1
|
Lopez-Valcarcel M, Lopez-Campos F, Zafra J, Cienfuegos I, Ferri M, Barrado M, Hernando S, Counago F. Liquid biopsy to personalize treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Transl Res 2024; 16:1531-1549. [PMID: 38883349 PMCID: PMC11170619 DOI: 10.62347/dicu9510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is an innovative approach that provides a more complete understanding of treatment response and prognosis in monitoring metastatic prostate cancer. It complements invasive tissue biopsy and involves the assessment of various biomarkers in body fluids such as blood, semen, and urine. Liquid biopsy analyzes circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, circulating tumor DNA, and the secretome. This is particularly important given the heterogeneity of prostate cancer and the need for better prognostic biomarkers. Liquid biopsy can personalize the treatment of homonosensitive and castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer by acting as a predictive and prognostic tool. This review discusses various biomarkers, assay techniques, and potential applications in daily clinical practice, highlighting the exciting possibilities that this emerging field holds for improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Lopez-Valcarcel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan Zafra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital Málaga, Spain
| | - Irene Cienfuegos
- Department of Urology, Virgen del Puerto Hospital Plasencia, Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain
| | - Maria Ferri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Marta Barrado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Navarra University Hospital Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Susana Hernando
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Fundación Alcorcon University Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Counago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid Clinical Director, San Francisco de Asis and La Milagrosa Hospitals, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bryce AH, Crawford ED, Agarwal N, Hussain MH, Beltran H, Cooperberg MR, Petrylak DP, Shore N, Spratt DE, Tagawa ST, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Boike TP, Calais J, Carducci MA, Chapin BF, Cookson MS, Davis JW, Dorff T, Eggener SE, Feng FY, Gleave M, Higano C, Iagaru A, Morgans AK, Morris M, Murray KS, Poage W, Rettig MB, Sartor O, Scher HI, Sieber P, Small E, Srinivas S, Yu EY, Zhang T, Koo PJ. Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 2. JU OPEN PLUS 2024; 2:e00032. [PMID: 38774467 PMCID: PMC11107999 DOI: 10.1097/ju9.0000000000000138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Background Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature. Materials and Methods The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators. Results This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies. Conclusions The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan H. Bryce
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - E. David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Maha H. Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center/Genesis Care, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | | | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Ana M. Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew J. Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Brian F. Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - John W. Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tanya Dorff
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Scott E. Eggener
- Departments of Surgery (Urology), University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katie S. Murray
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Wendy Poage
- Prostate Conditions Education Council, Centennial, Colorado
| | - Matthew B. Rettig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Departments of Medicine and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Howard I. Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Sieber
- Keystone Urology Specialists, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miyahira AK, Soule HR. The 29th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation Scientific Retreat Report. Prostate 2024; 84:113-130. [PMID: 37915138 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 29th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Scientific Retreat was held from October 27 to 29, 2022, at the Omni La Costa Resort in Carlsbad, CA. This was the first-ever hybrid PCF Retreat. METHODS The Annual PCF Scientific Retreat is a prominent international scientific gathering centered on groundbreaking, unpublished, and influential studies in basic, translational, and clinical prostate cancer research. It also covers research from related fields with a strong potential for influencing prostate cancer research and patient care. RESULTS Key areas of research that were focused on at the 2022 PCF Retreat included: (i) the contributions of molecular and genomic factors to prostate cancer disparities; (ii) novel clinical trial updates; (iii) lessons from primary prostate cancer; (iv) lessons from single-cell studies; (v) genetic, epigenetic, epitranscriptomic and posttranslational mechanisms and clinical heterogeneity in prostate cancer; (vi) biology of neuroendocrine and lineage-plastic prostate cancer; (vii) next generation prostate cancer theranostics and combination therapies; (viii) the biology and therapeutic potential of targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinases pathways; (ix) combining immunomodulatory treatments for prostate cancer; (x) novel gamma delta (γδ) T-cell therapy platforms for oncology; and (xi) lessons from other cancers. CONCLUSIONS This article provides a summary of the presentations from the 2022 PCF Scientific Retreat. By disseminating this knowledge, we hope to enhance our understanding of the present research landscape and guide future strides in both prostate cancer research and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K Miyahira
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Howard R Soule
