miR-543 regulates the epigenetic landscape of myelofibrosis by targeting TET1 and TET2

Fibrosis and bone marrow: understanding causation and pathobiology

Bone marrow fibrosis represents an important structural change in the marrow that interferes with some of its normal functions. The aetiopathogenesis of fibrosis is not well established except in its primary form. The present review consolidates current understanding of marrow fibrosis. We searched PubMed without time restriction using key words: bone marrow and fibrosis as the main stem against the terms: growth factors, cytokines and chemokines, morphology, megakaryocytes and platelets, myeloproliferative disorders, myelodysplastic syndrome, collagen biosynthesis, mesenchymal stem cells, vitamins and minerals and hormones, and mechanism of tissue fibrosis. Tissue marrow fibrosis-related papers were short listed and analysed for the review. It emerged that bone marrow fibrosis is the outcome of complex interactions between growth factors, cytokines, chemokines and hormones together with their facilitators and inhibitors. Fibrogenesis is initiated by mobilisation of special immunophenotypic subsets of mesenchymal stem cells in the marrow that transform into fibroblasts. Fibrogenic stimuli may arise from neoplastic haemopoietic or non-hematopoietic cells, as well as immune cells involved in infections and inflammatory conditions. Autoimmunity is involved in a small subset of patients with marrow fibrosis. Megakaryocytes and platelets are either directly involved or are important intermediaries in stimulating mesenchymal stem cells. MMPs, TIMPs, TGF-β, PDGRF, and basic FGF and CRCXL4 chemokines are involved in these processes. Genetic and epigenetic changes underlie many of these conditions.

Deepening Our Understanding of the Factors Affecting Landscape of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: What Do We Know about Them?

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) arise from the uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in bone marrow. As with all tumors, the development of MPNs is a consequence of alterations in malignant cells and their interaction with other extrinsic factors that support and promote tumor progression. Since the discovery of driver mutations, much work has focused on studying and reviewing the genomic features of the disease but has neglected to delve into the important role that many other mechanisms may play. This review discusses the genetic component of MPNs but focuses mainly on some of the most relevant work investigating other non-genetic factors that may be crucial for the disease. The studies summarized here address MPN cell-intrinsic or -extrinsic factors and the interaction between them through transcriptomic, proteomic and microbiota studies, among others.

The emerging role of non-coding RNAs in the epigenetic regulation of pediatric cancers

Epigenetics is a process that involves the regulation of gene expression without altering the sequence of DNA. Numerous studies have documented that epigenetic mechanisms play a critical role in cell growth, differentiation, and cancer over the past decade. The well-known epigenetic modifications are either on DNA or at the histone proteins. Although several studies have focused on regulating gene expression by non-coding RNAs, the current understanding of their biological functions in various human diseases, particularly in cancers, is inadequate. Only about two percent of DNA is involved in coding the protein-coding genes, and leaving the rest 98 percent is non-coding and the scientific community regarded as junk or noise with no known purpose. Most non-coding RNAs are derived from such junk DNA and are known to be involved in various signaling pathways involving cancer initiation, progression, and the development of therapy resistance in many human cancer types. Recent studies have suggested that non-coding RNAs, especially microRNAs, piwi-interactingRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs, play a significant role in controlling epigenetic mechanism(s), indicating the potential effect of epigenetic modulation of non-coding RNAs on cancer progression. In this review article, we briefly presented epigenetic marks' characteristics, crosstalk between epigenetic modifications and microRNAs, piwi-interactingRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs to uncover the effect on the phenotype of pediatric cancers. Further, current knowledge on understanding the RNA epigenetics will help design novel therapeutics that target epigenetic regulatory networks to benefit cancer patients in the clinic.

TET2-mediated epigenetic reprogramming of breast cancer cells impairs lysosome biogenesis

TET2-mediated oxidation of 5-methylcytosine establishes an antiviral state and contributes to MYC-dependent down-regulation of genes involved in lysosome biogenesis and function in breast cancer cells.

