Use of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Treatment of Upper Extremity Vascular Ulcers

Cold Hands or Feet: Is It Raynaud's or Not?

Raynaud's phenomenon is an exaggerated response to cold stimuli that may be primary or secondary. The diagnosis relies on patient history and physical examination to distinguish RP from other vasomotor dysfunction (e.g. acrocyanosis, pernio, small fiber neuropathy with vasomotor symptoms, and complex regional pain syndrome). Achenbach syndrome, or spontaneous venous hemorrhage, may also be mistaken for RP but is a self-limiting phenomenon. Laboratory evaluation and vascular diagnostic testing may identify SRP causes. Regardless of etiology, treatment includes warming with trigger avoidance, and consideration of vasodilators (eg. calcium channel, alpha-1 blockers). SRP with digital ulceration may require PDE5i, endothelin-1 receptor blockers, and prostanoids. Refractory cases may require pneumatic arterial pumps, botulinum toxin administration, or surgical sympathectomy.

Raynaud Phenomenon and Other Vasospastic Disorders

Vasospastic disorders are prevalent in the general population and can affect individuals of any age. Primary (or idiopathic) vasospastic disorders often have a benign course; treatment focuses on the control of symptoms. Secondary vasospastic disorders occur owing to an underlying condition and have an increased risk of complications, including tissue loss and digital ulcerations; treatment should focus on the underlying condition. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of vasospastic disorders, including Raynaud syndrome, acrocyanosis, livedo reticularis, and pernio.

Diagnostic criteria, severity classification and guidelines of systemic sclerosis

Several effective drugs have been identified for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, in advanced cases, not only their effectiveness is reduced but they may be also harmful due to their side-effects. Therefore, early diagnosis and early treatment is most important for the treatment of SSc. We established diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2003 and early diagnostic criteria for SSc in 2011, for the purpose of developing evaluation of each organ in SSc. Moreover, in November 2013, the American College of Rheumatology and the European Rheumatology Association jointly developed new diagnostic criteria for increasing their sensitivity and specificity, so we revised our diagnostic criteria and severity classification of SSc. Furthermore, we have revised the clinical guideline based on the newest evidence. In particular, the clinical guideline was established by clinical questions based on evidence-based medicine according to the New Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual (version 1.0). We aimed to make the guideline easy to use and reliable based on the newest evidence, and to present guidance as specific as possible for various clinical problems in treatment of SSc.

Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Digital ulcers (DUs) are a common visible manifestation of the progressive vascular disease that characterizes the SSc disease process. DUs not only impact significantly on patients' quality of life and hand function, but are also a biomarker of internal organ involvement and of disease severity. The aetiology of (digital) vascular disease in SSc is multifactorial, and many of these factors are potentially amenable to therapeutic intervention. The management of DU disease in SSc is multifaceted. Patient education and non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. smoking cessation) should not be neglected. There are a number of drug therapies available to prevent (e.g. phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and ET receptor-1 antagonists) and treat (e.g. i.v. iloprost) DUs. DUs are also important for two other reasons: firstly, as a primary end point in SSc-related clinical trials; and secondly, DUs are included in the ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria. However, the reliability of rheumatologists to grade DUs is poor to moderate at best, and this poses challenges in both clinical practice and research. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with a description of the spectrum of DU disease in SSc including pathophysiology, epidemiology and clinical burden, all of which inform the multifaceted approach to management.

Scleroderma and evidence based non-pharmaceutical treatment modalities for digital ulcers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Digital ulcers are difficult to heal, increasing the chance of infection, gangrene, amputation and limited functional use of hands. They are a complication in scleroderma or systematic sclerosis (SSc) and occur in approximately 50% of patients. This is a systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of non-pharmaceutical therapeutic modalities and their effectiveness to facilitate the healing of chronic digital ulcers in patients with scleroderma.

METHOD

A comprehensive review of computerised databases from 2000-2013: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Pedro, OT Seeker, OT Search, OVID, and Proquest as well as manual review of other resources was completed using the following search terms scleroderma or systemic sclerosis and/or digital ulcers, specific modalities (low level laser therapy, electrical stimulation, intermittent compression, ultrasound, vitamin E, myofascial release, wound dressings, iontophoresis, negative pressure therapy, and exercise), chronic wounds, and wound care. English language studies, from 2000 to January 2013, which used therapeutic modalities to facilitate healing of digital ulcers and use healing of the digital ulcer as an outcome measure were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 403 identified articles, only 11 studies addressed non-pharmaceutical treatment modalities to facilitate healing for digital ulcers. Exercise had no direct effect on healing ulcers. The following studies were positive but have limitations in design and sample size:: hyperbaric oxygen therapy (n=2), negative pressure therapy (n=1), intermittent compression (n=27) and acoustic pressure wound healing (n=1). Vitamin E gel showed a significant difference compared to a control group (n=27). Iontophoresis studies have shown that the modality increases blood flow but the results in five different studies are mixed and the application and intensity were inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

No one modality was proven to be the most effective. Larger efficacy studies on treating digital ulcers are needed in order to develop appropriate care guidelines to improve outcomes, promote function and lower health-care costs.

Therapeutic modalities--an updated review for the hand surgeon

The number of therapeutic modalities available to the hand surgeon has greatly increased over the past several decades. A field once predicated only on heat, massage, and cold therapy now uses electrical stimulators, ultrasound, biofeedback, iontophoresis, phonophoresis, mirror therapy, lasers, and a number of other modalities. With this expansion in choices, there has been a concurrent effort to better define which modalities are truly effective. In this review, we aim to characterize the commonly used modalities and provide the evidence available that supports their continued use.