Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

The aim of our retrospective analysis was to compare the results of incisional hernia repair by porcine small intestinal submucosa-derived (SIS) meshes with those obtained by alloplastic polypropylene-based (PP) meshes in comparable surgical indications by matched-pair design. We hypothesized that in incisional hernia, SIS mesh repair is associated with fewer recurrences and SSO than PP mesh repair in incisional hernias.

METHODS

Twenty-four matched pairs (SIS vs. PP mesh repair between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2013) were identified by matching criteria: gender, age, comorbidities, body mass index, EHS hernia classification, mesh implantation technique, CDC wound classification, and source of contamination/primary surgery leading to incisional hernia. Minimal follow-up time was 24 months. Means and standard deviations were compared by paired t test; categorial data were compared by McNemar's test. Poisson's distribution and negative binominal distribution were employed to detect significant correlation.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in the pre- and perioperative factors and the follow-up times. There were significantly more wound complications (19 vs. 12, p = 0.041), longer hospital stay (22.0 ± 6.3 vs. 12.0 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.010), and significantly more recurrent hernias (25 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.004) after SIS mesh repair. Both the Poisson's distribution and the negative binominal distribution unveiled significantly more complication points (3-6 vs. 1-2) per month after SIS mesh repair.

CONCLUSION

There is no advantage of SIS meshes compared to PP meshes in incisional hernia repair with different degrees of wound contamination in this matched-pair analysis. Further prospective and randomized trials or at least registry studies such as the EHS register with standardized and defined conditions are warranted.

Repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias

Umbilical and epigastric hernias are primary midline defects that are present in up to 50% of the population. In the United States, only about 1% of the population carries this specific diagnosis, and only about 11% of these are repaired. Repair is aimed at symptoms relief or prevention, and the patient's goals and expectations should be explicitly identified and aligned with the health care team. This article details some relevant and interesting anatomic issues, reviews existing data, and highlights some common and important surgical techniques. Emphasis is placed on a patient-centered approach to the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias.

A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: what have we learned?

BACKGROUND

Innovative types of biologic mesh have provided new alternatives to ventral incisional hernia repair, especially in the face of contamination. The authors studied the experience and outcomes of patients who underwent repair of a ventral incisional hernia with biologic mesh.

METHODS

Online database and detailed reference searches were conducted. Studies chosen for review had a sample size of at least 40 patients, level IV evidence at most, and a Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies index of at least 10. Indications for use of biologic mesh, type of mesh, patient comorbidities, and surgical techniques were also noted.

RESULTS

Eight studies fulfilled the search criteria and included 635 patients using AlloDerm, Surgisis, and Strattice biologic tissue matrices. In one study, indications and surgical techniques were standardized, and follow-up was prospective. In the other seven studies, indications, surgical techniques, and follow-up were assessed retrospectively. The mean patient age, when reported, was 55.7 years. Body mass index ranged from 30 to 35 kg/m2 in 44 percent of the reported patients. In seven of the eight studies [565 patients (89 percent)], the mean follow-up was 25.8 months and the mean hernia recurrence rate was 21 percent. Complication rate exceeded 20 percent in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic tissue matrices are mostly used in contaminated fields, which has allowed for a one-stage repair with no or little subsequent mesh removal. Ventral incisional hernia repair with these matrices continues to be plagued by a high recurrence rate and complications. Prospective randomized trials are needed to properly direct practice in the use of these meshes and evaluate their ultimate value.

Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached on the use of bioprosthetics to repair abdominal wall defects. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the outcomes from studies describing this use of various bioprosthetics for incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

Studies published by October 2011 were identified through literature searches using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 491 articles were scanned, 60 met eligibility criteria. Most studies were retrospective case studies. The studies ranged considerably in methodologic quality, with a modified Methodological Index of Nonrandomized Studies score from 5 to 12. Many repairs were performed in contaminated surgical sites (47.9%). At least one complication was seen in 87% of repairs. Major complications noted were wound infections (16.9%) and seroma (12.0%). With a mean follow-up period of 13.6 months the hernia recurrence rate was 15.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an insufficient level of high-quality evidence in the literature on the value of bioprosthetics for incisional hernia repair. Randomized controlled trials that use standardized reporting comparing bioprosthetics with synthetic mesh for incisional hernia repair are needed.