A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.

Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal wall herniation (AWH) is an increasing problem for patients, surgeons, and healthcare providers. Surgical-site specific outcomes, such as infection, recurrence, and mesh explantation, are improving; however, successful repair still exposes the patient to what is often a complex major operation aimed at improving quality of life. Quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, such as aesthetics, pain, and physical and emotional functioning, are less often and less well reported. We reviewed QOL tools currently available to evaluate their suitability.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in compliance with PRISMA guidelines was performed between 1st January 1990 and 1st May 2019. English language studies using validated quality-of-life assessment tool, whereby outcomes using this tool could be assessed were included.

RESULTS

Heterogeneity in the QOL tool used for reporting outcome was evident throughout the articles reviewed. AWH disease-specific tools, hernia-specific tools, and generic tools were used throughout the literature with no obviously preferred or dominant method identified.

CONCLUSION

Despite increasing acknowledgement of the need to evaluate QOL in patients with AWH, no tool has become dominant in this field. Assessment, therefore, of the impact of certain interventions or techniques on quality of life remains difficult and will continue to do so until an adequate standardised outcome measurement tool is available.

The use of a novel synthetic resorbable scaffold (TIGR Matrix®) in a clinical quality improvement (CQI) effort for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR)

PURPOSE

The use of hernia mesh is a common practice in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) operations. The high cost of biologic mesh has raised questions about the value of its use in AWR. Resorbable synthetic mesh may have the potential benefits of biologic mesh, minimizing the need for removal when infected, at a lower cost.

METHODS

A hernia program has implemented the principles of clinical quality improvement (CQI) to improve patient outcomes. One process improvement attempt was implemented using a newly available resorbable synthetic scaffold. Long-term follow-up was obtained as a part of the CQI process.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients undergoing AWR were included between 8/11 and 9/15 (49 months). There were 58 female (64%) and 33 male (36%) patients. The average age was 57.2 years (28-80). The average BMI was 34.0 (17.6-53.4). There were 52 patients (57%) with recurrent hernias. Mean hernia defect size was 306.6 cm² (24-720) and mean mesh size was 471.7 cm² (112-600). Outcomes included a mean length of stay of 7.5 days (0-49), a recurrence rate of 12% (11/91) and a wound complication rate of 27% (25/91). The recurrence rate decreased to 4.5% (3/66) after several improvements, including adopting a transversus abdominus release (TAR) approach, were implemented. There were no mesh-related complications and no mesh removal (partial or total) was required. The mean follow-up length was 42.4 months (0-102).

CONCLUSION

In this group of patients, an attempt at process improvement was implemented using a resorbable synthetic scaffold for AWR. With no mesh-related complications and no mesh removals required, there was an improvement in value due to the decrease in mesh cost and improved outcomes over time. Long-term follow-up demonstrated the durability of the repair.

Non-cross-linked biological mesh in complex abdominal wall hernia: a cohort study

Purpose

Complex abdominal wall hernia repair (CAWHR) is a challenging procedure. Mesh prosthesis is indicated, but the use of synthetic mesh in a contaminated area may add to overall morbidity. Biological meshes may provide a solution, but little is known about long-term results. The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction following Strattice™ (PADM) placement.

Methods

In this cohort study, all patients operated for CAWHR with PADM in three large community hospitals in Germany were included. Patients underwent abdominal examination, an ultrasound was performed, and patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under Identifier NCT02168231.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were assessed (14 male, age 67.5 years, follow-up 42.4 months). The most frequent postoperative complication was wound infection (39.1%). In no case, the PADM had to be removed. Four patients had passed away. During outpatient clinic visit, six out of 23 patients (26.1%) had a recurrence of hernia, one patient had undergone reoperation. Five patients (21.7%) had bulging of the abdominal wall. Quality-of-life questionnaires revealed that patients judged their scar with a median 3.5 out of 10 points (0 = best) and judged their restrictions during daily activities with a median of 0 out of 10.0 (0 = no restriction).

Conclusions

Despite a high rate of wound infection, no biological mesh had to be removed. In some cases, therefore, the biological meshes provided a safe way out of desperate clinical situations. Both the recurrence rate and the amount of bulging are high (failure rate 47.8%). The reported quality of life is good after repair of these complex hernias.