Methylation and demethylation of cytosines in DNA are believed to act as keystones of cell-specific gene expression by controlling the chromatin structure and accessibility to transcription factors. Cancer cells have their own transcriptional programs, and we sought to alter such a cancer-specific program by enforcing expression of the catalytic domain (CD) of the methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 in breast cancer cells. The TET2 CD decreased the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells through both activation and repression of a repertoire of genes that, interestingly, differed in part from the one observed upon treatment with the hypomethylating agent decitabine. In addition to promoting the establishment of an antiviral state, TET2 activated 5mC turnover at thousands of MYC-binding motifs and down-regulated a panel of known MYC-repressed genes involved in lysosome biogenesis and function. Thus, an extensive cross-talk between TET2 and the oncogenic transcription factor MYC establishes a lysosomal storage disease–like state that contributes to an exacerbated sensitivity to autophagy inducers.

MicroRNA-489-3p attenuates neuropathic allodynia by regulating oncoprotein DEK/TET1-dependent epigenetic modification in the dorsal horn

Originally characterized as an oncoprotein overexpressed in many forms of cancer that participates in numerous cellular pathways, DEK has since been well described regarding the regulation of epigenetic markers and transcription factors in neurons. However, its role in neuropathic allodynia processes remain elusive and intriguingly complex. Here, we show that DEK, which is induced in spinal dorsal horn neurons after spinal nerve ligation (SNL), is regulated by miR-489-3p. Moreover, SNL-induced decrease in miR-489-3p expression increased the expression of DEK, which recruited TET1 to the promoter fragments of the Bdnf, Grm5, and Stat3 genes, thereby enhancing their transcription in the dorsal horn. Remarkably, these effects were also induced by intrathecally administering naïve animals with miR-489-3p inhibitor, which could be inhibited by knockdown of TET1 siRNA or DEK siRNA. Conversely, delivery of intrathecal miR-489-3p-mimic into SNL rats attenuated allodynia behavior and reversed protein expression coupled to the promoter segments in the dorsal horn. Thus, a spinal miR-489-3p/DEK/TET1 transcriptional axis may contribute to neuropathic allodynia. These results may provide a new target for treating neuropathic allodynia.

SERS-based DNA methylation profiling allows the differential diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy

This study highlights the potential of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) to differentiate between B-cell lymphoma (BCL), T-cell lymphoma (TCL), lymph node metastasis of melanoma (Met) and control (Ctr) samples based on the specific SERS signal of DNA extracted from lymph node tissue biopsy. Differences in the methylation profiles as well as the specific interaction of malignant and non-malignant DNA with the metal nanostructure are captured in specific variations of the band at 1005 cm^-1, attributed to 5-methylcytosine and the band at 730 cm^-1, attributed to adenine. Thus, using the area ratio of these two SERS marker bands as input for univariate classification, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70 was achieved in differentiating between malignant and non-malignant DNA. In addition, DNA from the BCL and TCL groups exhibited differences in the area of the SERS band at 730 cm^-1, yielding an AUC of 0.84 in differentiating between these two lymphadenopathies. Lastly, using multivariate data analysis techniques, an overall accuracy of 94.7% was achieved in the differential diagnosis between the BCL, TCL, Met and Ctr groups. These results pave the way towards the implementation of SERS as a novel tool in the clinical setting for improving the diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy.

The Emerging Roles and Therapeutic Implications of Epigenetic Modifications in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies globally. In spite of positive responses to initial therapy, the overall survival rates of OC patients remain poor due to the development of drug resistance and consequent cancer recurrence. Indeed, intensive studies have been conducted to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying OC therapeutic resistance. Besides, emerging evidence suggests a crucial role for epigenetic modifications, namely, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA regulation, in the drug resistance of OC. These epigenetic modifications contribute to chemoresistance through various mechanisms, namely, upregulating the expression of multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs), remodeling of the tumor microenvironment, and deregulated immune response. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the role of epigenetic mechanisms in clinical therapeutic resistance may improve the outcome of OC patients. In this review, we will discuss the epigenetic regulation of OC drug resistance and propose the potential clinical implications of epigenetic therapies to prevent or reverse OC drug resistance, which may inspire novel treatment options by targeting resistance mechanisms for drug-resistant OC patients.

