1
|
Parmar KL, Law J, Carter B, Hewitt J, Boyle JM, Casey P, Maitra I, Farrell IS, Pearce L, Moug SJ. Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study. Ann Surg 2021; 273:709-718. [PMID: 31188201 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to document the prevalence of frailty in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy and to explore relationships between frailty and postoperative morbidity and mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The majority of adults undergoing emergency laparotomy are older adults (≥65 y) that carry the highest mortality. Improved understanding is urgently needed to allow development of targeted interventions. METHODS An observational multicenter (n=49) UK study was performed (March-June 2017). All older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were included. Preoperative frailty score was calculated using the progressive Clinical Frailty Score (CFS): 1 (very fit) to 7 (severely frail). Primary outcome measures were the prevalence of frailty (CFS 5-7) and its association to mortality at 90 days postoperative. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and morbidity, length of critical care, and overall hospital stay. RESULTS A total of 937 older adults underwent emergency laparotomy: frailty was present in 20%. Ninety-day mortality was 19.5%. After age and sex adjustment, the risk of 90-day mortality was directly associated with frailty: CFS 5 adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-8.14] and CFS 6/7 aOR 6·10 (95% CI, 2.26-16.45) compared with CFS 1. Similar associations were found for 30-day mortality. Increasing frailty was also associated with increased risk of complications, length of Intensive Care Unit, and overall hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS A fifth of older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy are frail. The presence of frailty is associated with greater risks of postoperative mortality and morbidity and is independent of age. Frailty scoring should be integrated into acute surgical assessment practice to aid decision-making and development of novel postoperative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat L Parmar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ben Carter
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Hewitt
- Department of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Ishaan Maitra
- North West Deanery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | | | - Lyndsay Pearce
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, UK
| | - Susan J Moug
- Department of Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mull HJ, Rosen AK, Charns MP, Itani KM, Rivard PE. Identifying Risks and Opportunities in Outpatient Surgical Patient Safety: A Qualitative Analysis of Veterans Health Administration Staff Perceptions. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e177-e185. [PMID: 29112029 PMCID: PMC8445239 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little is known about patient safety risks in outpatient surgery. Inpatient surgical adverse events (AEs) risk factors include patient- (e.g., advanced age), process- (e.g., inadequate preoperative assessment), or structure-related characteristics (e.g., low surgical volume); however, these factors may differ from outpatient care where surgeries are often elective and in younger/healthier patients. We undertook an exploratory qualitative research project to identify risk factors for AEs in outpatient surgery. METHODS We developed a conceptual framework of patient, process, and structure factors associated with surgical AEs on the basis of a literature review. This framework informed our semistructured interview guide with (1) open-ended questions about a specific outpatient AE that the participant experienced and (2) outpatient surgical patient safety risk factors in general. We interviewed nationwide Veterans Health Administration surgical staff. Results were coded on the basis of categories in the conceptual framework, and additional themes were identified using content analysis. RESULTS Fourteen providers representing diverse surgical roles participated. Ten reported witnessing an AE, and everyone provided input on risk factors in our conceptual framework. We did not find evidence that patient race/age, surgical technique, or surgical volume affected patient safety. Emerging factors included patient compliance, postoperative patient assessments/instruction, operating room equipment needs, and safety culture. CONCLUSIONS Surgical staff are familiar with AEs and patient safety problems in outpatient surgery. Our results show that processes of care undertaken by surgical providers, as opposed to immutable patient characteristics, may affect the occurrence of AEs. The factors we identified may facilitate more targeted research on outpatient surgical AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillary J. Mull
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Amy K. Rosen
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Martin P. Charns
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kamal M.F. Itani
- Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
- Department of Surgery, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter E. Rivard
- Healthcare Administration, Sawyer Business School Suffolk University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antiseptic efficacy of an innovative perioperative surgical skin preparation: A confirmatory FDA phase 3 analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 41:653-659. [PMID: 32131912 PMCID: PMC7282856 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An innovative approach to perioperative antiseptic skin preparation is warranted because of potential adverse skin irritation, rare risk of serious allergic reaction, and perceived diminished clinical efficacy of current perioperative antiseptic agents. The results of a confirmatory US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) phase 3 efficacy analysis of a recently approved innovative perioperative surgical skin antiseptic agent are discussed. METHODS The microbial skin flora on abdominal and groin sites in healthy volunteers were microbiologically sampled following randomization to either ZuraGard, a 2% chlorhexidine/70% isopropyl alcohol preparation (Chloraprep), or a control vehicle (alcohol-free ZuraGard). Mean log10 reduction of colony-forming units (CFU) was assessed at 30 seconds, 10 minutes, and 6 hours. RESULTS For combined groin sites (1,721 paired observations) at all time points, the mean log10 CFU reductions were significantly greater in the ZuraGard group than in the Chloraprep group (P < .02). Mean log10 CFU reductions across combined abdominal and groin sites at all time points (3,277 paired observations) were significantly greater in the ZuraGard group than in the Chloraprep group (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS A confirmatory FDA phase 3 efficacy analysis of skin antisepsis in human volunteers documented that ZuraGard was efficacious in significantly reducing the microbial burden on abdominal and groin test sites, exceeding that of Chloraprep. No significant adverse reactions were observed following the application of ZuraGard. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02831998 and NCT02831816.
