Anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment effects on the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery ectasia: an updated systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE), widenings in sections of the arteries, is a rare condition found in up to 3-5% of angiography cases. Sometimes recurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) has been reported in the CAE subjects. The present systematic review aims to collect and summarize reports on whether the use of anticoagulants in addition to single antiplatelet/dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT/DAPT) in CAE patients with significant occlusion/ heavy thrombus is efficient and safe in decreasing the incidence/recurrence of MACE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematically comprehensive search was performed covering PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were found including 20 case reports, four case series, and one randomized clinical trial. Of 20 case reports 15 were male (75%), and five were female (25%). Of the four the case series, all showed positive outcomes after DAPT plus anticoagulant in more than 50% of patients; two took only DAPT and 13 took anticoagulant ± DAPT, and five compared both. Cases received DAPT only experienced recurrences of MACE. The other cases were uneventful with less MACE and better outcomes after the use of anticoagulant ± DAPT. Results of these case-series included 457 CAE patients showed that more than 80% of subjects were male, and in all studies tailored pharmacological interventions, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant (warfarin) therapies, resulted in less MACE and mortality.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that antiplatelet (SAPT/DAPT) must be applied in combination with anticoagulants to provide more efficient protection against MACE in CAE patients. However, further high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the results.

Prevalence, Predictors, and Impact of Coronary Artery Ectasia in Patients With Atherosclerotic Heart Disease

The clinical relevance of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is poorly understood. We investigated the prevalence, potential predictors, and prognostic significance of CAE in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2016 to December 2018 were included and followed up for 1 year. CAE was diagnosed as an abnormal dilation >1.5-fold the diameter of adjacent normal segments on angiography. A total of 590 patients with CAE were identified from 36 790 patients undergoing PCI (overall rate of CAE: 1.6%). In multivariate analysis, variables including body mass index >30 kg/m2 (risk ratio, RR: 2.413, P = .018), ever-smoking (RR: 1.669, P < .001), hypertension (RR: 1.221, P = .025), acute myocardial infarction at admission (RR: 1.343, P = .004), no diabetes (RR: .810, P = .023), previous myocardial infarction (RR: 1.545, P < .001), no left main disease (RR: .632, P = .008) and multiple-vessel disease (RR: 1.326, P = .001), increased C-reactive protein (RR: 1.006, P = .012) were predictors of CAE. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes did not differ significantly between patients with or without CAE (P = .203). CAE is not uncommon among patients undergoing PCI in this cohort study. The presence of CAE vs its absence had no significant impact on 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI.

Antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia and acute myocardial infarction: A case report

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE).

CASE SUMMARY

This case reports the dynamic observation of a patient for 48 mo after a diagnosis of CAE with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The first antithrombotic agents used were aspirin (100 mg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d). During the sixth month of observation, a second AMI occurred involving the same culprit vessel; therefore, antithrombotic agents were changed to aspirin (100 mg/d) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice per day). Twelve months after the second AMI, an attempt to reduce the dosage ticagrelor failed; therefore the original dose was continued. The CAE was relatively stable during the following 4 years.

CONCLUSION

This case indicates that a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor may be more effective for CAE patients with AMI than aspirin and clopidogrel.

Association of ectatic non-infarct-related artery with 1-month stent thrombosis in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Ectatic infarct-related artery (IRA) has been shown to be associated with higher thrombus burden, no-reflow, stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The effect of ectatic non-IRA on ST without ectatic IRA is not known. We aimed to assess the effect of ectatic non-IRA presence on ST within 1 month after primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

A total of 1541 patients with a diagnosis of STEMI and underwent pPCI between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Patients with and without 1 month ST were compared. Penalised logistic regression method was used to assess the association between ST and candidate predictors due to the risk of overfitting.

RESULTS

Median age of the study group was 56.5 (48.7 to 67.2) years. The Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, ectatic non-IRA presence and use of tirofiban were significantly higher in the ST group (18.2±9.9 vs 15.1±9.9, p=0.03; 25% vs 7.2%, p<0.001; 54.2% vs 30.5%, p<0.001; respectively). Significantly higher thrombus aspiration (14.3% vs 6.7%, p=0.03) and lower stent implantation (67.7% vs 84%, p<0.001) rates were observed in ectatic IRA group compared with ectatic non-IRA group. In multivariable analysis, ectatic non-IRA presence was independently associated with 1-month ST (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.86 to 8.63, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Ectatic non-IRA presence without ectatic IRA in patients with STEMI increases the risk of ST within the first month of pPCI.