Cell-Free Biological Approach for Corneal Stromal Wound Healing

Corneal opacification is the fourth most common cause of blindness globally behind cataracts, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. The standard treatment of serious corneal scarring is corneal transplantation. Though it is effective for restoring vision, the treatment outcome is not optimal, due to limitations such as long-term graft survival, lifelong use of immunosuppressants, and a loss of corneal strength. Regulation of corneal stromal wound healing, along with inhibition or downregulation of corneal scarring is a promising approach to prevent corneal opacification. Pharmacological approaches have been suggested, however these are fraught with side effects. Tissue healing is an intricate process that involves cell death, proliferation, differentiation, and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Current research on stromal wound healing is focused on corneal characteristics such as the immune response, angiogenesis, and cell signaling. Indeed, promising new technologies with the potential to modulate wound healing are under development. In this review, we provide an overview of cell-free strategies and some approaches under development that have the potential to control stromal fibrosis and scarring, especially in the context of early intervention.

MiR-543 Inhibits the Migration and Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition of TGF-β-Treated Endometrial Stromal Cells via the MAPK and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathways

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is one of the most prevalent reproductive system diseases in females. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are reported to be master regulators in a variety of diseases, including IUA, but the role of microRNA-543 (miR-543) in IUA remains to be elucidated. In this study, we observed that miR-543 was downregulated in transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)-treated endometrial stromal cells (ESCs). Functionally, we observed that miR-543 suppressed the migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and inhibited expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in TGF-β-treated ESCs. Mechanistically, MAPK1 is targeted by miR-543 after prediction and screening. A luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that miR-543 complementarily binds with the 3' untranslated region of mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1), and western blot analysis indicated that miR-543 negatively regulates MAPK1 protein levels. In addition, results from rescue assays showed that miR-543 inhibits the migration and EMT of TGF-β-treated ESCs by targeting MAPK1. In addition, we observed that miR-543 inactivates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway through inhibiting the phosphorylation of MAPK1 and β-catenin. Finally, we confirmed that miR-543 represses migration, EMT and inhibits levels of ECM proteins in TGF-β-treated ESCs by targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Our results demonstrated that miR-543 suppresses migration and EMT of TGF-β-treated ESCs by targeting the MAPK and Wnt/β-catenin pathways.

miR-543 Inhibits the Occurrence and Development of Intrauterine Adhesion by Inhibiting the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Endometrial Cells

Objective

To explore the function of miR-543 in endometrial cells and the possible mechanism of regulating the occurrence and development of intrauterine adhesion.

Method

Endometrial epithelial cells and endometrial adenocarcinoma cells were transfected with miR-543 mimics and miR-543 inhibitor as the experimental group and were tested with the control group, using the CCK-8 method, scratch test, and Transwell assay, and flow cytometry was used to detect the proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of cells. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to detect the expression of corresponding mRNA and protein.

Results

After the overexpression of miR-543, endometrial epithelial cells and endometrial adenocarcinoma cells have reduced migratory, proliferative, and invasive capabilities, while the apoptosis rate has increased significantly. The mRNA expression of CDH2, COL16A1, vimentin, α-SMA and fibronectin decreased, and the protein expression of CDH2, vimentin, and α-SMA also decreased, while the mRNA and protein expression of CDH1 increased. The result after interfering with miR-543 is opposite, and luciferase reporter gene confirms that CDH2 is the target gene of miR-543.

Conclusion

During the formation of intrauterine adhesions, the expression of CDH2, COL16A1, vimentin, and α-SMA may be inhibited by the high expression of miR-543, which may affect the degree of fibrosis and collagen content in the intrauterine adhesions, thereby inhibiting the occurrence and development of intrauterine adhesions.

Editing and Chemical Modifications on Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer: A New Tale with Clinical Significance

Currently, for seemingly every type of cancer, dysregulated levels of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are reported and non-coding transcripts are expected to be the next class of diagnostic and therapeutic tools in oncology. Recently, alterations to the ncRNAs transcriptome have emerged as a novel hallmark of cancer. Historically, ncRNAs were characterized mainly as regulators and little attention was paid to the mechanisms that regulate them. The role of modifications, which can control the function of ncRNAs post-transcriptionally, only recently began to emerge. Typically, these modifications can be divided into reversible (i.e., chemical modifications: m⁵C, hm⁵C, m⁶A, m¹A, and pseudouridine) and non-reversible (i.e., editing: ADAR dependent, APOBEC dependent and ADAR/APOBEC independent). The first research papers showed that levels of these modifications are altered in cancer and can be part of the tumorigenic process. Hence, the aim of this review paper is to describe the most common regulatory modifications (editing and chemical modifications) of the traditionally considered “non-functional” ncRNAs (i.e., microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs and circular RNAs) in the context of malignant disease. We consider that only by understanding this extra regulatory layer it is possible to translate the knowledge about ncRNAs and their modifications into clinical practice.