Collapse
|
4
|
Carter B, Law J, Hewitt J, Parmar KL, Boyle JM, Casey P, Maitra I, Pearce L, Moug SJ, Ross B, Oleksiewicz J, Fearnhead N, Jump C, Boyle J, Shaw A, Barker J, Hughes J, Randall J, Tonga I, Kynaston J, Boal M, Eardley N, Kane E, Reader H, Mahapatra SR, Garner-Jones M, Tan JJ, Mohamed S, George R, Whiteman E, Malik K, Smart CJ, Bogdan M, Chaudhury MP, Sharma V, Subar D, Patel P, Chok SM, Lim E, Adhiyaman V, Davies G, Ross E, Maitra R, Steele CW, Roxburgh C, Griffiths S, Blencowe NS, Kirkham EN, Abraham JS, Griffiths K, Abdulaal Y, Iqbal MR, Tarazi M, Hill J, Khan A, Farrell I, Conn G, Patel J, Reddy H, Sarveswaran J, Arunachalam L, Malik A, Ponchietti L, Pawelec K, Goh YM, Vitish-Sharma P, Saad A, Smyth E, Crees A, Merker L, Bashir N, Williams G, Hayes J, Walters K, Harries R, Singh R, Henderson NA, Polignano FM, Knight B, Alder L, Kenchington A, Goh YL, Dicurzio I, Griffiths E, Alani A, Knight K, MacGoey P, Ng GS, Mackenzie N, Maitra I, Moug S, Ong K, McGrath D, Gammeri E, Lafaurie G, Faulkner G, Di Benedetto G, McGovern J, Subramanian B, Narang SK, Nowers J, Smart NJ, Daniels IR, Varcada M, Gala T, Cornish J, Barber Z, O'Neill S, McGregor R, Robertson AG, Paterson-Brown S, Raymond T, Thaha MA, English WJ, Forde CT, Paine H, Morawala A, Date R, Casey P, Bolton T, Gleaves X, Fasuyi J, Durakovic S, Dunstan M, Allen S, Riga A, Epstein J, Pearce L, Gaines E, Howe A, Choonara H, Dewi F, Bennett J, King E, McCarthy K, Taylor G, Harris D, Nageswaran H, Stimpson A, Siddiqui K, Lim LI, Ray C, Smith L, McColl G, Rahman M, Kler A, Sharma A, Parmar K, Patel N, Crofts P, Baldari C, Thomas R, Stechman M, Aldridge R, O'Kelly J, Wilson G, Gallegos N, Kalaiselvan R, Rajaganeshan R, Mackenzie A, Naik P, Singh K, Gandraspulli H, Wilson J, Hancorn K, Khawaja A, Nicholas F, Marks T, Abbott C, Chandler S. Association between preadmission frailty and care level at discharge in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg 2020; 107:218-226. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Older adults undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have significantly poorer outcomes than younger adults. For those who survive, the level of care required on discharge from hospital is unknown and such information could guide decision-making. The ELF (Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty) study aimed to determine whether preoperative frailty in older adults was associated with increased dependence at the time of discharge.
Methods
The ELF study was a UK-wide multicentre prospective cohort study of older patients (65 years or more) undergoing emergency laparotomy during March and June 2017. The objective was to establish whether preoperative frailty was associated with increased care level at discharge compared with preoperative care level. The analysis used a multilevel logistic regression adjusted for preadmission frailty, patient age, sex and care level.
