Pharmacokinetics of the KRASG12C inhibitor adagrasib is limited by CYP3A and ABCB1, and influenced by binding to mouse plasma carboxylesterase 1c

Adagrasib (Krazati™) is the second FDA-approved specific KRASG12C inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring this mutation. The impact of the drug efflux transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2, and the drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP3A and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) on the pharmacokinetics of oral adagrasib were studied using genetically modified mouse models. Adagrasib was potently transported by human ABCB1 and modestly by mouse Abcg2 in vitro. In Abcb1a/b-/- and Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice, the brain-to-plasma ratios were enhanced by 33- and 55-fold, respectively, compared to wild-type mice, whereas ratios in Abcg2-/- mice remained unchanged. The influence of ABC transporters was completely reversed by coadministration of the dual ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar, increasing the brain penetration in wild-type mice by 41-fold while no signs of acute CNS toxicity were observed. Tumor ABCB1 overexpression may thus confer adagrasib resistance. Whereas the ABC transporters did not affect adagrasib plasma exposure, CYP3A and Ces1 strongly impacted its apparent oral availability. The plasma AUC0-8 h was significantly enhanced by 2.3-fold in Cyp3a-/- compared to wild-type mice, and subsequently 4.3-fold reduced in transgenic CYP3A4 mice, indicating substantial CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adagrasib plasma exposure was strongly reduced in Ces1-/- compared to wild-type mice, but tissue exposure was slightly increased, suggesting that adagrasib binds to plasma Ces1c in mice and is perhaps metabolized by Ces1. This binding could complicate interpretation of mouse studies, especially since humans lack circulating CES1 enzyme(s). Our results may be useful to further optimize the clinical safety and efficacy of adagrasib, and give more insight into potential drug-drug interactions risks.

Structure and Function of Hepatobiliary ATP Binding Cassette Transporters

The liver is beyond any doubt the most important metabolic organ of the human body. This function requires an intensive crosstalk within liver cellular structures, but also with other organs. Membrane transport proteins are therefore of upmost importance as they represent the sensors and mediators that shuttle signals from outside to the inside of liver cells and/or vice versa. In this review, we summarize the known literature of liver transport proteins with a clear emphasis on functional and structural information on ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which are expressed in the human liver. These primary active membrane transporters form one of the largest families of membrane proteins. In the liver, they play an essential role in for example bile formation or xenobiotic export. Our review provides a state of the art and comprehensive summary of the current knowledge of hepatobiliary ABC transporters. Clearly, our knowledge has improved with a breath-taking speed over the last few years and will expand further. Thus, this review will provide the status quo and will lay the foundation for new and exciting avenues in liver membrane transporter research.

P-glycoprotein Limits Ribociclib Brain Exposure and CYP3A4 Restricts Its Oral Bioavailability

Ribociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of some types of breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor. It is currently investigated in the clinic to treat other malignancies, including brain tumors. Using in vitro and genetically modified mouse models, we investigated the effect of the multidrug efflux transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2, and the drug-metabolizing CYP3A enzymes on ribociclib pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution. In vitro, ribociclib was avidly transported by human ABCB1, but not by human ABCG2 and only modestly by mouse Abcg2. Upon oral administration at 20 mg/kg, the plasma AUC_0-24h of ribociclib was increased by 2.3-fold, and its terminal elimination was delayed in Abcb1a/1b^-/-;Abcg2^-/- compared to wild-type mice. The brain-to-plasma ratios of ribociclib were increased by at least 23-fold relative to wild-type mice in Abcb1a/1b^-/-;Abcg2^-/- and Abc1a/1b^-/- mice, but not noticeably in Abcg2^-/- mice. Oral coadministration of elacridar, an ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor, increased the brain penetration of ribociclib in wild-type mice to the same level as seen in Abcb1a/1b^-/-;Abcg2^-/- mice. Plasma exposure of ribociclib further decreased by 3.8-fold when transgenic human CYP3A4 was overexpressed in Cyp3a-deficient mice. Ribociclib penetration into the brain is thus drastically limited by ABCB1 in the blood-brain barrier, but coadministration of elacridar can fully reverse this process. Moreover, human CYP3A4 can extensively metabolize ribociclib and strongly restrict its oral bioavailability. The insights obtained from this study may be useful to further optimize the clinical application of ribociclib, especially for the treatment of (metastatic) brain tumors.

