1
|
Tepelenis K, Stefanou CK, Stefanou SK, Sitos E, Steliou F, Mpakas K, Lepida D, Chatzoglou T, Smyris TI, Kefala MA. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: A systematic review. Asian J Surg 2024:S1015-9584(24)01871-2. [PMID: 39237412 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is an infrequent complication of colonoscopy. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature's current notions, clinical features, and management of post-colonoscopy appendicitis. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception until December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text papers for any study design about post-colonoscopy appendicitis and abstracted data. 56 articles with a total of 67 patients were included in the systematic review. The median age was 54.9 years (range 24-84), with more male individuals affected (64.2 %). The main indication of colonoscopy was investigation (37.3 %). Forty-three patients had colonoscopy with additional procedures (64.2 %). Most patients (79.1 %) presented with symptoms within two days after the colonoscopy. The clinical manifestation was the same as acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of post-colonoscopy appendicitis was confirmed in 70.2 % of the cases, mainly with abdominal computed tomography or, alternatively, ultrasound. Most patients were successfully treated with surgery (88.1 %), either open (56.8 %) or laparoscopic appendectomy (31.3 %). The conversion rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was 19.2 %. Non-operative management with intravenous antibiotics was attempted in 17 patients with a success rate of 41.2 %. Histopathology revealed acute appendicitis in 30 cases (44.8 %) and complicated appendicitis in 29 (49.2 %). Fecalith was found in 21 cases (31.3 %). Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is an infrequent but potential complication of colonoscopy. The onset of symptoms, especially pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting after a colonoscopy, should raise suspicion of this entity. A satisfactory outcome depends on timely diagnosis and appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostas Tepelenis
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece.
| | | | | | - Evangelos Sitos
- Department of Anesthesia and Postoperative Intensive Care, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Frideriki Steliou
- Department of Anesthesia and Postoperative Intensive Care, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Mpakas
- Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitra Lepida
- Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tepelenis K, Stefanou CK, Stefanou SK, Tsoumanis P, Ntalapa KM, Galani V, Gogos-Pappas G, Vlachos K. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: a case report. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab285. [PMID: 34276957 PMCID: PMC8279750 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Appendicitis after colonoscopy is rare, with an estimated incidence of 3.8 cases per 10 000 colonoscopies. Herein, we report a 56-year-old female who visited the emergency department with a history of diffuse abdominal pain and nausea 8 h after a screening colonoscopy. Abdominal examination disclosed deep tenderness at Mc Burney point and positive Rovsign's sign. Laboratory studies revealed elevated white blood cells and neutrophils (WBC 15.37 K/Ul and NEUT 86.5%) with normal C-reactive protein (5 mg/l). The initial diagnosis was acute appendicitis, which was confirmed by the ultrasonographic findings. The patient was admitted to the surgical department, and a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is increasingly recognized as a complication after colonoscopy in the last decade. Early recognition is vital in preventing morbidity and mortality. It may also be worthwhile to include appendicitis after colonoscopy as a possible complication during the consent before the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostas Tepelenis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos K Stefanou
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Ioannina, "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Stefanos K Stefanou
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Ioannina, "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Periklis Tsoumanis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Vasiliki Galani
- Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ng ZQ, Elsabagh A, Wijesuriya R. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: Systematic review of current evidence. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:2032-2040. [PMID: 32503089 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Appendicitis after colonoscopy is an exceedingly rare complication. It remains to be explored if this entity is truly a complication of colonoscopy or a coincidental occurrence of appendicitis post-colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to systematically review all the available evidence since it was first described in 1988. METHODS The literature on post-colonoscopy appendicitis was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Additional manual search was performed and cross-checked for additional references. The search was performed up to November 2019. Data collected included demographics, reason for colonoscopy, time to diagnosis, imaging performed, management, and outcome. RESULTS Fifty-three cases were found in the systematic review with a median age of 55 years (24-84 years). The time to diagnosis post-colonoscopy was mostly within 24-48 h. Clinical features mimicked those of common acute appendicitis. In the past decade, computed tomography scan has been the imaging choice to investigate abdominal pain after colonoscopy, mainly to rule out perforation. The mainstay of management was appendectomy (open or laparoscopy). Four of the 12 cases (33.3%) were treated successfully with antibiotics alone. There has been a twofold increase in cases reported in the past decade (2009-2019, n = 31 vs 1999-2008, n = 15). CONCLUSION There is a considerable variation in the definition of post-colonoscopy appendicitis in the current literature. Regardless of whether post-colonoscopy appendicitis is a true entity, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with acute abdomen following colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi Qin Ng
