Factors Associated With Retained Foreign Bodies Following Major Operations

Retained Foreign Object Signals a Dangerous Atmosphere in the Operating Room

A retained foreign object (RFO), also known as an unintentionally retained foreign object (URFO) or a retained surgical item (RSI), is an object retained after skin closure following an invasive procedure. After falls, it is the second most reported sentinel event (SE). Several factors increase the risk of RFO: intraoperative blood loss, longer duration of operation, more sub-procedures, lack of (or incorrect) surgical counts, more than one surgical team, and unexpected intraoperative factors. Unclear policies regarding the counting responsibility, the handling of surgical specimens, the involvement of two surgical teams, and the improper hand-off with a shift of the surgical technician represent other important contributing factors. Technologies, such as bar-coded sponges to aid in accurate counting and radiofrequency identification (RFID)-tagged sponges to provide intraoperative counting and detection, have shown to decrease the incidence of RFOs. However, the adoption of these technologies has been limited. Furthermore, the extremely high percentage of falsely "correct counts" points to the critical role of an unsafe operating ooom (OR) culture in the genesis of RFOs. We argue that the RFO is the dead canary: just as the dead bird signals the presence of lethal gas in the coal mine, the RFO signals the presence of a dangerous culture in the OR. Eliminating RFOs requires a multipronged strategy. OR staff should be reminded that failure can and will happen and they need to remain vigilant. Every team member should be capable and responsible to prevent the compounding of errors. Counting policy should be standardized mandating when, what, how, and by whom surgical counts are performed and documented. When policy is ignored or violated, OR staff should be involved in reviewing and revising the policy. However, commitment to safety requires leadership to provide appropriate resources and to role model core organizational values.

The Retained Surgical Items Risk Assessment Scale: Development and Psychometric Characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Retained surgical items in operating rooms (ORs) continue to contribute significantly to medical errors. The first step in addressing the problem of retained surgical items is to identify the main risk factors. Identification of risk factors can impact OR standards and reduce such errors.

METHODS

The research included 270 participants. The data of the study were collected with the Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Form, Operating Room Count Control Form and the Retained Surgical Items Risk Assessment Scale developed. In the analysis of the data, Content Validity Index, Cronbach α, item-total score correlation, Kuder-Richardson, Kappa, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The Content Validity Index of the scale was 0.92. Kappa value was 0.993. The explained variance in the exploratory factor analysis of the scale was 50.03%. After confirmatory factor analysis, two factors were obtained for the final version of the 15 items. Factors had been determined as "Count and Surgery" and "Equipment". Among the subdimensions of the scale, Cronbach's α values were between 0.742 and 0.760, and 0.722 for the entire scale. When the ROC analysis results were examined, the cut-off point was ≥8, the specificity was 93.13%, and the sensitivity was 87.50%. The area under the ROC curve was calculated as 0.938.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale was presented as a valid and reliable measurement tool developed to assess the Retained Surgical Items Risk in ORs. If high-risk patients are checked and necessary precautions are taken before leaving the ORs, the incidence of retained surgical items can be significantly reduced.

Are temporal trends in retained foreign object rates after surgery in Switzerland impacted by increasing coding intensity? A retrospective analysis of hospital routine data from 2000 to 2019

OBJECTIVES

Retained foreign objects (RFOs) after surgery can cause harm to patients and negatively impact clinician and hospital reputation. RFO incidence based on administrative data is used as a metric of patient safety. However, it is unknown how differences in coding intensity across hospitals and years impact the number of reported RFO cases. The objective of this study is to investigate the temporal trend of RFO incidence at a national level and the impact of changes in coding practices across hospitals and years.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using administrative hospital data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

21 805 005 hospitalisations at 354 Swiss acute-care hospital sites PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: RFO incidence over time, the distribution of RFOs across hospitals and the impact of differences in coding intensity across the hospitals and years.