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kato T, Kawakami K, Mizutani K, Ando T, Sakai Y, Sakurai K, Toyota S, Ehara H, Ito H, Ito M. H19 in Serum Extracellular Vesicles Reflects Resistance to AR Axis-targeted Therapy Among CRPC Patients. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2023; 20:456-468. [PMID: 37643783 PMCID: PMC10464938 DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We aimed to evaluate the changes of androgen receptor (AR) signaling-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in serum extracellular vesicles (EVs) from prostate cancer (PC) patients, in order to identify novel biomarkers for AR axis-targeted therapy (ARAT)-resistance among castration-resistant PC (CRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS EVs were isolated from 2 patients before and after acquiring ARAT-resistance. RNA profiling of EVs was performed by RNA-sequencing. The expression levels of selected lncRNAs in EVs were analyzed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in 58 localized and 14 metastatic PC patients at diagnosis, 7 ARAT-naïve and 6 ARAT-resistant CRPC patients. LncRNA H19 expression in PC tissue was examined using published data. In order to analyze the role of H19, the prognosis was analyzed in PC patients and proteomic analysis was performed in 22Rv1 PC cells. RESULTS RNA-sequencing revealed that AR-regulated RNAs were most enriched in EVs after acquiring ARAT-resistance. Among them, up-regulation of AR signaling-related lncRNAs (PCAT1, H19, HOXA-11AS, ZEB1-AS1, ARLNC1, PART1, CTBP1-AS and PCA3) was confirmed by ddPCR. H19 contained in EVs (EV-H19) was significantly increased among ARAT-resistant patients compared to ARAT-naïve CRPC or metastatic PC patients. In PC tissue, H19 was negatively correlated with AR protein and AR-activity score and up-regulated in neuroendocrine CRPC tissue with low AR expression. Furthermore, EV-H19 expression was significantly associated with worse outcome to androgen-deprivation therapy. Proteomic analysis demonstrated that H19 knockdown enhanced PC-related protein expression. CONCLUSION EV-H19 may negatively correlate with AR-signaling activity and could be a marker to diagnose ARAT-resistance among CRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Kato
- Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan;
- Department of Urology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kyojiro Kawakami
- Research Team for Functional Biogerontology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Mizutani
- Department of Urology, Central Japan International Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ando
- Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Sakai
- Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kouhei Sakurai
- Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Shohei Toyota
- Department of Urology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Ehara
- Department of Urology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Ito
- Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ito
- Research Team for Functional Biogerontology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang X, Barnett E, Smith J, Wilkinson E, Subramaniam RM, Zarrabi A, Rodger EJ, Chatterjee A. Genetic and epigenetic features of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and their emerging applications. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 383:41-66. [PMID: 38359970 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer in men globally. De novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is uncommon at initial diagnosis, however, (treatment-induced) t-NEPC emerges in up to 25% of prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) cases treated with androgen deprivation, carrying a drastically poor prognosis. The transition from PRAD to t-NEPC is underpinned by several key genetic mutations; TP53, RB1, and MYCN are the main genes implicated, bearing similarities to other neuroendocrine tumours. A broad range of epigenetic alterations, such as aberrations in DNA methylation, histone post-translational modifications, and non-coding RNAs, may drive lineage plasticity from PRAD to t-NEPC. The clinical diagnosis of NEPC is hampered by a lack of accessible biomarkers; recent advances in liquid biopsy techniques assessing circulating tumour cells and ctDNA in NEPC suggest that the advent of non-invasive means of monitoring progression to NEPC is on the horizon. Such techniques are vital for NEPC management; diagnosis of t-NEPC is crucial for implementing effective treatment, and precision medicine will be integral to providing the best outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xintong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Edward Barnett
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jim Smith
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Te Whatu Ora/Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Emma Wilkinson
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia; Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Amir Zarrabi
- Te Whatu Ora/Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand; Precision Urology, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Euan J Rodger
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Aniruddha Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Honorary Professor, School of Health Sciences and Technology, UPES University, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kemppainen J, Kangasmäki A, Malaspina S, Pape B, Jalomäki J, Kairemo K, Kononen J, Joensuu T. Single Center Experience with a 4-Week 177Lu-PSMA-617 Treatment Interval in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246155. [PMID: 36551641 PMCID: PMC9776672 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a promising theragnostic treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, both the optimal treatment dose and interval in mCRPC and the rate of identification of responders from non-responders among possible treatment candidates are unknown. Methods: 62 men with mCRPC who were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 during 1/2017−2/2019 were included in the study. Treatment responses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were determined. The median follow-up time was 1.4 years (IQR 0.5−2.2). Tumor volume of metastases (MTV), SUVmax and tumor lesion activity (TLA) were quantitated from pre-treatment PSMA PET/CT images together with pre-treatment PSA. Results: An average of three treatment cycles (2−5) were given within a four-week interval. PFS was 4.9 months (2.4−9.6) and OS was 17.2 months (6−26.4). There were no major adverse events reported. A significant PSA response of >50% was found in 58.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with longer OS, p < 0.004. PSA response was not associated with staging PSMA-derived parameters. Conclusions: 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment in four-week intervals was safe and effective. Almost 60% of patients had a significant PSA response, which was associated with better OS. Pre-treatment PSA kinetics or staging PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters were not helpful in identifying treatment responders from non-responders; better biomarkers are needed to aid in patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jukka Kemppainen
- Docrates Cancer Center, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +358-10-773-2050
| | | | - Simona Malaspina
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Bernd Pape
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vaasa, 65101 Vaasa, Finland
| | | | - Kalevi Kairemo
- Docrates Cancer Center, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|