Educational Value of Surgical Residents Operating as Teaching Assistant

OBJECTIVE

To assess the educational of value of teaching assistant (TA) cases from the perspectives of attending, chief resident, and junior resident. We hypothesized the greatest educational value of TA cases would be for chief residents more so than other team members.

DESIGN

A prospective survey was designed and collected for TA cases separately from attendings, chief residents, and junior residents to assess operative details and educational value. The study period ran from August 2021 through December 2022. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was undertaken to compare answers and discover themes in the free-text responses of attendings and residents.

SETTING

Single center, tertiary care institution, Maine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Portland, ME PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine teaching assistant cases were captured from a total of 117 completed surveys that were completed by 44 chief residents, 49 junior residents, 22 attendings (n = 22) and 2 APPs.

RESULTS

A wide variety of TA cases were included in the study with the most common reason for performing a TA case being resident request 68%. Operative complexity was most commonly rated easiest third (50%) and middle third (41%) of overall cases. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time. Attendings reported learning something about the resident's skills that they were not expecting in 59% of the cases. Thematic analysis: attendings focused on the steps of the procedure, including the technical aspects, particularly regarding opening while residents largely focused on communication and preparation.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching assistant cases seem to have more educational value for chief and junior residents than attendings. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time.

Teaching assistant cases in general surgery training - A literature review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of understanding of the scope and purpose of teaching assistant cases, impact on patients and safety, as well as the facilitators or barriers to resident participation in these cases.

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Education Resources Information Center), were searched. The references of identified resources were additionally hand-searched. 10 articles were identified and considered in the literature review.

RESULTS

The TA case literature focuses on case numbers and safety. The discussions of papers allude to perceived benefits of TA cases. The literature review reveals that residents are more likely to be granted TA opportunities if they show themselves worthy of entrustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The work elucidates aspects of TA cases that have not previously been emphasized or highlighted. The literature review can serve to inform attending surgeons and trainees how to optimize the opportunities teaching assistant cases can afford.

Evaluating chief resident readiness for the teaching assistant role: The Teaching Evaluation assessment of the chief resident (TEACh-R) instrument

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Surgery has mandated chief residents complete 25 cases in the teaching assistant (TA) role. We developed a structured instrument, the Teaching Evaluation and Assessment of the Chief Resident (TEACh-R), to determine readiness and provide feedback for residents in this role.

METHODS

Senior (PGY3-5) residents were scored on technical and teaching performance by faculty observers using the TEACh-R instrument in the simulation lab. Residents were provided with their TEACh-R scores and surveyed on their experience.

RESULTS

Scores in technical (p < 0.01) and teaching (p < 0.01) domains increased with PGY. Higher technical, but not teaching, scores correlated with attending-rated readiness for operative independence (p 0.02). Autonomy mismatch was inversely correlated with teaching competence (p < 0.01). Residents reported satisfaction with TEACh-R feedback and desire for use of this instrument in operating room settings.

CONCLUSION

Our TEACh-R instrument is an effective way to assess technical and teaching performance in the TA role.

Effect of Establishing a Teaching Assistant Case Minimum on General Surgery Residents: 18-Year Comparison of a Single Institution to National Data

BACKGROUND

Teaching assistant (TA) cases are a training mainstay, due to increased resident autonomy. Since 2014, the American Board of Surgery (ABS) requires a 25 TA case minimum for graduating resident eligibility for board certification. Herein, we analyze our institution's experience compared with the national average, for any change effected by the requirement.

STUDY DESIGN

ACGME case log data were obtained for the July 2001 to June 2018 academic years. We compared average TA cases of our program against the national average and national 50th percentile: 2001 to 2014, and 2014 to 2018 academic years. The program TA cases were also broken down by category, with a comparison before and after 2014. Values of p were calculated using a t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

From July 2001 to June 2018, our program averaged 30.1 TA cases/resident, and national 50th percentile average was 28.1. For July 2001 to June 2014 AY (aka pre-2014) and July 2014 to June 2018 AY (aka post-2014) cases per resident, our program averages were 24.9 and 46.1, respectively, and the national 50th percentile averages were 24.4 and 40.3, respectively-both statistically significant increases. Average program percentiles were 46.4 (pre-2014), and 61.5 (post-2014), and 59.6% of program cases logged were biliary, large intestine, and hernia (2001 to 2018 AY), with a statistically significant increase in several case subcategories post-2014.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching assistant cases are an invaluable resource for residents, fostering increased autonomy. Since the 2014 minimum, a statistically significant increase in TA cases was noted in our program and nationally. The majority of sub-categories logged were core procedures. Unequivocally, the TA case minimum requirement has made a difference. This will hopefully lead to increased autonomy and therefore, more comfortable and capable general surgeons. Wide variability is noted in what counts as a TA case, with further clarification needed by the ACGME and ABS.