Treatment and Outcome of Patients With Coronary Artery Ectasia: Current Evidence and Novel Opportunities for an Old Dilemma

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is defined as a diffuse or focal dilation of an epicardial coronary artery, which diameter exceeds by at least 1. 5 times the normal adjacent segment. The term ectasia refers to a diffuse dilation, involving more than 50% of the length of the vessel, while the term aneurysm defines a focal vessel dilation. CAE is a relatively uncommon angiographic finding and its prevalence ranges between 0.3 and 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Although its pathophysiology is still unclear, atherosclerosis seems to be the underlying mechanism in most cases. The prognostic role of CAE is also controversial, but previous studies reported a high risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in these patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite the availability of different options for the interventional management of patients with CAE, including covered stent implantation and stent-assisted coil embolization, there is no one standard approach, as therapy is tailored to the individual patient. The abnormal coronary dilation, often associated with high thrombus burden in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, makes the interventional treatment of CAE patients challenging and often complicated by distal thrombus embolization and stent malapposition. Moreover, the optimal antithrombotic therapy is debated and includes dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, or a combination of them. In this review we aimed to provide an overview of the pathophysiology, classification, clinical presentation, natural history, and management of patients with CAE, with a focus on the challenges for both clinical and interventional cardiologists in daily clinical practice.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronary artery ectasia presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is not yet fully understood. We aimed to examine differences in clinical and procedural characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes in patients with CAE undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients presenting with STEMI with a culprit native coronary artery from July 2015 to June 2019. Patients were divided into CAE and Non-CAE groups as detected on coronary angiography during PPCI. Comparison between groups was made for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics, as well as complications, pharmacological treatment, and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

36/1780 (2.0%) patients were found to have CAE. Patients with CAE had a median age of 57.1 ± 11.7 years and were more likely to be male 33/36 (91.7%). Diabetes was less commonly seen in the CAE group (11.1% vs 31.4%, p = 0.010), and there were no differences in the proportion of patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Patients with CAE had more involvement of right coronary artery (RCA) culprit vessel (63.9% vs. 38.4%, p = 0.026), less coronary stenting (25.0% vs 87.2%, p < 0.001) and post-PPCI TIMI 3 flow (69.4% vs 95.5%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged with oral anticoagulants (36.1% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, all-cause mortality rates were higher in the non-CAE group (0.0% vs 11.5%, p < 0.028), suggesting that CAE was not associated with unfavorable long-term outcome. On multivariate analysis, CAE was not an independent predictor of MACE.

CONCLUSION

Despite lower rates of post-PPCI TIMI 3 flow, CAE was not associated with unfavorable long-term outcome.

Prevalence and Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is described in 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the prognostic impact of CAE. The prevalence and prognostic value of CAE in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. In 4788 patients presenting with AMI referred for coronary angiography the presence of CAE (defined as dilation of a coronary segment with a diameter ≥1.5 times of the adjacent normal segment) was confirmed in 174 (3.6%) patients (age 62 ± 12 years; 81% male), and was present in the culprit vessel in 79.9%. Multivessel CAE was frequent (67%). CAE patients were more frequently male, had high thrombus burden and were treated more often with thrombectomy and less often was stent implantation. Markis I was the most frequent angiographic phenotype (43%). During a median follow-up of 4 years (1-7), 1243 patients (26%) experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE): 282 (6%) died from a cardiac cause, 358 (8%) had a myocardial infarction, 945 (20%) underwent coronary revascularization and 58 (1%) presented with a stroke. Patients with CAE showed higher rates of MACE as compared to those without CAE (36.8% versus 25.6%; p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, CAE was associated with MACE (HR 1.597; 95% CI 1.238-2.060; p <0.001) after adjusting for risk factors, type of AMI and number of narrowed coronary arteries. In conclusion, the prevalence of CAE in patients presenting with AMI is relatively low but was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE at follow-up.

Clinical outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and angiographic evidence of coronary artery ectasia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to compare the long-term outcome of subjects with and without CAE undergoing emergent coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of CAE in STEMI patients has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, study included consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing emergent coronary angiography from January 2012 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was the assessment of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with versus those without CAE at the longest available follow-up. The propensity score weighting technique was employed to account for potential selection bias between groups.

