An online recovery plan program: can peer coaching increase participation?

Peer coaching in cardiac surgery: a pilot study on rehabilitation participation and perioperative challenges

Following cardiac surgery, active participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with reduced cardiovascular events and improved survival. However, CR attendance remains persistently low, with only ∼25% of patients participating. The Peer Coaching for Cardiac Patients (PCCP) pilot programme aimed to assess whether peer coaching could enhance CR participation and reduce perioperative anxiety and depression in cardiac surgery patients. Ten patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were enrolled, receiving 4 60-min coaching sessions via Zoom, by a coach who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting in the past. Outcomes were measured by CR participation rates, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 scores, and a post-programme survey. Seven of the 10 patients completed the PCCP programme, all of which attended CR for an average of 19.3 ± 8.70 sessions and 9.57 ± 3.0 weeks. No statistically significant difference in PHQ-9 scores was observed (P = 0.341). Participants rated the programme highly in its role in anxiety reduction (9.0 ± 1.2) and likelihood of participating in CR (9.43 ± 1.05). These results suggests that peer coaching shows potential to support CR participation and address perioperative anxiety and depression. Future studies with larger sample sizes, well-defined control groups and extended follow-up are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Persuasive design principle of social support in digital interventions targeting mental health symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the available evidence on efficacy of social support strategies, as defined by the persuasive system design framework, in internet-based and mobile-based interventions (IMI) targeting mental health.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials comparing IMI implementing a social support strategy for mental health symptoms to various control conditions. Publications up to June 2023 (date of search 6 June 2023) were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0. Data were pooled based on a random-effects model.

RESULTS

After screening 6484 records, a total of 45 studies met our inclusion criteria. At 96%, social support was predominantly implemented through the strategy of social facilitation, by which users recognising others using the intervention (eg, discussion forum). IMI implementing social support strategies showed moderate effect sizes of Hedges' g=-0.34 (95% CI -0.47 to -0.21, p<0.001) in comparison to different control conditions. Heterogeneity was considerable (I2=73.6%; 95% CI 64.8 to 80.3). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant influence of targeted psychological condition (p<0.001), type of social support (p<0.001) and control condition (p<0.001). In k=11 component studies (ie, comparison to a disentangled version of the same intervention), IMI with social support strategies were not significantly more effective in comparison to the same IMI without social support (Hedges' g=-0.08 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.05, p=0.19, I2=0%). 64% (k=7) of component studies reported higher adherence rates in IMI with social support.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a small number of component studies, implementing social support strategies in IMI that target mental health symptoms has no significant incremental benefit on effectiveness. To draw more robust conclusions, the potential of other social support strategies besides social facilitation should be exploited in future component studies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020222810.

Development and Long-Term Acceptability of ExPRESS, a Mobile Phone App to Monitor Basic Symptoms and Early Signs of Psychosis Relapse

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia relapses are common, have profound, adverse consequences for patients and are costly to health services. Early signs interventions aim to use warning signs of deterioration to prevent full relapse. Such interventions show promise but could be further developed. This study addresses 2 developments: adding basic symptoms to checklists of conventional early signs and using a mobile phone app ExPRESS to aid early signs monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) design a pool of self-report items assessing basic symptoms (Basic Symptoms Checklist, BSC); (2) develop and beta test a mobile phone app (ExPRESS) for monitoring early signs, basic symptoms, and psychotic symptoms; and (3) evaluate the long-term acceptability of ExPRESS via qualitative feedback from participants in a 6-month feasibility study.

