Management of Recurrent Paraesophageal Hernia

Introduction: Recurrent paraesophageal hernias (rPEH) represent a clinical and surgical challenge. Even with a relatively high incidence, most of them are minimally symptomatic, and the need for reoperation is low. For those patients who are candidates for surgery, laparoscopic revision is a feasible and safe technique although there are other treatment options available. Methods: This article provides an overview of the definition, mechanisms of recurrence, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and indications for treatment of rPEH, as well as an overview of the surgical management options and a description of the technical principles of the repair and/or resection. Results: Surgeons should consider multiple factors when deciding the appropriate treatment of patients with rPEH, and all of them require a complete and comprehensive evaluation. The surgical options need to be individualized and include a redo PEH repair and revisional fundoplication, a partial or total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, or an esophagectomy. There are key steps during the surgical repair that contribute to a successful operation and also auxiliary techniques that can improve postoperative outcomes. After laparoscopic redo most patients have improvement of their symptoms and an acceptable rate of perioperative complications when they are performed by experienced foregut surgeons. In obese patients with rPEH, bariatric surgery can be the best treatment option. Conclusions: Laparoscopic reoperative management should be considered in symptomatic patients who are not controlled with maximal nonoperative therapy, after a thorough work-up and appropriate counseling. In cases with multiple hernia repairs, it is important to consider alternative operations.

When should we use mesh in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair? A systematic review

The use of mesh in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the usefulness of mesh in patients with large hiatal hernia (HH), obesity, recurrent HH, and complicated HH. We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding the outcomes of LHHR with mesh reinforcement. All articles between 2000 and 2020 describing LHHR with primary suturing, mesh reinforcement, or those comparing both techniques were included. Symptom improvement, quality of life (QoL) improvement, and recurrence rates were evaluated in patients with large HH, obesity, recurrent HH, and complicated HH. Reported outcomes of the use of mesh in patients with large HH had wide variability and heterogeneity. Morbidly obese patients with HH should undergo a weight-loss procedure. However, the benefits of HH repair with mesh are unclear in these patients. Mesh reinforcement during redo LHHR may be beneficial in terms of QoL improvement and hernia recurrence. There is scarce evidence supporting the use of mesh in patients undergoing LHHR for complicated HH. Current data are heterogeneous and have failed to find significant differences when comparing primary suturing with mesh reinforcement. Further research is needed to determine in which patients undergoing LHHR mesh placement would be beneficial.

Surgical Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernias: A Review

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) can be challenging due to the lack of consensus regarding indications and principles of operative treatment. In addition, data about the pathophysiology of the hernias are scant. Therefore, the goal of this review is to shed light and describe the classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and indications for treatment of PEHs, and provide an overview of the surgical management and a description of the technical principles of the repair.

Simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review

Sleeve gastrectomy can exacerbate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in some patients and cause de novo reflux in others. Some surgeons believe Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the best bariatric surgical procedure for obese patients with hiatus hernia. Others believe that even patients with hiatus hernia can also be safely offered sleeve gastrectomy if combined with a simultaneous hiatus hernia repair. Still, others will offer these patients sleeve gastrectomy without any attempt to diagnose or repair hiatus hernia repair. The effectiveness of concurrent hiatal hernia repair in reducing the incidence of postoperative reflux after sleeve gastrectomy is unclear. This review systematically investigates the results and techniques of simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair for the treatment of obesity in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Concurrent Large Para-oesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Results from 5-year Follow Up

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to identify the efficacy and safety of combining laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with repair of large para-oesophageal hernias.

BACKGROUND

Para-oesophageal hernias are more common in the obese with higher recurrence rates following repair. The effect and safety of combining para-oesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is unknown.

METHODS

One-hundred fourteen consecutive patients undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with concurrent repair of a large para-oesophageal hernia were prospectively identified and matched to a control group undergoing primary laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding only. Weight loss and complication data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database, and a standardised bariatric outcome questionnaire was used to assess post-operative symptoms, satisfaction with surgery and satiety scores.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 4.9 ± 2.1 years, total weight loss was 16.4 ± 9.9% in the hernia repair group and 17.6 ± 12.6% in the control group (p = 0.949), with 17 vs. 11% loss to follow up rates (p = 0.246). No statistically significant difference in revisional surgery rate and symptomatic recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in four patients in the hernia repair group (3.5%). No statistically significant difference in mean reflux (9.9 vs. 10.3, p = 0.821), dysphagia (20.7 vs. 20.1, p = 0.630) or satiety scores was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent repair of large para-oesophageal hiatal hernia and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding placement is safe and effective both in terms of symptom control and weight loss over the intermediate term. In obese patients with large hiatal hernias, consideration should be given to combining repair of the hernia with a bariatric procedure.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unclear. We aimed to outline the currently available literature.

