Three Types of Nodal Melanocytic Nevi in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Patients With Melanoma: Pitfalls, Immunohistochemistry, and a Review of the Literature

The presence or absence of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes often drives melanoma staging, prognosis, and treatment. However, distinguishing between metastatic melanoma cells and clusters of benign melanocytic nevus cells is not always straightforward. When morphologic hematoxylin and eosin interpretation alone is not sufficient, additional hematoxylin and eosin sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies may be beneficial. This review and small cases series of 3 diagnostically challenging melanocytic sentinel lymph node cases highlights the IHC approach to evaluate intraparenchymal nodal melanocytic nevi, coexistent metastatic melanoma with adjacent melanocytic nevi cells, and nodal blue nevi. In challenging cases, cytological morphology of the melanocytes, location within the lymph node, and IHC studies may assist in diagnosis. If these tools yield conflicting results, expert opinion is recommended.

Management of the positive sentinel lymph node in the post-MSLT-II era

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The publication of MSLT-II shifted recommendations for management of sentinel lymph node biopsy positive (SLNB+) melanoma to favor active surveillance. We examined trends in immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following publication of MSLT-II.

METHODS

Using a prospective melanoma database at a high-volume center, we identified a cohort of consecutive SLNB+ patients from July 2016 to April 2019. Patient and disease characteristics were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to examine factors associated with CLND.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-five patients were included for analysis. CLND rates were 67%, 33%, and 26% for the year before, year after, and second-year following MSLT-II. Factors associated with undergoing CLND included primary located in the head and neck (59% vs 33%, P = .003 and odds ratio [OR], 5.22, P = .002) and higher sentinel node tumor burden (43% vs 10% for tumor burden ≥0.1 mm, P < .001 and OR, 8.64, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of CLND in SLNB+ melanoma decreased dramatically, albeit not uniformly, following MSLT-II. Factors that increased the likelihood of immediate CLND were primary tumor located in the head and neck and high sentinel node tumor burden. These groups were underrepresented in MSLT-II, suggesting that clinicians are wary of implementing active surveillance recommendations for patients perceived as higher risk.

Micrometastatic cancer cells in lymph nodes, bone marrow, and blood: Clinical significance and biologic implications

Cancer metastasis may be regarded as a progressive process from its inception in the primary tumor microenvironment to distant sites by way of the lymphovascular system. Although this type of tumor dissemination often occurs in an orderly fashion via the sentinel lymph node (SLN), acting as a possible gateway to the regional lymph nodes, bone marrow, and peripheral blood and ultimately to distant metastatic sites, this is not a general rule as tumor cells may enter the blood and spread to distant sites, bypassing the SLN. Methods of detecting micrometastatic cancer cells in the SLN, bone marrow, and peripheral blood of patients have been established. Patients with cancer cells in their SLN, bone marrow, or peripheral blood have worse clinical outcomes than patients with no evidence of spread to these compartments. The presence of these cells also has important biologic implications for disease progression and the clinician's understanding of the process of cancer metastasis. Further characterization of these micrometastatic cancer cells at each stage and site of metastasis is needed to design novel selective therapies for a more "personalized" treatment.

Accuracy of the non-sentinel node risk score (N-SNORE) in patients with cutaneous melanoma and positive sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in patients with melanoma permits identification of those at risk for further metastases in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). However, a mere 20% of SLN-positive patients have metastases in NSLN. Therefore we need criteria to predict NSLN-positivity. A new score system known as the non-sentinel risk score, (N-SNORE) based on five clinical and pathological characteristics (gender, regression in primary melanoma, proportion of SNs containing melanoma, perinodal lymphatic invasion, and SN tumor burden), was first published in 2010. In this study, the accuracy of N-SNORE was validated in melanoma patients with positive SLN.

