Impact of Mentoring on Diversity and Inclusion in Surgery

When I Don't see me, Am I seen? Race and student perception of the surgery clerkship

INTRODUCTION

Increasing interest in general surgery from students who are Under-Represented in Medicine (URiM) is imperative to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. We examined medical student third year surgery clerkship evaluations quantitatively and qualitatively to understand the experiences of URiM and non-URiM learners at our institution.

METHODS

Evaluations from 235 graduated medical students between the years of 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. T-tests were used to compare numerical data. Free-text comments were qualitatively analyzed using inductive thematic analysis by two independent reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third.

RESULTS

Evaluations were completed by 214 non-URiM students (91.1 ​%) and 21 (8.9 ​%) URiM students. There were no significant differences between URiM and non-URiM students in ratings of faculty and resident teaching. When asked whether residents were positive role models for patient care, non-URiM students were more likely than URiM students to agree (3.284 vs. 2.864, p ​= ​0.040). When asked whether they considered faculty to be positive role models, non- URM students were also more likely to answer affirmatively than URiM students (3.394 vs. 2.909 p ​= ​0.013). Qualitative comments were similar between the two groups. When asked what the strengths of the clerkship were, the most commonly evoked theme was "interactions with team" with subthemes of "team integration" "feeling valued" and positive "faculty" or "resident" interactions. "Operative experience" was the second most commonly evoked strength of the clerkship. The most common criticisms of the clerkship involved "negative interactions with team" with subthemes of "not prioritized above other learners" and "ignored." Negative "academic experience" was the next most commonly evoked weakness, with an affiliated theme of "lack of teaching."

CONCLUSIONS

URiM students are less likely than non-URiM students to see surgical residents and faculty as positive role models. Integrating medical students into the team, taking time to teach, and allowing students to feel valued in their roles improves the clerkship experience for trainees and can contribute to recruitment efforts.

Investing in the Future: A Premedical Surgical Elective for Undergraduate Students

BACKGROUND

Research has shown that providing surgical exposure and mentorship before clerkship can bolster interest and cultivate quality surgical residents. However, most studies have focused exclusively on programs for 1st and 2nd year medical students. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel undergraduate premedical surgical elective (PMSE) and the interests and perceptions of PMSE participants of the surgical field.

METHODS

Undergraduate students applied for a semester long PMSE that included surgical shadowing, mentorship, a research component, attendance at seminars, and hands-on workshops. Post-PMSE completion, participants were invited to complete an online survey about their perceptions of pursuing a career in surgery and their specialties of interest.

RESULTS

Thirty-six PMSE participants completed the survey (21 females and 15 males). More than half (57%) of female respondents expressed interest in a surgical career. Most respondents (78%) agreed or strongly agreed that they are confident in their ability to become a surgeon. A lower proportion of female respondents (33%) believed the atmosphere of the surgical field to be inclusive than males (53%). Males accumulated significantly more surgical shadowing hours than females (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

Findings from this study describe a novel PMSE at a large undergraduate institution. Survey data of PMSE participants revealed a high proportion of female respondents would like to pursue a career in surgery and reported confidence in achieving this. However, females perceived the field to be less inclusive than male respondents. Improving inclusivity may require increased focus and attention by PMSEs and surgical education programs.

Effective Mentoring Across Differences-Best Practices and Effective Models to Address the Needs of Underrepresented Trainees in Surgical Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

Mentorship plays a critical role in the career development of surgical trainees and faculty. As the surgical workforce continues to diversify, mentoring trainees who differ) race, ethnicity, country of origin, socioeconomic status, educational background, religion, gender, sexual orientation or ability) can pose challenges to the experience for both mentor and mentee.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this manuscript is to introduce surgical educators to the systemic barriers faced by trainees and to models of effective mentorship.

METHODS

At the 2022 APDS Meeting, a panel convened to highlight the current challenges of mentoring across differences and effective models for surgical educators. This paper highlights and expands the summary of this panel.

RESULTS

Examples of novel mentoring models are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledgment of barriers, Implementation of deliberate mentoring strategies, and collaboration with national surgical organizations and surgery departments and faculty may help to reduce physician attrition.

Racial and Ethnic Bias in Medical School Clinical Grading: A Review

OBJECTIVE

Improving diversity in healthcare is a widely recognized national goal. The diversity of medical student matriculants has increased, yet this trend is not seen in the composition of competitive residency programs. In this review, we examine racial and ethnic disparities in medical student grading during clinical years and explore the consequences of how this may exclude minority students from accessing competitive residency positions.

DESIGN

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ERIC databases using variations of the terms "race," "ethnicity," "clerkship," "rotation," "grade," "evaluation", or "shelf exam." Of 391 references found using the criteria, 29 were related to clinical grading and race/ethnicity and included in the review. The GRADE criteria were used to determine the quality of evidence.

SETTING

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.

RESULTS

Five studies examining a total of 107,687 students from up to 113 different schools found racial minority students receive significantly fewer Honors grades in core clerkships compared to White students. Three studies examining 94,814 medical student evaluations from up to 130 different schools found significant disparities in the wording of written clerkship evaluations based on race and/or ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

A large body of evidence suggests the presence of racial bias in subjective clinical grading and written clerkship evaluations of medical students. Grading disparities can disadvantage minority students when applying to competitive residency programs and may contribute to a lack of diversity in these fields. As low minority representation has a negative impact on patient care and research advancement, strategies to resolve this issue must be further explored.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Among Anesthesiology Trainees

Background:

Historically in medicine, women and minorities have been underrepresented. This trend is especially significant in the anesthesiology workforce.

Objective:

The goals of this study were to quantify the current state of diversity by race/ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation among anesthesiology residents.

Methods:

An institutionally reviewed and validated survey was delivered through Qualtrics to 130 anesthesiology program directors. Topics addressed included gender identity, sexual orientation, racial and ethnic background, rationale for pursuing anesthesiology, and medical training experiences. The study was administered from February to April 2021; 135 anesthesiology residents responded to the survey.

Results:

The sample was 44.4% white (n = 60), 54.1% male (n = 73), and 83.7% (n = 113) of respondents self-reported as straight or heterosexual. Respondents indicated that role models/mentors were somewhat or very important in their desire to pursue anesthesiology (n = 85; 67.2%), 42% reported that having women/diverse faculty was somewhat or very important in their decision to pursue anesthesiology. Discrimination during the anesthesiology residency application process or as a resident ranged from 4.4% due to sexual orientation to 18.7% due to gender/gender identity and race/ethnicity.

Conclusions:

Experiences of discrimination based on race/ethnicity, gender, and gender identity continues to be a concern among anesthesiology trainees. Creating an environment that is inclusive and supportive of all trainees regardless of race/ethnicity, gender/gender identity, and sexual orientation is needed. Interventions and strategies to create an inclusive environment may improve diversity within anesthesiology.