Designing a comprehensive care program for high-cost clients in a managed care environment

A study to compare the differences between genders in psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with psychoses

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric comorbidities worsen the outcome and increase severity of suffering in psychotic disorders. Gender differences have also been found to impact the severity and outcome in psychoses. In this background, this study attempted to compare psychiatric comorbidity between genders.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare psychiatric co-morbidity between men and women with psychotic disorders.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive cross sectional study design was used. Data was collected through clinical interviews using standardized tools as well as the current case records. We used the MINI neuropsychiatric interview 5.0 to generate an ICD 10 diagnosis for primary psychotic illness and psychiatric comorbidity. PANSS was used to assess severity. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, Hamilton Anxiety rating scale, Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and Fagerstrom Nicotine Tolerance Questionnaire were used to study comorbidity.

RESULTS

100 patients were included in the study. 61% of the population had a psychiatric comorbidity. 42% of the men had significantly more multiple psychiatric comorbidities as compared to 7% among women. Men had significantly more substance use than women. Age of onset of psychosis was not found to be different between men and women.

CONCLUSION

In this study men had more psychiatric comorbidity than women, owing to greater levels of substance use disorders and anxiety disorders. This could be one of the possible reasons for differing outcomes between men and women with psychotic disorders thus indicating need for systematic future researching in psychiatric comorbidities in psychoses.

Predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with high service use in a public mental health system

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) To investigate the individual- and system-level characteristics associated with high utilization of acute mental health services according to a widely-used theory of service use-Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Use -in individuals enrolled in a large, public-funded mental health system; and (2) To document service utilization by high use consumers prior to a transformation of the service delivery system. We analyzed data from 10,128 individuals receiving care in a large public mental health system from fiscal years 2000-2004. Subjects with information in the database for the index year (fiscal year 2000-2001) and all of the following 3 years were included in this study. Using logistic regression, we identified predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics associated with being categorized as a single-year high use consumer (HU: >3 acute care episodes in a single year) or multiple-year HU (>3 acute care episodes in more than 1 year). Thirteen percent of the sample met the criteria for being a single-year HU and an additional 8% met the definition for multiple-year HU. Although some predisposing factors were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of being classified as a HU (younger age and female gender) relative to non-HUs, the characteristics with the strongest associations with the HU definition, when controlling for all other factors, were enabling and need factors. Homelessness was associated with 115% increase in the odds of ever being classified as a HU compared to those living independently or with family and others. Having insurance was associated with increased odds of being classified as a HU by about 19% relative to non-HUs. Attending four or more outpatient visits was an enabling factor that decreased the chances of being defined as a HU. Need factors, such as having a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychotic disorder or having a substance use disorder increased the likelihood of being categorized as a HU. Characteristics with the strongest association with heavy use of a public mental health system were enabling and need factors. Therefore, optimal use of public mental services may be achieved by developing and implementing interventions that address the issues of homelessness, insurance coverage, and substance use. This may be best achieved by the integration of mental health, intensive case management, and supportive housing, as well as other social services.

Indian research on comorbidities

The objective of this paper is to provide a review on the psychiatric comorbidity research in India based on the data published in the last six decades. The comorbidity data world over reflects that it is a much more common phenomenon than observed in routine clinical practice. In India, research into this domain of psychiatry has been limited, with comorbidity reported to be as high as 60%. In the few publications in this area, most of the authors have looked into substance related comorbidity. Small numbers of studies have looked into comorbid conditions in child psychiatry, especially mental retardation and very few studies have looked at other comorbidities. The landmarks in the studies in the area of psychiatric comorbidity have been highlighted in this review article.

Level of care utilization system for psychiatric and addiction services (LOCUS): a preliminary assessment of reliability and validity

The financing of mental health care services has undergone significant change in the past several years, with increasing emphasis on resource management. This emphasis has raised concerns among consumers and providers of services that needed resources are often withheld. In order to address this issue, the American Association of Community Psychiatrists (AACP) developed an instrument designed to maintain balance between quality care and the wise use of resources. The Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services (LOCUS) evaluates clients along six dimensions and defines six levels of resource intensity. It also provides a methodology to facilitate rapid and consistent level of care recommendations. This paper describes the circumstances leading to the creation of LOCUS and the principles used to guide its development. It then describes preliminary reliability and validity testing design and outcome. This initial testing indicates that LOCUS can facilitate consistent placement of clients in psychiatric or addiction services and does so in a manner which trends in a pattern similar to the recommendations of clinicians who are naive to LOCUS assessment and placement methodology.

Innovations in integrated dual diagnosis treatment in public managed care: the Choate dual diagnosis case rate program

This article describes the implementation and preliminary evaluation of a dual diagnosis case rate program developed as a collaborative experiment between a public managed Medicaid organization (MHMA) and a specialized integrated dual diagnosis provider (Choate) with a vertically integrated, managed-care oriented system of care. The case rate program applied to dually-diagnosed inpatient referrals for a period of 65 days. On admission, 68% of the patients had little insight, motivation and compliance regarding addiction or psychiatric management. Nonetheless, 56% maintained sobriety for 65 days, and 49% of these were still sober at 95-day follow up.