Comparison of Syringes With Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs: Particle Burden and Protein Aggregates in Brolucizumab, Aflibercept and Bevacizumab

Impact of Post Manufacturing Handling of Protein-Based Biologic Drugs on Product Quality and User Centricity

This article evaluates the current gaps around the impact of post-manufacturing processes on the product qualities of protein-based biologics, with a focus on user centricity. It includes the evaluation of the regulatory guidance available, describes a collection of scientific literature and case studies to showcase the impact of post-manufacturing stresses on product and dosing solution quality. It also outlines the complexity of clinical handling and the need for communication, and alignment between drug providers, healthcare professionals, users, and patients. Regulatory agencies provide clear expectations for drug manufacturing processes, however, guidance supporting post-product manufacturing handling is less defined and often misaligned. This is problematic as the pharmaceutical products experience numerous stresses and processes which can potentially impact drug quality, safety and efficacy. This article aims to stimulate discussion amongst pharmaceutical developers, health care providers, device manufacturers, and public researchers to improve these processes. Patients and caregivers' awareness can be achieved by providing relevant educational material on pharmaceutical product handling.

[Translated article] Syringes for intraocular administration: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: (silicone) AND (syringes) AND ((intraocular) OR (intravitreal)) and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone; the administration technique; the physicochemical aspects of silicone release; and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialised syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding 2 that will probably be commercialised in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Syringes for intraocular administration: Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: "silicone" AND "syringes" AND ("intraocular" OR "intravitreal") and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone, the administration technique, the physicochemical aspects of silicone release, and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialized syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding two that will probably be commercialized in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Application of an organotypic ocular perfusion model to assess intravitreal drug distribution in human and animal eyes

Intravitreal (ITV) drug delivery is a new cornerstone for retinal therapeutics. Yet, predicting the disposition of formulations in the human eye remains a major translational hurdle. A prominent, but poorly understood, issue in pre-clinical ITV toxicity studies is unintended particle movements to the anterior chamber (AC). These particles can accumulate in the AC to dangerously raise intraocular pressure. Yet, anatomical differences, and the inability to obtain equivalent human data, make investigating this issue extremely challenging. We have developed an organotypic perfusion strategy to re-establish intraocular fluid flow, while maintaining homeostatic pressure and pH. Here, we used this approach with suitably sized microbeads to profile anterior and posterior ITV particle movements in live versus perfused porcine eyes, and in human donor eyes. Small-molecule suspensions were then tested with the system after exhibiting differing behaviours in vivo. Aggregate particle size is supported as an important determinant of particle movements in the human eye, and we note these data are consistent with a poroelastic model of bidirectional vitreous transport. Together, this approach uses ocular fluid dynamics to permit, to our knowledge, the first direct comparisons between particle behaviours from human ITV injections and animal models, with potential to speed pre-clinical development of retinal therapeutics.