Role of gender in the survival outcome of acute phase of major trauma: A nationwide, population-based study

BACKGROUND

Animal models of trauma have shown that females have better posttraumatic survival; however, results of previous studies on the influence of gender on major trauma patients have been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between gender and survival in major trauma patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients registered in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 2008 and 2012 with the diagnosis codes 800-939 and 950-957 (International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification). Data on gender, age, catastrophic illness, and new injury severity score (NISS) ≥16 were collected for comparing patients' mortality after trauma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate dissimilarities in age, comorbidities, NISS, and primary traumatic regions between the genders.

RESULTS

Among 10 012 major trauma patients included in the study cohort, 28.8% (n = 2880) were women. The PSM patient group consisted of 50% (2876 of 5752) women. Women had a higher 30-day (15.4% of women vs 13.8% of men; p < 0.05) and hospital (16.1% of women vs 14.5% of men; p < 0.05) mortality and lower incidence rates of acute respiratory dysfunction (62.5% of women vs 65.9% of men; p < 0.005) and acute hepatic dysfunction (0.8% of women vs 2.1% of men; p < 0.001). However, the analysis of PSM patient groups showed lower mortality rates in women with moderate trauma (NISS 16-24) in the acute phase within three days (1.4% of women vs 2.7% of men, p = 0.03). Analysis of patients with an NISS of 16-24 who died within three days showed a higher NISS in women than in men (19.7 ± 2.3 vs 18.0 ±1.9, respectively, p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is no gender difference in 30-day or hospital mortality among major trauma patients. However, women admitted for moderate major trauma had higher survival within three days of major trauma.

The influence of sex on outcomes in trauma patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the influence of sex on outcomes among trauma patients, including injury severity, medical resource utility, complications, and mortality.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted by internet search. Data were extracted from selected studies and analyzed using Stata to compare outcomes between male and female injured patients.

RESULTS

Eventually, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria with 100,566 men and 39,762 women. Pooled data revealed that male sex was associated with increased risk of mortality, hospital length of stay, and higher incidence of complications. No difference was detected in injury severity between male and female patients.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of this meta-analysis strongly supports the sex dimorphism in the prognosis of trauma patients and further work should be done to decipher potential mechanism.

The effect of hospital care on early survival after penetrating trauma

Background

The effectiveness of emergency medical interventions can be best evaluated using time-to-event statistical methods with time-varying covariates (TVC), but this approach is complicated by uncertainty about the actual times of death. We therefore sought to evaluate the effect of hospital intervention on mortality after penetrating trauma using a method that allowed for interval censoring of the precise times of death.

Methods

Data on persons with penetrating trauma due to interpersonal assault were combined from the 2008 to 2010 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and the 2004 to 2010 National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). Cox and Weibull proportional hazards models for survival time (t_SURV) were estimated, with TVC assumed to have constant effects for specified time intervals following hospital arrival. The Weibull model was repeated with t_SURV interval-censored to reflect uncertainty about the precise times of death, using an imputation method to accommodate interval censoring along with TVC.

Results

All models showed that mortality was increased by older age, female sex, firearm mechanism, and injuries involving the head/neck or trunk. Uncensored models showed a paradoxical increase in mortality associated with the first hour in a hospital. The interval-censored model showed that mortality was markedly reduced after admission to a hospital, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.63, 0.73) during the first 30 min declining to a HR of 0.01 after 120 min. Admission to a verified level I trauma center (compared to other hospitals in the NTDB) was associated with a further reduction in mortality, with a HR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97).

Conclusions

Time-to-event models with TVC and interval censoring can be used to estimate the effect of hospital care on early mortality after penetrating trauma or other acute medical conditions and could potentially be used for interhospital comparisons.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-014-0024-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.