METHODS

A total of 106 melanoma patients with positive SLN, who had undergone complete lymph node dissection (CLND) subsequently, were included in the study. The N-SNORE was calculated in all patients, and the risk was compared to the frequency of NSLN metastases. Statistical analysis of the data was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were at very low risk for NSN metastasis (score 0), 63 patients at low risk (score 1-3), 19 at intermediate risk (score 4-5), 6 at high risk (score 6-7), and 5 at very high risk (score >8). NSLN positivity rates for these 5 risk groups were 7.7%, 18.2%, 21.1%, 33.3%, and 80%, respectively. According to Fisher's exact test, the contingency coefficient was .322; the p-value was .025.

CONCLUSION

An increasing N-SNORE was clearly correlated with a higher risk of NSLN positivity. Based on the p-value and the contingency coefficient, the overall accuracy of the N-SNORE was proven on statistical calculation.

Is complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a complete lymph node dissection (CLND). However, metastatic melanoma is not present in approximately 80% of CLND specimens. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive in patients with melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The search identified 54 relevant articles reporting the frequency of NSN metastases in melanoma. Original data was abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

FINDINGS

The pooled estimates that were found to be significantly associated with the high likelihood of NSN metastases were: ulceration (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.53-2.31), satellitosis (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.86-5.66), neurotropism (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.39-4.53), >1 positive SLN (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.2-2.62), Starz 3 (old) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.89-3.76), Angiolymphatic invasion (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.34-4.54), extensive location (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.74-2.81), macrometastases >2 mm (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.61-2.35), extranodal extension (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.79-6.40) and capsular involvement (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37-7.27). There were 3 characteristics not associated with NSN metastases: subcapsular location (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.67), Rotterdam Criteria <0.1 mm (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.50) and Starz I (new) (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91). Other variables including gender, Breslow thickness 2-4 mm and extremity as primary site were found to be equivocal.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with low SLN tumor burden could probably be spared the morbidity associated with CLND. We identified 9 factors predictive of non-SLN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. However, further studies are needed to confirm the standard criteria for not performing CLND.

Progression of cutaneous melanoma: implications for treatment

The survival rates of melanoma, like any type of cancer, become worse with advancing stage. Spectrum theory is most consistent with the progression of melanoma from the primary site to the in-transit locations, regional or sentinel lymph nodes and beyond to the distant sites. Therefore, early diagnosis and surgical treatment before its spread is the most effective treatment. Recently, new approaches have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. Genomic profiling and sequencing will form the basis for molecular taxonomy for more accurate subgrouping of melanoma patients in the future. New insights of molecular mechanisms of metastasis are summarized in this review article. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a standard of care for staging primary melanoma without the need for a more morbid complete regional lymph node dissection. With recent developments in molecular biology and genomics, novel molecular targeted therapy is being developed through clinical trials.

The impact of primary melanoma thickness and microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes on melanoma patient survival

BACKGROUND

The primary objectives of this work are to (1) quantitate tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and (2) assess the independent contributions of SLN tumor burden and primary melanoma thickness (PMT) with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Sixty-three patients (41 male and 22 female) with one or more positive SLNs were available for review in this study, with median follow-up of 6.8 years. PMT was measured and SLN metastases were assessed for size, as maximum metastasis size (MMS) in mm, by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (S100 and HMB45). PFS and OS were calculated from time of SLN resection until melanoma recurrence or death. Univariate and multivariate analyses and trend test were performed.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS differed significantly by MMS (log-rank P = 0.031 for PFS and P = 0.016 for OS) and PMT (log-rank P = 0.036 for PFS and P < 0.001 for OS). After adjusting for age and gender, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with MMS was 1.09 per mm increase (P = 0.05) for PFS, and 6.30 (P = 0.014) and 5.41 (P = 0.048) for OS in patients, respectively, with MMS of 0.6-5.5 mm and MMS ≥5.5 mm compared with those with MMS <0.6 mm. When patients were stratified by their tumor characteristics of PMT, the risk for disease progression and worse OS was substantially higher for the group with PMT ≥ 4.5 mm (HR = 13.10 and P = 0.022 for PFS; HR = 17.26 and P < 0.001 for OS) relative to the baseline group with PMT <1.6 mm. All patients had completion lymph node dissection (CLND) except for four patients. Patients with positive CLND (14, 22.2%) showed significant worse PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.0003) than the negative CLND group (45, 71.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

PMT and MMS were independently prognostic of PFS and OS in melanoma patients. Patients with negative CLND had significantly better PFS and OS than those with positive CLND.