RESULTS

From 1,674 patients with STEMI, 154 (9.2%) had an angiographic evidence of CAE; 380 patients were included in the no CAE group. CAE patients were more often males and smokers, and showed a lower prevalence of diabetes than no CAE patients. After percutaneous coronary intervention, the corrected thrombolysis in MI frame count (p < .001) and the myocardial blush grade (p < .001) were significantly lower in CAE than in no CAE patients. The mean follow-up was 1,218.3 ± 574.8 days. The adjusted risk for the primary outcome resulted significantly higher in patients with CAE compared to those without (adjusted HR: 1.84; p = .017). No differences in terms of all-cause and cardiac death were found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, STEMI patients with CAE had a distinct clinical and angiographic profile, and showed a significantly higher risk of recurrent MI than those without CAE.

Underlying factors relating to acute myocardial infarction for coronary artery ectasia patients

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients were more prone to present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), this case-control research aimed to explore the underlying factors relating AMI for them.This study investigated a serial of 119 patients who underwent coronary angiography and were diagnosed as CAE between the years 2016 and 2017 at the Beijing Friendship Hospital; 32 of the patients developed AMI and 87 did not develop AMI. The possible factors relating to AMI, including disease history, cardiovascular risk factors, thrombotic condition, inflammation status, and coronary imaging characteristics, were comprehensively compared between CAE patients with and without AMI.CAE patients with AMI had a lower antiplatelet rate, a higher blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, increased neutrophil to lymphocyte (NL) ratio, higher Gensini score, and larger proportions of Markis type II. Logistic regression analysis also indicated that AMI history, lower antiplatelet rate, higher NL ratio, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and Gensini score, as well as Markis type II were associated with AMI in CAE patients.AMI history, lower antiplatelet treatment rates, poor blood lipid control and higher coronary stenosis extent, higher inflammatory response, and Markis type II were closely related to the incidence of AMI in CAE patients.

Is Anticoagulant Necessary in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome? A Systematic Review of Case Reports

Coronary artery ectasia is found in 3 to 8% of patient's undergoing angiography and may sometimes induce acute myocardial infarction. Some articles reported a recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the presence of coronary artery ectasia (CAE). Our study aims to summarize the latest evidence on whether the use of anticoagulant in addition to SAPT/DAPT (single antiplatelet/dual antiplatelet) treating ACS with CAE patients is necessary. Since the trials concerning our objectives were scarce, we pooled case reports/series. We performed a comprehensive search on case reports/series on coronary artery ectasia that presented with acute coronary syndrome published until March 2019. We collected 13 cases from 11 reports. Out of 13 patients, 5 (38.5%) took DAPT only without anticoagulant and 8 (61.5%) took anticoagulant ± DAPT. Three out of five (60%) who took DAPT only, experienced recurrences at 1st and 2nd months' follow-up. The other two (40%) was uneventful at a mean of two months' follow-up. Eight patients who took anticoagulant were uneventful for a mean of 8.4 months. Those who took anticoagulant were at lower risk of experiencing ACS recurrence ( p  = 0.035). Two of the patients who experienced recurrence became 6 and 12 months free after optimal anticoagulation. The author of this study proposed that anticoagulant must be considered should SAPT/DAPT failed to provide adequate protection to the recurrence of ACS, especially in CAE patients who did not have other obvious stenotic lesions. However, the evidence is weak since this study only pooled case reports/series.

Is Coronary Artery Ectasia a Thrombotic Disease?

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare disease and a substantial portion of patients with CAE are first diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The question was raised if CAE was a kind of thrombotic disease. We assessed a consecutive series of 119 patients with CAE including 32 patients with AMI (CAE + AMI group) and 87 patients without AMI (CAE group). During the same period, 90 patients with coronary heart disease, 90 patients with normal coronary arteries (control), and 120 AMI patients without CAE (AMI group) were randomly selected and evaluated. Both current and previous AMI prevalence rates in the CAE population were higher than the AMI rate for the other patients undergoing coronary angiograms; the mean platelet volume and fibrinogen were increased in the CAE + AMI and CAE groups. For patients with CAE with AMI, most of the thrombotic lesions were in the ectasia site. After dividing the patients with CAE into with and without antiplatelet treatment groups before admission, the AMI rate was lower in the antiplatelet group. Platelets may participate in the thrombotic process in CAE. Antiplatelet treatment may decrease the AMI rate of patients with CAE.