METHODS

The BSC items and ExPRESS were developed and then adjusted following feedback from beta testers (n=5) with a schizophrenia diagnosis. Individuals (n=18) experiencing a relapse of schizophrenia within the past year were asked to use ExPRESS for 6 months to answer weekly questions about experiences of early signs, basic symptoms, and psychotic symptoms. At the end of follow-up, face-to-face qualitative interviews (n=16; 2 were uncontactable) explored experiences of using ExPRESS. The topic guide sought participants' views on the following a priori themes regarding app acceptability: item content, layout, and wording; app appearance; length and frequency of assessments; worries about app use; how app use fitted with participants' routines; and the app's extra features. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the framework method, which allows examination of both a priori and a posteriori themes, enabling unanticipated aspects of app use experiences to be explored.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 38 years (range 22-57 years). Responses to a priori topics indicated that long-term use of ExPRESS was acceptable; small changes for future versions of ExPRESS were suggested. A posteriori themes gave further insight into individuals' experiences of using ExPRESS. Some reported finding it more accessible than visits from a clinician, as assessments were more frequent, more anonymous, and did not require the individual to explain their feelings in their own words. Nevertheless, barriers to app use (eg, unfamiliarity with smartphones) were also reported. Despite ExPRESS containing no overtly therapeutic components, some participants found that answering the weekly questions prompted self-reflection, which had therapeutic value for them.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that apps are acceptable for long-term symptom monitoring by individuals with a schizophrenia diagnosis across a wide age range. If the potential benefits are understood, patients are generally willing and motivated to use a weekly symptom-monitoring app; most participants in this study were prepared to do so for more than 6 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03558529; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03558529 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70qvtRmZY).

Acceptability of Interventions Delivered Online and Through Mobile Phones for People Who Experience Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review

Background

Psychological interventions are recommended for people with severe mental health problems (SMI). However, barriers exist in the provision of these services and access is limited. Therefore, researchers are beginning to develop and deliver interventions online and via mobile phones. Previous research has indicated that interventions delivered in this format are acceptable for people with SMI. However, a comprehensive systematic review is needed to investigate the acceptability of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions for SMI in depth.

Objective

This systematic review aimed to 1) identify the hypothetical acceptability (acceptability prior to or without the delivery of an intervention) and actual acceptability (acceptability where an intervention was delivered) of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions for SMI, 2) investigate the impact of factors such as demographic and clinical characteristics on acceptability, and 3) identify common participant views in qualitative studies that pinpoint factors influencing acceptability.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the databases PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science in April 2015, which yielded a total of 8017 search results, with 49 studies meeting the full inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they measured acceptability through participant views, module completion rates, or intervention use. Studies delivering interventions were included if the delivery method was online or via mobile phones.

Results

The hypothetical acceptability of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions for SMI was relatively low, while actual acceptability tended to be high. Hypothetical acceptability was higher for interventions delivered via text messages than by emails. The majority of studies that assessed the impact of demographic characteristics on acceptability reported no significant relationships between the two. Additionally, actual acceptability was higher when participants were provided remote online support. Common qualitative factors relating to acceptability were safety and privacy concerns, the importance of an engaging and appealing delivery format, the inclusion of peer support, computer and mobile phone literacy, technical issues, and concerns about the impact of psychological state on intervention use.

Conclusions

This systematic review provides an in-depth focus on the acceptability of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions for SMI and identified the need for further research in this area. Based on the results from this review, we recommend that researchers measure both hypothetical and actual acceptability to identify whether initial perceptions of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions change after access. In addition, more focus is needed on the potential impact of demographic and clinical characteristics on acceptability. The review also identified issues with module completion rates and intervention use as measures of acceptability. We therefore advise researchers to obtain qualitative reports of acceptability throughout each phase of intervention development and testing. Further implications and opportunities for future research are discussed.

Self-management and bipolar disorder--a clinician's guide to the literature 2011-2014

This review provides clinicians and individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) with an overview of evidence-based skills shown to be effective in BD and amenable to self-management including psychoeducation; monitoring moods, medications, and social function; sleep hygiene; setting goals and relapse plans; and healthy lifestyles (physical activity, healthy eating, weight loss and management, medical comorbidities). Currently available self-management resources for BD are summarized by mode of delivery (workbooks, mobile technologies, internet, and peer-led interventions). Regardless of the self-management intervention/topic, the research suggests that personally tailored interventions of longer duration and greater frequency may be necessary to achieve the maximal benefit among individuals with BD. Means to support these self-management interventions as self-sustaining identities are critically needed. Hopefully, the recent investment in patient-centered research and care will result in best practices for the self-management of BD by mode of delivery. Since self-management of BD should complement rather than replace medical care, clinicians need to partner with their patients to incorporate and support advances in self-management for individuals with BD.

