Prescribing Habits of Providers and Risk Factors for Nonadherence to Opioid Prescribing Guidelines

National Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Rates Following Pediatric Urology Procedures Before and After the 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics Challenge to Reduce Opioid Prescribing: A Claims Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends in opioid prescribing rates following pediatric urologic surgery.

METHODS

We queried the TriNetX Research database for patients under age 18 who underwent one of seven common pediatric urology procedures. We identified the proportion of patients that received an oral opioid prescription within 5days of surgery. The primary analysis evaluated the trend in postoperative opioid prescriptions using 3-month intervals from January 2010 to December 2022. We performed an interrupted time series analysis assessing trends in opioid prescribing patterns both before and after the American Academy of Pediatrics challenge.

RESULTS

Of the 81,644 pediatric urology procedures, 29,595 (36.2%) received a postoperative opioid prescription, including 29.8% of circumcisions, 25.8% of hydrocelectomies, 39.6% of hypospadias repairs, 42.7% of pyeloplasties, 42.8% of ureteral reimplants. For all procedures we observed rising rates of opioid prescribing, increasing by 0.9% per 3-month interval prior to the challenge statement release from 2010 to 2018. We observed an overall significant decrease in opioid prescribing by 2.2% per 3-month interval following the challenge statement release. Additionally, since 2018, there was a significant decrease in opioid prescribing in all of the race, ethnicity, and age cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Opioid prescribing following pediatric urology procedures has sharply decreased following the 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics challenge statement which underscores the value of cross-specialty quality improvement initiatives. Nonetheless, opioid prescribing remains high with potential racial or age disparities that warrant further investigation.

Utilization of a National Registry to influence opioid prescribing behavior after hernia repair

PURPOSE

Despite progress toward curtailing opioid prescribing, physicians are often slow to adopt new prescribing practices. Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), we aimed to demonstrate the ability of a national, disease-specific, personalized registry to impact opioid prescribing.

METHODS

Using a collaborative and iterative process, a module was developed to capture surgeon opioid prescribing, patient-reported consumption, and risk factors for opioid use. Study reported according to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 guidelines.

RESULTS

Six months after implementation of the ACHQC opioid module, we assessed participation, prescribing and patient consumption patterns. For ventral hernia repair (VHR; n = 398), 23 surgeons reported prescribing > 20 pills (43%), 11-20 (40%), and < 10 (18%). In contrast, patients (n = 217) reported taking < 10 pills in 65% and only 20% reported taking > 15. For inguinal hernia repair (IHR; n = 443) 37 surgeons reported prescribing > 20 tablets (22%), 11-20 (32%), and < 10 (44%). Patients (n = 277) reported taking < 10 pills in 81% of cases, including 50% reporting zero, and only 13% taking > 15. We identified barriers to practice change and developed a strategy for education, provision of individualized data, and encouraging participation. Surgeon participation has since increased significantly (n = 65 for VHR; n = 53 for IHR), and analysis of the impact of this process is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

Quality improvement requires physician engagement, which can be facilitated by meaningful and actionable data. The specificity of the ACHQC and the ability to provide surgeons with individualized data is a model method to incite change in physician behavior and improve patient outcomes.