When the Mesh Goes Away: An Analysis of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh for Complex Hernia Repair

Mesh reinforcement is a cornerstone of modern ventral hernia repair (VHR); yet, complications with synthetic mesh and cost of biologic have created a need for alternative options. Biosynthetic mesh is a resorbable scaffold that theoretically leverages the benefits and minimizes deficiencies of existing mesh types. This study evaluates 2-year outcomes following poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh reinforcement for complex VHR.

Methods

A retrospective review of all consecutive VHR with P4HB (n = 70) was conducted from 2015 to 2018 by a single surgeon. Clinical outcomes, quality of life (QoL; and cost were assessed.

Results

Seventy patients were included with an average age and body mass index of 58.6 years and 33 kg/m², respectively. High-risk comorbidities included hypertension (59%), and smoking history (50%). Cases were primarily modified Ventral Hernia Working Group class 2 (50%), or 3 (36%), with average defect size of 323 cm² (25-972 cm²). P4HB was placed in the retromuscular (80%) or onlay (20%) plane. Mean follow-up was 24 months (12.2-41 months). Hernia recurrence rate was 5.7% (n = 4) and occurred an average of 285 days (209-368 days) post-repair. Of the 21 surgical site occurrences (SSO), 5 (7%) required surgical intervention. A significant improvement in overall QoL (P = 0.001) was noted following repair. Defect size and SSOPI were independently associated with increased direct cost.

Conclusions

P4HB mesh for complex VHR is associated with favorable 2-year clinical outcomes, acceptable hernia recurrence rate, and a significant improvement in QoL. This study supports the use of biosynthetic mesh as an effective biomaterial for complex VHR.

Measuring Success in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: The Role of Validated Outcome Scales

BACKGROUND

Diminished quality of life (QOL) often drives patients to hernia repair, and patient-reported outcomes have gained importance in hernia research. Functional outcomes provide a patient-centered evaluation of a treatment, and improved QOL is a desired outcome assessing treatment effectiveness.

METHODS

Properties of validated QOL measure are reviewed and distinctions between generic and disease-specific measures are discussed. Based on a review of the literature, current validated outcome scales are evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Currently, there is little agreement over the best means to measure QOL. As a result, several measures have been created, focusing on several distinct aspects of QOL. While generic measures provide global assessments, disease-specific measures report changes as they relate to the hernia itself and hernia surgery. With the introduction of new QOL measures, it is important to understand the properties of a good QOL measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Several questions remain unanswered regarding QOL, including which measures best assess hernia patients, what is the ideal time to evaluate QOL, and for how long postoperatively should QOL be measured. The introduction of guidelines to address these issues may enable improvement in value assessment.

Abdominal wall reconstruction following resection of large abdominal aggressive neoplasms using tensor fascia lata flap with or without mesh reinforcement

PURPOSE

Abdominal wall defects caused by neoplasms with large extended resection defects remain a challenging problem. Autologous flaps, meshes, and component separation techniques are effective in reconstructing these defects. We retrospectively reviewed and assessed the success of reconstruction using tensor fascia lata flap with or without meshes.

METHODS

18 patients with abdominal wall neoplasms were identified during the period from 2007 to 2016. A retrospective review of office charts and hospital records was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients received corresponding treatment according to the degree of defects, with a mean age of 53.89 ± 14.56 years old, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 22.89 ± 4.09 kg/m², and a mean American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score of 2.18 ± 0.75. Operative details included the mean defect size (303.44 ± 175.67 cm²), the mean mesh size (265.92 ± 227.99 cm²), and the mean operative time (382.33 ± 180.38 min). Postoperative wound complications were identified in 7 (39%) patients, including incisional infection, edema and thrombus. Neoplasm recurrence was observed in 2 (13%) primary neoplasms patients. No hernias were present in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal wall defects caused by neoplasms should be repaired by autologous flaps combined with or without mesh reinforcement. Most type I defects should be primary sutured; type II or III defects should be repaired well by flaps, with or without mesh; if the incision is infected or contaminated, biological mesh or flaps are the best choice.