Angiographic Characteristics of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Infarct-related Coronary Artery Ectasia Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Coronary ectasia accounts for 0.3%-4.9% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. We conducted the present study to evaluate the angiographic characteristics of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with infarct-related coronary artery ectasia (IRAE) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated 667 STEMI patients who were divided into 2 groups of IRAE (n = 81) and non-IRAE (n = 568). Preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, postprocedural TIMI flow grade, thrombus burden grade, and TIMI frame count were then evaluated. In adjusted analysis, fewer patients with IRAE had open (TIMI flow grade II or III) infarct-related arteries before the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (7.4% vs. 27.5%; odds ratio: 4.522; 95% confidence interval, 1.924-10.628; P = 0.001). Meanwhile, postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 was less common in these patients (49.4% vs. 68.4%; odds ratio: 2.239; 95% confidence interval, 1.392-3.599; P = 0.001). High thrombus burden was more frequent in the patients with IRAE, with an odds ratio of 1.938 in the adjusted analysis. The corrected TIMI frame count was also significantly higher in the IRAE patients than in those without. Our STEMI patients with IRAE had impaired perfusion. Moreover, this group of patients more frequently had high thrombus burden. These patients might be at increased risk of unsuccessful revascularization probably due to distal embolization and no-reflow phenomenon, which could impact their short- and long-term outcomes. Because coronary ectasia is a known risk factor for acute coronary syndrome, it is beneficial that these patients be deemed high risk and kept under close monitoring.

Coronary artery ectasia, an independent predictor of no-reflow after primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The no-reflow phenomenon is a serious complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) may increase the risk of no-reflow, however, only limited data is available on the potential impact of CAE. The aim of this study was to determine the potential association between CAE and no-reflow after primary PCI.

METHODS

A case control study was performed based on a prospective cohort of STEMI patients from January 2000 to December 2011. All patients with TIMI 0-1 flow post primary PCI, in the absence of dissection, thrombus, spasm or high-grade residual stenosis, were considered as no-reflow case. Control subjects were two consecutive STEMI patients after each case, with TIMI flow ≥2 after primary PCI. CAE was defined as dilatation of an arterial segment to a diameter at least 1.5 times that of the adjacent normal coronary artery.

RESULTS

In the no-reflow group, frequency of CAE was significantly higher (33.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Baseline variables were comparable between patients with and without CAE. Patients with CAE had more often TIMI 0-1 flow pre-PCI (91% vs 71% p = 0.03), less often anterior STEMI (3% vs 37%, p < 0.001) and underwent significantly less often a PCI with stenting (47% vs 74%, p = 0.003). After multivariate analysis, CAE remained a strong and independent predictor of no-reflow (OR 13.9, CI 4.7-41.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CAE is a strong and independent predictor of no-reflow after primary PCI for STEMI. Future studies should assess optimal treatment.

Molecular and cellular insights into the pathogenesis of coronary artery ectasia

Coronary artery ectasia describes a local or diffuse dilatation of the epicardial coronary arteries. This review summarizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of coronary artery ectasia. Better identification of the pathophysiologic steps will shed light into the clinical significance and may have direct implications for the management strategies of this disease. Additionally, understanding the underlying etiology may help to improve treatment modalities specific to coronary artery ectasia.

Coronary Artery Ectasia Predicts Future Cardiac Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective—

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is an infrequently observed vascular phenotype characterized by abnormal vessel dilatation and disturbed coronary flow, which potentially promote thrombogenicity and inflammatory reactions. However, whether or not CAE influences cardiovascular outcomes remains unknown.

Approach and Results—

We investigated major adverse cardiac events (MACE; defined as cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI]) in 1698 patients with acute MI. The occurrence of MACE was compared in patients with and without CAE. CAE was identified in 3.0% of study subjects. During the 49-month observation period, CAE was associated with 3.25-, 2.71-, and 4.92-fold greater likelihoods of experiencing MACE (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88–5.66; P <0.001), cardiac death (95% CI, 1.37–5.37; P =0.004), and nonfatal MI (95% CI, 2.20–11.0; P <0.001), respectively. These cardiac risks of CAE were consistently observed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (MACE: hazard ratio, 4.94; 95% CI, 2.36–10.4; P <0.001) and in a propensity score–matched cohort (MACE: hazard ratio, 8.98; 95% CI, 1.14–71.0; P =0.03). Despite having a higher risk of CAE-related cardiac events, patients with CAE receiving anticoagulation therapy who achieved an optimal percent time in target therapeutic range, defined as ≥60%, did not experience the occurrence of MACE ( P =0.03 versus patients with percent time in target therapeutic range <60% or without anticoagulation therapy).