Overview of the Side-Effects of FDA- and/or EMA-Approved Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies

In the last decade there has been tremendous effort in offering better therapeutic management strategies to patients with hematologic malignancies. These efforts have ranged from biological to clinical approaches and resulted in the rapid development of new approaches. The main “problem” that comes with the high influx of newly approved drugs, which not only influences hematologists that frequently work with these drugs but also affects other healthcare professionals that work with hematologists in patient management, including intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, is they have to keep up within their specialty and, in addition, with the side-effects that can occur when encountering hematology-specific therapies. Nonetheless, there are few people that have an in-depth understanding of a specialty outside theirs. Thus, this manuscript offers an overview of the most common side-effects caused by therapies used in hematology nowadays, or that are currently being investigated in clinical trials, with the purpose to serve as an aid to other specialties. Nevertheless, because of the high amount of information on this subject, each chapter will offer an overview of the side-effects of a drug class with each reference of the section being intended as further reading.

SERS-Based Assessment of MRD in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia?

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a unique chromosome translocation t(15;17)(q24;q21), which leads to the PML/RARA gene fusion formation. However, it is acknowledged that this rearrangement alone is not able to induce the whole leukemic phenotype. In addition, epigenetic processes, such as DNA methylation, may play a crucial role in leukemia pathogenesis. DNA methylation, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), involves the covalent transfer of a methyl group (-CH3) to the fifth carbon of the cytosine ring in the CpG dinucleotide and results in the formation of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC). The aberrant gene promoter methylation can be an alternative mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation. Understanding cancer epigenetics and its pivotal role in oncogenesis, can offer us not only attractive targets for epigenetic treatment but can also provide powerful tools in monitoring the disease and estimating the prognosis. Several genes of interest, such as RARA, RARB, p15, p16, have been studied in APL and their methylation status was correlated with potential diagnostic and prognostic significance. In the present manuscript we comprehensively examine the current knowledge regarding DNA methylation in APL pathogenesis. We also discuss the perspectives of using the DNA methylation patterns as reliable biomarkers for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring and as a predictor of relapse. This work also highlights the possibility of detecting aberrant methylation profiles of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) through liquid biopsies, using the conventional methods, such as methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR), sequencing methods, but also revolutionary methods, such as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS).

The role of miR-543 in human cancerous and noncancerous diseases

MicroRNA (miRNA) is a noncoding single-stranded RNA molecule that can regulate the posttranscriptional expression level of a gene by binding to the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of the target messenger RNA. miR-543 is a kind of miRNA, which plays an important role in the occurrence and development of various human cancerous and noncancerous diseases. miR-543 directly or indirectly regulates a large number of downstream target genes and plays an important role in cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions. In addition, many studies have verified the regulatory mechanism, physiological role, biological function, and prognostic value of miR-543. Therefore, this article reviews the papers published in the past decade and elaborates on the research progress of miR-543 from the aspects of physiology and pathology, especially in cancerous and other noncancerous diseases. In particular, we pay attention to the expression patterns, direct targets, biological functions, related pathways, and prognostic value of miR-543 reported in experimental articles. And by comparing similar research articles, we point out existing controversies in this field to date, so as to facilitate further research in the future.

The Interplay between MicroRNAs and the Components of the Tumor Microenvironment in B-Cell Malignancies

An increased focus is being placed on the tumorigenesis and contexture of tumor microenvironment in hematopoietic and solid tumors. Despite recent clinical revolutions in adoptive T-cell transfer approaches and immune checkpoint blockade, tumor microenvironment is a major obstacle to tumor regression in B-cell malignancies. A transcriptional alteration of coding and non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs), has been widely demonstrated in the tumor microenvironment of B-cell malignancies. MiRNAs have been associated with different clinical-biological forms of B-cell malignancies and involved in the regulation of B lymphocyte development, maturation, and function, including B-cell activation and malignant transformation. Additionally, tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles regulate recipient cell functions in the tumor microenvironment to facilitate metastasis and progression by delivering miRNA contents to neighboring cells. Herein, we focus on the interplay between miRNAs and tumor microenvironment components in the different B-cell malignancies and its impact on diagnosis, proliferation, and involvement in treatment resistance.