Safety and Efficacy of Enalapril in Multivalvular Heart Disease with Significant Mitral Stenosis—SCOPE-MS

Myocardial fibrosis in rheumatic heart disease: emerging concepts and clinical implications

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a significant cardiovascular burden in the world even though it is no longer common in affluent countries. Centuries of history surrounding this disease provide us with a thorough understanding of its pathophysiology. Infections in the throat, skin, or mucosa are the gateway for Group A Streptococcus (GAS) to penetrate our immune system. A significant inflammatory response to the heart is caused by an immunologic cascade triggered by GAS antigen cross-reactivity. This exaggerated immune response is primarily responsible for cardiac dysfunction. Recurrent inflammatory processes damage all layers of the heart, including the endocardium, myocardium, and pericardium. A vicious immunological cycle involving inflammatory mediators, angiotensin II, and TGF-β promotes extracellular matrix remodeling, resulting in myocardial fibrosis. Myocardial fibrosis appears to be a prevalent occurrence in patients with RHD. The presence of myocardial fibrosis, which causes left ventricular dysfunction in RHD, might be utilized to determine options for treatment and might also be used to predict the outcome of interventions in patients with RHD. This emerging concept of myocardial fibrosis needs to be explored comprehensively in order to be optimally utilized in the treatment of RHD.

Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatic heart disease

AIMS

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major global health problem. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are commonly administered in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, but its role in RHD patients is still limited. We performed a retrospective study to determine the effect of RAASi on long-term outcomes for RHD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 1:1 propensity score matching was implemented to balance baseline characteristics between groups RAASi and non-RAASi. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to investigate the associations of RAASi with the risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death (CVD), and cerebrovascular death. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations of RAASi with the risks of 1, 3, and 5 year heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), and new-onset stroke. A total of 734 RHD patients were enrolled as study participants; nearly half of these participants had combined valve damage (54.4%), worse New York Heart Association functional class status (III and IV, 55.2%), surgical treatment (54.2%), and AF (65.0%). After propensity score matching, 514 RHD patients were finally analysed. RAASi treatment was associated with decreased risks of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001], CVD (adjusted HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30-0.76, P = 0.002), and cerebrovascular death (adjusted HR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.60, P = 0.003). Further subgroup analysis showed that RAASi treatment was associated with decreased risks of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79, P = 0.004), CVD (adjusted HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.91, P = 0.025), and cerebrovascular death (adjusted HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05-0.65, P = 0.008) in RHD patients without surgical treatment, and better effect was observed in RHD patients with surgical treatment on the risks of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.85, P = 0.012) and CVD (adjusted HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.90, P = 0.024) except cerebrovascular death (adjusted HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.08-3.36, P = 0.491). RAASi treatment was associated with decreased HF rehospitalization risk of 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23-0.61, P < 0.001], 3 year (adjusted OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.68, P < 0.001), and 5 year (adjusted OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30-0.77, P = 0.002) as well as new-onset AF risk (adjusted OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21-0.68, P = 0.001). RAASi treatment had nothing to do with new-onset stroke risk (adjusted OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47-1.38, P = 0.428).

CONCLUSION

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor treatment was significantly associated with decreased risks of mortality, HF rehospitalization, and new-onset AF in RHD patients in median 5.9 year follow-up.

Randomised controlled trial into the role of ramipril in fibrosis reduction in rheumatic heart disease: the RamiRHeD trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a major burden in developing countries and accounts for 80% of all people living with the disease, where it causes most cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in children and young adults. Chronic inflammation and fibrosis of heart valve tissue due to chronic inflammation in RHD will cause calcification and thickening of the impacted heart valves, especially the mitral valve. This fibrogenesis is enhanced by the production of angiotensin II by increased transforming growth factor β expression and later by the binding of interleukin-33, which is known to have antihypertrophic and antifibrotic effects, to soluble sST2. sST2 binding to this non-natural ligand worsens fibrosis. Therefore, we hypothesise that ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) would improve rheumatic mitral valve stenosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial with a pre-post test design. Patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and valve dysfunction will be planned for cardiac valve replacement operation and will be given ramipril 5 mg or placebo for a minimum of 12 weeks before the surgery. The expression of ST2 in the mitral valve is considered to be representative of cardiac fibrosis. Mitral valve tissue will be stained by immunohistochemistry to ST2. Plasma ST2 will be measured by ELISA. This study is conducted in the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiac Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, starting on 27 June 2019.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The performance and dissemination of this study were approved by the ethics committee of National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita with ethical code LB.02.01/VII/286/KEP.009/2018.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03991910.

Rheumatic Heart Disease: The Unfinished Global Agenda

Primarily affecting the young, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected chronic disease commonly causing premature morbidity and mortality among the global poor. Standard clinical prevention and treatment is based on studies from the early antimicrobial era, as research investment halted soon after the virtual eradication of the disease from developed countries. The emergence of new global data on disease burden, new technologies, and a global health equity platform have revitalized interest and investment in RHD. This review surveys past and current evidence for standard RHD diagnosis and treatment, highlighting gaps in knowledge.

Mitral stenosis

Mitral stenosis is a common disease that causes substantial morbidity worldwide. The disease is most prevalent in developing countries, but is increasingly being identified in an atypical form in developed countries. All treatments that increase valve area improve morbidity. Mortality improves with surgery; the benefit of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty to mortality might be similar to that of surgery but needs further study. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty is the treatment of choice for patients in whom treatment is indicated, except for those with suboptimum valve morphology, and even these patients are sometimes treated with this procedure if surgery is not feasible or if surgical risk is prohibitive. We review the pathology, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with mitral stenosis.

Effects of chronic angiotensin II receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatments on neurohormonal levels and haemodynamics during cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Chronic treatment with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists frequently causes deleterious hypotension during anaesthesia. We compared the effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) on neurohormonal levels and haemodynamics during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

Forty-four patients undergoing mitral valvular surgery who were treated with either ARA (ARA group, n=14) or ACEI (ACEI group, n=15) over 12 weeks or who were not treated with any RAS antagonist (control group, n=15) were enrolled. The plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin (AVP) and angiotensin II, and haemodynamic variables were measured before (T1) and 15 min after (T2) the start of CPB, before aortic unclamping (T3) and at skin closure (T4). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained above 60 mm Hg with phenylephrine administration during CPB.

RESULTS

The plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, AVP and angiotensin II levels increased during CPB in all groups. Compared with the control group, the AVP level was lower at T1 in the ARA group and at T2 in the ARA and ACEI groups. The angiotensin II level was higher at T1, T2 and T3 in ARA group compared with ACEI and control groups. There were no significant differences in the epinephrine and norepinephrine levels among the three groups. The amount of administered phenylephrine during CPB was greater and MAP was lower in the ARA group compared with the ACEI and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic ARA treatment resulted in more profound hypotension than ACEI treatment during CPB, and this may be associated with the blockade of angiotensin II receptors by ARA.