Evaluation of a complex case: the value of a drug washout period

Polypharmacy or medication washout: an old tool revisited

There has been a rapid increase in the use of polypharmacy in psychiatry possibly due to the introduction of newer drugs, greater availability of these newer drugs, excessive confidence in clinical trial results, widespread prescribing of psychotropic medications by primary care, and pressure to augment with additional medications for unresolved side effects or greater efficacy. Even the new generation of medications may not hold significant advantages over older drugs. In fact, there may be additional safety risks with polypharmacy being so widespread. Washout, as a clinical tool, is rarely done in medication management today. Studies have shown that augmenting therapy with additional medications resulted in 9.1%-34.1% dropouts due to intolerance of the augmentation, whereas studies of medication washout demonstrated only 5.9%-7.8% intolerance to the washout procedure. These perils justify reconsideration of medication washout before deciding on augmentation. There are unwarranted fears and resistance in the medical community toward medication washout, especially at the moment a physician is trying to decide whether to washout or add more medications to the treatment regimen. However, medication washout provides unique benefits to the physician: it establishes a new baseline of the disorder, helps identify medication efficacy from their adverse effects, and provides clarity of diagnosis and potential reduction of drug treatments, drug interactions, and costs. It may also reduce overall adverse events, not to mention a potential to reduce liability. After washout, physicians may be able to select the appropriate polypharmacy more effectively and safely, if necessary. Washout, while not for every patient, may be an effective tool for physicians who need to decide on whether to add potentially risky polypharmacy for a given patient. The risks of washout may, in some cases, be lower and the benefits may be clearly helpful for diagnosis, understanding medication effects, the doctor/patient relationship, and safer use of polypharmacy if indicated.

Augmentation strategies of clozapine with antipsychotics in the treatment of ultraresistant schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 70% of neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenic patients are nonresponders to clozapine. Several clozapine augmentation strategies have come into clinical practice although often without evidence-based support. Among these strategies, the combined use of clozapine with another antipsychotic has been reported for up to 35% of patients receiving clozapine.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of the present work were to (1) review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of the clozapine augmentation with another antipsychotic using a MEDLINE search of the literature from 1978 to December 2005 and (2) to propose an operational definition of schizophrenia refractory to clozapine ("ultraresistant schizophrenia") for the implementation and homogenization of future therapeutic trials.

CONCLUSION

Case controls and open clinical trials largely dominate the literature, and there are only 4 double-blind studies of clozapine augmentation with antipsychotics. The results of these studies are somewhat discrepant. Moreover, the heterogeneity of definitions of resistance to clozapine, of outcome measures and of dose and duration of pharmacological trials is a major limitation for drawing conclusions.

Clozapin-Augmentation mit atypischen Antipsychotika

Typical antipsychotic medications have considerably improved clinical outcome of patients suffering from schizophrenic psychoses, but up to 40% of the cases show treatment resistant symptoms. Even therapy with atypical antipsychotic drugs such as risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, sulpiride, amisulpride, and ziprasidone often fails to reach complete remission due to resistant, positive or negative symptoms or dose-limiting side effects. As this also holds true in the case of monotherapy with clozapine, a substance known to be effective against treatment-resistant schizophrenia, increasing numbers of patients receive atypical antipsychotic drugs in addition to clozapine. This review systematically evaluates case reports and clinical investigations on the use of clozapine combined with risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sulpiride, amisulpride, or ziprasidone. Details on indication, methodology, and effects of the investigations are summarized. Only one double blind, placebo-controlled trial on the combination with sulpiride exists within a number of altogether 31 publications about 1182 treatments. Favorable effects on positive and/or negative symptoms or improvements of clozapine-induced side effects were described for every combination approach. In some cases pharmacokinetic interactions or serious unfavorable effects occurred. In conclusion it might be accepted that most of the combination therapies follow a neurobiological rational. There a major differences in the level of evidence that they are safe, tolerable and effective. We discuss criteria for the indication for augmenting clozapine therapy and the differential indication for existing alternatives. Additional randomized prospective trials are needed in order to evaluate these strategies systematically.