Predictors of CNS-Active Medication Use and Polypharmacy Among Homebound Older Adults With Depression

Prevalence and trend of central nervous system-active medication polypharmacy among US commercially insured adults with vs without early-onset dementia: a multi-year cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the prevalence and trend of central nervous system (CNS)-active medication polypharmacy among adults with early-onset dementia (EOD) and whether these estimates differ for adults without EOD but with chronic pain, depression, or epilepsy, conditions managed by CNS-active medications.

METHODS

A multi-year, cross-sectional study using 2012-2021 MarketScan Commercial Claims data was conducted among adults aged 30 to 64 years with EOD and those without EOD but having a diagnosis of chronic pain, depression, or epilepsy as comparison groups. For each disease cohort, the primary outcome was CNS-active medication polypharmacy defined as concurrent use of ≥ 3 CNS-active medications on the US Beers Criteria list that overlapped for > 30 consecutive days during 12 months following a randomly selected medical encounter with the disease diagnosis. A separate multivariate modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate time trends in CNS polypharmacy in each disease cohort. Differences in trend estimates between EOD and non-EOD disease cohorts were examined by an interaction between EOD status and yearly time.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2020, the annual crude prevalence of CNS polypharmacy was higher among adults with EOD (21.2%-25.0%) than adults with chronic pain (5.1%-5.9%), depression (14.8%-21.7%), or epilepsy (20.0%-22.3%). The adjusted annual prevalence of CNS polypharmacy among patients with EOD did not significantly change between 2013 and 2020 (adjusted prevalence rate ratio [aPRR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.01), whereas a significant decreasing trend was observed among non-EOD cohorts with chronic pain (aPRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.69), depression (aPRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and epilepsy (aPRR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89). The interaction analysis indicated that patients with epilepsy and depression (vs with EOD) had a decreasing probability of CNS-active medication polypharmacy over time (aPRR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]; P < .001 for interaction for both conditions).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CNS polypharmacy among US commercially insured adults with EOD (vs without) was higher and remained unchanged from 2013 to 2021. Medication reviews of adults with EOD and CNS polypharmacy are needed to ensure that benefits outweigh risks associated with combined use of these treatments.

Mitigating the Risk of Adverse Effects Related to Augmentation Therapy for Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: A Case Report

Polypharmacy of psychotropic medications predisposes older adults to adverse drug events (ADEs). One contributing factor is inhibition of metabolic pathways between substrates (competitive inhibition) or between substrates and inhibitors of the same cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoforms. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate observed sedation and difficulty concentrating from augmentation therapy for resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and to highlight the value of clinical tools to identify opportunities for treatment optimization to reduce ADEs. The pharmacist identified significant medication burden and competitive inhibition of drug metabolism in the CYP450 system during a telehealth medication therapy management consultation with a 69-year-old male. The pharmacist recommended clinical monitoring and communicated concerns about medication-induced sedation, difficulty concentrating, and other medication-related problems (MRP) to providers. Several recommendations were implemented which helped improved patient’s outcomes. Individualizing MDD pharmacotherapy based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions and geriatric dosage considerations may lead to better outcomes and tolerability among older adults.

Association Between Polypharmacy, Anxiety, and Depression Among Chinese Older Adults: Evidence from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey

Purpose

To investigate the association between polypharmacy, anxiety, and depression among Chinese older adults.

Patients and Methods

The data used in this study were from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), the 2018 wave. Polypharmacy status was measured by the accumulation of self-reported medications. Anxiety and depression were assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), respectively. Logistic regression models were performed.

Results

A total of 2484 Chinese older adults (female: 1321, 53.2%) aged from 60 to 117 years old were included in the analysis. Regression analysis showed that polypharmacy was associated with depression after controlling for the covariates. No association was observed between polypharmacy and anxiety.

Conclusion

There was a suggestive link between polypharmacy and depression among Chinese older adults. Having polypharmacy might be an indicator for the possible depression among this population, but a comprehensive assessment of polypharmacy is necessary.

First Do No Harm: Psychotropic Prescribing Principles and Guidelines for Older Adults

The drive to prescribe to alleviate symptoms and ease suffering is prevalent in health care. In psychiatry, it is no different. Although monotherapy remains the preferred approach to treating psychiatric disorders, especially when combined with nonpharmacological approaches, in practice, a focus on remission of symptoms over patient preferences and quality of life can result in higher doses than necessary and polypharmacy from the addition of drugs for augmentation or treatment of adverse effects. This is especially concerning for older adults who are likely to have comorbid medical disorders, eventually leading to prescribing cascades as different providers address different symptoms. Whereas we generally look to best practice guidelines to treat identified disorders, the approach to treating older adults with multimorbidities requires collaboration among the patient, the family (if appropriate), and the provider to re-evaluate goals based on the patient's priorities, and to examine tradeoffs, reduce medication overload, and simplify care. Fortunately, many resources are available to help the clinician in this process. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 58(8), 12-16.].