Corvis Biomechanical Factor Facilitates the Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

Altered Corneal Biomechanics According to the Biomechanical E-Staging in Pellucid Marginal Degeneration

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate corneal biomechanics in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) compared with healthy controls using Corvis ST (Oculus, Germany) by using the new biomechanical E-staging (based on the Corvis Biomechanical Factor, the linearized Corvis Biomechanical Index) together with tomographic parameters.

METHODS

Corneal biomechanical and topographic data of 75 eyes of 75 patients with PMD and 75 eyes of 75 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls were investigated. Topographic parameters (K1, K2, Kmax, central corneal thickness (CCT), and Belin/Ambrósio Deviation Index (BAD-D) were evaluated in dependence of and correlated with the biomechanically defined E-stages. Biomechanical parameters were also recorded for the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Patients with PMD showed higher K2, Kmax, BAD-D, and Corvis Biomechanical Factor values and a lower CCT compared with healthy controls ( P < 0.001). The E-stage was positively correlated with K1, K2, Kmax, BAD-D, and intraocular pressure difference and negatively correlated with CCT. Stage-dependent analysis revealed a significant increase in K1, K2, Kmax ( P < 0.001), and BAD-D ( P = 0.041) in stage E3 compared with E0 and a significant decrease in stage E2 in CCT ( P = 0.009) compared with E0.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that patients with PMD may have a reduced corneal stiffness compared with healthy controls which worsens with increasing E-stage. Significant changes in topographic parameters were observed at stage E2 for CCT and at stage E3 for K1, K2, Kmax, and BAD-D when compared with stage E0.

Keratectasia severity staging and progression assessment based on the biomechanical E-staging

Until recently, corneal topography has been the gold standard in detecting keratectasia and monitoring its progression. The recently introduced ABCD tomographic keratoconus staging system focuses on anterior ("A") and posterior ("B") radius of curvature, thinnest corneal thickness ("C"), best-corrected visual acuity with spectacles ("D") and is supplemented with the introduction of the biomechanical E-staging (BEST, "E"). The need for biomechanical staging arose from the fact of altered biomechanical characteristics of keratectasia in comparison to healthy corneas. Ectatic corneas usually exhibit a biomechanical weakening and greater deformation than healthy corneas when exposed to a biomechanical stressor such as a standardized air puff indentation as provided by the Corvis ST® (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The BEST is based on the linear term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and provides a biomechanical keratoconus severity staging and progression assessment within the CST software. This review traces the development of the BEST as an addition to the tomographic ABCD staging system and highlights its strengths and limitations when applied in daily practice for the detection, monitoring and progression assessment in keratectasia.

Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach

Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest in assessing corneal biomechanics in different diseases, such as keratoconus, glaucoma, and corneal disorders. Given the interaction and structural continuity between the cornea and sclera, evaluating corneal biomechanics may give us further insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, progression, and management of glaucoma. Therefore, some authorities have recommended baseline evaluations of corneal biomechanics in all glaucoma and glaucoma suspects patients. Currently, two devices (Ocular Response Analyzer and Corneal Visualization Schiempflug Technology) are commercially available for evaluating corneal biomechanics; however, each device reports different parameters, and there is a weak to moderate agreement between the reported parameters. Studies are further limited by the inclusion of glaucoma subjects taking topical prostaglandin analogues, which may alter corneal biomechanics and contribute to contradicting results, lack of proper stratification of patients, and misinterpretation of the results based on factors that are confounded by intraocular pressure changes. This review aims to summarize the recent evidence on corneal biomechanics in glaucoma patients and insights for future studies to address the current limitations of the literature studying corneal biomechanics.