- Department of General Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Midland, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Abdallah Elsabagh
- Department of General Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Midland, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Ruwan Wijesuriya
- Department of General Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Midland, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the cases of postcolonoscopy appendicitis (PCA) reported in the literature. A comprehensive search using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified 57 cases. The median age at presentations of PCA was 55 years. PCAs typically occurred during the first 24 hours after colonoscopy, and the majority developed after diagnostic colonoscopy. Clinical presentations were similar to those with common acute appendicitis, though with a high perforation rate. Most patients were correctly diagnosed using ultrasound or computed tomography scan. Treatment included open appendicectomy, laparoscopic appendicectomy or cecotomy, radiologic drainage of the abscess, nonoperative treatment with antibiotics. In addition to barotrauma, fecalith impaction into the appendiceal lumen, direct trauma to the appendiceal orifice, and underlying ulcerative colitis, a pre-existing subclinical disease of the appendix seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis. For PCA, timely diagnosis and management are crucial to attain a satisfactory outcome.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou XC, Huang CW, Dai YY, Huang ZY, Lou Z. Perforated appendicitis after colonoscopy: cause or coincidence?: A rare case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8747. [PMID: 29145325 PMCID: PMC5704870 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000008747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Colonoscopy is a relatively safe and common procedure with low risks of complications, and acute appendicitis with perforation is an extremely rare complication of colonoscopy. The current study presents an unusual case of acute gangrenous appendicitis with perforation following a screening colonoscopy. PATIENT CONCERNS A 73-year-old man presented to our emergency department with lower right abdominal pain 3 days after a routine screening colonoscopy. On physical examination the patient had signs of generalized peritonitis. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed the presence of multiple free gas in the right subphrenic space and abdominal cavity with exudate effusions in both sides of the paracolic sulci and the pelvic cavity, especially around the ascending colon and caecum. The CT scan also showed a dilated and inflamed appendix with fecaliths. DIAGNOSES The patient was diagnosed with acute gangrenous appendicitis with perforation after colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS The patient underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperative findings revealed an inflamed gangrenous appendix with focal perforation and impacted fecaliths. The colon showed no evidence of perforation or other areas of concern and thus, a conclusive diagnosis was achieved. An appendectomy was performed and the abdominal cavity was rinsed and drained thoroughly. OUTCOMES The postoperative course was uneventful. LESSONS This study may increase clinical awareness with regard to perforated appendicitis after colonoscopy. Acute appendicitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of lower right abdominal pain following a colonoscopy, in addition to possible colonic injury. Furthermore, emergency surgery should be recommended for the typical signs of perforation with peritonitis and free pneumoperitoneum. Early recognition and prompt surgical treatment are critical, which can avoid severe outcomes and improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yan-yan Dai
- Department of Pathology, The Dingli Clinical Institute of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou Central Hospital), Wenzhou, Zhejiang
| | | | - Zheng Lou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diagnostic Colonoscopy Leading to Perforated Appendicitis: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2016; 2016:1378046. [PMID: 27980869 PMCID: PMC5131238 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1378046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Revised: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Intestinal perforation is a known complication after colonoscopy. However, appendiceal involvement with inflammation and perforation is extremely rare and only 37 cases of postcolonoscopy appendicitis have been reported so far. We describe a case of perforated appendicitis 24 hours after colonoscopy that was treated successfully in our Department. Case Report. A 60-year-old female patient underwent a colonoscopy during the investigation of nontypical abdominal pain without pathologic findings. 24 hours after the examination she presented gradually increased right lower quadrant abdominal pain and a CT scan was performed, showing an inflammation of the appendiceal area with free peritoneal air. Through laparotomy, perforated appendicitis was diagnosed and an appendectomy was performed. The patient was discharged on the tenth postoperative day in good health condition. Discussion. The characteristics of all cases reported in the literature are described, including our case. Perforated appendicitis soon after a colonoscopy is a rare, but serious complication; therefore, it is crucial to be included in the differential diagnosis of postcolonoscopy acute abdominal pain.
