High-Performance Trauma Centers in a Single-State Trauma System : Big Saves or Marginal Gains?

Dex® carbohydrate drinks in trauma patients fasting preoperatively – A patient satisfaction study

Introduction

Dex® is an alkaline carbohydrate (CHO) drink used preoperatively in patients fasting for elective surgery. Its utilisation in patients awaiting emergency surgery is yet to be ascertained. We undertook a study assessing patient satisfaction relating to the introduction of Dex® in trauma patients in a Level 1 adult trauma centre.

Methods

Patients fasting for surgery, and able to receive clear fluids in compliance with local guidelines, were eligible for inclusion. Patient satisfaction scores for predetermined variables were recorded via an interval observer scale prior to and following the introduction of Dex® to the trauma unit.

Results

Prior to the introduction of Dex® 14 satisfaction evaluations were completed. A further 13 evaluations were returned after Dex® was made available. Post-traumatic amnesia accounted for some patients being unable to complete the evaluation. Patients who completed the satisfaction evaluations after Dex® was introduced reported higher satisfaction in all but two variables (‘Headache’ and ‘Staff Annoyance’). ‘Hunger’ median scores were 7 (95% CI, 5–8) prior to the introduction of Dex® and 3 (95% CI, 2–6) after its’ introduction ( p = .004). ‘Thirst’ median scores were 7.5 (95% CI, 6–10) and 4 (95% CI, 3–8) prior to and after Dex® introduction, respectively ( p = .018).

Conclusion

No adverse events or theatre timing related issues were associated with the use of Dex®. A larger randomised study of CHO drink supplementation in trauma patients fasting preoperatively is warranted to further evaluate these satisfaction endpoints as well as the other variables investigated in this study. Postoperative evaluation of these markers should also be considered.

Extended reality anatomy undergraduate teaching: a literature review on an alternative method of learning

BACKGROUND

The majority of undergraduate anatomy learning has shifted online, or to a mixture of virtual and face-to-face teaching, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cadaveric shortages have also influenced the need for alternative methods of anatomical education. This study examines the current literature on the use of extended reality technologies (XR) such as Virtual reality (VR), Augmented reality (AR), and Mixed reality (MR) for anatomy teaching and explores its potential for implementation in medical education.

METHODS

A literature review was performed of PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Springer databases. Included studies were assessed for user satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, cost, acceptability and side effects.

RESULTS

The database search identified 1687 papers, of which 45 papers were included in this review. Both AR and VR had high rates of satisfaction and acceptability as a supplementary teaching aid amongst undergraduate participants. AR was found to have higher effectiveness than VR. VR is more expensive than AR. Results and comparisons were limited due to short length of study.

CONCLUSIONS

VR is a popular choice with undergraduates as an aid to supplement teaching, in spite of the associated cost and side effects such as nausea. AR has shown the most potential for independent study. Larger and long-term studies are required to determine true effectiveness, and consideration of the clinical relevance of these technologies.