Improved Rod Sensitivity as Assessed by Two-Color Dark-Adapted Perimetry in Patients With RPE65-Related Retinopathy Treated With Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl

Partial rescue of the full-field electroretinogram in patients with RPE65-related retinal dystrophy following gene augmentation therapy with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl

PURPOSE

To present a series of patients with RPE65-related retinal dystrophy showing a partial rescue of the full-field electroretinogram (ERG) following gene replacement therapy with voretigene neparovec-rzyl (Luxturna®).

METHODS

This retrospective chart review examined 17 patients treated with voretigene neparovec-rzyl (VN) at the Casey Eye Institute (2018-2022). The last pre-operative ERG and all available post-operative ERGs were analyzed to identify subjects with functional rescue. Measurements of amplitudes and implicit times were compared to data from age-matched controls and the attenuation relative to the lower limit of normal (LLN) was calculated. For comparison with other functional exams, the last pre-operative and all post-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) data, visual field (VF) tests and full-field threshold stimulus tests (FST) were also described.

RESULTS

Of patients who underwent ERGs, most had unrecordable ERGs that did not change after treatment. However, we identified three patients, treated bilaterally, who demonstrated partial rescue of the full-field ERG in both eyes which was sustained during the course of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of patients treated with VN showing a partial rescue of the ERG. This is also the first report of bilateral ERG rescue, as well as the first description of ERG recovery occurring in non-pediatric subjects. Full-field ERG could be used in combination with other psychophysical tests and imaging modalities to detect and deepen our understanding of the response to this gene therapy approach.

Objective Outcomes to Evaluate Voretigene Neparvovec Treatment Effects in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of voretigene neparvovec (VN) treatment by objective fixation stability and chromatic pupillometry testing in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up.

SUBJECTS

Twelve patients (aged 7-34 years) with RPE65-related inherited retinal dystrophies were treated at the same center with VN in both eyes.

METHODS

Patients treated at the same center with VN were evaluated over a 12-month posttreatment follow-up by subjective and objective tests. Furthermore, patients treated with VN who developed atrophy were compared with those who did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), full-field stimulus threshold test (FST), semiautomated kinetic visual field (SKVF), microperimetry, and chromatic pupillometry over a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant improvements of BCVA (P < 0.001), SKVF (P < 0.05), and FST (P < 0.001) were already observed 45 days after treatment and were maintained at the 12-month timepoint. Fixation stability, assessed by microperimetry, improved significantly (P < 0.05) after treatment. Chromatic pupillometry showed significant improvements (P < 0.05) at the 6- and 12-month timepoints. The increase in maximum pupillary constriction significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with higher retinal sensitivity in FST. Four patients developed multifocal retinal atrophy in both eyes, detected at the 6-month timepoint, but this atrophy was not generally associated with worse visual function outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explores objective outcomes in order to demonstrate the efficacy of VN treatment in addition to the tests normally performed in clinical practice. Our findings show a significant improvement of retinal function both in subjective assessments, such as BCVA, SKVF, and FST, and in objective measurements of fixation stability and maximum pupillary constriction. Moreover, the significant correlation between maximum pupillary constriction and light sensitivity thresholds corroborates the introduction of chromatic pupillometry as an objective test to better assess treatment outcomes in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Phenotyping and genotyping inherited retinal diseases: Molecular genetics, clinical and imaging features, and therapeutics of macular dystrophies, cone and cone-rod dystrophies, rod-cone dystrophies, Leber congenital amaurosis, and cone dysfunction syndromes

Inherited retinal diseases (IRD) are a leading cause of blindness in the working age population and in children. The scope of this review is to familiarise clinicians and scientists with the current landscape of molecular genetics, clinical phenotype, retinal imaging and therapeutic prospects/completed trials in IRD. Herein we present in a comprehensive and concise manner: (i) macular dystrophies (Stargardt disease (ABCA4), X-linked retinoschisis (RS1), Best disease (BEST1), PRPH2-associated pattern dystrophy, Sorsby fundus dystrophy (TIMP3), and autosomal dominant drusen (EFEMP1)), (ii) cone and cone-rod dystrophies (GUCA1A, PRPH2, ABCA4, KCNV2 and RPGR), (iii) predominant rod or rod-cone dystrophies (retinitis pigmentosa, enhanced S-Cone syndrome (NR2E3), Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (CYP4V2)), (iv) Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (GUCY2D, CEP290, CRB1, RDH12, RPE65, TULP1, AIPL1 and NMNAT1), (v) cone dysfunction syndromes (achromatopsia (CNGA3, CNGB3, PDE6C, PDE6H, GNAT2, ATF6), X-linked cone dysfunction with myopia and dichromacy (Bornholm Eye disease; OPN1LW/OPN1MW array), oligocone trichromacy, and blue-cone monochromatism (OPN1LW/OPN1MW array)). Whilst we use the aforementioned classical phenotypic groupings, a key feature of IRD is that it is characterised by tremendous heterogeneity and variable expressivity, with several of the above genes associated with a range of phenotypes.