DATA SOURCES

All relevant databases were searched for publications examining the effect of laparoscopic SG on GERD. Primary outcome measure was change in prevalence of GERD symptoms, antireflux medication use, and esophageal function tests. Secondary outcomes were prevalence of new-onset GERD and esophagitis. Thirty-three articles were included. Eleven studies used questionnaires to assess changes in the prevalence of GERD symptoms, with a risk difference in prevalence of 4.3%. Eight studies used esophageal function tests, with paradoxical results. Pooled incidence of new-onset GERD symptoms was 20%, with a strong suggestion of heterogeneity. New-onset esophagitis ranged from 6.3% to 63.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of high heterogeneity among available studies and paradoxical outcomes of objective esophageal function tests, the exact effect of laparoscopic SG on the prevalence of GERD remains unanswered. Surgeons should carefully evaluate preoperative GERD symptoms when choosing the proper bariatric technique.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in morbidly obese patients.

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic GERD is considered by many a contraindication to LSG. However, studies evaluating the relationship between LSG and GERD by 24-hour pH monitoring are lacking.

METHODS

Consecutive morbidly obese patients selected for LSG were included in a prospective clinical study. Gastroesophageal function was evaluated using a clinical validated questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring before and 24 months after LSG. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT02012894).

RESULTS

From June 2009 to September 2011, a total of 71 patients were enrolled into the study; 65 (91.5%) completed the 2-year protocol. On the basis of preoperative 24-hour pH monitoring, patients were divided into group A (pathologic, n=28) and group B (normal, n=37). Symptoms improved in group A, with the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale score decreasing from 53.1±10.5 to 13.1±3.5 (P<0.001). The DeMeester score and total acid exposure (% pH<4) decreased in group A patients (DeMeester score from 39.5±16.5 to 10.6±5.8, P<0.001; % pH<4 from 10.2±3.7 to 4.2±2.6, P<0.001). Real "de novo" GERD occurred in 5.4% group B patients. No significant changes in lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal peristalsis amplitude were found in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG improves symptoms and controls reflux in most morbidly obese patients with preoperative GERD. In obese patients without preoperative evidence of GERD, the occurrence of "de novo" reflux is uncommon. Therefore, LSG should be considered an effective option for the surgical treatment of obese patients with GERD.

Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The study compared laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) staple-line leak rates of 4 prevalent surgical options: no reinforcement, oversewing, nonabsorbable bovine pericardial strips (BPS), and absorbable polymer membrane (APM).

BACKGROUND

LSG is a multipurpose bariatric/metabolic procedure with effectiveness proven through the intermediate term. Staple-line leak is a severe complication of LSG for which no definitive method of prevention has been identified.

METHODS

The systematic review study design was employed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement screening guidelines. Inclusion criteria centered on variables potentially relevant to LSG leak: leak rate, age, gender, calibrating bougie size, distance between pylorus and gastric transection line, overall complication rate, and mortality. Analysis of variance models were used to explore differences in select demographic and surgical technique variables characterizing each reinforcement group. An omnibus χ(2) test followed by independent Fisher's exact tests were used to compare leak rates.

RESULTS

There were 659 articles identified; 41 duplicates removed. Of 618 remaining articles, 324 did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 294 remaining articles, 206 were eliminated (kin studies, those not reporting staple-line or leak incidence, those reporting discontinued products). There were 88 papers included in the analysis. Statistically significant differences were found between groups across demographic and surgical variables studied (p<0.001). There were 191 leaks in 8,920 patients; overall leak rate 2.1%. Leak rates ranged from 1.09% (APM) to 3.3% (BPS); APM leak rate was significantly lower than other groups (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Systematic review of 88 included studies representing 8,920 patients found that the leak rate in LSG was significantly lower using APM staple-line reinforcement than oversewing, BPS reinforcement, or no reinforcement.

Incidence of delayed gastric emptying associated with revisional laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Over the past 15 years, laparoscopic repair of primary paraesophageal hernias (PEH) has become the preferred operative approach. Today, more surgeons are approaching recurrent PEHs laparoscopically, though few studies exist on the long-term results of these revisional operations, particularly regarding the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all laparoscopic repairs for recurrent PEH done by three surgeons at a single institution from 2003 to 2011. Data collected included age, sex, weight, BMI, pre- and postoperative symptoms, and operative data, but our primary focus was on those patients with pre- and postoperative delayed gastric emptying ultimately requiring operative intervention.

RESULTS

Of 284 patients who underwent laparoscopic PEH repair, 91 (32 %) were performed for recurrent PEH. A sleeve gastrectomy was performed in ten of these patients (11 %) for concomitant morbid obesity which were excluded from our study group, leaving 81 study patients. The mean age was 56 years, and mean BMI was 30. All cases were completed laparoscopically; in 45 (56 %) either a partial or complete fundoplication was performed, and in 68 (84 %) a percutaneous gastrostomy tube (PEG) was placed at the time of revision. Sixty-eight patients underwent repair of a first recurrence, of which 8 (12 %) ultimately required a gastric emptying procedure to alleviate symptoms of DGE. There were nine patients who had a second recurrence repaired, and six (66 %) progressed to a gastric emptying procedure. Finally, of the four patients who had a third recurrence repaired, three (75 %) eventually needed a gastric emptying procedure.

CONCLUSION

While the incidence of DGE associated with initial PEH repair is low, DGE is a significantly more common finding in patients requiring reoperation for recurrent PEH. This risk increases significantly with repair of each subsequent recurrence. Our data suggest that DGE should be anticipated and patients counseled of the ramifications of this problem preoperatively. Surgeons performing revisional PEH surgery should preemptively develop protocols for the postoperative management of DGE from the time of operation.