Inguinopelvic lymphadenectomy following positive inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: true frequency of synchronous pelvic metastases

BACKGROUND

True frequency of synchronous pelvic metastases with positive inguinal sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is unknown. Role of pelvic dissection in the SLN era is unclear.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2004, 1 surgeon routinely performed nonselective, complete inguinopelvic lymphadenectomy after positive inguinal SLN biopsy. All cases were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic features associated with pelvic disease were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with positive inguinal SLN underwent, without additional selection, 42 complete inguinopelvic lymphadenectomies. Median age was 46.5 years (range 25-79 years); 79% had lower extremity primaries. Median Breslow depth was 2.3 mm (range 1.0-10.0 mm), Clark's IV/V 98%, ulceration 26%. Frequency of synchronous pelvic disease upon completion lymphadenectomy was 5 of 42 (11.9%). Patients with and without pelvic disease were similar in age, sex, Breslow depth, Clark's level, ulceration, and mitoses. All 5 cases with pelvic metastases had extremity primaries (4 distal, 1 proximal). Of the 5, 3 (60%) had ≥3 total involved inguinal nodes, compared with only 1 (2.7%) of the 37 cases without pelvic disease (P=.003). Ratio of positive to total number inguinal nodes retrieved was >0.20 in 80% of cases with pelvic disease and 8.6% of cases without (P=.002). Upon lymphoscintigraphy review, secondary pelvic drainage was present in 80% of cases with pelvic disease compared with 56% of cases without pelvic disease, though the trend was statistically insignificant (P=.63).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of unselected, SLN-positive patients with complete inguinopelvic lymphadenectomy, frequency of synchronous pelvic disease was 11.9%. Patients with ≥3 total involved inguinal nodes or inguinal node ratio >0.20 appear more likely to harbor pelvic disease.

Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria

PURPOSE

Prognosis in patients with sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma correlates with several characteristics of the metastases in the SN such as size and site. These factors reflect biologic behavior and may separate out patients who may or may not need additional locoregional and/or systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 2008, 1,080 patients (509 women and 571 men) were diagnosed with tumor burden in the SN in nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group centers. In total, 1,009 patients (93%) underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median Breslow thickness was 3.00 mm. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Tumor load and tumor site were reclassified in all nodes by the Rotterdam criteria for size and in 88% by the Dewar criteria for topography.

RESULTS

Patients with submicrometastases (< 0.1 mm in diameter) were shown to have an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 91% and a low nonsentinel node (NSN) positivity rate of 9%. This is comparable to the rate in SN-negative patients. The strongest predictive parameter for NSN positivity and prognostic parameter for survival was the Rotterdam-Dewar Combined (RDC) criteria. Patients with submicrometastases that were present in the subcapsular area only, had an NSN positivity rate of 2% and an estimated 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 95%.

CONCLUSION

Patients with metastases < 0.1 mm, especially when present in the subcapsular area only, may be overtreated by a routine CLND and have an MSS that is indistinguishable from that of SN-negative patients. Thus the RDC criteria provide a rational basis for decision making in the absence of conclusions provided by randomized controlled trials.

Sentinel lymph nodes in cutaneous melanoma: handling, examination, and clinical repercussion

CONTEXT

Within the last 15 years, evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has become the most popular method of early staging of several malignancies, including melanoma. Sentinel lymph nodes are usually examined on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections and by routine histology/immunohistochemistry (research protocols have used other techniques such as polymerase chain reaction). Approximately 20% of patients with cutaneous melanoma have metastasis in the SLN. In most studies, detection of positive SLN conveys a poorer prognosis for patients with cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To review the morphologic patterns of melanoma metastasis in the SLN, the differential diagnosis, and the quantification of tumor burden as a prognostic factor.

DATA SOURCES

Personal observations and review of the pertinent literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes is certainly becoming a widespread technique and most authors agree on its prognostic power for staging patients with cutaneous melanoma. Current studies are evaluating the possible therapeutic value of removal of positive SLNs.