Results
A total of 934 patients were included from 49 hospitals. Mean(s.d.) age was 76·2(6·8) years, with 57·6 per cent women; 20·2 per cent were frail. Some 37·4 per cent of older adults had an increased care level at discharge. Increasing frailty was associated with increased discharge care level, with greater predictive power than age. The adjusted odds ratio for an increase in care level was 4·48 (95 per cent c.i. 2·03 to 9·91) for apparently vulnerable patients (Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) 4), 5·94 (2·54 to 13·90) for those mildly frail (CFS 5) and 7·88 (2·97 to 20·79) for those moderately or severely frail (CFS 6 or 7), compared with patients who were fit.
Conclusion
Over 37 per cent of older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy required increased care at discharge. Frailty scoring was a significant predictor, and should be integrated into all acute surgical units to aid shared decision-making and discharge planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Carter
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Law
- Department of Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - J Hewitt
- Department of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - K L Parmar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, NorthWest Deanery, UK
| | - J M Boyle
- Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - P Casey
- Health Education North West, Manchester, NorthWest Deanery, UK
| | - I Maitra
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - L Pearce
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - S J Moug
- Department of Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although most surgical outcomes research focuses on clinical end points and complications, older adult patients may value functional outcomes more. However, little is known about the risk of long-term functional disability after colorectal procedures. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this research was to understand the incidence and likelihood of functional decline after high-risk (ie, ≥1% inpatient mortality) colorectal operations both without and with complications. DESIGN This was a retrospective matched cohort study. SETTINGS The Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative, longitudinal survey of adults >50 years of age, collects data on functional status, cognition, and demographics, among other topics. The survey was linked with Medicare claims and National Death Index data from 1992 to 2012. PATIENTS Patients ≥65 years of age who underwent elective high-risk colorectal surgery with functional status measured before and after surgery were included. These patients were matched 1:3 to survey respondents who did not undergo major surgery, based on propensity scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Functional decline, the primary outcome, was defined as an increase in the number of activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living requiring assistance before and after surgery. Using logistic regression, we examined whether surgery without or with complications was associated with functional decline. RESULTS We identified 289 patients who underwent high-risk colorectal surgery and 867 matched control subjects. Of the surgery patients, 90 (31%) experienced a complication. Compared with the control subjects, surgery patients experienced greater likelihood of functional decline (without complications: OR = 1.82 (95% CI, 1.22-2.71), and with complications: OR = 2.96 (95% CI, 1.70-5.14)). Increasing age also predicted greater odds of functional decline (OR = 2.09, per decade (95% CI, 1.57-2.80)). LIMITATIONS The functional measures were self-reported by survey participants. CONCLUSIONS High-risk colorectal surgery, without or with complications, is associated with increased likelihood of functional decline in older adults. Patient-centered decision-making should include discussion of expected functional outcomes and long-term disability. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B78. PÉRDIDA DE LA FUNCIONALIDAD A LARGO PLAZO LUEGO DE CIRUGÍA ELECTIVA COLORRECTAL DE ALTO RIESGO EN EL PACIENTE AÑOSO: Aunque en la mayoría de las investigaciones los resultados quirúrgicos se centran en los puntos finales clínicos y las complicaciones, actualmente se pueden valorar los resultados funcionales en el paciente añoso. Sin embargo, se sabe poco sobre el riesgo de la discapacidad funcional a largo plazo después de un procedimiento colorrectal.Comprender la incidencia y la probabilidad del deterioro funcional después de operaciones colorrectales de alto riesgo (es decir, ≥1% de mortalidad hospitalaria) con y sin complicaciones.Estudio de cohorte emparejado retrospectivo.El seguimiento longitudinal representativo a nivel nacional en adultos de >50 años y que recopila datos sobre su estado funcional, su estado cognitivo y su demografía, entre otros temas es el llamado "Estudio de Salud en jubilados." La encuesta se vinculó con los reclamos de Medicare y los datos del Índice Nacional de Defunciones entre 1992 y 2012.Aquellos de ≥65 años que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva de alto riesgo con un estado funcional medido antes y después de la cirugía. Estos pacientes se compararon 1: 3 con los encuestados que no se sometieron a cirugía mayor, según puntajes de propensión.La disminución functional como resultado primario, se definió como un aumento en el número de actividades de la vida diaria y actividades instrumentales de la vida diaria que requieren asistencia antes y después de la cirugía. Mediante la regresión logística, evaluamos si la cirugía sin complicaciones y/o con complicaciones