Effect of Diagnosis on Outcomes in the Setting of Enhanced Recovery Protocols

BACKGROUND

Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in colectomy reduces length of stay and morbidity, but it remains unknown whether benefits vary by clinical diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes after colectomy in the setting of enhanced recovery protocols were compared for 3 diagnoses: 1) neoplasm, 2) diverticulitis, and 3) IBD.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective registry-based cohort study.

SETTINGS

Novel enhanced recovery variables were released in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in 2014.

PATIENTS

Patients with enhanced recovery variable data undergoing elective colectomy (July 2014 to December 2015) for neoplasm, diverticulitis, or IBD were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was prolonged length of stay. Additional outcomes included surgical site infection, death/serious morbidity, reoperation, readmission, and days to achieve per os pain control, tolerance of a diet, and return of bowel function.

RESULTS

We identified 4620 patients with neoplasm, 1730 patients with diverticulitis, and 593 patients with IBD. Patients undergoing colectomy for IBD were more likely to have prolonged length of stay (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.46-2.69), death/serious morbidity (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.32), and readmission (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.15-2.08) compared with patients with neoplasm. Patients with IBD took longer than patients with neoplasm or diverticulitis to achieve per os pain control (mean, 4.2 days vs 3.4 and 3.5 days, p < 0.001) and tolerate a diet (mean, 4.1 days vs 3.7 and 3.5 days, p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients with neoplasm and diverticulitis were seen.

LIMITATIONS

There may be heterogeneity among implemented enhanced recovery protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing colectomy for neoplasm and diverticulitis have improved outcomes in comparison with patients undergoing colectomy for IBD. Knowledge of expected outcomes for patients with different diagnoses may inform clinician and patient expectations. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A623.

Obesity is not associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent single-institutional series have examined the relationship of body mass index (BMI) in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) generally without significant increase in serious complications with increasing BMI. This study evaluates the impact of BMI on complication rates using a national cohort.

METHODS

The ACS NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing concurrent CRS with IPC (2005-2012). Death and serious morbidity (DSM) was the primary outcome. Statistical analyses were performed to determine significant associations between peri-operative factors and DSM.

RESULTS

Of 1,085 patients, there were 30.4% (n = 330) obese (BMI >30) and 32.1% (n = 348) normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) patients. DSM rates did not differ between these groups (P = 0.853). Obese patients were more likely to experience post-operative wound (P = 0.017) and renal (P = 0.002) complications. Hypoalbuminemia (OR 7.34; 95% CI 2.27-23.73), prolonged operative time (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.83-4.97) and concomitant liver resection (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.31-8.28) were independent risk factors for DSM among obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is not significantly associated with DSM in patients undergoing CRS/IPC, and should not be a major deterrence for surgery. However, obese patients are more likely to experience wound and renal complications and hypoalbuminemia is a strong preoperative risk factor. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:619-624. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.