Conclusions—

The presence of CAE predicted future cardiac events in patients with acute MI. Our findings suggest that acute MI patients with CAE are a high-risk subset who might benefit from a pharmacological approach to controlling the coagulation cascade.

Disequilibrium of Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolytic System in Patients With Coronary Artery Ectasia

Thrombus formation and myocardial infarction are not uncommon in patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). In light of this, the present study aims to systemically evaluate the blood coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in CAE patients. In this study, we enrolled 30 patients with CAE, 30 patients with coronary atherosclerosis disease (CAD), and 29 subjects with normal coronary arteries (control). The coagulation system was evaluated using a routine coagulation function test performed in the hospital laboratory before coronary angiography, and measurements included prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen time, and thrombin time. The evaluation of the fibrinolytic system included measurements of D-dimer, euglobulin lysis time, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, plasminogen, plasminogen activity assay, α1-antitrypsin (α1-AT), α2 plasmin inhibitor (α2-PI), and α2-macroglobulin (α2-MG). Alpha1-AT, α2-PI, and α2-MG also inhibit activities of 3 neutrophil serine proteases, namely human neutrophil elastase (HNE), cathepsin G (CG), and proteinase 3 (PR3); therefore, the plasma levels of these 3 proteinases were also evaluated.In CAE patients, the circulating coagulation system was normal. For the fibrinolytic system, a decrease of plasminogen activity was observed (P = 0.029) when compared with CAD patients, and the concentrations of α1-AT (both P < 0.001), α2-PI (P = 0.002 and P = 0.025), and α2-MG (P = 0.034 and P < 0.001) were significantly elevated when compared with CAD patients and normal controls. Moreover, the plasma levels of HNE (both P < 0.001) and CG (P = 0.027 and 0.016) in CAE patients were also significantly higher than those of the CAD and control groups. There was no difference in plasma PR3 concentration among these 3 groups.Disequilibrium of the coagulation/fibrinolytic system may contribute to thrombus formation and clinical coronary events in patients with CAE. The increased plasma concentrations of α1-AT, α2-PI, and α2-MG might provide beneficial effects by inhibiting the proteinases and restraining the ectatic process; on other hand, they led to unfavorable results by inhibiting plasmin and decreasing thrombus degradation in CAE patients.

Coronary artery ectasia in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, inflammatory disorders, and sickle cell disease

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) or aneurysm is usually defined as dilation ≥1.5-fold the normal vessel diameter. It has an incidence of 1.4-5.3% and is associated with a wide variety of etiologies-mainly congenital, atherosclerotic, and inflammatory ones. CAE is very common in sickle cell disease, and possibly sickle cell trait, with an incidence of 17.7%. It is likely related to the inflammatory process associated with hemoglobin S. Prognosis depends mainly on the underlying etiology. Atherosclerotic CAE does not carry additional risks compared to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (ACAD) without ectasia. However, isolated CAE in the absence of ACAD carries an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) due to vasospasm, slower coronary blood flow, and thrombosis, typically within the dilated segments. Due to lack of studies and guidelines, management recommendations are based on personal experiences. Therapy should be tailored to each individual case after assessment of severity, history of complications, underlying etiology, and comorbidities. Treatment of underlying condition and avoidance of exacerbating factors are essential. Medical therapy in general may include antiplatelets, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors statins, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. In severe CAE or history of MI, the addition of anticoagulation therapy after assessing bleeding risk may be warranted. In acute MI, the large thrombus burden in the dilated segment makes the percutaneous approach very challenging. Aspiration attempts can result in distal thromboembolization. Survival is better in bypass grafting than with medical therapy. Nonetheless, bypass grafting does not improve survival in atherosclerotic CAE. Depending on the physical characteristics of aneurysm, different surgical approaches can be sought; however, the ideal one is unclear.