se asoció con un deterioro funcional.Identificamos 289 pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal de alto riesgo y 867 controles pareados. De los pacientes de cirugía, 90 (31%) experimentaron algun tipo de complicación. En comparación con los controles, los pacientes de cirugía experimentaron una mayor probabilidad de deterioro funcional (sin complicaciones: OR 1.82, IC 95% 1.22-2.71, y con complicaciones: OR 2.96, IC 95% 1.70-5.14). El aumento de la edad también predijo mayores probabilidades en el deterioro funcional (OR 2.09, por década, IC 95% 1.57-2.80).Las medidas funcionales fueron autoinformadas por los participantes de la encuesta.La cirugía colorrectal de alto riesgo, con o sin complicaciones, se asocia con una mayor probabilidad de deterioro funcional en adultos mayores. La toma de decisiones centradas en el paciente deben incluir la discusión de los resultados funcionales esperados y la discapacidad a largo plazo. Vea el resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B78.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy and safety of a novel antimicrobial preoperative skin preparation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019; 40:1157-1163. [PMID: 31385562 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alternatives to skin preparation with conventional preoperative antiseptics are required because of adverse reactions and the potential emergence of resistance. Here, we present 2 phase 2 studies of ZuraGard (ZG), a novel formulation of isopropyl alcohol and functional excipients developed for preoperative skin antisepsis. METHODS Microbial skin flora on abdominal and inguinal sites in healthy volunteers were quantitatively assessed following application of ZG versus a negative control (ZV) and a chlorhexidine/alcohol preparation, Chloraprep (CP). In trial 1, ZG administered for both recommended and abbreviated application times was compared with CP and ZV via bacterial reductions at 10 minutes, and 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours following application. In trial 2, the 10-minute postapplication responder rates (RRs) for ZG, participants with abdominal ≥2 log10 per cm2, and inguinal ≥3 log10 per cm2 reductions in colony-forming units (CFU) were compared to RRs of participants treated with CP. RESULTS In trial 1, ZG at the recommended application time reduced mean bacterial counts by ~3.18 log10 CFU/cm2 and ~2.98 log10 CFU/cm2 at abdominal and inguinal sites, respectively. Qualitatively similar reductions were observed for the abbreviated ZG application time and all CP applications. Application of ZV was ineffective. In trial 2, 10-minute RRs for ZG and CP exceeded 90% at abdominal sites. At inguinal sites, RRs were 83.3% for ZG and 86.7% for CP. No skin irritation or other adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS ZG matched CP efficacy under these experimental conditions with immediate and persistent microbial reductions, including abbreviated application times. Further clinical studies of this novel preoperative antiseptic are merited.
Collapse
|
7
|
Berian JR, Baker TL, Rosenthal RA, Coleman J, Finlayson E, Katlic MR, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Tang VL, Robinson TN, Ko CY, Russell MM. Application of the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Methodology to a Large Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Group Evaluating the Validity and Feasibility of Patient-Centered Standards in Geriatric Surgery. Health Serv Res 2018; 53:3350-3372. [PMID: 29569262 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore (1) differences in validity and feasibility ratings for geriatric surgical standards across a diverse stakeholder group (surgeons vs. nonsurgeons, health care providers vs. nonproviders, including patient-family, advocacy, and regulatory agencies); (2) whether three multidisciplinary discussion subgroups would reach similar conclusions. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING Primary data (ratings) were reported from 58 stakeholder organizations. STUDY DESIGN An adaptation of the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Methodology (RAM) process was conducted in May 2016. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Stakeholders self-administered ratings on paper, returned via mail (Round 1) and in-person (Round 2). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In Round 1, surgeons rated standards more critically (91.2 percent valid; 64.9 percent feasible) than nonsurgeons (100 percent valid; 87.0 percent feasible) but increased ratings in Round 2 (98.7 percent valid; 90.6 percent feasible), aligning with nonsurgeons (99.7 percent valid; 96.1 percent feasible). Three parallel subgroups rated validity at 96.8 percent (group 1), 100 percent (group 2), and 97.4 percent (group 3). Feasibility ratings were 76.9 percent (group 1), 96.1 percent (group 2), and 92.2 percent (group 3). CONCLUSIONS There are differences in validity and feasibility ratings by health professions, with surgeons rating standards more critically than nonsurgeons. However, three separate discussion subgroups rated a high proportion (96-100 percent) of standards as valid, indicating the RAM can be successfully applied to a large stakeholder group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia R Berian
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - JoAnn Coleman
- Department of Surgery, LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Emily Finlayson
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark R Katlic
- Department of Surgery, LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Victoria L Tang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.,Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Marcia M Russell