Assessing the Evidence for e-Resources for Mental Health Self-Management: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

In a climate which recognizes mental health as a key health improvement target, but where mental health services are increasingly over-stretched, self-management e-resources can play a potentially important role in helping to ensure people get the care and support they need. They have the potential to enable individuals to learn more about, and to exercise active involvement in, their care, and thus we see a growing interest in this area for both research and practice. However, for e-resources to become important adjuncts to clinical care, it is necessary to understand if and how they impact on patients and care outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review systematically the research evidence for theory-driven and evidence-based mental health self-management e-resources; and make recommendations about strengthening the future evidence base.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted. No limits to study design were applied. We did not restrict the types of Web-based technologies included, such as websites and mobile applications, so long as they met the study inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of data was performed to elaborate both the development and effectiveness of online resources.

RESULTS

In total, 2969 abstracts were identified. Of those, 8 papers met the inclusion criteria. Only one randomized controlled trial was identified. The e-resources were aimed at self-management of bipolar disorder, depression, or general mental health problems. Some of the e-resources were intended to be used as prevention aids, whereas others were recovery orientated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health self-management e-resources have the potential to be widely effective, but our review shows it is early days in terms of development of the evidence base for them. To build robust evidence, clear guidelines are needed on the development and reporting of e-resources, so that both developers and researchers maximize the potential of a new, but rapidly evolving area.

Computerized recovery support for substance use disorders: predictors of posttreatment usage

OBJECTIVE

The primary goal of this study was to examine which characteristics differentiated patients who highly engaged with a computerized recovery support program after alcohol/drug treatment from those who did not engage with the program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The program delivered individually tailored clinical content in a multimedia format over 18 months following residential treatment. A key component of the program was access to a recovery coach, a licensed drug and alcohol counselor. Posttreatment logins to the program, the amount of clinical content accessed, and the number of recovery coach contacts were measured.

RESULTS

Several factors were found to predict program engagement, including several demographic variables, the number of recovery coach contacts, motivation to be in recovery, and attendance at 12-step groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings, combined with others in the literature, suggest that low engagement with computerized health programs is a widespread problem. Because many of these programs show therapeutic promise, future studies should continue to increase understanding of factors associated with high engagement so that efforts to increase engagement may be applied more effectively.

Predictors of participant retention in a guided online self-help program for university students: prospective cohort study

Background

Attrition is a persistent issue in online self-help programs, but limited research is available on reasons for attrition or successful methods for improving participant retention. One potential approach to understanding attrition and retention in such programs is to examine person-related variables (eg, beliefs and attitudes) that influence behavior. Theoretical models, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior, that describe conditions influencing human behavior may provide a useful framework for predicting participant retention in online-based program.

Objective

We examined predictors of participant retention in a guided online anxiety, depression, and stress self-help program for university students using the theory of planned behavior. We also explored whether age, symptom severity, and type of coaching (ie, email vs phone) affected participant retention.

Methods

65 university students with mild to moderate depression, anxiety, and stress were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Participants completed a questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior prior to commencing the online-based program and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) during the assessment module of the program. Participant retention was operationalized as the number of program modules completed.

Results

Perceived control over completing the online program significantly predicted intention to complete the program (F_3,62=6.7; P=.001; adjusted R²=.2; standardized beta=.436, P=.001). Age (standardized beta=.319, P=.03) and perceived behavioral control (standardized beta=.295, P=.05) predicted the number of program modules completed (F_3,61=3.20, P=.03, adjusted R² =.11). Initial level of distress (ie, symptom severity) did not predict participant retention (P=.55). Participants who chose phone-based coaching completed more program modules than participants who chose email-based coaching (Mann-Whitney’s U=137; P=.004).

Conclusions

Participants’ age, level of perceived behavioral control, and choice of interaction (ie, phone-based or email-based coaching) were found to influence retention in this online-based program.

Integrating bipolar disorder management in primary care

There is growing realization that persons with bipolar disorder may exclusively be seen in primary (general medical) care settings, notably because of limited access to mental health care and stigma in seeking mental health treatment. At least two clinical practice guidelines for bipolar disorder recommend collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) to help integrate mental health care to better manage this illness. CCMs, which include provider guideline support, self-management support, care management, and measurement-based care, are well-established in primary care settings, and may help primary care practitioners manage bipolar disorder. However, further research is required to adapt CCMs to support complexities in diagnosing persons with bipolar disorder, and integrate decision-making processes regarding medication safety and tolerability in primary care. Additional implementation studies are also needed to adapt CCMs for persons with bipolar disorder in primary care, especially those seen in smaller practices with limited infrastructure and access to mental health care.