The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention

Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes

Surgical and percutaneous coronary artery intervention revascularization are traditionally considered isolated options. A simultaneous hybrid approach may allow an opportunity to match the best strategy for a particular anatomic lesion. Concerns regarding safety and feasibility of such an approach exist. We examined the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of a simultaneous hybrid revascularization strategy (minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting of the left anterior descending [LAD] artery and drug-eluting stent [DES] to non-LAD lesions) in 13 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease that underwent left internal mammary artery to LAD minimally invasive direct coronary bypass performed through a lateral thoracotomy, followed by stenting of non-LAD lesions, in a fluoroscopy-equipped operating room. Assessment of coagulation parameters was also undertaken. Inhospital and postdischarge outcomes of these patients were compared to a group of 26 propensity score matched parallel controls that underwent standard off-pump coronary artery bypass. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. All hybrid patients were successfully treated with DES and no inhospital mortality occurred in either group. Hybrid patients had a shorter length of stay (3.6 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.3 days, P < .0001) and intubation times (0.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.7 +/- 9.6 hours, P < .02). Despite aggressive anticoagulation and confirmed platelet inhibition, hybrid patients had less blood loss (581 +/- 402 vs 1242 +/- 941 mL, P < .05) and decreased transfusions (0.33 +/- 0.49 vs 1.47 +/- 1.53 U, P < .01). Six-month angiographic vessel patency and major adverse cardiac events were similar in the hybrid and off-pump coronary artery bypass groups. A simultaneous hybrid approach consisting of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery to LAD combined with revascularization of the remaining coronary targets using percutaneous coronary artery intervention with DES is a feasible option accomplished with acceptable clinical outcomes without increased bleeding risk.

Hybrid approach for complex coronary artery and valve disease: a clinical follow-up study

BACKGROUND

For patients suffering from complex coronary artery disease (CAD) with or without concomitant valve disease, no evidence is available in the current guidelines to propose a predefined treatment regimen. We sought to assess the clinical impact of an unconventional or extended definition of the hybrid approach that combines percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiac surgery in subjects suffering from severe solitary CAD or combined with valve disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between July 2002 and August 2004, 18 consecutive patients with complex CAD with or without significant valve disease who qualified for a hybrid approach were enrolled in a clinical follow-up study. Four patients eventually did not complete the proposed interventions. One patient refused treatment after inclusion, one patient died before treatment could be undertaken and two patients died after surgery but before PCI. In the other 14 cases combined treatment was technically successful. After a mean follow-up period of 15alpha5 months two patients had died, one due to sudden cardiac death and one of a noncardiac cause. No other major adverse clinical events were reported. A marked increase in quality of life was reported in those alive.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid approach had a favourable long-term outcome in patients with complex cardiovascular disease undergoing successful treatment; however, this was observed at the expense of significant periprocedural mortality in these high-risk subjects. Therefore we believe that hybrid approaches may provide an alternative for selected cases. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:329-4.).

Are you Ready to Become a Robo-Surgeon?

Robotic and minimally invasive surgery represents the future of modern surgical care. However, its role during the training of surgical residents has yet to be investigated. A previous study conducted by our group surveyed program directors at accredited general surgery training programs in the United States to determine the prevalence and application of robotics in their residency programs. This current study is a follow-up survey sent to residents across the United States to see whether they were being adequately trained and exposed to robotic surgery during their training. A survey was sent to 1800 general surgery residents, and their responses were tabulated and analyzed. Twenty-three per cent of the 1800 residents responded to our survey. An overwhelming 57 per cent of the responders indicated a high interest in robotic surgery. However, 80 per cent of the responders indicated not having a robotic training program. Robotic surgery has led to many promising advancements within the surgical subspecialties. With this emerging technology comes the need for a greater emphasis on the training of surgeons in robotics during their residency.