A Clinicopathological Appraisal of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors at a Racially Diverse Safety Net Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Significant knowledge gaps exist regarding clinicopathological profiling as well as treatment, surveillance, and survival of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs).

METHODS

We clinicopathologically characterized and identified racial differences among patients with dNETs at a large safety net hospital. Tumor grades were updated based on the World Health Organization 2019 NET classification, and overall survival was determined.

RESULTS

We identified 17 dNETs and found no differences in clinicopathologic characteristics across racial groups. Pathological diagnosis was upgraded in 35% of dNETs, and age >65 years significantly shortened overall survival.

DISCUSSION

Larger-scale studies are needed to determine the significance of these findings.

Extended surgical resection for nonfunctioning duodenal neuroendocrine tumor

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) account for <3% of all gastrointestinal NET. Most lesions are small-sized and are located in the first or second duodenal part. Tumoral grading, evaluated by Ki67 index, strongly influences patient’s outcome. Endoscopic resection is recommended for lesions measuring <2 cm, while pancreaticoduodenectomy should be the treatment of choice for large duodenal NET; Whipple procedure should be preferred in case of duodenal origin and contiguity with gastric antrum. Involvement of surrounding structures, as well as the presence of resectable liver metastases, does not contraindicate surgical resection. Herein we report a case of a 68-year-old male, presenting with an extensive mass of the descending pre-ampullary duodenal part, with involvement of the right colon and the presence of a pericholecystic single liver metastasis. In spite of such advanced disease, surgery on the patient was successful, with an uneventful postoperative outcome.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor: A rare case report

RATIONALE

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor (d-NET) is a rare tumor originating in the neuroendocrine system. The clinical manifestations of d-NET are similar to those of other digestive tract tumors, resulting in a lack of specificity and complex clinical symptoms.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 55-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with a chief complaint of an abdominal mass that had been present for more than 4 months.

DIAGNOSES

The upper abdomen enhanced computed tomography scan showed an uneven density mass across the upper abdomen, and the tumor size was approximately 6.2 × 5.8 cm with obvious visible enhancement present in 1 area and a cystic nonenhanced area. The postoperative pathology showed the tumor cells to be positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin, cytokeratin, CD56 (partial weak), negative for vimentin, CD117, DOG-1, CD34, S-100, SMA, desmin, and Ki-67 approximately 2%, which confirmed the diagnosis of d-NETs.

INTERVENTIONS

We preferred laparoscopic surgical exploration, but the tumor started at the ascending part of the duodenum and involved the mesenteric artery. As the branches of the superior mesenteric artery were intertwined with the tumor, it was difficult to operate with the endoscope, so we converted to open laparotomy. The postoperative pathology revealed the presence of d-NET.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged after the operation. One-month and 3-month follow-up after surgery, showed no evidence of recurrence.

LESSONS

Radiological imaging studies are insufficient for the differential diagnosis of abdominal mass from other diseases, whereas surgery is the only radical treatment method, and the preferred surgical method is still active radical resection of the tumor.

Surgical resection for duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia: Outcome, prognostic factors and risk of metastases

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNEN) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of surgical management and to identify risk factors for metastatic disease.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for dNEN were retrospectively analysed. Clinicopathologic features, perioperative outcome and survival were assessed. A literature review with focus on risk factors for metastatic disease was additionally performed.

RESULTS

24 patients were identified. Out of 22 patients presenting with their primary tumour, 20 patients underwent curative resection and 18 patients received curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. 17 patients underwent formal oncological resection. Surgical mortality was 1 out of 24 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 67% in the entire cohort, 71% in patients undergoing resection for their primary tumour, 72% for patients undergoing curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy, 75% for pN0 and 70% for pN1 tumours. Lymph node metastases were identified in 15 patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, including 9 of 14 patients with tumours smaller than 2 cm, and 6 of 10 patients with G1 tumours. Literature review confirmed a high risk of metastases in small (58%) or G1 (24%) tumours. Tumour grade and angioinvasion were significantly associated with overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Even well differentiated or small dNEN harbour a considerable risk of metastases. These data challenge the concepts of surveillance, local resection and endoscopic management for dNEN based on size and grading. Angioinvasion was identified as a strong negative predictor of overall and disease-free survival in dNEN.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: Somewhere between the pancreas and small bowel?

BACKGROUND

While sub-2 cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often observed, small bowel-NETs undergo resection and lymphadenectomy regardless of size. Aim was to define the natural history of duodenal (D-NETs), determine the role of resection, and define the factors associated with overall survival (OS) after resection.

METHODS

National Cancer Database (2004-2014) was queried for the patients with nonmetastatic/nonfunctional D-NETs. Local resection (LR): local excision/polypectomy/excisional biopsy. Anatomic resection (AR): radical surgery. Tumor size was divided into less than 1 cm, 1 to 2 cm, and ≥2 cm. Propensity score weighting was used to create balanced resection and no-resection cohorts. The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

Among 5502 patient, the median age was 65 years. The median follow-up was 49 months. The median tumor size was 0.8 cm. Resection was performed in 72% (n = 3954; LR: 61%, AR: 39%). Lymph node (LN) resection was performed in 26% (43% had metastasis). A total of 74% had negative margins. Resection and no-resection cohorts were propensity score weighted for age/sex/race/Charlson-Deyo score/tumor grade (all independently associated with OS on multivariable analysis). Resection was associated with improved median OS compared to no resection in all sizes (<1 cm: median not reached vs 194 months; 1-2 cm: median not reached vs 56 months; >2 cm: median not reached vs 90 months; all P < .01). Subset analysis of each resection size cohort demonstrated that neither type of resection, LN retrieval, LN positivity, or margin status was associated with OS (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with nonmetastatic and nonfunctional D-NETS should be considered for resection regardless of tumor size. Given the lack of prognostic value, the resection type and extent of LN retrieval should be tailored to each patient's clinical picture and safety profile.