Management of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures: Is MRI Necessary in Patients without Neurological Deficits?

Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Injury: Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Targeted for non-spine specialist trauma surgeons, this systematic scoping review aimed to examine literature for up-to-date evidence on presentation, management, and outcomes of thoracolumbar spine injuries in adult trauma patients.

METHODS

This review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. We searched four bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included experimental, observational, and evidence-synthesis articles evaluating patients with thoracic, lumbar, or thoracolumbar spine injury, published in English between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2021. Studies which focused on animals, cadavers, cohorts with N <30, and pediatric cohorts (age <18 years old), as well as case studies, abstracts, and commentaries were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 2501 studies were screened, of which 326 unique studies were fully text reviewed and twelve aspects of injury management were identified and discussed: injury patterns, determination of injury status and imaging options, considerations in management, and patient quality of life. We found: (1) imaging is a necessary diagnostic tool, (2) no consensus exists for preferred injury characterization scoring systems, (3) operative management should be considered for unstable fractures, decompression, and deformity, and (4) certain patients experience significant burden following injury.

DISCUSSION

In this systematic scoping review, we present the most up-to-date information regarding the management of traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries. This allows non-specialist trauma surgeons to become more familiar with thoracolumbar spine injuries in trauma patients and provides a framework for their management.

Is magnetic resonance imaging needed for decision making diagnosis and treatment of thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures?

PURPOSE

The radiological examination including plain radiography, CT and MRI are critical to assess the severity of the instability, to diagnose the fracture type and to select the appropriate treatment strategy for the thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures. The aim of this prospective observational study was to investigate the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on decision making for the diagnosis and treatment of acute thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures.

METHODS

Consecutive 180 patients with acute thoracic and/or lumbar vertebral fractures were included in the study. The fracture pattern was evaluated by using initial radiographs, computed tomography (CT) and MRI within 24 h of trauma. Fractures were classified according to AO classification before and after MRI. TLICS classification was also used to decide treatment plan. MRI findings were compared to surgical findings in the surgically treated patients.

RESULTS

A significant moderate agreement was found between Xray + CT and post-MRI classifications for all fracture types (Kappa = 0.511; p < 0.001). In 101 patients with new findings on MRI, a significant moderate correlation was observed between Xray + CT and post-MRI classifications in the fracture re-classification (Kappa = 0.441, p < 0.001). There was a significant change in the treatment plan of patients with new findings on MRI according to Xray + CT (p < 0.0001). After MRI evaluation, the treatment plan changed in favor of surgery in 33.9% of patients who were scheduled for conservative treatment according to Xray + CT (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Since MRI assessment of acute thoracic and/or lumbar injuries has led to a remarkable treatment change decision that confirms intraoperative findings of the patients who were decided to undergo surgery, MRI should be obtained in thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures, regardless of the CT and plain radiographic findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective observational study.

Thoracic and lumbar spine trauma classification systems fail to predict post-traumatic kyphotic deformity

Background

Post-traumatic kyphosis of the thoracic and lumbar spine can lead to pain and decreased function. MRI has been advocated to assess ligament integrity and risk of kyphosis.

Methods

All thoracic and lumbar spine MRI performed for evaluation of trauma over a 3-year period at a single institution were reviewed. Patients were included if there was an MRI showing a vertebral body fracture and follow-up radiographs. Two observers retrospectively reviewed all radiographs, CT and MRI scans, and classified injuries based on the Denis, TLICS, AO and load sharing classification systems. Change in kyphosis between injury and follow-up studies was measured. The initial radiology reports made at time of patient injury were compared to the retrospective interpretations.

Results

There were 67 separate injuries in 62 patients. Kyphosis measuring ≥ 10° developed despite an intact PLC in 6/14 nonoperative cases, and 3/7 surgically treated cases; when PLC was partially injured, it developed in 6/10 cases (8 treated nonoperatively, 2 treated operatively. Thirty injuries had complete disruption of PLC by MRI, 24 treated with fusion. Kyphosis ≥ 10° developed in 3/6 treated nonoperatively, and 8/24 treated with fusion. Development of kyphosis was independent of degree of vertebral body comminution. It developed equally in patients with Grade 2 and Grade 3 Denis injuries. It developed in patients with intact PLC when multiple vertebrae were involved and/or there was compressive injury to anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). There was high interobserver variability in assessment of severity of ligamentous injury on MRI.

Conclusions

Classification systems of thoracic and lumbar spine injury and integrity of the PLC failed to predict the risk of development of post-traumatic kyphotic deformity.

Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Importance and Surgical Implications

The soft tissues surrounding the spine play a primordial role in its stability, the most important of which are located posteriorly and are deemed the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC). Injuries to the PLC in the setting of thoracolumbar trauma are often dreaded and little attention has been given to them in the management protocols of thoracolumbar trauma. This review aims to summarize and contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries of the thoracolumbar spine with the aim to provide a clear guide for clinical management. Injuries to the PLC may be suspected on the clinical exam but are often missed, leading to serious complications, including instability and neurological compromise. The diagnosis is often made indirectly by spinal radiographs and CT-scanning or by direct visualization of soft tissues via magnetic resonance imaging. The latter remains the standard imaging modality and is mandatory for patients with a high suspicion of PLC injury. PLC injuries are associated with vertebral fractures and follow a progressive pattern of severity, depending on the mechanism of injury and extent of trauma. Surgical management is warranted, as PLC damage renders the spine unstable. Although fusion was once the standard of care and remains applicable for certain patients, recent endeavors of temporary spinal fixation without fusion are increasingly gaining traction in patients with PLC injuries. In conclusion, PLC injuries are challenging as they are often missed, poorly understood, and are not easily managed. Proper diagnosis and management are crucial to avoid long-standing complications such as spinal instability. Considering the paucity of available data on such an important topic in thoracolumbar trauma, this review article aims to contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries in order to demystify this sparsely covered subject.

Achieving Value in Spine Surgery: 10 Major Cost Contributors

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES

The increasing cost of healthcare overall and for spine surgery, coupled with the growing burden of spine-related disease and rising demand have necessitated a shift in practice standards with a new emphasis on value-based care. Despite multiple attempts to reconcile the discrepancy between national recommendations for appropriate use and the patterns of use employed in clinical practice, resources continue to be overused-often in the absence of any demonstrable clinical benefit. The following discussion illustrates 10 areas for further research and quality improvement.

METHODS

We present a narrative review of the literature regarding 10 features in spine surgery which are characterized by substantial disproportionate costs and minimal-if any-clear benefit. Discussion items were generated from a service-wide poll; topics mentioned with great frequency or emphasis were considered. Items are not listed in hierarchical order, nor is the list comprehensive.

RESULTS

We describe the cost and clinical data for the following 10 items: Over-referral, Over-imaging & Overdiagnosis; Advanced Imaging for Low Back Pain; Advanced imaging for C-Spine Clearance; Advanced Imaging for Other Spinal Trauma; Neuromonitoring for Cervical Spine; Neuromonitoring for Lumbar Spine/Single-Level Surgery; Bracing & Spinal Orthotics; Biologics; Robotic Assistance; Unnecessary perioperative testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In the pursuit of value in spine surgery we must define what quality is, and what costs we are willing to pay for each theoretical unit of quality. We illustrate 10 areas for future research and quality improvement initiatives, which are at present overpriced and underbeneficial.

Emergent Comprehensive Imaging of the Major Trauma Patient: A New Paradigm for Improved Clinical Decision-Making

Modern advances in the medical imaging layered onto sophisticated trauma resuscitation strategies in highly organized regionalized trauma systems have created a paradigm shift in the management of severely injured patients. Although immediate exploratory surgery to identify and control life-threatening injuries still has its place, accelerated image acquisition and interpretation procedures now make it rare for trauma surgeons in major centers to venture into damage control surgery unaided by computed tomography (CT) or other imaging, particularly in cases of blunt trauma. Indeed, because of the high incidence of clinically occult injuries associated with major mechanism trauma, and even lower energy trauma in frail or elderly patients, CT imaging has become as invaluable as physical examination, if not more so, in critical decision-making in support of optimal outcomes. In particular, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) completed promptly after initial assessment of a major trauma provides a quick, comprehensive survey of injuries that enables better surgical planning, obviates the need for multiple subsequent studies, and permits specialized reconstructions when needed. For those at risk for problematic occult injury after modest trauma, WBCT facilitates safer discharge planning and simplified follow-up. Through standardized guidelines, streamlined protocols, synoptic reporting, accessible web-based platforms, and active collaboration with clinicians, radiologists dedicated to trauma and emergency imaging enable clearer understanding of complex injuries in high-risk patients which leads to superior clinical decision-making. Whereas dated dogma has long warned that the CT scanner is the last place to take a challenging trauma patient, modern practice suggests that, more often than not, early comprehensive imaging can be done safely and efficiently and is in the patient's best interest. This article outlines how the role of diagnostic imaging for major trauma has evolved considerably in recent years.