After Orthokeratology Lens Wear

Myopia Control Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of a Novel Orthokeratology Lens (MESOK Study)-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Combining Clinical and Tear Proteomics Data

Myopia control efficacy and long-term safety of the Breath-O-Correct orthokeratology (OK) lens was evaluated in a 2-year randomized, single vision (SV) spectacle lens-controlled, single-blind clinical trial combining clinical and tear proteomics data. A total of 71 children (43 OK, 9.8 ± 1.3 years; 28 SV, 9.5 ± 1.4 years) completed the 2-year study. Axial length (AL), cycloplegic refraction, clinical safety parameters (best-corrected visual acuity, central cornea thickness, corneal endothelial health, ocular surface disease index), and quantitative tear proteomics were evaluated by masked examiners. Mean 2-year-normalized AL elongations in the OK and SV groups differed significantly (p = 0.03) and were 0.37 ± 0.37 mm and 0.60 ± 0.41 mm, respectively. OK-mediated myopia control efficacy was 37.1%. No significant difference was found in clinical safety parameters of both groups (p > 0.10), except for a thinner central corneal thickness in the OK group (p = 0.01). Proteomics revealed modest OK lens-mediated effects on immune response proteins, including an increased abundance of haptoglobin at 6 and 12 months and a decreased abundance of two proteins (neutrophil defensin 3 and histone 4) at 6 months. The changes were further validated using a high-resolution multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM^HR) mass spectrometry. In summary, the Breath-O-Correct OK lens significantly reduced AL elongation in schoolchildren without adverse clinical effects or subclinical inflammatory responses.

Tear Proteomics of Children and Young Adult Soft Contact Lens, Orthokeratology and Spectacle Wearers - A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Contact lens complications occur more often in older teenagers and young adults compared to children. This study explored differences in tear proteomics between children and young adults wearing soft contact lens (SCL), orthokeratology or spectacles for >3 years.

METHODS

Twelve children and 12 sex- and correction-matched young adults were enrolled. Tears were collected via Schirmer strips for tear proteomic analysis using mass spectrometry. Proteome Discoverer was used for protein identification. Label-Free Quantitation was generated using Scaffold software; Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare proteins by age and correction groups. Generalized linear models were used to assess differences in overall protein levels by age and correction groups. A secondary analysis of proteins presented in >50% of samples of each group was conducted using the R/Bioconductor limma package.

RESULTS

There were 385 proteins present only in young adults while 183 were unique in children. There were 528 unique proteins to SCL, 96 to orthokeratology and 149 to spectacle wearers. Based on Fisher's Exact analyses, 126 proteins were higher in young adults than children (all P < 0.048). Forty-seven protein levels were higher in SCL compared to orthokeratology (all P < 0.01), 33 protein levels were higher in SCL compared to spectacles (all P < 0.01), 15 protein levels were higher in orthokeratology compared to spectacle wearers (all P < 0.01). Based on generalized linear models, young adults had higher overall protein levels than children (P = 0.001), SCL had higher protein levels than spectacle wearers (P < 0.001) but no differences were found between orthokeratology and spectacle wearers (P = 0.79). Based on the secondary analysis, only Antileukoproteinase was higher in the young adult orthokeratology group compared to other groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Tear protein type and abundance differ by age and correction. Further research is needed to understand the effects of contact lens correction in children and young adults on the tear proteome.