Comparison of Single-Port Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernioplasty Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernioplasty : A Single-Center Study

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) technique compared with the traditional three-port total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique for inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised study involved patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia at our hospital from December 2021 to July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to SIL-TEP or TEP groups based on a computer-generated random number table. Perioperative clinical indicators for the surgical approaches were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients eligible for study, 66 were randomised to the SIL-TEP group and 61 to the TEP group. The operation time for SIL-TEP was significantly longer than for TEP but the time to return to normal activities was significantly shorter and short-term pain score was significantly lower. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, pain relief time, hospitalization costs or cosmetic satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

While SIL-TEP is more challenging than TEP for hernia repair, we found that at our centre it is comparable with regard to overall safety and feasibility. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

Early perioperative outcomes of single-port compared to multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Single-port (SP) robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a promising new technique. The aim of this study was to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of SP-RAPN to the multi-port (MP) surgical platform. This is a retrospective, cohort-based study involving patients undergoing SP-RAPN between 2019 and 2020 at a single institution. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative outcomes data were gathered and compared to a 1-to-1 matched MP cohort. A total of 50 SP and 50 matched MP cases were included. Length of surgery and ischemia time were not statistically significant between the two cohorts; however, estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the SP group than in the MP (IQR 25-50 vs. IQR 50-100 mL, p = 0.002). No differences were seen in regard to the 30-day readmission rate, surgical margin status, pain scores, and complications between the two approaches. We found no statistically significant differences in positive margins, pain score, length of stay, or readmission rate between matched SP and MP patients. These data support the viability of the SP technique as an alternative to MP-RAPN when in the hands of experienced surgeons.