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Wong
- General Surgery; Goulburn Base Hospital; Goulburn New South Wales Australia
| | - Jared Chang
- General Surgery; Goulburn Base Hospital; Goulburn New South Wales Australia
| | - Wisam Alkidady
- General Surgery; Goulburn Base Hospital; Goulburn New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuriyama M. Acute appendicitis as a rare complication after colonoscopy. Clin J Gastroenterol 2013; 7:32-5. [PMID: 26183506 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-013-0443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 12/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
9
|
Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:231-54. [PMID: 23554415 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00085-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 306] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Flexible endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Contaminated endoscopes are the medical devices frequently associated with outbreaks of health care-associated infections. Accurate reprocessing of flexible endoscopes involves cleaning and high-level disinfection followed by rinsing and drying before storage. Most contemporary flexible endoscopes cannot be heat sterilized and are designed with multiple channels, which are difficult to clean and disinfect. The ability of bacteria to form biofilms on the inner channel surfaces can contribute to failure of the decontamination process. Implementation of microbiological surveillance of endoscope reprocessing is appropriate to detect early colonization and biofilm formation in the endoscope and to prevent contamination and infection in patients after endoscopic procedures. This review presents an overview of the infections and cross-contaminations related to flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy and illustrates the impact of biofilm on endoscope reprocessing and postendoscopic infection.
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiral Patel
- Department of Surgery Jewish Hospital Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
April MD, Simmons JR, Nielson AS. An unusual cause of postcolonoscopy abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 31:273.e1-4. [PMID: 22795421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Accepted: 05/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a common procedure used for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Life-threatening complications are uncommon (28/10 000 procedures) but include perforation, hemorrhage, diverticulitis, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Although previously reported, the association between appendicitis and colonoscopy is not widely known. This case report highlights the underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of postcolonoscopy appendicitis. A 52-year-old man presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain 8 hours after an uncomplicated routine screening colonoscopy. He initially reported mild generalized abdominal discomfort which 3 hours after the procedure intensified and localized to the periumbilical region. Computed tomography of the abdomen with oral and intravenous contrast revealed appendicitis as the cause of his abdominal pain. He underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and recovered uneventfully. Colonoscopy is a common procedure that rarely has life-threatening complications. Although establishing causality is difficult, there is an association between colonoscopy and appendicitis, which may be underreported with literature-based estimates as high as 3.8 appendicitis cases per 10 000 procedures. Timely diagnosis of postcolonoscopy appendicitis may prove challenging given limited knowledge of this association between colonoscopy and appendicitis and similarity of presentation with other more well-known complications. This case report demonstrates that a recent history of colonoscopy should not preclude consideration of a traditionally broad differential diagnosis for abdominal pain, including appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D April
- Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed ServicesHealth Education Consortium, San Antonio, TX 78234-6200, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Apendicitis aguda tras colonoscopia. Med Clin (Barc) 2011; 137:710. [PMID: 21592536 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2011.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2011] [Revised: 03/17/2011] [Accepted: 03/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|