Single Center Experience with Voretigene Neparvovec Gene Augmentation Therapy in RPE65 Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration in a Clinical Setting

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of baseline data on psychophysical and morphological outcomes of subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) (Luxturna, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.) treatment.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal, consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with RPE65-biallelic mutation-associated inherited retinal degeneration (RPE65-IRD) treated between February 2020 and March 2022 with VN and oral immunosuppression according to the manufacturer's recommendation by one surgeon (F.G.H.).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgical and clinical records, ancillary testing, and retinal imaging after VN therapy for RPE65-IRD. Descriptive statistics compared data at baseline up to 32 months post-treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance VA (LLVA), Goldmann visual fields (GVFs), chromatic full-field stimulus threshold (FST) testing (FST), scotopic and photopic 2-color threshold perimetry (2CTP), and multimodal retinal imaging.

RESULTS

Thirty eyes of 19 patients were analyzed (10 pediatric patients < 20 years; 20 adult patients > 20 years of age; overall range: 8-40 years) with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-32). The fovea was completely or partially detached in 16 eyes, attached in 12 eyes, and not assessable in 2 eyes on intraoperative imaging. Median BCVA at baseline was better in the pediatric group (P < 0.05) and did not change significantly independent of age. Meaningful loss of BCVA (≥ 0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) occurred in 5 of 18 adult eyes, and a meaningful gain (≥-0.3 logMAR) occurred in 2 of 18 adult and 2 of 8 pediatric eyes. The LLVA and scotopic 2CTP improved considerably in pediatric patients. Scotopic blue FST improved at all ages but more in pediatric patients (8/8 eyes gained ≥ 10 decibels [dB]; P < 0.05). In pediatric patients, median GVF improved by 20% for target V4e and by 50% for target III4e (target I4e not detected). Novel atrophy developed in 13 of 26 eyes at the site of the bleb or peripheral of vascular arcades. Improvements in FST did not correlate with development of chorioretinal atrophy at 12 months. Mean central retinal thickness was 165.87 μm (± 26.26) at baseline (30 eyes) and 157.69 μm (± 30.3) at 12 months (26 eyes). Eight adult patients were treated unilaterally. The untreated eyes did not show meaningful changes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These data in a clinical setting show the effectiveness of VN therapy with stable median BCVA and mean retinal thickness and improvements of LLVA, FST, and 2CTP up to 32 months. Treatment effects were superior in the pediatric group. We observed new chorioretinal atrophy in 50% of the treated eyes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Application of Electrophysiology in Non-Macular Inherited Retinal Dystrophies

Inherited retinal dystrophies encompass a diverse group of disorders affecting the structure and function of the retina, leading to progressive visual impairment and, in severe cases, blindness. Electrophysiology testing has emerged as a valuable tool in assessing and diagnosing those conditions, offering insights into the function of different parts of the visual pathway from retina to visual cortex and aiding in disease classification. This review provides an overview of the application of electrophysiology testing in the non-macular inherited retinal dystrophies focusing on both common and rare variants, including retinitis pigmentosa, progressive cone and cone-rod dystrophy, bradyopsia, Bietti crystalline dystrophy, late-onset retinal degeneration, and fundus albipunctatus. The different applications and limitations of electrophysiology techniques, including multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), full-field ERG (ffERG), electrooculogram (EOG), pattern electroretinogram (PERG), and visual evoked potential (VEP), in the diagnosis and management of these distinctive phenotypes are discussed. The potential for electrophysiology testing to allow for further understanding of these diseases and the possibility of using these tests for early detection, prognosis prediction, and therapeutic monitoring in the future is reviewed.

Outcomes and Adverse Effects of Voretigene Neparvovec Treatment for Biallelic RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Dystrophies in a Cohort of Patients from a Single Center

Our study evaluated the morphological and functional outcomes, and the side effects, of voretigene neparvovec (VN) gene therapy for RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) in 12 eyes (six patients) at the Oxford Eye Hospital with a mean follow-up duration of 8.2 (range 1-12) months. All patients reported a subjective vision improvement 1 month after gene therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable (baseline: 1.28 (±0.71) vs. last follow-up: 1.46 (±0.60); p = 0.25). Average white Full-Field Stimulus Testing (FST) showed a trend towards improvement (baseline: -4.41 (±10.62) dB vs. last follow-up: -11.98 (±13.83) dB; p = 0.18). No changes in central retinal thickness or macular volume were observed. The side effects included mild intraocular inflammation (two eyes) and cataracts (four eyes). Retinal atrophy occurred in 10 eyes (eight mild, two severe) but did not impact FST measurements during the follow-up period. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) was noted in three patients (six eyes); four eyes (two patients) required glaucoma surgery. The overall safety and effectiveness of VN treatment in our cohort align with previous VN clinical trials, except for the higher occurrence of retinal atrophy and increased IOP in our cohort. This suggests that raised IOP and retinal atrophy may be more common than previously reported.