Effect of the ATP-binding cassette drug transporters ABCB1, ABCG2, and ABCC2 on erlotinib hydrochloride (Tarceva) disposition in in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies employing Bcrp1-/-/Mdr1a/1b-/- (triple-knockout) and wild-type mice

We tested whether erlotinib hydrochloride (Tarceva, OSI-774), an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a substrate for the ATP-binding cassette drug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp; MDR1, ABCB1), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2), and multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2) in vitro and whether P-gp and BCRP affect the oral pharmacokinetics of erlotinib hydrochloride in vivo. In vitro cell survival, drug transport, accumulation, and efflux of erlotinib were done using Madin-Darby canine kidney II [MDCKII; wild-type (WT), MDR1, Bcrp1, and MRP2] and LLCPK (WT and MDR1) cells and monolayers as well as the IGROV1 and the derived human BCRP-overexpressing T8 cell lines. In vivo, the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib after p.o. and i.p. administration was studied in Bcrp1/Mdr1a/1b(-/-) (triple-knockout) and WT mice. In vitro, erlotinib was actively transported by P-gp and BCRP/Bcrp1. No active transport of erlotinib by MRP2 was observed. In vivo, systemic exposure (P = 0.01) as well as bioavailability of erlotinib after oral administration (5 mg/kg) were statistically significantly increased in Bcrp1/Mdr1a/1b(-/-) knockout mice (60.4%) compared with WT mice (40.0%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib is transported efficiently by P-gp and BCRP/Bcrp1 in vitro. In vivo, absence of P-gp and Bcrp1 significantly affected the oral bioavailability of erlotinib. Possible clinical consequences for drug-drug and drug-herb interactions in patients in the gut between P-gp/BCRP-inhibiting substrates and oral erlotinib need to be addressed.

In vitro transport of gimatecan (7-t-butoxyiminomethylcamptothecin) by breast cancer resistance protein, P-glycoprotein, and multidrug resistance protein 2

Lipophilic camptothecin derivatives are considered to have negligible affinity for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2). Gimatecan, a new orally available 7-t-butoxyiminomethyl-substituted lipophilic camptothecin derivative, has been previously reported to be not a substrate for BCRP. Using a panel of in vitro models, we tested whether gimatecan is a substrate for BCRP as well as for P-glycoprotein (MDR1) or multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2), ATP-binding cassette drug efflux transporters involved in anticancer drug resistance, and able to affect the pharmacokinetics of substrate drugs. Cell survival, drug transport, accumulation, and efflux were studied in IGROV1 and (human BCRP overexpressing) T8 cells, Madin-Darby canine kidney II (MDCKII-WT, MDCKII-Bcrp1, MDCKII-MDR1, and MDCKII-MRP2), and LLCPK (LLCPK-WT and LLCPK-MDR1) cells. Competition with methotrexate uptake was studied in Sf9-BCRP membrane vesicles. In vitro, expression of BCRP resulted in 8- to 10-fold resistance to gimatecan. In Transwell experiments, gimatecan was transported by Bcrp1 and transport was inhibited by the BCRP/P-glycoprotein inhibitors elacridar and pantoprazole. Efflux of gimatecan from MDCKII-Bcrp1 cells was faster than in WT cells. In Sf9-BCRP membrane vesicles, gimatecan significantly inhibited BCRP-mediated transport of methotrexate. In contrast, gimatecan was not transported by MDR1 or MRP2. Gimatecan is transported by BCRP/Bcrp1 in vitro, although to a lesser extent than the camptothecin analogue topotecan. Implications of BCRP expression in the gut for the oral development of gimatecan and the interaction between gimatecan and other BCRP substrate drugs and/or inhibitors warrant further clinical investigation.