Sentinel node positive melanoma patients: prediction and prognostic significance of nonsentinel node metastases and development of a survival tree model

BACKGROUND

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for melanoma detects additional nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in approximately 20% of cases. This study aimed to establish whether NSN status can be predicted, to determine its effect on survival, and to develop survival tree models for the sentinel node (SN) positive population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sydney Melanoma Unit (SMU) patients with at least 1 positive SN, meeting inclusion criteria and treated between October 1992 and June 2005, were identified from the Unit database. Survival characteristics, potential predictors of survival, and NSN status were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression model, and logistic regression analyses, respectively. Classification tree analysis was performed to identify groups with distinctly different survival characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 323 SN-positive melanoma patients met the inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, age, gender, primary tumor thickness, mitotic rate, number of positive NSNs, or total number of positive nodes were statistically significant predictors of survival. NSN metastasis, found at CLND in 19% of patients, was only predicted to a statistically significant degree by ulceration. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that survival was more closely related to number of positive NSNs than total number of positive nodes. Classification tree analysis revealed 4 prognostically distinct survival groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSN metastases could not be reliably identified prior to CLND. Prognosis following CLND was more closely related to number of positive NSNs than total number of positive nodes. Classification tree analysis defined distinctly different survival groups more accurately than use of single-factor analysis.

Interobserver reproducibility of histologic parameters of melanoma deposits in sentinel lymph nodes: implications for management of patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

: Histologic parameters of melanoma deposits in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) have been shown to be predictive of clinical outcome and the presence or absence of tumor in non-SLNs, but assessment of these parameters is prone to interobserver variation.

METHODS

: Histologic sections of 44 SLNs containing metastatic melanoma were examined by 7 pathologists. Parameters assessed included cross-sectional area of tumor deposits, cross-sectional area of SLNs, percentage of SLN area involved by tumor calculated from the 2 previous parameters, estimated percentage of SLN area involved by tumor, tumor penetrative depth, location of tumor within the SLN, and presence of extracapsular spread. Levels of interobserver agreement were measured by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

: There was good to excellent interobserver agreement on measurement of quantitative parameters: maximal size of largest tumor deposits, calculated area of 3 largest tumor deposits, percentage of the area of SLN involved by tumor, and tumor penetrative depth (ICC, 0.88, 0.73, 0.68, and 0.83, respectively). There was moderate agreement on the evaluation of subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular location of tumor deposits (ICC = 0.50). Agreement on assessment of extracapsular spread was fair (ICC = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

: Assessment of some of the quantitative parameters was highly reproducible between pathologists. However, evaluation of the location of tumor deposits within SLNs and assessment of extracapsular spread was less reproducible. Clearer definitions and training can be expected to improve the reproducibility of assessment. These results have important implications for reliability and reproducibility of these parameters in staging, prediction of outcome, and clinical management of melanoma patients. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Cutaneous Melanoma

Examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) has probably become the most popular method of early staging of patients who have cutaneous melanoma because SLN are considered to be the lymph nodes most likely to contain metastatic deposits; they can be examined in a more intense manner than in standard lymphadenectomy. There are several protocols to examine SLN but most of them use formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin with the addition of immunohistochemistry. By using these protocols, approximately 20% of patients who have cutaneous melanoma have melanoma cells in the SLN. Current studies are evaluating the possible therapeutic value of removal of positive SLN, but it is accepted by most authors that detection of positive SLN conveys an impaired prognosis for patients who have cutaneous melanoma.

