Damage control thoracic surgery: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Damage control surgery in trauma prioritizes patient stabilization through an initial temporizing surgical approach to rapidly control hemorrhage and contamination, minimizing intraoperative time to allow for resuscitation and the correction of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in the intensive care unit. This is followed by definitive repair of injuries once physiological parameters have improved. While damage control techniques for traumatic intra-abdominal and extremity injuries are well established and frequently utilized, the same cannot be said for damage control thoracic surgery. The complexity of thoracic injuries, the intricate decision making process, the level of surgical expertise required, and potential complications make damage control thoracic surgery particularly challenging. However, advances in surgical techniques, improvements in perioperative care, and the emergence of adjuncts such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have significantly enhanced decision making and underscored the importance of timely and decisive intervention in damage control thoracic surgery to optimize patient outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of damage control thoracic surgery, detailing the principles, indications, operative techniques, perioperative management, and the integration of advanced therapies to improve outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries.

Lung hemorrhage in trauma: Technical tricks and tips

At some point as the on-call trauma surgeon, you may need to operate on a bleeding lung. This concise review addresses preoperative and intraoperative considerations for traumatic lung injuries, including how to deal with specific findings at the time of surgery.

Traumatic Suprahepatic inferior vena cava injury survival of a rare case

Traumatic supra-hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injury is rare and nearly universally fatal. We report an excellent outcome from a case involving severe injury of the suprahepatic and intra-pericardial IVC utilizing emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

The goal of this case report is to outline key factors that facilitated the patient's survival of extensive IVC injury. We conclude that aggressive prehospital fluid resuscitation, facile transfer to the operating room, early detection of anatomy and pathology of the injury, an early decision to call for perfusion and cardiothoracic surgery, and prompt blood transfusion were the key factors that allowed for the patient to survive without deficits.

Nationwide utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiothoracic trauma: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma requires that all level I trauma centers have cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) capabilities immediately available. Despite this mandate, there are limited data on the utilization and clinical outcomes among trauma patients requiring CPB in the management of injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current use of CPB in the care of trauma patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank from 2010 to 2015. Adult patients sustaining cardiothoracic injuries who underwent surgical repair within the first 24 hours of admission were included. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes (in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, and complications) between patients who underwent CPB within the first 24 hours of admission and those with similar injuries who did not receive CPB.

RESULTS

A total of 28,481 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified, of whom 319 underwent CPB. Three-hundred three CPB patients were matched to 895 comparison patients who did not undergo CPB. Overall in-hospital mortality was 35%. Patients who were not treated with CPB had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with those treated with CBP (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.12; p = 0.003); however, complications were significantly lower in those who did not receive CPB (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.86; p = 0.003). Hospital LOS (non-CPB: mean, 13.4 ± 16.3 days; CPB: mean, 14.7 ± 15.1 days; p = 0.23) and intensive care unit LOS (non-CPB: mean, 9.9 ± 10.7 days; CPB: mean, 10.1 ± 9.7 days; p = 0.08) did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of CPB in the initial management of select cardiothoracic injuries is associated with a survival benefit. Further investigation is required to delineate which specific injuries would benefit the most from the use of CPB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level IV.

A review of emergency cardiopulmonary bypass for severe poisoning by cardiotoxic drugs

Cardiovascular collapse remains a leading cause of death in severe acute drug intoxication. Commonly prescribed medications such as antidysrhythmics, calcium channel antagonists, and beta adrenergic receptor antagonists can cause refractory cardiovascular collapse in massive overdose. Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (ECPB), a modality originating in cardiac surgery, is a rescue technique that has been successfully implemented in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest unresponsive to traditional medical interventions. More recently a growing number of animal studies, case reports, and case series have documented its use in refractory hemodynamic collapse in poisoned patients. This article will review current ECPB techniques and explore its growing role in the treatment of severely hemodynamically compromised poisoned patients.

Penetrating cardiac injury: overcoming the limits set by Nature

Repair of cardiac wounds was considered impossible little over 100 years ago. Despite progress, penetrating cardiac injury remains a highly lethal form of trauma today. Cardiac tamponade and exsanguination are the greatest immediate and life-threatening risks. Clinical presentation is extremely variable and diagnosis may be highly deceptive. Unlike other forms of trauma, resuscitation is of limited value and urgent operative intervention is the only meaningful treatment. Refinements in cardiothoracic surgery and the simultaneous evolution of trauma care systems have both contributed to saving lives. However, mortality rates for this condition have changed little in the last century, due largely to the rising proportion of more lethal injuries caused by gunshot wounds.