RESULTS

The annual RFO rate more than doubled between 2000 and 2019 (from 4.6 to 11.8 with a peak of 17.0 in 2014) and coincided with increasing coding intensity (mean number of diagnoses: 3.4, SD 2.0 in 2000; 7.40, SD 5.2 in 2019). After adjusting for patient characteristics, two regression models confirmed that coding intensity was a significant predictor of both whether RFO cases were reported at the hospital level (OR: 12.94; 95% CI: 7.38 to 22.68) and the number of reported cases throughout the period at the national level (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR): 5.95; 95% CI: 1.11 to 31.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results raise concerns about the use of RFO incidence for comparing hospitals, countries and years. Utilising coding indices could be employed to mitigate the effects of coding intensity on RFO rates.

Root causes and preventability of unintentionally retained foreign objects after surgery: a national expert survey from Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Retained foreign objects (RFO) after surgery are rare, serious patient safety events. In international comparisons based on routine data, Switzerland had remarkably high RFO rates. The objectives of this study were to 1) explore national key stakeholders' views on RFO as a safety problem, its preventability and need for action in Switzerland; and 2) to assess their interpretation of Switzerland's RFO incidence compared to other countries.

METHODS

A semi-structured expert survey was conducted among national key representatives, including clinician experts, patient advocates, health administration representatives and other relevant stakeholders (n = 21). Data were coded and analyzed to generate themes related to the study questions following a deductive approach.

RESULTS

Experts in this study unequivocally emphasized the tragedy for individual patients affected by RFOs. Productivity pressure and the strong economization of operating rooms were perceived as detrimental to safety culture, which was seen as essential for RFO prevention, specifically by those working in the OR. RFOs were seen as "maximally minimizable" but not completely preventable. There was strong agreement that within country differences in RFO risk between Swiss hospitals existed. On the systems level and compared to other safety issues, RFO were having less urgency for most experts. The international comparison of RFO incidences raised serious skepticism across all groups of experts. The validity of the data was questioned and the dominant interpretation of Switzerland's high RFO incidence compared to other countries was a "reporting artifact" based on high coding quality in Swiss hospitals. While most experts thought that the published RFO incidence warrants in-depth analysis of the data, there was little agreement about who's role it was to initiate any further activities.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation offers valuable insights into the perspectives of significant stakeholders concerning RFOs, their root causes, and preventability. The findings demonstrate how international comparative safety data are perceived, interpreted, and utilized by national experts to derive conclusive insights.

Association of Chronic Kidney Disease with perioperative outcomes following acute lower limb revascularization

Background

There is a paucity of data examining the impact of advancing chronic kidney disease stages on outcomes following revascularization for acute limb ischemia. The present study examined the association of chronic kidney disease with in-hospital mortality, amputation, and resource utilization following revascularization for acute limb ischemia using a nationally representative cohort.

Methods

The 2016–2018 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all adult hospitalizations with lower extremity acute limb ischemia requiring surgical and/or endovascular interventions. Patients were grouped according to the presence of chronic kidney disease and its severity: no chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease 1–3 (chronic kidney disease stages 1 through 3), chronic kidney disease 4–5 (chronic kidney disease stages 4 through 5), and end-stage renal disease. Multivariable logistic and linear models were used to evaluate association of chronic kidney disease stage with outcomes of interest.

Results

Of an estimated 82,610 patients meeting study criteria, 14.8% had chronic kidney disease (chronic kidney disease 1–3: 63.4%, chronic kidney disease 4–5: 12.1%, end-stage renal disease: 24.5%). Compared to those with chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease patients were on average older, were more frequently female, and had a higher median Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Increasing severity of chronic kidney disease was associated with a stepwise increase in unadjusted mortality rates (4.7% in no chronic kidney disease to 12.6% in end-stage renal disease, P < .001). Following risk adjustment, only end-stage renal disease was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 3.10, 95% confidence interval 2.28–4.22) and limb amputation (adjusted odds ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.59–2.48) compared to patients with no chronic kidney disease. Similarly, advancing chronic kidney disease stage conferred increased odds of prolonged length of stay and greater hospitalization costs.

Conclusion

Advanced renal dysfunction demonstrated inferior perioperative outcomes and greater health care expenditures in the study population. These findings imply that quality improvement efforts in acute limb ischemia revascularization should target patients with chronic kidney disease 4–5 and end-stage renal disease.