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Söderbäck H, Mahteme H, Hellman P, Sandblom G. Prophylactic Resorbable Synthetic Mesh to Prevent Wound Dehiscence and Incisional Hernia in High High-risk Laparotomy: A Pilot Study of Using TIGR Matrix Mesh. Front Surg 2016; 3:28. [PMID: 27243017 PMCID: PMC4870474 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Wound dehiscence and incisional hernia are potentially serious complications following abdominal surgery, especially if performed through a midline incision. Although prophylactic reinforcement with on-lay mesh has been shown to reduce this risk, a permanent mesh carries the risk of seroma formation, infection, and persistent pain. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of a reabsorbable on-lay mesh to reinforce the midline suture in patients with high risk for wound dehiscence or incisional hernia. Method Sixteen patients with three or more risk factors for wound dehiscence or incisional hernia were included. A TIGR® Matrix mesh, composed of a mixture of 40% copolymer fibers of polyglycolide, polylactide, and polytrimethylene carbonate and 60% copolymer fibers of polylactide and polytrimethylene carbonate, was placed on the aponeurosis with an overlap of five on either side and fixated with continuous monofilament polydioxanone suture. All postoperative complications were registered at clinical follow-up. Results Mean follow-up was 9 months. One patient developed a seroma that needed drainage and antibiotic treatment. One patient had a wound infection that needed antibiotic treatment. There was no complication requiring a reoperation. No wound dehiscence or incisional hernia was seen. Conclusion On-lay placement of TIGR® Matrix is safe and may provide a feasible way of reinforcing the suture line in patients with high risk for postoperative wound dehiscence or incisional hernia. Larger samples are required, however, if one is to draw any conclusion regarding the safety and effectiveness of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Haile Mahteme
- Institution for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| | - Per Hellman
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Desserud KF, Veen T, Søreide K. Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient. Br J Surg 2015; 103:e52-61. [PMID: 26620724 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency general surgery in the elderly is a particular challenge to the surgeon in charge of their care. The aim was to review contemporary aspects of managing elderly patients needing emergency general surgery and possible alterations to their pathways of care. METHODS This was a narrative review based on a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search up until 15 September 2015 for publications relevant to emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient. RESULTS The number of patients presenting as an emergency with a general surgical condition increases with age. Up to one-quarter of all emergency admissions to hospital may be for general surgical conditions. Elderly patients are a particular challenge owing to added co-morbidity, use of drugs and risk of poor outcome. Frailty is an important potential risk factor, but difficult to monitor or manage in the emergency setting. Risk scores are not available universally. Outcomes are usually severalfold worse than after elective surgery, in terms of both higher morbidity and increased mortality. A care bundle including early diagnosis, resuscitation and organ system monitoring may benefit the elderly in particular. Communication with the patient and relatives throughout the care pathway is essential, as indications for surgery, level of care and likely outcomes may evolve. Ethical issues should also be addressed at every step on the pathway of care. CONCLUSION Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient needs a tailored approach to improve outcomes and avoid futile care. Although some high-quality studies exist in related fields, the overall evidence base informing perioperative acute care for the elderly remains limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K F Desserud
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - T Veen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - K Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
St-Louis E, Sudarshan M, Al-Habboubi M, El-Husseini Hassan M, Deckelbaum DL, Razek TS, Feldman LS, Khwaja K. The outcomes of the elderly in acute care general surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015; 42:107-13. [PMID: 26038035 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0517-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Elderly patients form a growing subset of the acute care surgery (ACS) population. Older age may be associated with poorer outcomes for some elective procedures, but there are few studies focusing on outcomes for the elderly ACS population. Our objective is to characterize differences in mortality and morbidity for acute care surgery patients >80 years old. METHODS A retrospective review of all ACS admissions at a large teaching hospital over 1 year was conducted. Patients were classified into non-elderly (<80 years old) and elderly (≥80 years old). In addition to demographic differences, outcomes including care efficiency, mortality, postoperative complications, and length of stay were studied. Data analysis was completed with the Student's t test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables using STATA 12 (College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS We identified 467 non-elderly and 60 elderly patients with a mean age-adjusted Charlson score of 3.2 and 7.2, respectively (p < 0.001) and a mortality risk of 1.9 and 11.7 %, respectively (p < 0.001). The elderly were at risk of longer duration (>4 days) hospital stay (p = 0.05), increased postoperative complications (p = 0.002), admission to the ICU (p = 0.002), and were more likely to receive a non-operative procedure (p = 0.003). No difference was found (p = NS) for patient flow factors such as time to consult general surgery, time to see consult by general surgery, and time to operative management and disposition. CONCLUSIONS Compared to younger patients admitted to an acute care surgery service, patients over 80 years old have a higher risk of complications, are more likely to require ICU admission, and stay longer in the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E St-Louis
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - M Sudarshan
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - M Al-Habboubi
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - M El-Husseini Hassan
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - D L Deckelbaum
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - T S Razek
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - L S Feldman
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | - K Khwaja
- Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stey AM, Russell MM, Zingmond DS, Gibbons MM, Hall BL, Needleman J, Lawson EH, Liu N, Ko CY. Using Merged Clinical and Claims Registry Data to Identify High Utilizers of Surgical Inpatient Care 1 Year after Colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221:441-51.e1. [PMID: 26141469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Revised: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Under bundled payment initiatives, providers will be held financially responsible for patients' acute and post-acute care costs. Certain patients, termed high utilizers, use disproportionate shares of resources during 1 year. The aim of this study was to identify high utilizers, describe their costs, and determine whether preoperative characteristics predict high utilizer status. STUDY DESIGN Colectomy patients with 1-year follow-up were identified in a linked clinical (American College of Surgeons NSQIP) and administrative (Medicare inpatient claims) dataset (2005 to 2008). Cost of inpatient care was calculated by multiplying patient Medicare charges in each cost center by cost-to-charge ratios from the Medicare cost reports. A mixed-effects logistic model quantified the association between preoperative characteristics and being a high utilizer after elective and emergent colectomies. RESULTS One thousand and fifty-five of 10,561 colectomy patients accounted for >50% of the inpatient care cost of the entire cohort during 1 year postoperatively. This top decile of patients were labeled high utilizers and had substantially greater costs in the following cost centers: intensive care ($36,322 vs $0), respiratory ($2,875 vs $22), radiology ($649 vs $29), and cardiology ($5,057 vs $166) (all p < 0.001). High utilizers more frequently had emergent index colectomies (43% vs 17%; p < 0.001). Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV and V had 2-fold increased odds of being high utilizers after both elective (odds ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.89-3.90) and emergent colectomies (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.23-3.55). CONCLUSIONS Patients in the top cost decile account for the majority of costs in the year after colectomy, disproportionately accumulate those costs in particular cost centers, and can be identified preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Stey
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Marcia M Russell
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David S Zingmond
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Melinda M Gibbons
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bruce L Hall
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, Olin Business School, and Center for Health Policy, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis VA Medical Center, BJC Healthcare Saint Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Jack Needleman
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elise H Lawson
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nancy Liu
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Erekson EA, Fried TR, Martin DK, Rutherford TJ, Strohbehn K, Bynum JPW. Frailty, cognitive impairment, and functional disability in older women with female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 26:823-30. [PMID: 25516232 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2596-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating frailty as an important predictor of surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing major surgeries. The age-related onset of many symptoms of female pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in women suggests that many women seeking treatment for PFD may also have a high prevalence of frailty, which could potentially impact the risks and benefits of surgical treatment options. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of frailty, cognitive impairment, and functional disability in older women seeking treatment for PFD. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment between September 2011 and September 2012. Women, age 65 years and older, were recruited at the conclusion of their new patient consultation for PFD at a tertiary center. A comprehensive geriatric screening including frailty measurements (Fried Frailty Index), cognitive screening (Saint Louis University Mental Status score), and functional status evaluation for activities of daily living (Katz ADL score) was conducted. RESULTS Sixteen percent (n/N = 25/150) of women were categorized as frail according to the Fried Frailty Index score. After adjusting for education level, 21.3 % of women (n/N = 32/150) screened positive for dementia and 46 (30.7 %) reported functional difficulty or dependence in performing at least one Katz ADL. Sixty-nine women (46.0 %) chose surgical options for treatment of their PFD at the conclusion of their new patient visit with their physician. CONCLUSIONS Frailty, cognitive impairment, and functional disability are common in older women seeking treatment for PFD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth A Erekson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mik M, Magdzinska J, Dziki L, Tchorzewski M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A. Relaparotomy in colorectal cancer surgery – Do any factors influence the risk of mortality? A case controlled study. Int J Surg 2014; 12:1192-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 08/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
14
|
Barbas AS, Haney JC, Henry BV, Heflin MT, Lagoo SA. Development and implementation of a formalized geriatric surgery curriculum for general surgery residents. GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION 2014; 35:380-394. [PMID: 24447092 DOI: 10.1080/02701960.2013.879444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite the growth of the elderly population, most surgical training programs lack formalized geriatric education. The authors' aim was to implement a formalized geriatric surgery curriculum at an academic medical center. Surgery residents were surveyed on attitudes toward the care of elderly patients and the importance of various geriatric topics to daily practice. A curriculum consisting of 16 didactic sessions was created with faculty experts moderating. After curriculum completion, residents were surveyed to assess curriculum impact. Residents expressed increased comfort in accessing community resources. A greater percentage of residents recognized the significance of delirium and acute renal failure in elderly patients. Implementing a geriatric surgery curriculum geared toward surgery residents is feasible and can increase resident comfort with multidisciplinary care and recognition of clinical conditions pertinent to elderly surgical patients. This initiative also provided valuable experience for geriatric surgery curriculum development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Barbas
- a Department of Surgery , Duke University , Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mallol M, Sabaté A, Dalmau A, Koo M. Risk factors and mortality after elective and emergent laparatomies for oncological procedures in 899 patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 2013; 7:29. [PMID: 24007279 PMCID: PMC3847296 DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2013] [Accepted: 08/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Abdominal surgeries for cancer are associated with postoperative complications and mortality. A view of the success of anaesthetic, surgical and critical care can be gained by analyzing factors associated with mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). The objective of this study was to identify the postoperative mortality rate and the causes of perioperative death in high-risk patients after abdominal surgery for cancer. A secondary objective was to explore possible risk factors for death in scheduled and emergency surgeries, with a view to finding guidance on preventable risk factors. Methods An observational study, in a 12-bed surgical ICU of a tertiary hospital. Patients admitted after abdominal surgery for cancer to the ICU for more than 24 hours’ care were included from January 1, 2008–December 31, 2009. Data were extracted from the minimum basic dataset. The main outcome considered was 90-day mortality. Results Of 899 patients included, 80 (8.9%) died. Seven died within 48 hours of surgery, 18 died between 2 and 7 days, and 55 died after 7 days. Non-survivors were older and had more respiratory comorbidity, chronic liver disease, metastasis, and underwent more palliative procedures. 112 patients underwent emergency surgery; mortality in these patients for resection surgery was 32.5%; in the 787 patients who underwent scheduled surgery, mortality was 4.7% for resection procedures. The estimated odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of preoperative patient factors in emergency surgery confirmed a negative association between survival and older age 0.96 (0.91–1), the presence of respiratory comorbidity 0.14 (0.02–0.77) and metastasis 0.18 (0.05–0.6). After scheduled surgery, survival was negatively associated with age 0.93 (0.90–0.96) and chronic liver disease 0.40 (0.17–0.91). Analysis of complications after emergency surgery also indicated a negative association with sepsis 0.03 (0.003–0.32), respiratory events 0.043 (0.011–0.17) and cardiac events 0.11 (0.027–0.45); after scheduled surgery, respiratory 0.03 (0.01–0.08) and cardiac 0.11 (0.02–0.45) events, renal failure 0.02 (0.006–0.14) and neurological events 0.06 (0.007–0.5). Conclusions As most deaths occurred after discharge from the ICU, postoperative sepsis, respiratory and cardiac events should be watched carefully on the ward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Mallol
- Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona Health Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|