A Pilot Study of Perceptual-Motor Training for Peripheral Prisms

Gaze Scanning at Street Crossings by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With and Without Hemispatial Neglect

Purpose

To investigate compensatory gaze-scanning behaviors during street crossings by pedestrians with homonymous hemianopia (HH) and hemispatial neglect (HSN).

Methods

Pedestrians with right homonymous hemianopia (RHH) and left homonymous hemianopia without (LHH) and with left spatial-neglect (LHSN) walked on city streets wearing a gaze-tracking system that also captured scene videos. Street-crossing instances were manually annotated, and horizontal gaze scan of magnitude ≥20° and scanning rates were compared within-subject, between the side of the hemifield loss (BlindSide) and the other side (SeeingSide). Proportion of instances with scans to both the left and the right side at nonsignalized crossings (indicative of safe scanning behavior) were compared among the three subject groups.

Results

Data from 19 participants (6 LHH, 7 RHH, and 6 with mild [4] or moderate [2] LHSN), consisting of 521 street-crossing instances of a total duration of 201 minutes and 5375 gaze scans, were analyzed. The overall gaze magnitude (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was significantly larger toward the BlindSide (40.4° [39.1°-41.9°]) than the SeeingSide (36° [34.8°-37.3°]; P < 0.001). The scanning rate (mean [95% CI] scans/min) toward the BlindSide (14 [12.5-15.6]) was significantly higher than the SeeingSide (11.5 [10.3°-12.9°]; P < 0.001). The scanning rate in the LHSN group (10.7 [8.9-12.8]) was significantly lower than the LHH group (14 [11.6-17.0]; P = 0.045). The proportion of nonsignalized crossings with scans to both sides was significantly lower in LHSN (58%; P = 0.039) and RHH (51%; P = 0.003) than LHH (75%) participants.

Conclusions

All groups demonstrated compensatory scanning, making more gaze scans with larger magnitudes to the blind side. Mild to moderate LHSN adversely impacted the scanning rate.

Effects of Perceptual-motor Training on Collision Judgments with Peripheral Prism Expanded Vision

SIGNIFICANCE

Peripheral prisms (p-prisms) improve blind-side detection of hazards in hemianopia by shifting the image of the hazard into the intact visual field. Collision judgments can be made accurately after detection by using a gaze shift to fixate the hazard in the prism-free portion of the lens, but this is slow relative to normal peripheral vision. A prior study found that prism adaptation for visual direction did not occur with general wear. We developed a perceptual-motor training regimen that resulted in accurate pointing at p-prism targets after six 1-hour sessions.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine if improvements in pointing accuracy from perceptual-motor training generalized to collision judgments during simulated walking.

METHODS

Participants with hemianopia (n = 13) made collision judgments in virtual reality for a person appearing 0.4 to 13.5° from the walking path. Judgments were measured under fixed gaze, requiring collision judgments via the p-prism image only, and free gaze, representing a more natural scenario. Measurements were made without and with p-prisms immediately after fitting, after a 2-week acclimation, after training, and 3 months later. Controls (n = 13) did one visit without p-prisms.

RESULTS

Controls had 100% detection and symmetrically distributed collision judgments for the central 33 and 36% of hazards under fixed gaze and free gaze, respectively. In hemianopia, the seeing side was not different from controls. Blind-side detection was reduced without p-prisms to 40% fixed gaze and 82% free gaze and improved with p-prisms to 99% fixed gaze and 97% free gaze (P < .001). When first worn, fixed-gaze prism side collisions were 63 versus 37% on the seeing side and 41 versus 39% for free gaze (P < .001). There was a small improvement for fixed gaze after the 2-week acclimation (53%, P < .001), but no improvements from training or an additional 3 months of use.

CONCLUSIONS

P-prisms improved detection, but collision judgments were inaccurate when seen only via the p-prisms and did not improve with perceptual-motor training. Patients should continue to be advised to turn their head and eyes to fixate the hazard after detection.

Rehabilitation of visual disorders

While there is a long history of rehabilitation for motor deficits following cerebral lesions, less is known about our ability to improve visual deficits. Vision therapy, prisms, occluders, and filters have been advocated for patients with mild traumatic brain injury, on the premise that some of their symptoms may reflect abnormal visual or ocular motor function, but the evidence for their efficacy is modest. For hemianopia, attempts to restore vision have had unimpressive results, though it appears possible to generate blindsight through training. Strategic approaches that train more efficient use of visual search in hemianopia have shown consistent benefit in visual function, while prism aids may help some patients. There are many varieties of alexia. Strategic adaptation of saccades can improve hemianopic alexia, but there has been less work and mixed results for pure alexia, neglect dyslexia, attentional dyslexia, and the central dyslexias. A number of approaches have been tried in prosopagnosia, with recent studies of small groups suggesting that face perception of prosopagnosic subjects can be enhanced through perceptual learning.

Driving With Hemianopia VI: Peripheral Prisms and Perceptual-Motor Training Improve Detection in a Driving Simulator

Purpose

Drivers with homonymous hemianopia (HH) were previously found to have impaired detection of blind-side hazards, yet in many jurisdictions they may obtain a license. We evaluated whether oblique 57Δ peripheral prisms (p-prisms) and perceptual-motor training improved blind-side detection rates.

Methods

Patients with HH (n = 11) wore p-prisms for 2 weeks and then received perceptual-motor training (six visits) detecting and touching stimuli in the prism-expanded vision. In a driving simulator, patients drove and pressed the horn upon detection of pedestrians who ran toward the roadway (26 from each side): (1) without p-prisms at baseline; (2) with p-prisms after 2 weeks acclimation but before training; (3) with p-prisms after training; and (4) 3 months later.

Results

P-prisms improved blind-side detection from 42% to 56%, which further improved after training to 72% (all P < 0.001). Blind-side timely responses (adequate time to have stopped) improved from 31% without to 44% with p-prisms (P < 0.001) and further improved with training to 55% (P = 0.02). At the 3-month follow-up, improvements from training were maintained for detection (65%; P = 0.02) but not timely responses (P = 0.725). There was wide between-subject variability in baseline detection performance and response to p-prisms. There were no negative effects of p-prisms on vehicle control or seeing-side performance.

Conclusions

P-prisms improved detection with no negative effects, and training may provide additional benefit.

Translational Relevance

In jurisdictions where people with HH are legally driving, these data aid in clinical decision making by providing evidence that p-prisms improve performance without negative effects.