Vaccination Practices in Trauma Patients Undergoing Splenic Artery Embolization : A Split Practice

Splenic artery embolisation for blunt splenic trauma: 10 years of practice at a trauma centre

INTRODUCTION

Splenic artery embolisation (SAE) has transformed the management of splenic trauma. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes and postprocedural management of blunt splenic trauma patients treated with SAE at a trauma centre over a 10-year period.

METHODS

Details of patients undergoing SAE for blunt trauma between January 2012 and January 2022 were acquired from a prospectively maintained database. Patient records were reviewed for demographic information, splenic injury grades, embolisation efficacy, complications, and associated injuries and mortality. Data relating to Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and postprocedural practice (vaccinations, antibiotic prescribing, follow-up imaging) were also obtained.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (24 male, 12 female) with a median age of 42.5 years (range 13-97 years) were identified. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma splenic injury grades were III (n = 7), IV (n = 20) and V (n = 9). Seventeen patients had isolated splenic injury and 19 had additional injuries to other organ systems. Median ISS was 18.5 (range 5-50). SAE succeeded first time in 35/36 cases, and upon the second attempt in 1/36 cases. No patients died because of splenic injury or SAE although four patients with polytrauma died owing to other injuries. SAE complications occurred in 4/36 cases. For survivors, vaccinations were administered in 17/32 cases, and long-term antibiotics were initiated in 14/32 cases. Formal follow-up imaging was arranged in 9/32 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that SAE is an effective means of controlling splenic haemorrhage secondary to blunt trauma with no patient requiring subsequent laparotomy. Major complications occurred in 11% of cases. Follow-up practice varied regarding further imaging, antibiotic and vaccination administration.

A retrospective multi-centre study of splenic volumes measured by CT following splenic artery angioembolisation for high-grade blunt splenic injuries in adults

INTRODUCTION

Splenic artery embolisation is a recognised modality in the management of high grade blunt splenic injury. The impact of embolisation on the spleen in terms of volume and function remains unclear. This results in a lack of clarity regarding post embolisation vaccination policy.

METHODS

This was a two-centre, retrospective observational study over a 24-month period involving all patients who underwent splenic artery embolisation for high grade blunt splenic trauma (AAST grades III-V). Splenic volumes were calculated from an initial CT and a repeat CT at 6 months post embolisation. Subgroup analysis was performed analysing the location of embolisation, AAST grading, and evidence of splenic dysfunction as defined by the presence of altered red cell morphology.

RESULTS

Thirty patients achieved successful splenic salvage with angioembolisation. Mean volume loss was 44.14 cm³ (P = 0.038), with decreased volumes for distal embolisation and increased volumes for proximal embolisation. Three patients had altered red cell morphology; two demonstrated recovery at 6 months, with the third lost to follow up. There were significant associations between, initial splenic volume, AAST grade of injury, and altered red cell morphology. There was no significant association between location of embolisation, initial splenic volumes, or percentage volume change.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a statistically significant change in splenic volume post angioembolisation in trauma, which was associated with AAST grading but not location of embolisation. The low rate of altered red cell morphology appears transient.

Immune function and the role of vaccination after splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury

The spleen is the most commonly injured solid organ following blunt abdominal trauma. Over recent decades, splenic artery embolization (SAE) has become the mainstay treatment for haemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic trauma, with splenectomy the mainstay of treatment for unstable patients. Splenic function is complex but the spleen has an important role in immune function, particularly in protection against encapsulated bacteria. Established evidence suggests that following splenectomy immune function is impaired resulting in increased susceptibility to overwhelming post-splenectomy infection, however, immune function may be preserved following SAE. This review will discuss the current state of the literature on immune function following different treatments of blunt splenic injury, and the controversies surrounding what constitutes a quantitative test of splenic immune function.