Sporadic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in a patient with isolated mesenteric gastrinoma

INTRODUCTION

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is due to a gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumor (gastrinoma) with subsequent gastric acid hypersecretion, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcers, and chronic diarrhea.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year old patient presented with epigastric pain associated with diarrhea evolving for 10 years, he has been treated by acid-suppressive medications without substantial clinical improvement. Gastro-duodenal endoscopy was performed with gastric biopsies that showed peptic ulcerations, a serum gastrin assay that showed high levels exceeding 10 times the upper limit of the normal range. The abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan (CT-Scan) showed a solid-cystic mass with contrast enhancement in the right colon mesentery. The histopathological analysis of the resected mass showed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and the diagnosis of a sporadic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) was disclosed. Eighteen months after the surgical treatment the patient has no symptoms of the disease.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Patients with ZES present often with long-standing clinical symptoms with delayed diagnosis. The surgical resection of the causative gastrinoma remains the most effective therapeutic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with refractory chronic diarrhea and epigastric pain should be suspected of having ZES in order to benefit from adequate clinical management.

Validity of Secretin Stimulation Testing on Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is characterized by gastrinoma-induced hypergastrinemia causing excessive gastric acid secretion. Secretin stimulation tests (SSTs) are required for diagnosis in the majority of patients. Two case reports suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) cause false SST results. Consequently, PPIs are discontinued to allow hyperchlorhydria to recur; however, uncontrolled acidity can cause life-threatening complications in those with underlying undiagnosed ZES. The aim of this study was to determine whether PPIs influence the validity of SSTs for the diagnosis of ZES.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed. Charts of patients who underwent SSTs were reviewed to determine whether they were performed on or off PPI and the test's accuracy by comparing the results with gold standard tests (diagnostic laboratory testing performed off PPI or surgical pathology consistent with gastrinoma). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of SST on PPI were calculated and results compared with SST off PPI using noninferiority analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients corresponding to 29 SSTs were performed on PPI, and 70 patients corresponding to 107 SSTs were performed off PPI. Most of them were female and white and had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. We found no false-positive or false-negative SSTs on PPI. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of SSTs on PPI were determined to be noninferior to SSTs off PPI (P ≤ 0.05 for all).

DISCUSSION

In our cohort, SSTs on PPI compared with SSTs off PPI were noninferior for sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. These results suggest that PPI withdrawal before SSTs may not be necessary.