A Case for Psychiatric Leadership in Dispositional Capacity Assessment

C-L Case Conference: Assessment of Dispositional Capacity in Medically Complex Patients

We present the case of a 76-year-old male with mild cognitive impairment and delirium who was referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry for an assessment of capacity to choose discharge. Cases involving "dispositional capacity" are complex and increasingly frequent, with momentous consequences for patients and their families, but are rarely discussed in the literature. In this article, experts in functional assessment, cognition, and ethics provide guidance for this commonly encountered clinical scenario based on their experience and available literature. We review the content and formulation of occupational and physical therapy assessments and their utility to the consultation-liaison psychiatrist. We also examine the relationship of cognitive impairment to decisional capacity and offer suggestions on a structured approach to evaluation. Finally, we discuss the ethical and systemic considerations of dispositional capacity and explore potential pitfalls that can lead to interprofessional conflict and missed opportunities in patient care.

Racial Disparities in Psychiatric Decisional Capacity Consultations

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors examined potential disparities and biases in the placement and outcomes of decisional capacity evaluations across races, controlling for patient characteristics.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 181 patient decisional capacity consultations requested for the consultation-liaison psychiatry service at a tertiary care medical center from 2018 to 2019. The racial distribution of patients in these consultations was compared with the racial distribution of hospital inpatient admissions from 2018 to 2019. The authors analyzed patient outcomes by using logistic regression that controlled for race, gender, age, education, primary insurance, type of capacity assessment, and psychiatric diagnosis.

RESULTS

Decisional capacity consultations were placed disproportionately for Black (43% of consultations vs. 18% of total admissions) and Hispanic patients (26% of consultations vs. 21% of admissions) compared with White and Asian patients. Among 130 patients with a capacity determination, 95 (53% of total sample) were determined not to have capacity, an outcome that did not differ by race but was more likely to occur among patients diagnosed as having delirium. Sixty-seven patients with no capacity (37% of total sample) experienced a change in treatment, an outcome that was less likely to occur among Hispanic patients in the univariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant racial disparities were observed during the placement of a decisional capacity consultation. These findings reveal the potential biases introduced with both the initial challenge to a patient's capacity and the subsequent outcomes of the consultation. As such, the balance of risk versus benefit or utility of these consultations in certain populations must be carefully considered.