Prognostic significance of a positive nonsentinel lymph node in cutaneous melanoma

PURPOSE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy provides important prognostic information for patients with cutaneous melanoma. There may be additional prognostic significance to melanoma spreading from the SLN to nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). We examined the implications of a positive NSLN for overall and distant disease-free survival.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained, Institutional Review Board-approved melanoma database we studied patients who had a cutaneous melanoma, a positive SLN, and a completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Survival was determined using a combination of hospital records and the Social Security Death Index (SSDI). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to further characterize predictors of overall and distant disease-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 429 patients with positive SLN biopsies were identified, with at least one positive NSLN identified in 71 (17%). Median follow-up time was 36.8 months. Presence of a positive NSLN was significantly associated with poor outcome, although long-term survival was possible. Presence of ulceration, high mitotic rate, angiolymphatic invasion, total number of positive nodes, and volume of disease>1% in the SLN were significant predictors of survival on univariate analysis, but lost significance on multivariate. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed several predictors of overall survival: increasing age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, P<0.01], Breslow depth (HR 1.76, P<0.01), presence of extracapsular extension in the SLN (HR 2.39, P<0.01), and positive NSLN (HR 1.92, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Among node-positive melanoma patients, presence of a positive NSLN is a highly significant poor prognostic sign, even after considering the total number of positive nodes and volume of disease in the SLN. CLND after a positive SLN provides this important prognostic information.

Do micromorphometric features of metastatic deposits within sentinel nodes predict nonsentinel lymph node involvement in melanoma?

INTRODUCTION

Multiple attempts have been made to identify melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) who are unlikely to harbor residual disease in the nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). We examined whether the size and location of the metastases within the SLN may help further stratify the risk of additional positive NSLN.

METHODS

A review of our Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved melanoma database was undertaken to identify all SLN positive patients with SLN micromorphometric features. Univariate logistic regression techniques were used to assess potential significant associations. Decision tree analysis was used to identify which features best predicted patients at low risk for harboring additional disease.

RESULTS

The likelihood of finding additional disease on completion lymph node dissection was significantly associated with primary location on the head and neck or lower extremity (P = 0.01), Breslow thickness >4 mm (P = 0.001), the presence of angiolymphatic invasion (P < 0.0001), satellitosis (P = 0.004), extranodal extension (P = 0.0002), three or more positive SLN (P = 0.02) and tumor burden within the SLN >1% surface area (P = 0.004). Sex, age, mitotic rate, ulceration, Clark level, histologic subtype, regression, and number of SLN removed had no association with finding a positive NSLN. Location of the metastases (capsular, subcapsular or parenchymal) showed no correlation with a positive NSLN. Decision tree analysis incorporating size of the metastatic burden within the SLN along with Breslow thickness can identify melanoma patients with a positive SLN who have a very low risk of harboring additional disease with the NSLN.

CONCLUSION

Size of the metastatic burden within the SLN, measured as a percentage of the surface area, helps stratify the risk of harboring residual disease in the nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLN), and may allow for selective completion lymphadenectomy.

Microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes predicts synchronous nonsentinel lymph node involvement in patients with melanoma

PURPOSE

We and others have demonstrated that additional positive lymph nodes (LNs) are identified in only 8% to 33% of patients with melanoma who have positive sentinel LNs (SLNs) and undergo complete therapeutic LN dissection (cTLND). We sought to determine predictors of additional regional LN involvement in patients with positive SLNs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically node-negative melanoma who underwent SLN biopsy (1991 to 2003) and had positive SLNs were identified. Clinicopathologic factors, including extent of microscopic disease within SLNs, were evaluated as potential predictors of positive non-SLNs.

RESULTS

Overall, 359 (16.3%) of the 2,203 patients identified had a positive SLN. Positive non-SLNs were identified in 48 (14.0%) of the 343 patients with positive SLNs who underwent cTLND. On univariate analysis, several measures of SLN microscopic tumor burden, one versus three or more SLNs harvested, tumor thickness more than 2 mm, age older than 50 years, and Clark level higher than III were predictive of positive non-SLNs; primary tumor ulceration and number of positive SLNs had no apparent impact. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, measures of SLN microscopic tumor burden were the most significant independent predictors of positive non-SLNs; tumor thickness more than 2 mm and number of SLNs harvested also predicted additional disease. A model was developed that stratified patients according to their risk for non-SLN involvement.

CONCLUSION

In melanoma patients with positive SLNs, SLN tumor burden, primary tumor thickness, and number of SLNs harvested may be useful in identifying a group at low risk for positive non-SLNs and be spared the potential morbidity of a cTLND.